163 and Ramanujan Constant - Numberphile
video description
Date: 2022-04-08
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 9
Davizito
-Amateur- is not the right word here. We need to have a word to distinguish people like Ramanujan and Fermat from people like my sister (who is a computer scientist who dabbles in pure Mathematics for fun. Something that implies -natural mathematician- or -intuitive mathematician-. If Mathematics had as much -celebrity-professors- as Physics the term would have already been coined.
reply
-Amateur- is not the right word here. We need to have a word to distinguish people like Ramanujan and Fermat from people like my sister (who is a computer scientist who dabbles in pure Mathematics for fun. Something that implies -natural mathematician- or -intuitive mathematician-. If Mathematics had as much -celebrity-professors- as Physics the term would have already been coined.
reply
jdub
A Bridge from a want to be Feynman to (a Ram) a Bright Star. 163 - 9 - 8 - 7 / 6 - 5 - 4 / 3 - 2 + 1 = 137 Some would say it's going downward unless you start with the answers, The only real difference is 26, an English alpha-bet. I submit Also This is a Fist from Bruce Lee and some Kung Pow Chickens, The Chen Zen Bridge. Where is Akutagawa?
reply
A Bridge from a want to be Feynman to (a Ram) a Bright Star. 163 - 9 - 8 - 7 / 6 - 5 - 4 / 3 - 2 + 1 = 137 Some would say it's going downward unless you start with the answers, The only real difference is 26, an English alpha-bet. I submit Also This is a Fist from Bruce Lee and some Kung Pow Chickens, The Chen Zen Bridge. Where is Akutagawa?
reply
Preety
I wonder if educated and scholarly people think twice before calling someone an amateur. Mr. Clark, S. Ramanujan was one of the greatest mathematicians this world has seen and he didn't have to waste time learning math at school like any other.
reply
I wonder if educated and scholarly people think twice before calling someone an amateur. Mr. Clark, S. Ramanujan was one of the greatest mathematicians this world has seen and he didn't have to waste time learning math at school like any other.
reply
fredy
Sine exists only if you can prove the serie of prime is an odd number by sine.
Unfortunately you demonstrate it is not.
You can not divide 1 radian and expect the result to be an 1 with sine.
We need to use radian = tau = 1
reply
Sine exists only if you can prove the serie of prime is an odd number by sine.
Unfortunately you demonstrate it is not.
You can not divide 1 radian and expect the result to be an 1 with sine.
We need to use radian = tau = 1
reply
iera
Ramanujan was the most talented mathematician to grace the world. He didn't 'proof' what he already knew until they learned him how to. He knew things on his own that the collective mind of math's history took centuries to learn.
reply
Ramanujan was the most talented mathematician to grace the world. He didn't 'proof' what he already knew until they learned him how to. He knew things on his own that the collective mind of math's history took centuries to learn.
reply
D-ithi
Came here from some quack video that tries to assert this guy had access to some heavenly record of knowledge and that's why he was such a genius. While this guy was a genius, sadly most of humanity is grievously ignorant.
reply
Came here from some quack video that tries to assert this guy had access to some heavenly record of knowledge and that's why he was such a genius. While this guy was a genius, sadly most of humanity is grievously ignorant.
reply
Matt
10: 41 is my favorite moment. I have to agree, I don't think most ordinary people would expect that e-d-pi where d forms a number system with unique factorization, would be very close to, but not quite, a while number.
reply
10: 41 is my favorite moment. I have to agree, I don't think most ordinary people would expect that e-d-pi where d forms a number system with unique factorization, would be very close to, but not quite, a while number.
reply
Matt
10: 41 is my favorite moment. I have to agree, I don't think most ordinary people would expect that e-d-pi where d forms a number system with unique factorization, would be very close to, but not quite, a while number.
reply
10: 41 is my favorite moment. I have to agree, I don't think most ordinary people would expect that e-d-pi where d forms a number system with unique factorization, would be very close to, but not quite, a while number.
reply
Chrstphre
i have a dream that someday (? ) mathematicians will discover that when you 'graph' these things ( with however many dimensions are necessary ) this stuff will make a lot more sense, & be very easy to 'see'
reply
i have a dream that someday (? ) mathematicians will discover that when you 'graph' these things ( with however many dimensions are necessary ) this stuff will make a lot more sense, & be very easy to 'see'
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
