Henrietta Lacks, the Tuskegee Experiment, and Ethical Data Collection: Crash Course Statistics #12
video description
Date: 2022-04-04
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 10
Raymond
-_. historically, doctoring had much of its root system in sibling responsibility: the parents did all they could for their first child who then carried forward for his/her youngers, their seconds. and then there was the doing-unto-others modus operandi where doctors tried their-own medicine, rendering them willing to try worse on their dying patients. and then there was the financial-gain m. o. m. (motive-opportunity-means used to profile criminals) where treating government-drafted soldiers to return them as ticking-bombs 'puking with vengeance' to the frontline was lucrative and focused as on results-oriented-certainty not necessarily those you mention and giving rise to the double entendre of the hippocritical-hippocratical do-no-worse oath and statistics that imagined best-worstcase scenarios. _-
reply
-_. historically, doctoring had much of its root system in sibling responsibility: the parents did all they could for their first child who then carried forward for his/her youngers, their seconds. and then there was the doing-unto-others modus operandi where doctors tried their-own medicine, rendering them willing to try worse on their dying patients. and then there was the financial-gain m. o. m. (motive-opportunity-means used to profile criminals) where treating government-drafted soldiers to return them as ticking-bombs 'puking with vengeance' to the frontline was lucrative and focused as on results-oriented-certainty not necessarily those you mention and giving rise to the double entendre of the hippocritical-hippocratical do-no-worse oath and statistics that imagined best-worstcase scenarios. _-
reply
Jose
Probably the worst unethical consequence of private information gathered by Internet and software companies is income inequality. Poverty is one of the biggest issues our world faces, and poverty is maily the consequence of the unequal and unfair distribution of the economic production. Social network, software, Internet companies have grown so much that they have billions or trillions of dollars in their bank accounts, meanwhile half of the world's population are forced to survive with 3 or less dollars a day. Amaz-n, Faceb--k, Micr-s-ft, G--gle, they are all the best examples I can imagine of companies causing income inequality and poverty, and one of the ways they do so is by gathering our private information and selling it with comertial, political, etc purposes.
reply
Probably the worst unethical consequence of private information gathered by Internet and software companies is income inequality. Poverty is one of the biggest issues our world faces, and poverty is maily the consequence of the unequal and unfair distribution of the economic production. Social network, software, Internet companies have grown so much that they have billions or trillions of dollars in their bank accounts, meanwhile half of the world's population are forced to survive with 3 or less dollars a day. Amaz-n, Faceb--k, Micr-s-ft, G--gle, they are all the best examples I can imagine of companies causing income inequality and poverty, and one of the ways they do so is by gathering our private information and selling it with comertial, political, etc purposes.
reply
Raymond
-_. abuses of social media include political attack ads on the State Governor who flustered to remember his Twitter password when he was supposed to inform the public that there was-no, incoming ICBM, as if social media had anything to do with national security, ranting like 'commie-pinko sympathetizers' pretending to legally own their contagious disease samples (unless-of-course if they're guilty they should own-up. _-
reply
-_. abuses of social media include political attack ads on the State Governor who flustered to remember his Twitter password when he was supposed to inform the public that there was-no, incoming ICBM, as if social media had anything to do with national security, ranting like 'commie-pinko sympathetizers' pretending to legally own their contagious disease samples (unless-of-course if they're guilty they should own-up. _-
reply
Johannes
For Europeans, the question of whether we should get informed, voluntary consent has already been resolved. With the new privacy regulation that gets enforced from May, companies that use the personal data of EU citizens without informed, voluntary consent will risk crippling fines. Its still okay to abuse Americans, thought. -
reply
For Europeans, the question of whether we should get informed, voluntary consent has already been resolved. With the new privacy regulation that gets enforced from May, companies that use the personal data of EU citizens without informed, voluntary consent will risk crippling fines. Its still okay to abuse Americans, thought. -
reply
FrankieB
I think the important thing to remember with data collection is that you, the user, are never personally identifiable. Technically speaking, it's not you that's being sold, it's the behaviours or indicators of a group of users (that you happen to be a part of) that's being sold.
reply
I think the important thing to remember with data collection is that you, the user, are never personally identifiable. Technically speaking, it's not you that's being sold, it's the behaviours or indicators of a group of users (that you happen to be a part of) that's being sold.
reply
ResortDog
The government needs to respect the test subjects worth to the researchers not just their usage and what was with pardoning all the sadistic doctors or evil scientists if they joined up with the winners and shared their findings? We see who taught us our morals and why.
reply
The government needs to respect the test subjects worth to the researchers not just their usage and what was with pardoning all the sadistic doctors or evil scientists if they joined up with the winners and shared their findings? We see who taught us our morals and why.
reply
D.
Because animals cannot consent, we should not be testing on them. I'm glad she mentioned this-- too many discussions of ethics only talk about humans. Animals can suffer, too, and have a right to their own lives, just like you and I do.
reply
Because animals cannot consent, we should not be testing on them. I'm glad she mentioned this-- too many discussions of ethics only talk about humans. Animals can suffer, too, and have a right to their own lives, just like you and I do.
reply
vasisht
By far this has been the most easiest video to coast through conceptually, but at the same time also posed the most relevant and difficult questions. Indeed, we are the lawmakers for the digital fortress under construction!
reply
By far this has been the most easiest video to coast through conceptually, but at the same time also posed the most relevant and difficult questions. Indeed, we are the lawmakers for the digital fortress under construction!
reply
Kevin
Noticed the opening that scrolls just a bit to fast, always have to pause to read the dam labels had Yuma as the sunniest place in the world. Glad to report that it is sunny today after two dreadful days of clouds.
reply
Noticed the opening that scrolls just a bit to fast, always have to pause to read the dam labels had Yuma as the sunniest place in the world. Glad to report that it is sunny today after two dreadful days of clouds.
reply
Danilego
WHAT I watched the Crash Course Anatomy about this experiment YESTERDAY. First time watching both episodes and also first time I heard about the experiment. Coincidences, man!
reply
WHAT I watched the Crash Course Anatomy about this experiment YESTERDAY. First time watching both episodes and also first time I heard about the experiment. Coincidences, man!
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
