The Kennedy Assassination: Inside the Book Depository
video description
The committee thought that there was a second shooter, but they didnt know who or where, and they also thought there was a conspiracy, but again, they didnt know who was involved, or to what extent. Significant is the long list of those that the committee didnt think was involved in the conspiracy, nearly all the favourites, including the front runner, the CIA. In fact, they didnt leave many organisations that might have been involved, apart from, Mossad, the Vatican, and the Mother Teresa Foundation. Their statement, _-the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members [of anti-Castro Cuban groups or organised crime] may have been involved-_ is feeble and convoluted. Just what sort of available evidence could that possibly be?
Also, note the committees tenuous definition of conspiracy, right down to anybody who suspected that Oswald might kill JFK. (Findings HSCOA P95. On this basis, Marina should have been charged with conspiracy, especially as she knew that Oswald was intending to, and tried to, kill General Walker. -
As far as more than one shooter is concerned, their muddled statement in B) below about scientific acoustical evidence, is unconvincing, even though they insist it is based on scientific evidence three times. Also, it states that, _Scientific evidence negates some specific conspiracy allegations_ without defining what evidence and which conspiracy allegations. Their statements seem to be solely based on distorted and cluttered audio tapes, at least one of which was proved to be fabricated. These tapes were interpreted by experts, and their deliberations were used, to the exclusion of the overwhelming amount of simple non scientific evidence, that there were only three shots fired and those came from the TSBD, even though this is implicit in their other proclamations. -
-I. Findings of the Select Committee on Assassinations in the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Tex, November 22, 1963
-A)- _Lee Harvey Oswald fired three shots at President John F. Kennedy. The second and third shots he fired struck the President. The third shot he fired killed the President. _-
-1)- _President Kennedy was struck by two rifle shots fired from behind him. _-
-2)- _The shots that struck President Kennedy from behind him were fired from the sixth floor window of the southeast corner of the Texas School Book Depository building. _-
-3)- _Lee Harvey Oswald owned the rifle that was used to fire the shots from the sixth floor window of the southeast comer of the Texas School Book Depository building. _-
-4)- _Lee Harvey Oswald, shortly before the assassination, had access to and was present on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository building. _-
-5)- _Lee Harvey Oswalds other actions tend to support the conclusion that he assassinated President Kennedy. _-
-B)- -_Scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy. Other scientific evidence does not preclude the possibility of two gunmen firing at the President. Scientific evidence negates some specific conspiracy allegations. _
-C)- -_The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee is unable to identify the other gunman or the extent of the conspiracy. _
-1)- _The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that _-_the Soviet Government was not involved_-_ in the assassination of President Kennedy. _-
-2)- _The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that _-_the Cuban Government was not involved_-_ in the assassination of President Kennedy. _-
-3)- _The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that _-_anti-Castro Cuban groups, as groups, were not involved_-_ in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that _-_the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved. _
-4)- _The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the national syndicate of _-_organized crime, as a group, was not involved_-_ in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved. _-
-5)- -_The Secret Service, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Central Intelligence Agency were not involved_-_ in the assassination of President Kennedy. _-
Iss 04 2023-12-10
Date: 2023-12-17
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 28
-larryacks6544
We know for a fact as this video reveals, that Depository worker Bonnie Ray Williams ate his lunch on the 6th floor starting at 12 noon. and only left that floor some five minutes prior to the actual assassination at 12: 30 pm. We know that someone was in the sniper's nest at the same time and they knew that Williams was just a few windows away. We know that whoever was in the sniper's nest knew Williams was close by because they remained absolutely quiet while Williams was on the floor. The fact that Williams decided to return to the 6th floor to eat lunch indicates that any employee may have decided to watch the motorcade from the 6th floor, and whoever was in the sniper's nest had no way of preventing workers from arriving on the 6th floor shortly before the assassination. If workers had arrived on the 6th floor would the assassination have been called off? If Williams had remained on the 6th floor would the assassination have been called off? If Oswald was the assassin, and workers had seen him on the 6th floor with a rifle, Oswald might as well have surrendered to his fellow employees. I feel that whoever was in that sniper's nest had some insurance which Oswald didn't have; genuine or false Identification indicating they were police or Secret Service. Such identification would have allowed them to flash it to nosey Depository workers and allowed them to make a clean getaway, both inside and outside the Depository Building. THERE IS NO WAY THE ASSASSIN(S) COULD HAVE GUARANTEED THAT THEY WOULD HAVE THE SIXTH FLOOR TO THEMSELVES, HENCE THE NEED FOR INSURANCE INTHE FORM OF REAL OR FALSE IDENTIFICATION DESIGNED TO DIFUSE A TENSE AND CONFRONTATIONAL INTERACTION AFTER THE SHOOTING. RESULTING IN A CLEAN GETAWAY
reply
We know for a fact as this video reveals, that Depository worker Bonnie Ray Williams ate his lunch on the 6th floor starting at 12 noon. and only left that floor some five minutes prior to the actual assassination at 12: 30 pm. We know that someone was in the sniper's nest at the same time and they knew that Williams was just a few windows away. We know that whoever was in the sniper's nest knew Williams was close by because they remained absolutely quiet while Williams was on the floor. The fact that Williams decided to return to the 6th floor to eat lunch indicates that any employee may have decided to watch the motorcade from the 6th floor, and whoever was in the sniper's nest had no way of preventing workers from arriving on the 6th floor shortly before the assassination. If workers had arrived on the 6th floor would the assassination have been called off? If Williams had remained on the 6th floor would the assassination have been called off? If Oswald was the assassin, and workers had seen him on the 6th floor with a rifle, Oswald might as well have surrendered to his fellow employees. I feel that whoever was in that sniper's nest had some insurance which Oswald didn't have; genuine or false Identification indicating they were police or Secret Service. Such identification would have allowed them to flash it to nosey Depository workers and allowed them to make a clean getaway, both inside and outside the Depository Building. THERE IS NO WAY THE ASSASSIN(S) COULD HAVE GUARANTEED THAT THEY WOULD HAVE THE SIXTH FLOOR TO THEMSELVES, HENCE THE NEED FOR INSURANCE INTHE FORM OF REAL OR FALSE IDENTIFICATION DESIGNED TO DIFUSE A TENSE AND CONFRONTATIONAL INTERACTION AFTER THE SHOOTING. RESULTING IN A CLEAN GETAWAY
reply
-palemale2501
Forget about Oswald meeting anyone as he came down the stairs, he was maybe in the canteen all along and a pro shooter took the shots alone!
When the guy Williams eating the chicken on middle south of 6th floor, finally went downstairs to 5th floor at 12: 20pm or 12: 25pm, a second hidden shooter went to the 6th floor sniper nest but now late, so could only aim down Elm Street not up Houston Street and fired.
(How he got inside I have not worked out yet lol)
The shooter waited till the (3 men on) 5th floor, and maybe also (6 women on) 4th floor had emptied down the rear west stairs, and also heard the manager Tully and cop Baker coming up these same stairs and continued past his 6th floor hideout, and up to the roof (8th floor.
Then he either descended the rear stairs to 2nd floor, listening out for others coming up to him or going down ahead of him, or took the elevator from 5th floor where it waited, down to 2nd floor with lookout Oswald giving the all clear as he waited there - why else would Oswald stay in canteen adjacent to elevators, if he was going to leave anyway, or maybe he lost heart.
After getting passed the lady coming back into 2nd floor office, Oswald left it (maybe met shooter) and went down the south east corner stair (one floor) ahead of shooter as lookout, to first floor and out main front door and along Houston, then shooter was maybe seen getting in a car on Main Street, Oswald took a bus.
Maybe shooter was dressed as a cop or in a suit with a CIA FBI Secret Service badge if stopped.
reply
Forget about Oswald meeting anyone as he came down the stairs, he was maybe in the canteen all along and a pro shooter took the shots alone!
When the guy Williams eating the chicken on middle south of 6th floor, finally went downstairs to 5th floor at 12: 20pm or 12: 25pm, a second hidden shooter went to the 6th floor sniper nest but now late, so could only aim down Elm Street not up Houston Street and fired.
(How he got inside I have not worked out yet lol)
The shooter waited till the (3 men on) 5th floor, and maybe also (6 women on) 4th floor had emptied down the rear west stairs, and also heard the manager Tully and cop Baker coming up these same stairs and continued past his 6th floor hideout, and up to the roof (8th floor.
Then he either descended the rear stairs to 2nd floor, listening out for others coming up to him or going down ahead of him, or took the elevator from 5th floor where it waited, down to 2nd floor with lookout Oswald giving the all clear as he waited there - why else would Oswald stay in canteen adjacent to elevators, if he was going to leave anyway, or maybe he lost heart.
After getting passed the lady coming back into 2nd floor office, Oswald left it (maybe met shooter) and went down the south east corner stair (one floor) ahead of shooter as lookout, to first floor and out main front door and along Houston, then shooter was maybe seen getting in a car on Main Street, Oswald took a bus.
Maybe shooter was dressed as a cop or in a suit with a CIA FBI Secret Service badge if stopped.
reply
-Vort317545
Ok, so let me get this straight. The President is shot. The Highway patrol officer rushes into the building moments after. Finds someone entering the 2nd floor launch room and the boss of the building pointed that employee was Oswald himself. The officer then proceeds upstairs in hopes of still catching the gunmen. Then Oswald supposedly flees the scene. With two witnesses seeing no one leaving by way of the loading docks' employee entrance. We can logically assume in the moments after JFK is shot, that building went into instant -lock down-. So if no one was leaving by way of the loading docks. Then, how did Oswald exit the building? The front entrance. But wait, the building is in lock down. Surely, the police would have seen employees exiting from the front and booking it to bus stop and a no one stopped him. And then there is Oswald that has supposedly killed the President of the United States just minutes before. He-s causally strolling into the lunchroom. Does that make logical sense? Would you be casually strolling into a lunchroom if you-ve just pulled off the crime of the century? Into a room at the crime scene with only one door in or out. Of course not. Oswald was casually strolling into that lunchroom because he was obvious to the fact that JFK was shot.
reply
Ok, so let me get this straight. The President is shot. The Highway patrol officer rushes into the building moments after. Finds someone entering the 2nd floor launch room and the boss of the building pointed that employee was Oswald himself. The officer then proceeds upstairs in hopes of still catching the gunmen. Then Oswald supposedly flees the scene. With two witnesses seeing no one leaving by way of the loading docks' employee entrance. We can logically assume in the moments after JFK is shot, that building went into instant -lock down-. So if no one was leaving by way of the loading docks. Then, how did Oswald exit the building? The front entrance. But wait, the building is in lock down. Surely, the police would have seen employees exiting from the front and booking it to bus stop and a no one stopped him. And then there is Oswald that has supposedly killed the President of the United States just minutes before. He-s causally strolling into the lunchroom. Does that make logical sense? Would you be casually strolling into a lunchroom if you-ve just pulled off the crime of the century? Into a room at the crime scene with only one door in or out. Of course not. Oswald was casually strolling into that lunchroom because he was obvious to the fact that JFK was shot.
reply
-A-1BurmaShave
I-ve been a serious student of the Kennedy assassination since 1975. I-m a professional historian and have read nearly seventy books on this murder-both pro-conspiracy and pro-lone gunman.
Originally I sided with the pro-conspiracy cult, but the more evidence I learned about the less I believed in a fanciful conspiracy theory. Beginning in 1980 I-ve become convinced in Oswald-s lone guilt.
This video is top-notch. The logic behind the narrator is spot on accurate. He reveals the evidence and lets the viewer reach their own conclusions.
One point he missed though that bears mentioning is the ridiculous allegation that the Dallas police planted the paper bag Oswald used to conceal his rifle in.
Since the bag was found BEFORE Buell Frazier or his sister Linnie Mae Randall gave their sworn statement as to the existence of the bag, how would Dallas PD know at the time that if they PLANTED a phony bag to frame Oswald, how could they have known that Buell and Linnie was later talk of a brown paper bag in Oswald-s possession that morning?
Well done job on this video-s research, accuracy, and presentation! Four stars!
reply
I-ve been a serious student of the Kennedy assassination since 1975. I-m a professional historian and have read nearly seventy books on this murder-both pro-conspiracy and pro-lone gunman.
Originally I sided with the pro-conspiracy cult, but the more evidence I learned about the less I believed in a fanciful conspiracy theory. Beginning in 1980 I-ve become convinced in Oswald-s lone guilt.
This video is top-notch. The logic behind the narrator is spot on accurate. He reveals the evidence and lets the viewer reach their own conclusions.
One point he missed though that bears mentioning is the ridiculous allegation that the Dallas police planted the paper bag Oswald used to conceal his rifle in.
Since the bag was found BEFORE Buell Frazier or his sister Linnie Mae Randall gave their sworn statement as to the existence of the bag, how would Dallas PD know at the time that if they PLANTED a phony bag to frame Oswald, how could they have known that Buell and Linnie was later talk of a brown paper bag in Oswald-s possession that morning?
Well done job on this video-s research, accuracy, and presentation! Four stars!
reply
-sds5502
There are many credibly theories regarding the assassination of JFK. America will never truly know the who, what, why and how, due to the fumbling coverage of facts vs. fiction released by the incompetent Warren Report. The only truth known is where and when. The truth may never be known even if the government releases the rest of the documents. If they have kept the truth hidden for 60 years, can anyone really trust what they would label as the truth today. No, we can't and sadly Americans will never know who killed our president and caused the downward spiral of not just America, but the world.
Now he belongs to the ages, as was also said about America's great Emancipator, Lincoln.
John F. Kennedy
May 1917 - Nov. 1963
Son, Brother, Husband, Father,
Lt. JG, Congressmen and POTUS.
REST IN PEACE, YOU ARE NOT FORGOTTEN.
Now your nephew, RFKJR has taken up the mantle to bring peace and prosperity once again to this great nation for which you dedicated you life's work and gave the ultimate sacrifice. May God keep him safe while he undertakes this great challenge.
reply
There are many credibly theories regarding the assassination of JFK. America will never truly know the who, what, why and how, due to the fumbling coverage of facts vs. fiction released by the incompetent Warren Report. The only truth known is where and when. The truth may never be known even if the government releases the rest of the documents. If they have kept the truth hidden for 60 years, can anyone really trust what they would label as the truth today. No, we can't and sadly Americans will never know who killed our president and caused the downward spiral of not just America, but the world.
Now he belongs to the ages, as was also said about America's great Emancipator, Lincoln.
John F. Kennedy
May 1917 - Nov. 1963
Son, Brother, Husband, Father,
Lt. JG, Congressmen and POTUS.
REST IN PEACE, YOU ARE NOT FORGOTTEN.
Now your nephew, RFKJR has taken up the mantle to bring peace and prosperity once again to this great nation for which you dedicated you life's work and gave the ultimate sacrifice. May God keep him safe while he undertakes this great challenge.
reply
-theskeptic2010
The perpetrators of this assassination deliberately had multiple plots and side-plots going on simultaneously. Two main reasons: Backup in case one plot failed. Reason two - to throw people off having people chase down endless dead-ends. This is actually an old CIA trick. I think most people now finally acknowledge that lone-nut shooter theory is false, that there were multiple shooters, and that Oswald was a CIA operative. Far from being a lone-nut loser portrayed in the official narrative, Oswald was actually a radio operator in the Marines. You don't get that position by being a nobody. You actually have access to lots of intelligence. The fact that he was killed almost immediately by a Mob-connected person forever silencing him is all just a bit too convenient. Plus all of the other deaths like Dorothy Kilgalen. We will probably never know exactly what happened.
reply
The perpetrators of this assassination deliberately had multiple plots and side-plots going on simultaneously. Two main reasons: Backup in case one plot failed. Reason two - to throw people off having people chase down endless dead-ends. This is actually an old CIA trick. I think most people now finally acknowledge that lone-nut shooter theory is false, that there were multiple shooters, and that Oswald was a CIA operative. Far from being a lone-nut loser portrayed in the official narrative, Oswald was actually a radio operator in the Marines. You don't get that position by being a nobody. You actually have access to lots of intelligence. The fact that he was killed almost immediately by a Mob-connected person forever silencing him is all just a bit too convenient. Plus all of the other deaths like Dorothy Kilgalen. We will probably never know exactly what happened.
reply
-Souleman561
The issue is The Warren Commission determined what was allowed to be enter as evidence and what was not to be allowed to be entered as evidence to the Commission itself.
It in no way, shape or form did the Warren Comission include all of the available evidence especially the FBI reports/interviews done day of the event and hence why those FBI files were locked away for over 75 years and been slowly released, and unless you go thru all the documents they released you won't get the full picture of that days events.
But the fact the autopsy wasn't allowed to be performed in Dallas/County it was committed by the legally appointed Doctors literally shows conspiracy to hide the evidence i. e. the body being evidence of number of/direction of bullets which most likely wouldn't correlate to a single shooter from the rear.
reply
The issue is The Warren Commission determined what was allowed to be enter as evidence and what was not to be allowed to be entered as evidence to the Commission itself.
It in no way, shape or form did the Warren Comission include all of the available evidence especially the FBI reports/interviews done day of the event and hence why those FBI files were locked away for over 75 years and been slowly released, and unless you go thru all the documents they released you won't get the full picture of that days events.
But the fact the autopsy wasn't allowed to be performed in Dallas/County it was committed by the legally appointed Doctors literally shows conspiracy to hide the evidence i. e. the body being evidence of number of/direction of bullets which most likely wouldn't correlate to a single shooter from the rear.
reply
-robfrancis8690
Within a social system informed by the power of myth and easy-to-repudiate opinions, how do we know the assassination happened? I sense the entire event was a theatrical performance, scripted, staged, and acted, and why do I think this? Because they try so hard to confuse us with thousands of theories, but the theory no one seems to suggest? No one killed the Kennedys. And they probably hid them in plain sight in the highest positions of power. Do you accept their clowncracy and believe everything their disinformation puppets say? People will say, -well, we watched him get shot in the head. - Did you? Or did you see an exploding balloon prop triggered by the driver's air-powered remote control?
reply
Within a social system informed by the power of myth and easy-to-repudiate opinions, how do we know the assassination happened? I sense the entire event was a theatrical performance, scripted, staged, and acted, and why do I think this? Because they try so hard to confuse us with thousands of theories, but the theory no one seems to suggest? No one killed the Kennedys. And they probably hid them in plain sight in the highest positions of power. Do you accept their clowncracy and believe everything their disinformation puppets say? People will say, -well, we watched him get shot in the head. - Did you? Or did you see an exploding balloon prop triggered by the driver's air-powered remote control?
reply
-agstudioband
Why would Oswald take the gun after shooting to the other side of the building, risking that he would be seen with it? It doesnt make sense to me. If he had left the gun at snipers nest, as anyone logically would, he would have much higher chance of getting away from that situation. It was only matter of time untill people would come to 6th floor and possibly see him there. With a gun in his hand, or without it, changes the situation dramatically. If they saw him there without a gun, he could have pretended that he rushed to the 6th floor as first person, because he heard some shooting from there. He must have thought about the scenarios for escaping.
reply
Why would Oswald take the gun after shooting to the other side of the building, risking that he would be seen with it? It doesnt make sense to me. If he had left the gun at snipers nest, as anyone logically would, he would have much higher chance of getting away from that situation. It was only matter of time untill people would come to 6th floor and possibly see him there. With a gun in his hand, or without it, changes the situation dramatically. If they saw him there without a gun, he could have pretended that he rushed to the 6th floor as first person, because he heard some shooting from there. He must have thought about the scenarios for escaping.
reply
-palemale2501
At the line up, Oswald had already hastily changed clothes from the time of the shooting, and been roughed up a bit by the police, so Brennan might have had a little difficulty to identify him.
Does not matter which employees were where in descending the stairs after the shooting as Oswald must have managed to slip past them all to arrive at the entrance to 2nd floor canteen, when Truly and cop exited the stairwell and stopped him as he headed into it.
Did he really tbuy a coke before lunch and buy another after, and where did he buy any lunch anyway
reply
At the line up, Oswald had already hastily changed clothes from the time of the shooting, and been roughed up a bit by the police, so Brennan might have had a little difficulty to identify him.
Does not matter which employees were where in descending the stairs after the shooting as Oswald must have managed to slip past them all to arrive at the entrance to 2nd floor canteen, when Truly and cop exited the stairwell and stopped him as he headed into it.
Did he really tbuy a coke before lunch and buy another after, and where did he buy any lunch anyway
reply
-billfaint6736
Whilst I cannot rule out the possibility of other shooters, if you watch the videos, I saw it on live TV, the shots clearly come from behind JFK. That doesn't mean that there was not a second or even third gunman. But it certainly suggests that any shooter on the 'grassy knoll' took little, if any, part in the fatal shots. IF Oswald was set up as a 'patsy', as he claimed, then the details of his interrogation are, at best, wanting. Certainly, if anyone was trying to frame Oswald, then they completely botched the attempt.
reply
Whilst I cannot rule out the possibility of other shooters, if you watch the videos, I saw it on live TV, the shots clearly come from behind JFK. That doesn't mean that there was not a second or even third gunman. But it certainly suggests that any shooter on the 'grassy knoll' took little, if any, part in the fatal shots. IF Oswald was set up as a 'patsy', as he claimed, then the details of his interrogation are, at best, wanting. Certainly, if anyone was trying to frame Oswald, then they completely botched the attempt.
reply
-stephenminto3026
Poor quality story telling. Too selective. All the witnesses have variations. As you admit the conspiracy might just be to cover up incompetence.
The magic bullet is an enduring problem for the credibility of the official version. Same with the closeness of shots 2 and 3.
Yes Oswald may be a shooter but several eyewitnesses saw and smelt the smoke of a second shooter.
But nothing in your story precludes there being a second shooter. And Oswald doesn-t need to know about them directly.
reply
Poor quality story telling. Too selective. All the witnesses have variations. As you admit the conspiracy might just be to cover up incompetence.
The magic bullet is an enduring problem for the credibility of the official version. Same with the closeness of shots 2 and 3.
Yes Oswald may be a shooter but several eyewitnesses saw and smelt the smoke of a second shooter.
But nothing in your story precludes there being a second shooter. And Oswald doesn-t need to know about them directly.
reply
-guygranger7894
Lee Oswald incriminating himself by admitting he was in the building at the time of the shooting, his fingerprints on the bag a nd the rifle, being he same rifle he kept in his garage that his wife found missing with the police, In my book convicts him as being at least one of the shooters. I still believe the fatal shot to the president's head was from the front, possibly from the grassy knoll. My personal belief is that LBJ hired the CIA to do it using Lee Oswald
reply
Lee Oswald incriminating himself by admitting he was in the building at the time of the shooting, his fingerprints on the bag a nd the rifle, being he same rifle he kept in his garage that his wife found missing with the police, In my book convicts him as being at least one of the shooters. I still believe the fatal shot to the president's head was from the front, possibly from the grassy knoll. My personal belief is that LBJ hired the CIA to do it using Lee Oswald
reply
-user-q3cIy1mkx9
Three shots were fired. Lee Oswald fired two shots as the witness described. One of them hit the president and the other one hit the governor. -
And the last fatal one that hit the president's head was coming from the front of the motorcade. This country still needs to find out who that was. -
There should be the evidence somewhere and somehow even after 60 years. It could take 100 years to find out who killed the president, not injured him.
reply
Three shots were fired. Lee Oswald fired two shots as the witness described. One of them hit the president and the other one hit the governor. -
And the last fatal one that hit the president's head was coming from the front of the motorcade. This country still needs to find out who that was. -
There should be the evidence somewhere and somehow even after 60 years. It could take 100 years to find out who killed the president, not injured him.
reply
-stephen5009
How many people (untrained, unwarned civilians) actually are asked to explain and (very) accurately identify someone (before a lineup? Recently, I witnessed a purse snatching. It happened on the street, but I was on my balcony, which overlooks the street. I was about 150 feet away. The two bad guys had motorcycle helmets on (that's it -- all I noticed. the woman had medium-length blond hair maybe in her twenties (that's it). not much to go on.
reply
How many people (untrained, unwarned civilians) actually are asked to explain and (very) accurately identify someone (before a lineup? Recently, I witnessed a purse snatching. It happened on the street, but I was on my balcony, which overlooks the street. I was about 150 feet away. The two bad guys had motorcycle helmets on (that's it -- all I noticed. the woman had medium-length blond hair maybe in her twenties (that's it). not much to go on.
reply
-nman7044
Anyone that has shot a gun knows the kill shot to Kennedy was from the front, SCIENCE doesn-t lie- governments do! There were at least 6 bullets removed from the area. Multiple directions AND there is no one that can shoot that many rounds that fast with -accuracy-! People are so out of touch with what has become of America around them it-s very sad because it-s only got 100x worse since Kennedy to now
reply
Anyone that has shot a gun knows the kill shot to Kennedy was from the front, SCIENCE doesn-t lie- governments do! There were at least 6 bullets removed from the area. Multiple directions AND there is no one that can shoot that many rounds that fast with -accuracy-! People are so out of touch with what has become of America around them it-s very sad because it-s only got 100x worse since Kennedy to now
reply
-Mike-01234
I believe Lee shot Kennedy to impress his wife she would belittle him as a failure. The real failure was the secret service the shot was 55-80 yard shot from a bench rested position. This shot could be made by anyone with some practice most rifle ranges are 100 yards and from a bench rested position it's not that difficult to hit a target within 3-inch pattern once the rifle sights are dialed in.
reply
I believe Lee shot Kennedy to impress his wife she would belittle him as a failure. The real failure was the secret service the shot was 55-80 yard shot from a bench rested position. This shot could be made by anyone with some practice most rifle ranges are 100 yards and from a bench rested position it's not that difficult to hit a target within 3-inch pattern once the rifle sights are dialed in.
reply
-HotZTrain
Very well done video. But, who's to say the facts are all correct? Anyone remember the run away Southern Pacific train back in the late 1980's down Cajon Pass? Well, there have been sever very well produced video depicting the wreck all the way from Mojave. Problem is, I was there, know ALL the details and crew members. All the professional videos are full of miss information and some plain lies.
reply
Very well done video. But, who's to say the facts are all correct? Anyone remember the run away Southern Pacific train back in the late 1980's down Cajon Pass? Well, there have been sever very well produced video depicting the wreck all the way from Mojave. Problem is, I was there, know ALL the details and crew members. All the professional videos are full of miss information and some plain lies.
reply
-moshood55
To believe that Oswald, or whoever shot from the book depository acted alone, is to accept the magic bullet theory. And to not believe what your owne eyes tell you from the Zapruder film. Those are things that I just can't accept lol. This video does make it seem more likely that Oswald was the guy that shot from the schoolbook despository or at the very least brought his rifle for the shooting.
reply
To believe that Oswald, or whoever shot from the book depository acted alone, is to accept the magic bullet theory. And to not believe what your owne eyes tell you from the Zapruder film. Those are things that I just can't accept lol. This video does make it seem more likely that Oswald was the guy that shot from the schoolbook despository or at the very least brought his rifle for the shooting.
reply
-palemale2501
A Mauser on the roof would be a BIGGY, but how could an Oswald look-alike or another shooter have got down faster than Oswald and escaped as there is only the 2 service lifts, the main stairwell, plus a smaller stairwell from first to second floors, and a lift from first to fourth floor, and the external fire-escape, where they could have bumped into ANY employees, especially if a stranger.
reply
A Mauser on the roof would be a BIGGY, but how could an Oswald look-alike or another shooter have got down faster than Oswald and escaped as there is only the 2 service lifts, the main stairwell, plus a smaller stairwell from first to second floors, and a lift from first to fourth floor, and the external fire-escape, where they could have bumped into ANY employees, especially if a stranger.
reply
-RahulYadav-nk6wp
Oswald was a Patsy, when the killer says he was a patsy, that means there were few more people to kill JFK. The arrangement of assaination was done in a way that if Oswald even missed the first blow, the man at the front will be a backup to do make hit happen. Its a large cover up. And the worst part, you dont replace a body, his body was manipulated. Thats how grizly this murder was.
reply
Oswald was a Patsy, when the killer says he was a patsy, that means there were few more people to kill JFK. The arrangement of assaination was done in a way that if Oswald even missed the first blow, the man at the front will be a backup to do make hit happen. Its a large cover up. And the worst part, you dont replace a body, his body was manipulated. Thats how grizly this murder was.
reply
-palemale2501
If there was a conspiracy using Oswald, then it was just their really good luck or opportune (not a grand plan at all) that he found a job at the depository 6 weeks before, and that the route was fixed just one week before, and that Kennedy insisted on an open car to gain support in a politically difficult city. Of course there was a conspiracy and this was not the first attack planned.
reply
If there was a conspiracy using Oswald, then it was just their really good luck or opportune (not a grand plan at all) that he found a job at the depository 6 weeks before, and that the route was fixed just one week before, and that Kennedy insisted on an open car to gain support in a politically difficult city. Of course there was a conspiracy and this was not the first attack planned.
reply
-americanmale314
Dozens of other researchers have come to a totally different conclusion. It's widely accepted that there were multiple shooters. And no one thinks Oswald fired a shot. One of the oddest things is how the limousine was not inspected, and wS immediately sent away to be refurbished. But photographs confirm that two bullets hit the windshield. One from the front and one from the rear.
reply
Dozens of other researchers have come to a totally different conclusion. It's widely accepted that there were multiple shooters. And no one thinks Oswald fired a shot. One of the oddest things is how the limousine was not inspected, and wS immediately sent away to be refurbished. But photographs confirm that two bullets hit the windshield. One from the front and one from the rear.
reply
-Souleman561
Your video is flawed as this is purely Warren Comission evidence and agian they picked and choose what wad allowed as evidence and what was not going to be allowed as evidence. More people heard more then 3 gunshot then the witnesses used to report they heard only 3, Warren Comission didn't call on any of the witnesses who said anything other then 3 shots.
reply
Your video is flawed as this is purely Warren Comission evidence and agian they picked and choose what wad allowed as evidence and what was not going to be allowed as evidence. More people heard more then 3 gunshot then the witnesses used to report they heard only 3, Warren Comission didn't call on any of the witnesses who said anything other then 3 shots.
reply
-nickm2669
A good documentary, but as far as drawing conclusions, it says from the beginning, it-s only analyzing info with regards to the book depository. It completely ignores a lot of other information and testimony that would suggest Oswald wasn-t a lone gunman. It also doesn-t discuss in enough detail the inconsistencies and malpractice of the Warren commission.
reply
A good documentary, but as far as drawing conclusions, it says from the beginning, it-s only analyzing info with regards to the book depository. It completely ignores a lot of other information and testimony that would suggest Oswald wasn-t a lone gunman. It also doesn-t discuss in enough detail the inconsistencies and malpractice of the Warren commission.
reply
fun-facts
If it's true that Oswald pulled this off all by himself
Then its just so mind boggling that a random normal guy working in a book depository was able to assassinate the highest ranked official of the strongest country in the world i mean the US had nukes in 1945 had sent men to the moon but couldn't protect their president
reply
If it's true that Oswald pulled this off all by himself
Then its just so mind boggling that a random normal guy working in a book depository was able to assassinate the highest ranked official of the strongest country in the world i mean the US had nukes in 1945 had sent men to the moon but couldn't protect their president
reply
-boardgamer447
I may have missed this, but what was Oswald's motive for shooting JD Tippit?
Him leaving the building after the assassination seems odd by itself, but combined with killing the officer, and his statement -I didn't shoot anybody, - at least demonstrates violence and deceptive intent on his part.
reply
I may have missed this, but what was Oswald's motive for shooting JD Tippit?
Him leaving the building after the assassination seems odd by itself, but combined with killing the officer, and his statement -I didn't shoot anybody, - at least demonstrates violence and deceptive intent on his part.
reply
-Loosecannon1969
I'm sorry, but this is what THESE people say, we have nobidea whatvreally happened and with Oswald DEAD we'll never know how he came about working there. Dead men tell no tales, pretty convenient right? Yep. This little mini-drama you've concocted is filled with lies and misinformation.
reply
I'm sorry, but this is what THESE people say, we have nobidea whatvreally happened and with Oswald DEAD we'll never know how he came about working there. Dead men tell no tales, pretty convenient right? Yep. This little mini-drama you've concocted is filled with lies and misinformation.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
