VehiclesFashionRecipesBlogsHuntTravelsSportFunHandmadeITEducation
Mini-Games
x

x
zakruti.com » Knowledge, science, education » Numberphile
Speed Solve of a Rubik's Cube in Slow Motion - Numberphile

Speed Solve of a Rubik's Cube in Slow Motion - Numberphile

FBTwitterReddit

video description

Rating: 4.0; Vote: 1
Speed Solve of a Rubik's Cube in Slow Motion Down: Really cool vid, but there's one thing I want to know, because in slow motion, with all these experts, I know someone can figure it out. HOW MANY WRONG TURNS OCCUR IN THIS SOLUTION? He solved it, yeah. But how much time can be shaved off the total if we can remove the 'false steps'? Also, aren't 6 of the faces, or more correctly, 3 pairs of 2 opposing faces, faces that cannot be changed as regards their spatial relationship? I don't have one in front of me, and I'm not looking at a picture, (in fact, even the video is scrolled up off the screen, so I'm not even looking at THAT, but it seems to me that inherent in the design are, what's the word, antipodal colors that can't be changed, in that particular cube, without literally disassembling the thing? Yeah. That's right. I think. Again, I'm doing this in my head, but if there's a green on the South pole, with a red on the North pole, no matter WHAT you do, they'll ALWAYS have that spatial relationship? Doesn't that cut down that gazillion cotillion possible combinations for THAT particular cube? Eh? Now I got a headache. I knew there was a reason I couldn't get past trig.
Date: 2022-04-08

Comments and reviews: 9


Wait a minute. Listen to me babbling on like the 89th of the 100 monkeys, who got stuck with writing act III of Hamlet at union scale. I'm going on about something I must be the gazillion-cotillionth guy to catch on to. Something that all of the experts already allowed for, when they were doing the permutations calculations. The fact that the corner pieces also can't be changed in their relationships of their 3 assigned colors. Doesn't that ALSO cut down that huge number of possibilities? The number of possibilities that the professor (who does the trick with tying his shoes in one move) takes like 13 seconds to fully enumerate in that voice-over? I'm still trying to figure out that shoe-tying trick. I refuse to watch that video again, I'm going to figure out that -How mathematicians tie their shoes- trick if it kills me. And shouldn't that word be MATHS-ematicians?
reply

To be honest, every person can learn the method of solving a Rubic Cube. I learned the simple way (and had a record of 45 seconds) and also learned the advance method for a 2x2 cube and solved it in 3 seconds.
I didn't finish learning the advanced method for a 3x3x3 (takes about a week to master) but it is really possible.
Everyone can learn the advanced method of solving a Rubik's Cube, it takes a week and only requires some training and you could solve the cube in less than 30 seconds.
The people who go to contests all use advanced methods, but they don't see the cube and know exactly what will be the 20 moves, but insteed they work by stages.

reply

So, due to the quintillion possible mixes, would it be fair to say. If you randonly mix up a cube, the resulting cube would be in a state that no other cube has ever been in or ever will be in, from the start until the end of the Universe? Similar to shuffling a pack of cards? My fave thing is to say to a friend -Let, me show you something you have never seen before-. I shuffle a pack of cards then show them the outome. Simple.
reply

One number that has always bothered me is '9'
If you multiply it by any number greater than '0' then the remaining digits in the answer always add up to 9 when you round it down to one digit.
Ex: 9x55 =495
4+9+5=18 1+8=9
It would be great if you could explain this as it doesn't happen with any of the other 1-8 numbers.
Thank you and love your vids: )

reply

I can solve in 2 min. mostly less than 90 seconds.
Does God's no had different formula?
because he and I completely different moves.
I fix the edges, then layers and finally all the layers.
like length x breadth x height.
Does anyone familiar with this formula.

reply

wouldn't it be fun to put an unsolveble rubickscube in one of this contests and see how long it takes them to realise?
i mean i don't want to mock them i think it could give me a better impression on how their brain works this stuff out

reply

Dude I'm sorry but what is this video? they're obviously trying to appeal to non cubers, but numberphile's fanbase is filled with cubers in the first place. sorry this video did nothing for me and I'm a bod disappointed.
reply

4 years ago Numberphile inspired me to learn how to solve the Rubik's cube. Since then i've been to many competitions, my record is 12. 39 seconds and I average 18-19 seconds. Thanks Brady! -From a longtime viewer
reply

If you can solve iterations 0 and 1 of a Menger sponge (a Rubik's cube and a void cube, respectively, then could you make a second-iteration Menger sponge that could be solved, or is that impossible?
reply
Add a review, comment






Other channel videos