Alec Baldwin Charged Again With Involuntary Manslaughter
video description
Date: 2024-01-20
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 15
castlerock58
The charges are political. This has happened before in Hollywood, including with actor who shot Brandon lee and they were not charged with a crime. It is like charging an actor if a stunt set up by experts, the actor puts their trust in, goes wrong. Real guns should not be used for movies. The actor's job is acting and that involves aiming the gun at people or, in this case, the camera. That's why the people at the camera got hit instead of an actor. When you direct an actor to draw and point a gun while acting, they can't be sure not to pull the trigger. Triggers have almost certainly been pulled before but nothing happened because the armorers did their jobs and no live rounds ever got anywhere near the guns. I can't stand Baldwin but I don't want him to face political charges any more than Trump. Baldwin should be treated the same way as the actor who shot Brandon Lee.
reply
The charges are political. This has happened before in Hollywood, including with actor who shot Brandon lee and they were not charged with a crime. It is like charging an actor if a stunt set up by experts, the actor puts their trust in, goes wrong. Real guns should not be used for movies. The actor's job is acting and that involves aiming the gun at people or, in this case, the camera. That's why the people at the camera got hit instead of an actor. When you direct an actor to draw and point a gun while acting, they can't be sure not to pull the trigger. Triggers have almost certainly been pulled before but nothing happened because the armorers did their jobs and no live rounds ever got anywhere near the guns. I can't stand Baldwin but I don't want him to face political charges any more than Trump. Baldwin should be treated the same way as the actor who shot Brandon Lee.
reply
glennbond8266
He might have acted careless or let’s say, nonchalant about the gun after it was given to him, but it’s whomever GAVE him the gun loaded that is the real person of interest. Was it that woman whose job was to handle and take care of the guns! It sounds like it might have been her. Or someone she gave the gun to, to then give it to Baldwin. They should have checked that gun first before giving it to Baldwin. Bottom line.
reply
He might have acted careless or let’s say, nonchalant about the gun after it was given to him, but it’s whomever GAVE him the gun loaded that is the real person of interest. Was it that woman whose job was to handle and take care of the guns! It sounds like it might have been her. Or someone she gave the gun to, to then give it to Baldwin. They should have checked that gun first before giving it to Baldwin. Bottom line.
reply
zlot4hire
It's not a "prop" if it's an actual firing gun. He broke all the rules of dealing with guns and someone died from it. Nobody is accusing him of doing it on purpose, but he was still acting careless like several others on the set. If it were any of us there would be no question. If you were to ask him what should happen if we were to have done that, I'm pretty sure he wouldn't hesitate to say we needed to be in prison.
reply
It's not a "prop" if it's an actual firing gun. He broke all the rules of dealing with guns and someone died from it. Nobody is accusing him of doing it on purpose, but he was still acting careless like several others on the set. If it were any of us there would be no question. If you were to ask him what should happen if we were to have done that, I'm pretty sure he wouldn't hesitate to say we needed to be in prison.
reply
lastpme
I think the rep who was responsible for the gun safety (the armor) should be responsible for what happened on the film set. That person was hired to make sure the set was safe. I think as the producer he could be sued because he should have a more experienced gun safety rep since the person the film hired was inexperienced.
reply
I think the rep who was responsible for the gun safety (the armor) should be responsible for what happened on the film set. That person was hired to make sure the set was safe. I think as the producer he could be sued because he should have a more experienced gun safety rep since the person the film hired was inexperienced.
reply
glennbond8266
What’s odd and crazy is how the woman’s (who died) husband is now one of the acting producers! He wanted that after she was shot. I find it to be really odd that he requested that. How could he do that job after his wife was killed on the set! Talk about being an opportunist!
reply
What’s odd and crazy is how the woman’s (who died) husband is now one of the acting producers! He wanted that after she was shot. I find it to be really odd that he requested that. How could he do that job after his wife was killed on the set! Talk about being an opportunist!
reply
margegarland7635
They need to make a new law, like with double jeopardy, where they cant go back after someone, when thencharges were dropped, unless they have signifcanr new evidence, and rhy need to say what the new evidence is
reply
They need to make a new law, like with double jeopardy, where they cant go back after someone, when thencharges were dropped, unless they have signifcanr new evidence, and rhy need to say what the new evidence is
reply
SSIUK
I need to ask as nobody else is who put the live bullets into the gun for prop that’s the person they need to find and prosecute not the person who had the weapon in his had when it went off disgruntled employee maybe
reply
I need to ask as nobody else is who put the live bullets into the gun for prop that’s the person they need to find and prosecute not the person who had the weapon in his had when it went off disgruntled employee maybe
reply
jasonburke8657
Was it His fault though who in God's name gave Him a Gun with live rounds in it in the first place To Me the Person that gave Him live rounds on Set should be held accountable and not Alec.
reply
Was it His fault though who in God's name gave Him a Gun with live rounds in it in the first place To Me the Person that gave Him live rounds on Set should be held accountable and not Alec.
reply
robinrobin02
Its the prop person that should be charged! It was thier JOB to check that stuff.
Why do you think Brandon Lee died! And that found as an accidental death, if i remember correctly.
reply
Its the prop person that should be charged! It was thier JOB to check that stuff.
Why do you think Brandon Lee died! And that found as an accidental death, if i remember correctly.
reply
Kyller9-2
It's not the actors job to check the prop. There's a multi stage process of checking explosive props. Especially for guns. This was the fault of at least 3 people before Alec Baldwin.
reply
It's not the actors job to check the prop. There's a multi stage process of checking explosive props. Especially for guns. This was the fault of at least 3 people before Alec Baldwin.
reply
mrscary3105
They handed it to him and called "Cold Gun" the armorer should go down, she was at fault, not the actor. The armorer was a joke, and should have never been allowed on a set.
reply
They handed it to him and called "Cold Gun" the armorer should go down, she was at fault, not the actor. The armorer was a joke, and should have never been allowed on a set.
reply
JulieStardoll
i just dont understand why a full gun was used for filming. so weird. cant imagine the last moments of the victim. what a terrible way to die. so sorry for the family
reply
i just dont understand why a full gun was used for filming. so weird. cant imagine the last moments of the victim. what a terrible way to die. so sorry for the family
reply
thebuccaneersden
Let's all be honest for a second. We all know why Alec Baldwin is being targeted like this and it is because he made fun of Donald Trump.
reply
Let's all be honest for a second. We all know why Alec Baldwin is being targeted like this and it is because he made fun of Donald Trump.
reply
RevivedSaiyan
Democrats should give up on their nonsense, we already know the prop person is to blame not the actor. Bring this to supreme court.
reply
Democrats should give up on their nonsense, we already know the prop person is to blame not the actor. Bring this to supreme court.
reply
qkiz13
Dont see it his fault. This gun should not be loaded with normal ammunition, real ammo did not meant be on the set, how he could know
reply
Dont see it his fault. This gun should not be loaded with normal ammunition, real ammo did not meant be on the set, how he could know
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
