2019 / 2020 Hyundai Tucson Trying To Stay Relevant
video description
Date: 2019-08-16
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 10
webcomment
Don't both the Santa Fe and Tuscon use the problem-prone Theta II engine that has had multiple different problems spread over several years? There is no proof that all of it's numerous problems are now solved. It's a bigger reliability risk than even the oil-dilution issues in the CR-V engine. I wouldn't call it tried and true in that case, but at least it has a long powertrain warranty for the original new-vehicle buyer or CPO buyers.
reply
Don't both the Santa Fe and Tuscon use the problem-prone Theta II engine that has had multiple different problems spread over several years? There is no proof that all of it's numerous problems are now solved. It's a bigger reliability risk than even the oil-dilution issues in the CR-V engine. I wouldn't call it tried and true in that case, but at least it has a long powertrain warranty for the original new-vehicle buyer or CPO buyers.
reply
Kevin Gibb
The Tucson is just too close in price to the Santa Fe right now to be attractive. With good negotiating, can get a Santa Fe for only a bit more with a 2. 4L, and get more refinement, room, and 8 speed transmission with the Santa Fe. Seems they need to find a way to improve MPG on the Tucson, and lower price a bit, to keep it competitive within their own model lineup.
reply
The Tucson is just too close in price to the Santa Fe right now to be attractive. With good negotiating, can get a Santa Fe for only a bit more with a 2. 4L, and get more refinement, room, and 8 speed transmission with the Santa Fe. Seems they need to find a way to improve MPG on the Tucson, and lower price a bit, to keep it competitive within their own model lineup.
reply
FantomLightning
The thing that drives me insane with Hyundai is the fact that in just about all their vehicles you need to go for either the top, or second from the top trim just to get a sunroof. I don't want everything the loaded models have, mid range would do me fine but no sunroof even as an option.
reply
The thing that drives me insane with Hyundai is the fact that in just about all their vehicles you need to go for either the top, or second from the top trim just to get a sunroof. I don't want everything the loaded models have, mid range would do me fine but no sunroof even as an option.
reply
FSAPO
Hyundai needs to overhaul this car, badly. All of the other cars in their lineup are great, but this one is old and outdated. The CX-5 and Rav4 are definitely better. My mom had an old first-gen tuscon that got 320, 000 miles with basic maintenance. They're good cars.
reply
Hyundai needs to overhaul this car, badly. All of the other cars in their lineup are great, but this one is old and outdated. The CX-5 and Rav4 are definitely better. My mom had an old first-gen tuscon that got 320, 000 miles with basic maintenance. They're good cars.
reply
Iconoclast1962
I wish that auto reviewers would stop giving 0-60 mph statistics Nobody pushes a vehicle from complete stop to 60 mph. The time it takes to go from 55 to 75 would be a more usefulstatistic; This represents a more realistic mph range for passing on the highway.
reply
I wish that auto reviewers would stop giving 0-60 mph statistics Nobody pushes a vehicle from complete stop to 60 mph. The time it takes to go from 55 to 75 would be a more usefulstatistic; This represents a more realistic mph range for passing on the highway.
reply
bren rob
I find it odd that the 1. 6T / DCT was dropped from this car, meanwhile it still powers the Kona, Soul, Elantra Sport, etc. Hyundai needs to up their game with efficiency (the Sportage is similarly behind the curve when it comes to EPA mileage)
reply
I find it odd that the 1. 6T / DCT was dropped from this car, meanwhile it still powers the Kona, Soul, Elantra Sport, etc. Hyundai needs to up their game with efficiency (the Sportage is similarly behind the curve when it comes to EPA mileage)
reply
Herp McDerp
It seems somewhat outdated. Especially the fuel economy is bad for such a compact vehicle. I wonder why they didn't put the new CVT in it (I don't like CVTs but they are good for fuel economy.
reply
It seems somewhat outdated. Especially the fuel economy is bad for such a compact vehicle. I wonder why they didn't put the new CVT in it (I don't like CVTs but they are good for fuel economy.
reply
Luke-o 1234
I have a recommendation for your videos when you go over cargo volume compare it to other vehicles in the class with the same chart as you do for the size of the vehicle
reply
I have a recommendation for your videos when you go over cargo volume compare it to other vehicles in the class with the same chart as you do for the size of the vehicle
reply
pedro fernandez
This version is slower than the previous, but it won't be at the repair shop as much as the older one. Not to mention durability and reliability.
reply
This version is slower than the previous, but it won't be at the repair shop as much as the older one. Not to mention durability and reliability.
reply
ricky gars
just bought an se in central florida, otd price with gap and taxes and fees is 23, 430without gap it would be 22, 581 which is a great price.
reply
just bought an se in central florida, otd price with gap and taxes and fees is 23, 430without gap it would be 22, 581 which is a great price.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
