What the Apollo 11 Site Looks Like Today
video description
Date: 2024-01-04
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 38
-paulwojnar2291
Imagine how much more we could have achieved if the US and USSR had combined efforts rather than competetive ones.
Very excited that we are returning to the moon and then beyond.
I wonder, what will the deniers come up with when we see high quality close up photos of the Apollo landing sites.
Oh they will think of something for sure.
Rather than argue with them I say Yes this is all a simulation.
Nothing is real.
Including you the deniers.
reply
Imagine how much more we could have achieved if the US and USSR had combined efforts rather than competetive ones.
Very excited that we are returning to the moon and then beyond.
I wonder, what will the deniers come up with when we see high quality close up photos of the Apollo landing sites.
Oh they will think of something for sure.
Rather than argue with them I say Yes this is all a simulation.
Nothing is real.
Including you the deniers.
reply
Dude strange → -paulwojnar2291
Competition with the Soviets ended in about 1974, with Apollo 17. We have collaborated with the Russians ever since, over 50 years! Soyus, ISS, etc.
reply
Competition with the Soviets ended in about 1974, with Apollo 17. We have collaborated with the Russians ever since, over 50 years! Soyus, ISS, etc.
reply
Dude strange → -paulwojnar2291
The competition with the Soviets ended with the Apollo program, say 1974, Apollo 17? We have collaborated with the Russians since then, say 52 YEARS!
reply
The competition with the Soviets ended with the Apollo program, say 1974, Apollo 17? We have collaborated with the Russians since then, say 52 YEARS!
reply
-CaptainBobRockets
A big factor that they didn't capture in the video is that the large door on the bottom left side of the LM should be open. That was called the MESA. They had experiments, equipment and the camera that broadcast Neil's first step on the moon in there. Later they moved the camera onto the tripod set further away, so that we and mission control could watch both astronauts work on the moon.
reply
A big factor that they didn't capture in the video is that the large door on the bottom left side of the LM should be open. That was called the MESA. They had experiments, equipment and the camera that broadcast Neil's first step on the moon in there. Later they moved the camera onto the tripod set further away, so that we and mission control could watch both astronauts work on the moon.
reply
-lajosjakabfi3211
I see that they also left a pair of boots there. According to them, he climbed the ladder in socks. (5. 40)
They were never there. They never go there.
Wernher von Braun - Saturn V Apollo - Gravestone inscription: Psalms 19. 1.
The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament showeth His handiwork.
reply
I see that they also left a pair of boots there. According to them, he climbed the ladder in socks. (5. 40)
They were never there. They never go there.
Wernher von Braun - Saturn V Apollo - Gravestone inscription: Psalms 19. 1.
The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament showeth His handiwork.
reply
-muneerahmed9503
Why it has not done after Armstrong 1969 although we have high tech & modern era today so it will be easier then 1969 to reach moon its means its a fake stories made by America that grey have reach moon in 1969 because in that era no modern techs so they make world fool easily
reply
Why it has not done after Armstrong 1969 although we have high tech & modern era today so it will be easier then 1969 to reach moon its means its a fake stories made by America that grey have reach moon in 1969 because in that era no modern techs so they make world fool easily
reply
fun-facts
The manned moon landings were more complicated and perilous than the space shuttle earth orbits nearly a generation later but had no fatal mishaps unlike the latter. Simply amazing. NASA engineers and scientists in the 60s were probably better than those in the 80s.
reply
The manned moon landings were more complicated and perilous than the space shuttle earth orbits nearly a generation later but had no fatal mishaps unlike the latter. Simply amazing. NASA engineers and scientists in the 60s were probably better than those in the 80s.
reply
-bobbg9041
8: 44 whats the best ISP on the moon? Will my Air Jordan's explode? Or just make me bounce further.
Can i use my I phone on the moon to phone home?
I'm tottaly joking, but someday these jokes could be reality. Now thats something to hang your hat on.
reply
8: 44 whats the best ISP on the moon? Will my Air Jordan's explode? Or just make me bounce further.
Can i use my I phone on the moon to phone home?
I'm tottaly joking, but someday these jokes could be reality. Now thats something to hang your hat on.
reply
-jebroe860
Everywhere we go we leave a junk yard.
Crashing probes on to prestine planets to leave a mess.
We need to stop wasting money on it and heal our mother earth. We may be smart but we have a
junk yard mentality.
reply
Everywhere we go we leave a junk yard.
Crashing probes on to prestine planets to leave a mess.
We need to stop wasting money on it and heal our mother earth. We may be smart but we have a
junk yard mentality.
reply
-farout1704
If you were standing on the surface of the moon, and you looked up to the celestial sphere you would see a huge Earth shining down on you. Where are those movie or photo shots of the Large Earth? -
Reply
reply
If you were standing on the surface of the moon, and you looked up to the celestial sphere you would see a huge Earth shining down on you. Where are those movie or photo shots of the Large Earth? -
Reply
reply
-fritzmuller8246
Utter balls, take a look at the post landing interview. Three very unhappy men who had just come home from the greatest ever human endeavor. They should have been over the moon with joy. They weren't.
reply
Utter balls, take a look at the post landing interview. Three very unhappy men who had just come home from the greatest ever human endeavor. They should have been over the moon with joy. They weren't.
reply
-robwebber9267
This video states that they guess that this is what the items may look after 53 years or so. So can we not use a telliscope to physically see the landing area and debris. Sounds like science has issues.
reply
This video states that they guess that this is what the items may look after 53 years or so. So can we not use a telliscope to physically see the landing area and debris. Sounds like science has issues.
reply
-brians9532
How come no real photos of what is looks like today? We can take picutures of far away galaxies and can't see the moon landing site? Those conspiracy theorists have been batting 1000 lately.
reply
How come no real photos of what is looks like today? We can take picutures of far away galaxies and can't see the moon landing site? Those conspiracy theorists have been batting 1000 lately.
reply
fun-facts
I spent 4 years at Orroral Valley tracking station in Australia. Daily uploading of commands, and downloading data from ALSEP. A CSIRO team lased LRRR from their facility adjacent to Orroral.
reply
I spent 4 years at Orroral Valley tracking station in Australia. Daily uploading of commands, and downloading data from ALSEP. A CSIRO team lased LRRR from their facility adjacent to Orroral.
reply
-philkarn1761
Great video. Minor nit: the antenna on the seismometer and the laser retroreflector should have been shown pointed at earth, which was in the same direction as the LM leg with the ladder.
reply
Great video. Minor nit: the antenna on the seismometer and the laser retroreflector should have been shown pointed at earth, which was in the same direction as the LM leg with the ladder.
reply
-nivid01
The fact that Aldrin had to be reminded and then just -threw- the commemorative medals on the ground instead of respectfully placing them in an appropriate location show what a dill he was!
reply
The fact that Aldrin had to be reminded and then just -threw- the commemorative medals on the ground instead of respectfully placing them in an appropriate location show what a dill he was!
reply
-kenwall5846
It-s my belief that Stanley Kubrick was used to fake the moon landing. It proved more expensive than anticipated as being the perfectionist he was he insisted it be filmed on location!
reply
It-s my belief that Stanley Kubrick was used to fake the moon landing. It proved more expensive than anticipated as being the perfectionist he was he insisted it be filmed on location!
reply
-robertboykin1828
May the human race'es next adventure be TO STOP WARRING BETWIX EACH OTHER. If, or when that happens, may be life from the far reaches of space come to visit us.
reply
May the human race'es next adventure be TO STOP WARRING BETWIX EACH OTHER. If, or when that happens, may be life from the far reaches of space come to visit us.
reply
-casey2806
Disappointing video. It shows nothing of what the site actually looks like. I was expecting satellite images of what it actually looks like, not a history lesson.
reply
Disappointing video. It shows nothing of what the site actually looks like. I was expecting satellite images of what it actually looks like, not a history lesson.
reply
fun-facts
I would have expected to see a Lunar Rover, as well as the other equipment shown. There might even be other lunar rovers left from other missions, as well.
reply
I would have expected to see a Lunar Rover, as well as the other equipment shown. There might even be other lunar rovers left from other missions, as well.
reply
-TONYSTARK-ot8mm
Conspiracy says that no one ever got step on the moon, instead it is done on a studio and fooled us. --
The question is that true or false?
reply
Conspiracy says that no one ever got step on the moon, instead it is done on a studio and fooled us. --
The question is that true or false?
reply
-mwolrich
Hopefully when we get back to the moon, survey pictures of the site can be taken, to finally prove, yes, we actually did go. still a lot of deniers.
reply
Hopefully when we get back to the moon, survey pictures of the site can be taken, to finally prove, yes, we actually did go. still a lot of deniers.
reply
-dmann4683
Laughable. CGI and speculative. Space may be the final frontier but its made in a hollywood basement. - RHCP. Everyone is in love with illusion.
reply
Laughable. CGI and speculative. Space may be the final frontier but its made in a hollywood basement. - RHCP. Everyone is in love with illusion.
reply
-Paddy984
I was 11 years old when I watched the first moon landing on live TV in 1969. This video helped me understand what was left on the moon's surface.
reply
I was 11 years old when I watched the first moon landing on live TV in 1969. This video helped me understand what was left on the moon's surface.
reply
-v3dax
i believe moon landing wasnt faked at all but honestly, how tf that camera reached there during the moon landing and how tf did it film them 5: 48
reply
i believe moon landing wasnt faked at all but honestly, how tf that camera reached there during the moon landing and how tf did it film them 5: 48
reply
-lordjones6497
This was the time you can blast something across every television in America & the people will believe it - they can-t get this off now
reply
This was the time you can blast something across every television in America & the people will believe it - they can-t get this off now
reply
-knndyskful
Bro, your speech impediment is annoying
Have the computer read your script, you put out a cool video but you talk like an 8 yr old
reply
Bro, your speech impediment is annoying
Have the computer read your script, you put out a cool video but you talk like an 8 yr old
reply
-reinhardt2002
Made me trust in you: don't show animation, show just one photo about this hardware lefted in Moon! Made me trust this, guys! ---
reply
Made me trust in you: don't show animation, show just one photo about this hardware lefted in Moon! Made me trust this, guys! ---
reply
-guyfawkes8384
Still waiting for the day we have actual footage of the moon's surface and not some CGI created or -scanned surface- nonsense.
reply
Still waiting for the day we have actual footage of the moon's surface and not some CGI created or -scanned surface- nonsense.
reply
-eazypeazy33
I think it-s amazing how they live streamed from the moon to the White House then to all the TVs around the world, in the 60-s.
reply
I think it-s amazing how they live streamed from the moon to the White House then to all the TVs around the world, in the 60-s.
reply
-labeans4978
You said The camera that the astronauts placed captured the first steps on the moon? 5: 55 you might be off on your information
reply
You said The camera that the astronauts placed captured the first steps on the moon? 5: 55 you might be off on your information
reply
-BadAtTeaDude
Tranquility base.
The eagle never never ever landed.
Bugs Bunny went to the moon though.
Much more believable
reply
Tranquility base.
The eagle never never ever landed.
Bugs Bunny went to the moon though.
Much more believable
reply
fun-facts
So there-s a computer animated image of what the landing looks like -. We had video images in 1969 but not in the 21 century?
reply
So there-s a computer animated image of what the landing looks like -. We had video images in 1969 but not in the 21 century?
reply
-jimlippi4001
The one other thing that the astronauts left behind was their dignity for perpetuating this ruse for their entire lives.
reply
The one other thing that the astronauts left behind was their dignity for perpetuating this ruse for their entire lives.
reply
-caseysimon2098
How come we have telescopes that can take a picture of a pimple on Uranus, but not the landing areas on the moon?
reply
How come we have telescopes that can take a picture of a pimple on Uranus, but not the landing areas on the moon?
reply
-allengreg5447
I'd always thought they landed next to that crater because it looked like a convenient place to take a leak.
reply
I'd always thought they landed next to that crater because it looked like a convenient place to take a leak.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
