A Manifesto for the New Right
video description
Date: 2024-05-09
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 20
shyzunk
This feels very disjointed. In a way reminiscent of how Jordan Peterson tries to connect mountains of big concepts with a glue of myth, symbol and archetype. If it is to be a manifesto, it would either need to be relatively concise and snappy and understandable, or it would need to explain its terms. Especially if you want a lot of people to join in as you say.
But here instead, we fly through a ton of concepts with little to no explanation. A lot of them feel unconnected at best, as if you went through an entire library of philosophical thought, cherry picked a few pieces you really liked and then smushed them all together, without any reference to where you got them from. And I don't mean a list of those books to read in the description.
I recognize bits of political ideas and priorities, some new age stuff like god being everything everywhere and somehow also bored (which is in a way almost self contradictory, then that is somehow bolted onto an unfinished discussion of how we need to further the goals of the society all the way to self sacrifice for said society(to keep alive in it certain key principles, and yet maintain individualism and freedom.
Each of those steps need its own explanation and if it exists elsewhere, then a link to it.
And if you include a call to action, to join, to be with you, it would need to be a bit more actionable. At the end of it I am left with no clue where I would even begin if wanted to implement this stuff. I suspect I would agree with a lot of your ideas in isolation, object to a few and criticize the idea that they ought to be a larger coherent whole, but frankly, I don't even know for sure what you are trying to say half the time. What I remembered from this is dont avoid hard things, you need to become strong for this great fight. And that's about it.
I suggest you cut down on the number of thoughts you want to include and boil it down to the core principles, then restructure the manifesto around those to be as coherent and clear as possible. You can create ten more iterations if need be, and let the old ones die.
reply
This feels very disjointed. In a way reminiscent of how Jordan Peterson tries to connect mountains of big concepts with a glue of myth, symbol and archetype. If it is to be a manifesto, it would either need to be relatively concise and snappy and understandable, or it would need to explain its terms. Especially if you want a lot of people to join in as you say.
But here instead, we fly through a ton of concepts with little to no explanation. A lot of them feel unconnected at best, as if you went through an entire library of philosophical thought, cherry picked a few pieces you really liked and then smushed them all together, without any reference to where you got them from. And I don't mean a list of those books to read in the description.
I recognize bits of political ideas and priorities, some new age stuff like god being everything everywhere and somehow also bored (which is in a way almost self contradictory, then that is somehow bolted onto an unfinished discussion of how we need to further the goals of the society all the way to self sacrifice for said society(to keep alive in it certain key principles, and yet maintain individualism and freedom.
Each of those steps need its own explanation and if it exists elsewhere, then a link to it.
And if you include a call to action, to join, to be with you, it would need to be a bit more actionable. At the end of it I am left with no clue where I would even begin if wanted to implement this stuff. I suspect I would agree with a lot of your ideas in isolation, object to a few and criticize the idea that they ought to be a larger coherent whole, but frankly, I don't even know for sure what you are trying to say half the time. What I remembered from this is dont avoid hard things, you need to become strong for this great fight. And that's about it.
I suggest you cut down on the number of thoughts you want to include and boil it down to the core principles, then restructure the manifesto around those to be as coherent and clear as possible. You can create ten more iterations if need be, and let the old ones die.
reply
DogsRSweet
One of the things i see a lot about people who complain about weak or effeminate men, like femboys or trans women, is that it is a sign of the failing of men and society, like with the mouse utopia experiment.
I do agree that if a massive portion of men, like if 70% of men turned into effeminate men, it would break out society. But effeminate men is on the rise, sure, but is not near that level of population. It would surprise me, that in the US, if 10-15% of the 165 mil males, about 16. 5-20 mil males, were these effeminate men that would lead to the breakdown of society. These men do exist, but many of them still believe in masculine values.
Im someone who believes in strength, duty snd responsibility as a man. But I am comfortable enough with my identity to push the bounds of what makes a man a man. I want to be a thinner, lithe male who is aesthetical feminine or a femboy. This doesn't mean I'm not a man. Or that i think all men should be like me, but for me, being a man means being willing to push at what it means to be a man. And for me, clothes, looks, and a slightly higher voice doesn't equal a man. I think valuing those things that are not inclusive of the role or character of men, is part of why we have toxic masculinity. Why we have people like the Tates who are evil, disgusting men, that are seen as role models, rather than those who deserve the position, despite not fitting the man stereotype.
Men and women are not true opposing forces like heat and cold. They are complimentary forces divided. They are Yin and Yang. And like that symbol, within men are women's traits, and within women are men's traits.
We need some effeminate men who push the bounds of what it means to be a man. They aren't a bad thing just because they exist. In the same way the man's man the big, burley, strong man is the extra manly man, the opposite of the femboy, the extreme of men.
The exploration of femininity in men isn't a bad thing in and of itself, and i think people forget that a lot
reply
One of the things i see a lot about people who complain about weak or effeminate men, like femboys or trans women, is that it is a sign of the failing of men and society, like with the mouse utopia experiment.
I do agree that if a massive portion of men, like if 70% of men turned into effeminate men, it would break out society. But effeminate men is on the rise, sure, but is not near that level of population. It would surprise me, that in the US, if 10-15% of the 165 mil males, about 16. 5-20 mil males, were these effeminate men that would lead to the breakdown of society. These men do exist, but many of them still believe in masculine values.
Im someone who believes in strength, duty snd responsibility as a man. But I am comfortable enough with my identity to push the bounds of what makes a man a man. I want to be a thinner, lithe male who is aesthetical feminine or a femboy. This doesn't mean I'm not a man. Or that i think all men should be like me, but for me, being a man means being willing to push at what it means to be a man. And for me, clothes, looks, and a slightly higher voice doesn't equal a man. I think valuing those things that are not inclusive of the role or character of men, is part of why we have toxic masculinity. Why we have people like the Tates who are evil, disgusting men, that are seen as role models, rather than those who deserve the position, despite not fitting the man stereotype.
Men and women are not true opposing forces like heat and cold. They are complimentary forces divided. They are Yin and Yang. And like that symbol, within men are women's traits, and within women are men's traits.
We need some effeminate men who push the bounds of what it means to be a man. They aren't a bad thing just because they exist. In the same way the man's man the big, burley, strong man is the extra manly man, the opposite of the femboy, the extreme of men.
The exploration of femininity in men isn't a bad thing in and of itself, and i think people forget that a lot
reply
fishconnoisseur
I think one of the greatest things about the New World Order we’ve lived in since WW2 is the sheer incompetence that is so universal in the ruling classes of almost every nation which otherwise would have been naturally selected had it not been for the Rules based international community.
Hundreds of years from now it will be reported that Somalia hasn’t existed in decades at the time I’m writing this, and yet the international community universally agrees it exists. A similar phenomenon I think can be observed about the New Right and New Left in that they’re so intensely incompetent at achieving anything because the vested interests that get them into power simply desire to use their position to extract what wealth and power they can short term, then justify it by maintaining a declining status quo.
Writing this as a junior in highschool I fear that this world order of peace in of itself will have it’s bureaucracy and society cave in to a similar state as in the era following WW1, with clearly defined stable powers and a world constantly changing and fighting until some of the most depraved groups have taken all the resources they can to prepare for a REAL war. The bloodiest era in human history seems to have yet to happen, and is seeming more and more likely to be the defining factor of my adult life. To be living in history is a privilege and a curse.
reply
I think one of the greatest things about the New World Order we’ve lived in since WW2 is the sheer incompetence that is so universal in the ruling classes of almost every nation which otherwise would have been naturally selected had it not been for the Rules based international community.
Hundreds of years from now it will be reported that Somalia hasn’t existed in decades at the time I’m writing this, and yet the international community universally agrees it exists. A similar phenomenon I think can be observed about the New Right and New Left in that they’re so intensely incompetent at achieving anything because the vested interests that get them into power simply desire to use their position to extract what wealth and power they can short term, then justify it by maintaining a declining status quo.
Writing this as a junior in highschool I fear that this world order of peace in of itself will have it’s bureaucracy and society cave in to a similar state as in the era following WW1, with clearly defined stable powers and a world constantly changing and fighting until some of the most depraved groups have taken all the resources they can to prepare for a REAL war. The bloodiest era in human history seems to have yet to happen, and is seeming more and more likely to be the defining factor of my adult life. To be living in history is a privilege and a curse.
reply
c4call
Please. too much Plato here, not enough Aristotle. By which I mean to say, referring to men and women as opposites and misrepresenting the law of thermodynamics as being equivalent to that, is too much semantics and not enough logic. Calling men and women opposites is such a silly concept. It's like referring to a bolt and a nut as opposites, or 2 halves of an apple as opposites. With the apple example, they're only opposite sides of the same whole. And with the bolt and nut, they aren't opposites but rather 2 parts of a whole. 1 has external threads, the other internal threads, meant to fit together to serve a purpose. Same with male and female of any species. You need male and female to reproduce the species. Calling them opposites is silly though. And using the law of thermodynamics equal and opposite reaction is also silly, because we aren't opposites, like forces going in opposite directions. we are two halves of a whole species or type of animal, like a ying-yang circle. With the black and white halves with a dot of the other color mixed into each other side. We are complimentary, not even counter or contrary.
And references to evil, I toss out on principle as a childish view of things. As nietsche expressed, that which is beneficial is good, and that which is harmful is bad. There is no evil.
reply
Please. too much Plato here, not enough Aristotle. By which I mean to say, referring to men and women as opposites and misrepresenting the law of thermodynamics as being equivalent to that, is too much semantics and not enough logic. Calling men and women opposites is such a silly concept. It's like referring to a bolt and a nut as opposites, or 2 halves of an apple as opposites. With the apple example, they're only opposite sides of the same whole. And with the bolt and nut, they aren't opposites but rather 2 parts of a whole. 1 has external threads, the other internal threads, meant to fit together to serve a purpose. Same with male and female of any species. You need male and female to reproduce the species. Calling them opposites is silly though. And using the law of thermodynamics equal and opposite reaction is also silly, because we aren't opposites, like forces going in opposite directions. we are two halves of a whole species or type of animal, like a ying-yang circle. With the black and white halves with a dot of the other color mixed into each other side. We are complimentary, not even counter or contrary.
And references to evil, I toss out on principle as a childish view of things. As nietsche expressed, that which is beneficial is good, and that which is harmful is bad. There is no evil.
reply
luk7400
when we talk about things like god and fate and the rules of the universe, from a human perspective, i think what we really mean is the way humans are programmed to function.
we can't discard our programming because it would take hundreds of thousands of years of extra evolution, but the fundamental assumption you make is that the programming has to be followed for us to succeed.
i disagree with this because all of society is essentially a manipulation of that programming to reach greater ends. saying that we should strive to follow that programming and that anyone who's directly opposing it is wrong, to me, is fundamentally anti-human. instead, what we should seek to do is manipulate it to our own ends. i believe the manipulation of humanity's natural fate is the true leftist perspective.
however, where we agree is that this programming exists. it cannot be ignored. if you ignore it, you cannot manipulate it.
you have to know the rules to break and bend them.
reply
when we talk about things like god and fate and the rules of the universe, from a human perspective, i think what we really mean is the way humans are programmed to function.
we can't discard our programming because it would take hundreds of thousands of years of extra evolution, but the fundamental assumption you make is that the programming has to be followed for us to succeed.
i disagree with this because all of society is essentially a manipulation of that programming to reach greater ends. saying that we should strive to follow that programming and that anyone who's directly opposing it is wrong, to me, is fundamentally anti-human. instead, what we should seek to do is manipulate it to our own ends. i believe the manipulation of humanity's natural fate is the true leftist perspective.
however, where we agree is that this programming exists. it cannot be ignored. if you ignore it, you cannot manipulate it.
you have to know the rules to break and bend them.
reply
DylanPelzer-lq7oy
I would advise not throwing the idea of kindness under the bus like it's some filthy weak thing to be spat on, Rudyard. It reflects poorly upon you despite these concepts of honour, truth and freedom which you espouse, as it makes it seem as if you are supporting being a cruel, spiteful dick towards people, though I admit I might be misunderstanding what you mean by that. Humans can still treat one another with generosity, civility and respect while still maintaining their strength and dignity. Being kind does not automatically equate with being docile, deceitful and effeminate, since the world already has enough cruelty and hardship as it is.
Sorry if this comes across as a rant, but I've heard lots of people sneer at notions such as kindness. It's one of the things that makes us human, which elevates us above being base sociopathic apes with nukes.
reply
I would advise not throwing the idea of kindness under the bus like it's some filthy weak thing to be spat on, Rudyard. It reflects poorly upon you despite these concepts of honour, truth and freedom which you espouse, as it makes it seem as if you are supporting being a cruel, spiteful dick towards people, though I admit I might be misunderstanding what you mean by that. Humans can still treat one another with generosity, civility and respect while still maintaining their strength and dignity. Being kind does not automatically equate with being docile, deceitful and effeminate, since the world already has enough cruelty and hardship as it is.
Sorry if this comes across as a rant, but I've heard lots of people sneer at notions such as kindness. It's one of the things that makes us human, which elevates us above being base sociopathic apes with nukes.
reply
siecheil
youre like 22 dude. wisdom comes from experience. yes, adults dont know what theyre doing, but not all knowledge comes from reading books. wisdom comes from experience. from believing something is certain, and then finding out you were wrong. and at 22, you just dont have the experience, you havent found the corruption yet which skews your perception and have had to wipe your entire slate clean and start again from scratch. you have preconceptions, adopting ideas that you necessarily believe are true, ideas that the majority of other people believe are true, but arent. and thats something only time can fix. in another decade you might be there, but very few people have the luxury to pursue these questions, they have distractions, lives, jobs, other tasks that derail them. good luck, i hope you get there.
reply
youre like 22 dude. wisdom comes from experience. yes, adults dont know what theyre doing, but not all knowledge comes from reading books. wisdom comes from experience. from believing something is certain, and then finding out you were wrong. and at 22, you just dont have the experience, you havent found the corruption yet which skews your perception and have had to wipe your entire slate clean and start again from scratch. you have preconceptions, adopting ideas that you necessarily believe are true, ideas that the majority of other people believe are true, but arent. and thats something only time can fix. in another decade you might be there, but very few people have the luxury to pursue these questions, they have distractions, lives, jobs, other tasks that derail them. good luck, i hope you get there.
reply
jefaus06
After re-reading C. S. Lewis's Abolition of Man recently, a lot of his points are echoed in your manifesto. He linked universal truths under the banner of the Chinese term the dao. The process of the last 100 years of education was the destruction of value systems across the west, ensuring that we become morally malleable to our conditioners. Thanks for putting a cap-stone on these value principles that all societies have, even if they don't specificially agree on how they got there. These principles of value bring us to a place where we are able to fight against entropy and the forces within our nature that bring chaos.
We will soon return to an era where men will need chests again, and will need a new seat of morality in his being to moderate his intellect and rule over his lower appetites.
reply
After re-reading C. S. Lewis's Abolition of Man recently, a lot of his points are echoed in your manifesto. He linked universal truths under the banner of the Chinese term the dao. The process of the last 100 years of education was the destruction of value systems across the west, ensuring that we become morally malleable to our conditioners. Thanks for putting a cap-stone on these value principles that all societies have, even if they don't specificially agree on how they got there. These principles of value bring us to a place where we are able to fight against entropy and the forces within our nature that bring chaos.
We will soon return to an era where men will need chests again, and will need a new seat of morality in his being to moderate his intellect and rule over his lower appetites.
reply
Theboar2
This is not a new ideology with any real solutions or vision that can be used to start any political movement. This is just an inspiring, balanced philosophical mix of liberalism, christianity, stoicism and taoism trying to explain the problems of modern society and why we need more virtue but also why the right is good and the left is bad. The pursuit of glory leads to pride and pride comes before downfall. This is just the same old heroworship that western civilisation is built on. The libertarians are already fighting the left with the principle that everyone should be promoted based on their own merit and that our own productive classes always should be prioritized first in order to cut all unecessary spending and use it to support the peoples basic needs instead.
reply
This is not a new ideology with any real solutions or vision that can be used to start any political movement. This is just an inspiring, balanced philosophical mix of liberalism, christianity, stoicism and taoism trying to explain the problems of modern society and why we need more virtue but also why the right is good and the left is bad. The pursuit of glory leads to pride and pride comes before downfall. This is just the same old heroworship that western civilisation is built on. The libertarians are already fighting the left with the principle that everyone should be promoted based on their own merit and that our own productive classes always should be prioritized first in order to cut all unecessary spending and use it to support the peoples basic needs instead.
reply
ZombieCSSTutorials
Isn't belief merely justification of power and rules for society There is hardly any heavy debate over what the Biblical archangels looked like and their likes and dislikes, or how they feel, as much as how to pray and when to pray, so I assume that it is. The question now is, is belief necessary for society to function You kind of dodge this for the sake of encompassing non-wokes, but this is a very important foundational issue for the right that I don't think has been satisfyingly been addressed by anyone, and presents a problem for this manifesto. The 'spell' is broken: We're either going to accept humanity's future as soulless (and suffer, or we're going to reset back to a more manageable time (and suffer, of course.
reply
Isn't belief merely justification of power and rules for society There is hardly any heavy debate over what the Biblical archangels looked like and their likes and dislikes, or how they feel, as much as how to pray and when to pray, so I assume that it is. The question now is, is belief necessary for society to function You kind of dodge this for the sake of encompassing non-wokes, but this is a very important foundational issue for the right that I don't think has been satisfyingly been addressed by anyone, and presents a problem for this manifesto. The 'spell' is broken: We're either going to accept humanity's future as soulless (and suffer, or we're going to reset back to a more manageable time (and suffer, of course.
reply
MrBoltaxa
I have to disagree on one thing (that I noticed) - the comment about ancient egypt and nukes, I'm not so sure that they'd use it without a second thought, the west created the nuke, and we so how devastating it was, I think if ancient egyptians had a real sense of the power of the nuke, they'd have second thoughts about using it.
Another thing, that caught my attention is at the end of video, you are speaking with such passion,
then I remembered that you're 22 years old, and men your age have more testosterone and they actively seek adventure,
so how do you know all your videos and thoughts about the coming crisis aren't just manifestations of you own personal hormones and emotions
reply
I have to disagree on one thing (that I noticed) - the comment about ancient egypt and nukes, I'm not so sure that they'd use it without a second thought, the west created the nuke, and we so how devastating it was, I think if ancient egyptians had a real sense of the power of the nuke, they'd have second thoughts about using it.
Another thing, that caught my attention is at the end of video, you are speaking with such passion,
then I remembered that you're 22 years old, and men your age have more testosterone and they actively seek adventure,
so how do you know all your videos and thoughts about the coming crisis aren't just manifestations of you own personal hormones and emotions
reply
_spacegoat_
It's hard to believe you're only 22, Rudyard. When I was 22 (25 years ago) I thought I was open-minded and smart, but it turns out I was just a dime-a-dozen stoner stuck in a 24-hour loop of 'shower thoughts' and avoidance strategies, with an occasional profound insight that floated away then next time I lit up a joint. If I was thinking then about the things you're thinking now, and maybe acting on a few of them, at this point in my life I'd be a force to be reckoned with. Instead, I'm just a middle manager with an impending sense of societal doom. But at least I have the perspective now to know you're over the target, and your aim is lethal. Well done, man. Bombs away.
reply
It's hard to believe you're only 22, Rudyard. When I was 22 (25 years ago) I thought I was open-minded and smart, but it turns out I was just a dime-a-dozen stoner stuck in a 24-hour loop of 'shower thoughts' and avoidance strategies, with an occasional profound insight that floated away then next time I lit up a joint. If I was thinking then about the things you're thinking now, and maybe acting on a few of them, at this point in my life I'd be a force to be reckoned with. Instead, I'm just a middle manager with an impending sense of societal doom. But at least I have the perspective now to know you're over the target, and your aim is lethal. Well done, man. Bombs away.
reply
julonkrutor4649
While i do not agree with everything you say. not even close. i am willing to fight for honor, freedom and truth. I fought for over a decade now.
The problem is, it dose not advance you in this world. You always lack behind those, that cheat, lie and steal. Yes, it may be better in the long run for all, but short term its worse.
So i will take a break, focusing on myself, cheat, lie and steal for a while to better my position. is what i often think. But that is not the solution. Its also not the solution to fight the good fight and be miserable doing so. I do not have a solution for this, just a problem. Maybe i have not struggled enough yet
reply
While i do not agree with everything you say. not even close. i am willing to fight for honor, freedom and truth. I fought for over a decade now.
The problem is, it dose not advance you in this world. You always lack behind those, that cheat, lie and steal. Yes, it may be better in the long run for all, but short term its worse.
So i will take a break, focusing on myself, cheat, lie and steal for a while to better my position. is what i often think. But that is not the solution. Its also not the solution to fight the good fight and be miserable doing so. I do not have a solution for this, just a problem. Maybe i have not struggled enough yet
reply
bananabread6148
To play devil's advocate, I'd say it's a strawman to say that the left is tearing down greatness, simply out of envy. That is true to some degree, but there is utility in challenging those who have achieved greatness by way of corruption and exploitation. You could say that Larry Fink has accomplished greatness, but the question is whether or not his greatness actually enriches society or if it only enriches himself at everyone else's expense. (He was responsible for reforming mortgage lending in the 80's, which has resulted in a broken housing market that he has personally benefitted from in every subsequent housing bubble/crash since)
reply
To play devil's advocate, I'd say it's a strawman to say that the left is tearing down greatness, simply out of envy. That is true to some degree, but there is utility in challenging those who have achieved greatness by way of corruption and exploitation. You could say that Larry Fink has accomplished greatness, but the question is whether or not his greatness actually enriches society or if it only enriches himself at everyone else's expense. (He was responsible for reforming mortgage lending in the 80's, which has resulted in a broken housing market that he has personally benefitted from in every subsequent housing bubble/crash since)
reply
whatifalthist
Why do you want the Right to be new
The strength of the Right is in the fact that it's old. Really old. Like, preserving values that withstood and we're necessary after the collapse of countless civilisations.
This video felt like a combination of too undeveloped reasons to care and too many tacked on assumptions that were not sufficiently considered, like you recommending organisations whose main dynamics you highlighted was competition for survival when the Left has done a fantastic job of consuming other institutions through subversion and praises of both individualism and the to the big structures of the universe.
reply
Why do you want the Right to be new
The strength of the Right is in the fact that it's old. Really old. Like, preserving values that withstood and we're necessary after the collapse of countless civilisations.
This video felt like a combination of too undeveloped reasons to care and too many tacked on assumptions that were not sufficiently considered, like you recommending organisations whose main dynamics you highlighted was competition for survival when the Left has done a fantastic job of consuming other institutions through subversion and praises of both individualism and the to the big structures of the universe.
reply
whatifalthist
I stand with you because promotimg those 3 values just cant go wrong, however I do have to say that you do make intellectually dishonest videos. Theyre not grounded, too abstract and reading in patterns. Theyre not diligent and videos for example the spirit world were seuch nonsense even if somehow you managed to be right. I like how in this video you narrowed it down to those concrete real values that actions can be judged against but mist of your videos are thought porn with no evidence. However I do enjoy watching them even though it makes me nervous. Its very hard to take someome seriously if its so out there.
reply
I stand with you because promotimg those 3 values just cant go wrong, however I do have to say that you do make intellectually dishonest videos. Theyre not grounded, too abstract and reading in patterns. Theyre not diligent and videos for example the spirit world were seuch nonsense even if somehow you managed to be right. I like how in this video you narrowed it down to those concrete real values that actions can be judged against but mist of your videos are thought porn with no evidence. However I do enjoy watching them even though it makes me nervous. Its very hard to take someome seriously if its so out there.
reply
pvtcit9711
Your last few vids got me thinking of asking you. ARE YOU SURE ABOUT THAT Jokes, but seriously, are you super sure man like I feel a little bit like you've gone down the rabbit hole and probably bubbled in, where you are getting enough attention to think you are at the center of something big, but I just don't see it from where I am. I could be wrong, but maybe take it a bit slower in making claims about your position here. But yeah, who am I, just some unknown dev working on some project that helps keep the world more efficient and running, but seriously not a networker or anything like that
reply
Your last few vids got me thinking of asking you. ARE YOU SURE ABOUT THAT Jokes, but seriously, are you super sure man like I feel a little bit like you've gone down the rabbit hole and probably bubbled in, where you are getting enough attention to think you are at the center of something big, but I just don't see it from where I am. I could be wrong, but maybe take it a bit slower in making claims about your position here. But yeah, who am I, just some unknown dev working on some project that helps keep the world more efficient and running, but seriously not a networker or anything like that
reply
timhill7177
It's great and well intentioned but ultimately too youthful and still assumes far too much and features an oversimplified and internally mythologised idea 'the left' which is a myriad of ideas and efforts, much like conservatism. Your right/left dichotomy is inspired but ultimately too simple. Also, don't say your ready to die for any theory, especially your own at 22. That's an extraordinary level of hubris and you should be smart enough to recognise this is true, because, you're quite extraordinarily. Keep up the amazing work! It's really great.
- Your friendly neighbourhood 'leftist'
reply
It's great and well intentioned but ultimately too youthful and still assumes far too much and features an oversimplified and internally mythologised idea 'the left' which is a myriad of ideas and efforts, much like conservatism. Your right/left dichotomy is inspired but ultimately too simple. Also, don't say your ready to die for any theory, especially your own at 22. That's an extraordinary level of hubris and you should be smart enough to recognise this is true, because, you're quite extraordinarily. Keep up the amazing work! It's really great.
- Your friendly neighbourhood 'leftist'
reply
dumdum8880
Is this not a gnostic propostion If God is evolution, and the soul is society, then we Human as the dominent evolutionary force in the world and on ourselves would be equal to god in some way. And the value of our soul would be defined by how we contribute to our given society, regaurdless of wether that society is good. A better position is that God is good and we evolve to become more like God which in turn increases our survival chances. Not evolution is God, but God is what we evolution moves towards. And society outgrows from that.
reply
Is this not a gnostic propostion If God is evolution, and the soul is society, then we Human as the dominent evolutionary force in the world and on ourselves would be equal to god in some way. And the value of our soul would be defined by how we contribute to our given society, regaurdless of wether that society is good. A better position is that God is good and we evolve to become more like God which in turn increases our survival chances. Not evolution is God, but God is what we evolution moves towards. And society outgrows from that.
reply
tonyjarvis8176
You said in the video this manifesto is far shorter than I want it to be so I've had to simplify things. Why not make the long video Would you be willing to type this out
I think this is good and is on the right track. I can certainly believe in this and see the potential. An expansion on these ideas would help to curb misinterpretation.
Also what are your thoughts on a discord or some type of forum to discuss, debate and refine these ideas Thank you for all that you have done and continue to do. Honor, freedom, truth.
reply
You said in the video this manifesto is far shorter than I want it to be so I've had to simplify things. Why not make the long video Would you be willing to type this out
I think this is good and is on the right track. I can certainly believe in this and see the potential. An expansion on these ideas would help to curb misinterpretation.
Also what are your thoughts on a discord or some type of forum to discuss, debate and refine these ideas Thank you for all that you have done and continue to do. Honor, freedom, truth.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
