Spider-Man: No Way Home Has The BEST Ending Possible For a Trilogy (SPOILERS)
video description
I mean look what can you get from a 3 spidermans and 5 villains in one movie from different universes.
Come on CURING VILLAINS is that what you can get from All of THAT. It's just like when you want to go from a country to another country and you have a Helicopter but you ride a bicycle. I mean you have a helicopter why would you take a bicycle!
Unless there's some hidden script, I don't know about that would explain all of that sadly the movie was just made for nothing.
And there's more.
Ok, solving the problem of the people knowing Peter Parker's identity (Tom Holland) by a spell that would let all the world forget peter parker was awesome, but is Peter Parker's interruption to Doctor Strange really an excuse for opening a multiverse? And again it could just be better.
And the worst thing was after all of that, The World forgot Peter Parker. I mean after all of this 2 hour and 30 minutes movie they would let all of the people forget him, WHY? You did it from the beginning 15 minutes of the movie and it didn't work and then you do it AGAIN.
I'm a HUGE FAN OF MARVEL, but I just expected more from this Incredible Movie.
Date: 2022-06-24
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 9
First
The ending was definitely bittersweet. Im not against him finding his way on his own for now but I hope it doesn-t follow the same formula from passed Spider-Man trilogies. It was great seeing the passed trilogies on how each version of Spider-Man overcame their own problems. I think what people keep on forgetting is that with the passed Spider-Man movies was that he was basically the only hero with no Avengers. So of course they-re on their own when facing whatever life and villain problems they have. This version of Spider-Man that we have now has other heroes going around and about so ofc he-s gonna interact with them at some point. This might be an unpopular opinion but I love how we get a different take on Tom-s Spider-Man because of how he interacts with other characters/Heroes. One last thing I wanna point out was on Far From Home with the conversation he had with Happy. I mean it could be interpreted in different ways but I took it as Tony passing on the torch to Peter (not the iron man title or anything but the responsibility he once held. I hope the MCU doesn-t waste that conversation because that had so much depth in so many ways. For now we-ll see the Spider-Man that we all got to know growing up and I-m excited for that! I just hope that he won-t have to solo too long after he gets developed. Later on take his rightful place on the Avengers and possibly leading it.
reply
The ending was definitely bittersweet. Im not against him finding his way on his own for now but I hope it doesn-t follow the same formula from passed Spider-Man trilogies. It was great seeing the passed trilogies on how each version of Spider-Man overcame their own problems. I think what people keep on forgetting is that with the passed Spider-Man movies was that he was basically the only hero with no Avengers. So of course they-re on their own when facing whatever life and villain problems they have. This version of Spider-Man that we have now has other heroes going around and about so ofc he-s gonna interact with them at some point. This might be an unpopular opinion but I love how we get a different take on Tom-s Spider-Man because of how he interacts with other characters/Heroes. One last thing I wanna point out was on Far From Home with the conversation he had with Happy. I mean it could be interpreted in different ways but I took it as Tony passing on the torch to Peter (not the iron man title or anything but the responsibility he once held. I hope the MCU doesn-t waste that conversation because that had so much depth in so many ways. For now we-ll see the Spider-Man that we all got to know growing up and I-m excited for that! I just hope that he won-t have to solo too long after he gets developed. Later on take his rightful place on the Avengers and possibly leading it.
reply
Isidro
I don't think it was the best ending possible. Because it was a soft reset, much of what happens doesn't make a difference for the future. Sure, Tom learned lessons about responsibility, but he could've done that without the villains entering his universe. In other words, the villains were shoe-horned in so Tom could learn about loss and the risk his friends take by knowing him, which any villain could've done.
Because we don't see the redeemed villains in their home universes, there's no payoff for curing them. Consequently, we don't know how time manipulation works when it comes to different universes, so we don't know if Tobey and Andrew return to a modified world. We're left to just imagine what these reformed villains are doing in their home universes. And this is all assuming Strange's final spell doesn't make them forget who Peter is (which wouldn't make them villains again, but would heavily alter their characters.
All in all, this movie felt like one long trailer for the Strange movie, and a long attempt at soft resetting the Spiderman universe.
And ultimately, when you introduce 2 Spiderman while also developing the third, and FIVE villains who ALL need to be reformed, you cannot pack that into two and a half hours. This should've been a trilogy where Tobey and Andrew work with Tom for three movies.
reply
I don't think it was the best ending possible. Because it was a soft reset, much of what happens doesn't make a difference for the future. Sure, Tom learned lessons about responsibility, but he could've done that without the villains entering his universe. In other words, the villains were shoe-horned in so Tom could learn about loss and the risk his friends take by knowing him, which any villain could've done.
Because we don't see the redeemed villains in their home universes, there's no payoff for curing them. Consequently, we don't know how time manipulation works when it comes to different universes, so we don't know if Tobey and Andrew return to a modified world. We're left to just imagine what these reformed villains are doing in their home universes. And this is all assuming Strange's final spell doesn't make them forget who Peter is (which wouldn't make them villains again, but would heavily alter their characters.
All in all, this movie felt like one long trailer for the Strange movie, and a long attempt at soft resetting the Spiderman universe.
And ultimately, when you introduce 2 Spiderman while also developing the third, and FIVE villains who ALL need to be reformed, you cannot pack that into two and a half hours. This should've been a trilogy where Tobey and Andrew work with Tom for three movies.
reply
Kimberle
Probably has already been said here, but one big thing about Tom's Spiderman has as you said been so much about the tech. Not because Peter needed it as he found out when Stark takes his suit away, but because that is the universe his spidey lives in. However, at the end when he has to start over, he again realises that his value as a super hero is not diminished despite not having his tech. On top of that, he gets closer to a more accurate representation of the character because he starts over using things that only he designed and can do. He is a brilliant person and as such can do what a more traditional spidey would have done in making the things he needs to be Spiderman, be they simple or complex; from his webshooters which he has already developed, to making a new suit that does not need all that Stark tech to be effective, but also to not look as cheaply made as the one he wears in the first movie. Not only has his view of himself and his responsibilities as Spiderman changed, but he gets to demonstrate more faith in himself than he would if he had not been on this journey. I think it is great that he gets his new start as something closer to the original concept of Spiderman, which opens the door for more traditional Spiderman stories in the MCU. Great video, as is the part 1 movie breakdown you did. :)
reply
Probably has already been said here, but one big thing about Tom's Spiderman has as you said been so much about the tech. Not because Peter needed it as he found out when Stark takes his suit away, but because that is the universe his spidey lives in. However, at the end when he has to start over, he again realises that his value as a super hero is not diminished despite not having his tech. On top of that, he gets closer to a more accurate representation of the character because he starts over using things that only he designed and can do. He is a brilliant person and as such can do what a more traditional spidey would have done in making the things he needs to be Spiderman, be they simple or complex; from his webshooters which he has already developed, to making a new suit that does not need all that Stark tech to be effective, but also to not look as cheaply made as the one he wears in the first movie. Not only has his view of himself and his responsibilities as Spiderman changed, but he gets to demonstrate more faith in himself than he would if he had not been on this journey. I think it is great that he gets his new start as something closer to the original concept of Spiderman, which opens the door for more traditional Spiderman stories in the MCU. Great video, as is the part 1 movie breakdown you did. :)
reply
Level
This movie was definitely not very good as you are explaining.
Start and end of this movie was totally shit.
1. The last fight where all vilans fights 3 spiderman was totally flop. No good fight scene. No intense fight. And very small fight time.
2. There was such big cast of heroes and vilians that most of them didn't get justice for their roles. Including both other spiderman.
This is the same mistake as spiderman 3 where there were more vilans. Same failure.
3. There was never a good story building up throughout this film. Even casting spell just because he forgot to request MIT for his friends is bull shit. This is most idiotic start of Marvel story ever.
4. There were uselessly too much jokes by Ned throughout the movie. This never led the gravity build up in the film. Although, May died in the film.
I know you are big fan of Marvel movies. But please just for more content don't be baised towards it. Watching this movie 8 times makes me think you got very bad taste of films, even though your hidden details are great. I even regret for paying for 1 ticket of this film.
reply
This movie was definitely not very good as you are explaining.
Start and end of this movie was totally shit.
1. The last fight where all vilans fights 3 spiderman was totally flop. No good fight scene. No intense fight. And very small fight time.
2. There was such big cast of heroes and vilians that most of them didn't get justice for their roles. Including both other spiderman.
This is the same mistake as spiderman 3 where there were more vilans. Same failure.
3. There was never a good story building up throughout this film. Even casting spell just because he forgot to request MIT for his friends is bull shit. This is most idiotic start of Marvel story ever.
4. There were uselessly too much jokes by Ned throughout the movie. This never led the gravity build up in the film. Although, May died in the film.
I know you are big fan of Marvel movies. But please just for more content don't be baised towards it. Watching this movie 8 times makes me think you got very bad taste of films, even though your hidden details are great. I even regret for paying for 1 ticket of this film.
reply
Efai
I have to strongly disagree with your saying that chemistry between Spiderman and MJ just works. gosh, I said it about a million times, but here I go again, I really hate the decision they picked this homeless version of MJ for Tom. I still have a hard time to believe that this is the MJ in this universe. they're chemistry is totally not working for me and I was actually thrilled, when Tom didn't tell her, that he used to be her boyfriend. I know they eventually will ended up together in another movie, but for now, I'm happy they are not together. Toby has Kirsten and it wasn't perfect match, but it was somehow working. Andrew and Gwen were perfect and it was heartbreaking to see, how it ended up, but Tom and this homeless MJ is totally off for me and I really dislike this decision.
reply
I have to strongly disagree with your saying that chemistry between Spiderman and MJ just works. gosh, I said it about a million times, but here I go again, I really hate the decision they picked this homeless version of MJ for Tom. I still have a hard time to believe that this is the MJ in this universe. they're chemistry is totally not working for me and I was actually thrilled, when Tom didn't tell her, that he used to be her boyfriend. I know they eventually will ended up together in another movie, but for now, I'm happy they are not together. Toby has Kirsten and it wasn't perfect match, but it was somehow working. Andrew and Gwen were perfect and it was heartbreaking to see, how it ended up, but Tom and this homeless MJ is totally off for me and I really dislike this decision.
reply
Holymakinaw
Maybe I'm jaded but I thought it was all so BORING. We've all seen a zillion Spiderman movies already. time to take a good long break from it all. It's basically the same story over & over & over again. Flawed hero faces terribly daunting new challenge. Flawed hero is pushed to the brink of collapse by overwhelming new challenge. Flawed hero overcomes flaws to emerge victorious against new challenge. Wash, rinse, repeat.
reply
Maybe I'm jaded but I thought it was all so BORING. We've all seen a zillion Spiderman movies already. time to take a good long break from it all. It's basically the same story over & over & over again. Flawed hero faces terribly daunting new challenge. Flawed hero is pushed to the brink of collapse by overwhelming new challenge. Flawed hero overcomes flaws to emerge victorious against new challenge. Wash, rinse, repeat.
reply
JH_EFX
-SAD BUT BIG DETAIL YOU MAY HAVE MISSED-
The scene from school peter 1(tom) puts away norman's cure to the side he doesn't mention it.
Because he doesn't want to cure him. He wants to kill him for what norman did to may
You can see the conflict in peter 1(Tom) in this scene after peter 2 (Tobey)'s dialogue
To cure him.
reply
-SAD BUT BIG DETAIL YOU MAY HAVE MISSED-
The scene from school peter 1(tom) puts away norman's cure to the side he doesn't mention it.
Because he doesn't want to cure him. He wants to kill him for what norman did to may
You can see the conflict in peter 1(Tom) in this scene after peter 2 (Tobey)'s dialogue
To cure him.
reply
JH_EFX
-SAD BUT BIG DETAIL YOU MAY HAVE MISSED-
The scene from school peter 1(tom) puts away norman's cure to the side he doesn't mention it.
Because he doesn't want to cure him. He wants to kill him for what norman did to may
You can see the conflict in peter 1(Tom) in this scene after peter 2 (Tobey)'s dialogue
To cure him.
reply
-SAD BUT BIG DETAIL YOU MAY HAVE MISSED-
The scene from school peter 1(tom) puts away norman's cure to the side he doesn't mention it.
Because he doesn't want to cure him. He wants to kill him for what norman did to may
You can see the conflict in peter 1(Tom) in this scene after peter 2 (Tobey)'s dialogue
To cure him.
reply
JH_EFX
-SAD BUT BIG DETAIL YOU MAY HAVE MISSED-
The scene from school peter 1(tom) puts away norman's cure to the side he doesn't mention it.
Because he doesn't want to cure him. He wants to kill him for what norman did to may
You can see the conflict in peter 1(Tom) in this scene after peter 2 (Tobey)'s dialogue
To cure him.
reply
-SAD BUT BIG DETAIL YOU MAY HAVE MISSED-
The scene from school peter 1(tom) puts away norman's cure to the side he doesn't mention it.
Because he doesn't want to cure him. He wants to kill him for what norman did to may
You can see the conflict in peter 1(Tom) in this scene after peter 2 (Tobey)'s dialogue
To cure him.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
