Movies That Are Filled With The Most Ridiculous Mistakes
video description
The first one, especially if you are historical firearm buffs. During the Vietnam War montage, Logan has seen using what a supposed to be CAR-15 XM177, but somebody forgot the memo that M-16 upper receiver with brass deflector didn't exist until the 80s, with the updated M-16A2, and the first field tryout of M4 carbine.
The second one, during helo chase in the farmland. They are peppering Logan with an obvious M134 minigun, in reality, it makes an unmistakably whirling sound, due to extremely high rate of fire. Yet in the movie, the sound that appears is noticeably different.
Date: 2020-07-14
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 9
On
Gangs of New York, obvious miss, no way the lady survived that horrible scarring (a c section? she got, in the 1800s, with their limited medical tech. Also, Daniel Day and Leo and the rest cannot for the life of them device what accept they are making, even to the point that when the gangster gives his Five Points speech (which did not exist yet) his accent literally morphs from Irish to Bronx in the speech. The final narration does this for effect, but in this scene it should not have happened. Also in Gangs of New York, the post civil war navy did not have gunboats capable of shelling the harbor, nor would they have, if they could.
reply
Gangs of New York, obvious miss, no way the lady survived that horrible scarring (a c section? she got, in the 1800s, with their limited medical tech. Also, Daniel Day and Leo and the rest cannot for the life of them device what accept they are making, even to the point that when the gangster gives his Five Points speech (which did not exist yet) his accent literally morphs from Irish to Bronx in the speech. The final narration does this for effect, but in this scene it should not have happened. Also in Gangs of New York, the post civil war navy did not have gunboats capable of shelling the harbor, nor would they have, if they could.
reply
On
Titanic, you missed two really obvious mistakes. 1. The water in the room scene where Kate Winslet is suddenly her double, and they rotoscoped her face onto the double badly and as the water comes around said face, it floats above her skull. 2. The ship is tipping with the bow end up, and there is a man falling down the deck toward the sea. The dummy of the man strikes a metal part of the ship, one of the intakes, and it wobbles like it's made of rubber, which it is. And bonus 3rd that was fixed in the bluray, the sky is wrong.
reply
Titanic, you missed two really obvious mistakes. 1. The water in the room scene where Kate Winslet is suddenly her double, and they rotoscoped her face onto the double badly and as the water comes around said face, it floats above her skull. 2. The ship is tipping with the bow end up, and there is a man falling down the deck toward the sea. The dummy of the man strikes a metal part of the ship, one of the intakes, and it wobbles like it's made of rubber, which it is. And bonus 3rd that was fixed in the bluray, the sky is wrong.
reply
montecristo1845
The only thing I remember rolling my eyes about Pirates of the Caribbean Curse of the Black Pearl was when the two pirates dress up as two women in a rowboat as a distraction and the navy is like: HOLD YOUR FIRE (its just a couple of ladies out for a midnight row. in the middle of the ocean. miles from civilization. near an island that even we didnt know how to find without help. but other than that, completely normal event!
reply
The only thing I remember rolling my eyes about Pirates of the Caribbean Curse of the Black Pearl was when the two pirates dress up as two women in a rowboat as a distraction and the navy is like: HOLD YOUR FIRE (its just a couple of ladies out for a midnight row. in the middle of the ocean. miles from civilization. near an island that even we didnt know how to find without help. but other than that, completely normal event!
reply
Kev
Not a prop mistake, a plot hole that negates the entire reason for the movie in the first scenes. In the original Tomb Raider with Angelina Jolie she possesses one half of an triangle amulet and has to find and destroy the other half because if they're joined they could destroy the world. So why not just destroy the half you already have thus making it impossible for the two half's to be joined at all? Problem solved.
reply
Not a prop mistake, a plot hole that negates the entire reason for the movie in the first scenes. In the original Tomb Raider with Angelina Jolie she possesses one half of an triangle amulet and has to find and destroy the other half because if they're joined they could destroy the world. So why not just destroy the half you already have thus making it impossible for the two half's to be joined at all? Problem solved.
reply
El
Pirates of the Caribbean and the firearms, you are correct. They should have been reloading after one shot, muskets. But there have been many movies made where they have used the wrong firearm for the time period of the movie. There are even some old western movies where you almost never see the characters reload their weapons.
reply
Pirates of the Caribbean and the firearms, you are correct. They should have been reloading after one shot, muskets. But there have been many movies made where they have used the wrong firearm for the time period of the movie. There are even some old western movies where you almost never see the characters reload their weapons.
reply
Stuart
2: 59 Phantom of the Opera Raul in the water and the bubbles going downward reminded of a scene in Irwin Allen's movie Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea. In the scene the submarine is traveling under the Arctic icecap. The icecap is breaking up and huge chunks of ice are sinking and crashing down on the submarine.
reply
2: 59 Phantom of the Opera Raul in the water and the bubbles going downward reminded of a scene in Irwin Allen's movie Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea. In the scene the submarine is traveling under the Arctic icecap. The icecap is breaking up and huge chunks of ice are sinking and crashing down on the submarine.
reply
Dino
The rank of Commodore is the equivalent today of the US Rear Admiral (lower half. Its an actual rank, equal back then to a one star admiral. Peter Lorre's character in Irwin Allen's 1961 Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea movie was Commodore Lucius Emery.
reply
The rank of Commodore is the equivalent today of the US Rear Admiral (lower half. Its an actual rank, equal back then to a one star admiral. Peter Lorre's character in Irwin Allen's 1961 Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea movie was Commodore Lucius Emery.
reply
AlmostEthical
Any movie that disrespects gravity. If people (who aren't parkour experts) can fall from crazy heights and then get up and keep running, then you know that plot armour makes them invulnerable and any suspense is gone.
reply
Any movie that disrespects gravity. If people (who aren't parkour experts) can fall from crazy heights and then get up and keep running, then you know that plot armour makes them invulnerable and any suspense is gone.
reply
Jovan
I'm a Kansan. I've been too close for comfort to several tornadoes. I laughed my head off at 'Twister'. I think the only 'serious dramatic' film I've ever seen that was funnier was 'Prime Cut' with Lee Marvin and Gene Hackman.
reply
I'm a Kansan. I've been too close for comfort to several tornadoes. I laughed my head off at 'Twister'. I think the only 'serious dramatic' film I've ever seen that was funnier was 'Prime Cut' with Lee Marvin and Gene Hackman.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
