VehiclesFashionRecipesBlogsHuntTravelsSportFunHandmadeITEducation
Mini-Games
x

x
zakruti.com » IT - Software » PC World
Ray tracing in Battlefield 5: Live first reactions

Ray tracing in Battlefield 5: Live first reactions

FBTwitterReddit

video description

Rating: 4.0; Vote: 1
Gordon and Adam go live to check out raytracing in Battlefield 5 on an RTX 2080 Ti and Core i9-9900K spacemanjupiter: Something about the visuals in this game gives it a real generic look. The lighting in general is very unimpressive. Hardly any atmosphere either. The reflections are so inconsequential that I-m not even sure why the time was spent to implement it. What would be immediately noticeable, and 100% of the time, would be global illumination or RT shadows. If anything had 100% RT implemented the shadows would come by default. These cards are only doing a fraction of real ray tracing, and even at that it-s only approximate. I-m just not impressed at all yet by anything RTX. If you want to see what real ray tracing looks like, go watch a good Pixar movie. Once games are doing 100% real RT, that is what our game will look like. 10 years off still.
Date: 2022-03-15

Comments and reviews: 9


Ah I remember the good ol days when games like Crysis and technologies like shader 3. 0 were introduced and everyone was happy about the new visual fidelity even if 60 FPS and 1024 x 768 was the common resolution. Now a days everyone wants 144 FPS and 4K resolution while running on old tech with minor tweaks.
Go play your Fortnite and ancient CSGO at 144Hz 1440p and stop looking at new technologies that don't double your FPS and resolution.

reply

Odds are if you have something smart to say you either don't own an RTX card and you think it will always be in this primitive state. People said bad shit about VR and even that's come a long way. One day you'll literally be in your games and people will still talk shit. Haters gonna hate but they won't stop making it because you don't like it. I bought a 2070 so when ray tracing is more common and when it runs better I'm covered.
reply

The difference between the two: Without ray tracing puddles and other reflections are flipped and displayed on the puddle; while its on it simulates light rays bouncing off of surfaces and can display more and can display objects even if the aren't visible in the frame. For ex: A puddle under a car can display objects behind the car.
reply

-so how does that look. -
-ehh well it does kind of, uhhh maybe not so much. -
no its not worth 1200 dollars haha, 1200 dollars reaction would be like -HOLY SHIT LOOK, JUST LOOK AT IT, THIS IS GOING TO CHANGE GAMING FOREVER- even then id still wait for it to come down in price say 800 dollars or so

reply

Remember having a dedicated physx card? I hope Nvidia could bring that back but for Ray Tracing. Just buy one of the low end RTX gpus and run it with your main gaming GPU to enable and handle ray tracing effect. That way, we don't need to buy an entirely new GPU.
reply

well that was pretty mediocre. battlefield 4 which came out years back still look way better to me. damn, i just want this to get over with and see battlefield 6. cant believe activision did cod black ops justice.
reply

This is 1080, I doubt you can see the full potential at 1080. I also don't think is worth paying extra money just for some lightning effects, I rather get a used 1080ti for a fraction of the price of a 2080ti
reply

PC gamers are funny. Let's spend a house payment on a card that will help you see reflections in water. Yeah, seems legit. Makes me wonder how many of these people actually own homes.
reply

wow $1200 for what? WAIT until its all out. raytrace. $1200. to play at 1920x1080. man did NVIDIA really sucker people this time. bought something BEFORE it was even ready. sad
reply
Add a review, comment






Other channel videos