VehiclesFashionRecipesBlogsHuntTravelsSportFunHandmadeITEducation
Mini-Games
x

x
zakruti.com » Blogs and People » The New York Times
Do Australians Need a Sugar Intervention? Times Documentary

Do Australians Need a Sugar Intervention? Times Documentary

FBTwitterReddit

video description

Rating: 4.0; Vote: 1
Since 1990, the number of obese adults in Australia has tripled. Can a region built on the sugar industry turn down the sweets? William: I am surprised that the New York Times would produce this irresponsible propaganda film. It is absolutely true that sugary drinks are an important contributor to obesity. However, there are four sources of energy: protein, alcohol, carbohydrates, and fats. Mainly, it's down to carbs and fats. There was not even one mention of fats in this video. Fats that are low in saturated fat (such as canola, almonds) are beneficial in small daily amounts, but fats that are high in saturated fat (beef, dairy, cocoa, coconut) are deadly. Saturated fat causes strokes, heart attacks, cancer, and diabetes. All fats, good or bad, contribute to obesity. Alcohol lowers good cholesterol, causes inflammation of arteries, influences high blood pressure, and contributes to obesity. This video presents a popular, but deadly, misplaced emphasis. It would be very good if people would hydrate with water instead of sugary drinks, but they are being falsely reassured that sugar is the biggest problem.
Date: 2020-08-15

Comments and reviews: 9


Please note that we do have several sugar regions i. e. Ingham, Bundaberg, Ayr and Bowen. AND George Christiansen was behind the door when the brains were handed out and doesn't represent normal Australians. So it's normal to have to get a gastric bypass surgery? When are our politicians going to stop pandering to big companies and farmers and start putting in place policy that can fight the obesity epidemic.
reply

Taxing doesn't do anything. Vice taxes are a tax on the poor. HFCS is literally the only calories that people can afford in most cases.
It's not preferred because companies are the devil, it's preferred because corn is highly subsidized.
So by subsidizing corn and taxing sugar you are literally moving money from the poor to the richest companies in the world.

reply

Sugar and cocaine are two very pleasant things, but each of them is dangerous in its own way. Cocaine is a real criminal article and in the end a disappointment in life. But you can also drink coffee without sugar, if your life is already so sweet. so that all the pleasures of life that care for health and dyschhous rest rest.
reply

Yes, why not raise the cost of living here even higher? You lot have no place in telling us what needs to be done when your country is in complete disarray. Go fix that first, world police. I don't hate Americans. I hate people with mindsets like the ones we're seeing here - obnoxious and hypocritical.
reply

On average, every Australian is bitten by a shark 78 times a year. Approximately half of all these bites are in the groin area.
Considering these facts, JUST LET THEM EAT WHAT THEY WANT!
p. s. Fosters is Australian for beer.

reply

Seriously, George Christensen. Walk the walk. If you want to speak on sugar, you might want to try not to be morbidly obese. Sure, you have a right to be overweight, or smoke, or drink. It doesn't mean health promotion shouldn't act.
reply

Hey New York Times you got the issue right, now publish a huge a huge piece on the American Sugar Industry and how they know it is addictive yet they are pushing sugar into as many different foods as possible.
reply

Doesn't want the government to have control over sugar intake and diet, but is happy to travel to Malasia to undergo a serious surgery which it's only role is to control his food intake for him. Crazy.
reply

Sugar is a gateway drug, sugar doesn't grow in England but the English love sugar so obviously they had to get it from somewhere and once they got their hands on the main Supply they're total Junkies.
reply
Add a review, comment






Other channel videos