Donald Trump's Disgusting Puerto Rico Conspiracy, Hurricane Florence, Debby Ryan, Rihanna & More
video description
Date: 2019-11-01
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 9
Käthe Tobias
So for everyone running their mouths about how Puerto Rican officials should have been the ones distributing the supplies and aid that were delivered by FEMA, a couple of notes. 1. EVERYONE in Puerto Rico lost power for over a month. Everyone. All of Puerto Rico was without power. Thats not an issue of poor infrastructure, that was an effect of the hurricane. So, and this should go without saying, but here we are, no one had power, no one could use cell phones or internet, no one had food, and everyone needed disaster relief, INCLUDING government officials. 2. It absolutely is FEMAs job to distribute these supplies and aid to the people living in the areas they serve. It is not their job to dump supplies on an air strip and then leave. If you arent sure about this, you should do some research. 3. Puerto Rico is part of the United States. So when you talk about their government failing them youre making the same point as Phil. The federal government, who ultimately accepts responsibility for disaster relief, did indeed fail them. 4. Do you still feel upset/confused? Are you wondering if things are different because Puerto Rico is a territory rather than a state? Short answer, no. Long answer, here we are on the internet Its full of information and I suggest that you go find some, perhaps on a website ending. gov or. org. Find a textbook. Ask a librarian. There are lots of ways to answer your question besides posting them in a YouTube comment section phrased as Im not sure if. This inevitably turns into you deciding that your guesses are fact and we as a society cannot possibly elevate our public discourse if this is the standard we set for ourselves. Good luck, and lots of love
reply
So for everyone running their mouths about how Puerto Rican officials should have been the ones distributing the supplies and aid that were delivered by FEMA, a couple of notes. 1. EVERYONE in Puerto Rico lost power for over a month. Everyone. All of Puerto Rico was without power. Thats not an issue of poor infrastructure, that was an effect of the hurricane. So, and this should go without saying, but here we are, no one had power, no one could use cell phones or internet, no one had food, and everyone needed disaster relief, INCLUDING government officials. 2. It absolutely is FEMAs job to distribute these supplies and aid to the people living in the areas they serve. It is not their job to dump supplies on an air strip and then leave. If you arent sure about this, you should do some research. 3. Puerto Rico is part of the United States. So when you talk about their government failing them youre making the same point as Phil. The federal government, who ultimately accepts responsibility for disaster relief, did indeed fail them. 4. Do you still feel upset/confused? Are you wondering if things are different because Puerto Rico is a territory rather than a state? Short answer, no. Long answer, here we are on the internet Its full of information and I suggest that you go find some, perhaps on a website ending. gov or. org. Find a textbook. Ask a librarian. There are lots of ways to answer your question besides posting them in a YouTube comment section phrased as Im not sure if. This inevitably turns into you deciding that your guesses are fact and we as a society cannot possibly elevate our public discourse if this is the standard we set for ourselves. Good luck, and lots of love
reply
be engineering
Soooo, let's get this straight, if clean drinking water was a major cause of the deaths, how can we not draw a line to local government not doing their jobs, placing a large portion of blame at their feet, making their accusations toward others irrelevant. If Detroit got hit with a devastating crisis and you had people complaining about the tax payers not making it a shinning Metropolis that rivals all, and all you did was to fix the devastation that occurred from the tragic event. Wouldn't you be pissed off too. All I can say is if you have never seen this island, it's culture of political corruption, and lack of preparation for the inevitable over instant gratification I suggest taking a trip and putting your political correct hat away long enough for you to see what is really going on. The overwhelming amount of truck drivers charging doule, then triple, then quadruple for doing their jobs was well documented, and forced the federal government to send the national guard in to transport goods and services, this attitude is the norm for its population, overwhelming majority of these people will scam whatever they can from whoever they can. Make the trip and try your best to keep an open mind, then get back to us.
reply
Soooo, let's get this straight, if clean drinking water was a major cause of the deaths, how can we not draw a line to local government not doing their jobs, placing a large portion of blame at their feet, making their accusations toward others irrelevant. If Detroit got hit with a devastating crisis and you had people complaining about the tax payers not making it a shinning Metropolis that rivals all, and all you did was to fix the devastation that occurred from the tragic event. Wouldn't you be pissed off too. All I can say is if you have never seen this island, it's culture of political corruption, and lack of preparation for the inevitable over instant gratification I suggest taking a trip and putting your political correct hat away long enough for you to see what is really going on. The overwhelming amount of truck drivers charging doule, then triple, then quadruple for doing their jobs was well documented, and forced the federal government to send the national guard in to transport goods and services, this attitude is the norm for its population, overwhelming majority of these people will scam whatever they can from whoever they can. Make the trip and try your best to keep an open mind, then get back to us.
reply
Emmanuel Gonzalez Caseira
While I get were are you coming from Phil, you just can't accept Carmen Yulin Cruz's words at face value, specially when there is so much corruption that surrounds her, with her many, many times being mentioned as one of the causes. I myself I wouldn't have touched Puerto Rico no matter what, but that doesn't make Trump wrong in his assertions. Look at the hearings of Kavanaugh, the most noticeable example being Sen. Booker's little lame show about how he would breach the law if that meant the people could know. Politics are played this way, and the three thousand death toll, while it is a really sad tragedy, it indeed makes him look bad. I believe his comments came from a different understanding of the question before the death toll came to the front, and that is how was the immediate response after the hurricane hit Puerto Rico. That IS different from the lasting effects of said hurricane in Puerto Rico, specially with the many, MANY claims that the Puerto Rico government handled things in a really corrupt way. So you can't just take her words at face value Phil.
reply
While I get were are you coming from Phil, you just can't accept Carmen Yulin Cruz's words at face value, specially when there is so much corruption that surrounds her, with her many, many times being mentioned as one of the causes. I myself I wouldn't have touched Puerto Rico no matter what, but that doesn't make Trump wrong in his assertions. Look at the hearings of Kavanaugh, the most noticeable example being Sen. Booker's little lame show about how he would breach the law if that meant the people could know. Politics are played this way, and the three thousand death toll, while it is a really sad tragedy, it indeed makes him look bad. I believe his comments came from a different understanding of the question before the death toll came to the front, and that is how was the immediate response after the hurricane hit Puerto Rico. That IS different from the lasting effects of said hurricane in Puerto Rico, specially with the many, MANY claims that the Puerto Rico government handled things in a really corrupt way. So you can't just take her words at face value Phil.
reply
c daniela
The reason the death toll rose that way is because there was no way to accurately count the people who died during or after the storm. A lot of people were left unaccounted for and there was no way to contact police, hospitals, funeral homes or emergency services with the lack of communication and transportation. People would literally have to bury their deceased in their backyards or keep them in their homes until they could finally get to a funeral home or hospital, only to have no way of registering/documenting their death. A lot of people were buried or cremated at funeral homes without any type of documentation. As someone who was there when the hurricane happened, it pains me to know that people are undermining the deaths of so many people. I was fortunate not to have lost anybody, but a lot of people died, and I could care less who is to blame. I just hope that nobody has to go through the pain the families of these deceased went through. I hope this never has to happen again. Thank you for covering this story Phil, it means a lot.
reply
The reason the death toll rose that way is because there was no way to accurately count the people who died during or after the storm. A lot of people were left unaccounted for and there was no way to contact police, hospitals, funeral homes or emergency services with the lack of communication and transportation. People would literally have to bury their deceased in their backyards or keep them in their homes until they could finally get to a funeral home or hospital, only to have no way of registering/documenting their death. A lot of people were buried or cremated at funeral homes without any type of documentation. As someone who was there when the hurricane happened, it pains me to know that people are undermining the deaths of so many people. I was fortunate not to have lost anybody, but a lot of people died, and I could care less who is to blame. I just hope that nobody has to go through the pain the families of these deceased went through. I hope this never has to happen again. Thank you for covering this story Phil, it means a lot.
reply
rooktopwn
I know this is a bit late but about those shirt designs, they are god awful Because the print that clarifies the statement is so small it was bound to fail from the beginning. There was no hope of those shirts ever being a success. What would have been better in my opinion was to write positive responses to those quotes and then put the quotes themselves on a heavy card stock tag that promotes and explains the idea behind the line of clothing. That way the person who buys it isn't running around with something offensive emblazoned on their chest. Even if they wanted to keep the offensive quote they could have done better. The set up should have been reversed, with the clarifier up top in larger font, and the quote below in either equal or smaller font, giving emphasis to the explanation and message and not to the offensive material. All around it was just a shitty job and I'm honestly surprised it passed any sort of art/fashion director with any sense at all, accidental release or not.
reply
I know this is a bit late but about those shirt designs, they are god awful Because the print that clarifies the statement is so small it was bound to fail from the beginning. There was no hope of those shirts ever being a success. What would have been better in my opinion was to write positive responses to those quotes and then put the quotes themselves on a heavy card stock tag that promotes and explains the idea behind the line of clothing. That way the person who buys it isn't running around with something offensive emblazoned on their chest. Even if they wanted to keep the offensive quote they could have done better. The set up should have been reversed, with the clarifier up top in larger font, and the quote below in either equal or smaller font, giving emphasis to the explanation and message and not to the offensive material. All around it was just a shitty job and I'm honestly surprised it passed any sort of art/fashion director with any sense at all, accidental release or not.
reply
Noctis Headshot
Ok first of all we suffered a lot when Maria strikes down, many people have died due to the lack of basic needs such as food, water, no electricity, some cases that are robbery, etc. The fact is the President dont know when to help when many has a dire need. We are part of the U. S. territory and since many puerto ricans do work in the U. S, participated in any events to acts as troops in the battlefield and in the end to treat us like a herd or livestock and denying the fact that we need help or that we serve to our nation. President Trump is not a leader, he only runs the presidency to get more marketing business for his own guilty pleasures and divide all allies instead of unifying and helping those in need. The goverment in Puerto Rico is corrupt and still today we try to live in the best condition as possible. We will not forget this event and our fake leader's attitude
reply
Ok first of all we suffered a lot when Maria strikes down, many people have died due to the lack of basic needs such as food, water, no electricity, some cases that are robbery, etc. The fact is the President dont know when to help when many has a dire need. We are part of the U. S. territory and since many puerto ricans do work in the U. S, participated in any events to acts as troops in the battlefield and in the end to treat us like a herd or livestock and denying the fact that we need help or that we serve to our nation. President Trump is not a leader, he only runs the presidency to get more marketing business for his own guilty pleasures and divide all allies instead of unifying and helping those in need. The goverment in Puerto Rico is corrupt and still today we try to live in the best condition as possible. We will not forget this event and our fake leader's attitude
reply
Brandon DeFrenchi
Mr. DeFranco, you talk about the presidents twitter posts as if theyre real news. The president has been known to exaggerate things over the social media platform. Everyone knows that, but reporting things with no evidence to back it up is exactly what liberal media does on a daily basis. Im sure youve heard of TYT, theyre the perfect example of that. I havent seen your videos in awhile but would you even acknowledge the fact that Freedom of speech is under attack? That conservatives and conservative media is being silenced on social media? Would you even acknowledge that? The left seems to deem a conservative racist and their content hate speech and then systematically removed. Voices silenced. If any of you dont see that as a problem none of you are truly American, or youre so brainwashed that having your rights stripped away doesnt seem like such a bad thing to you.
reply
Mr. DeFranco, you talk about the presidents twitter posts as if theyre real news. The president has been known to exaggerate things over the social media platform. Everyone knows that, but reporting things with no evidence to back it up is exactly what liberal media does on a daily basis. Im sure youve heard of TYT, theyre the perfect example of that. I havent seen your videos in awhile but would you even acknowledge the fact that Freedom of speech is under attack? That conservatives and conservative media is being silenced on social media? Would you even acknowledge that? The left seems to deem a conservative racist and their content hate speech and then systematically removed. Voices silenced. If any of you dont see that as a problem none of you are truly American, or youre so brainwashed that having your rights stripped away doesnt seem like such a bad thing to you.
reply
Flynn
RE: Trump storyHe's insane. RE: InsatiableI strongly believe the controversy helped it to be renewed as it made it more popular. Many people will have consciously made the decision to watch it because they'll be thinking along the lines of Oh man, I need to see if this is really as bad/tone-deaf as it looks. RE: RevolveIt might seem a bit of a stretch here, but bear with me - this was fully intended. Yes, even with the payment to charity. Yes, even with all the negative press. Once your organisation has reached a certain size, there truly is no such thing as bad publicity. They just paid a small fee for millions of dollars worth of advertising and awareness-raising. A calculated and deliberate PR disaster, which we're seeing all the time these days. RE: HurricaneShameful. Politicians of any kind always seem to act in terms of short-term benefit, long-term loss.
reply
RE: Trump storyHe's insane. RE: InsatiableI strongly believe the controversy helped it to be renewed as it made it more popular. Many people will have consciously made the decision to watch it because they'll be thinking along the lines of Oh man, I need to see if this is really as bad/tone-deaf as it looks. RE: RevolveIt might seem a bit of a stretch here, but bear with me - this was fully intended. Yes, even with the payment to charity. Yes, even with all the negative press. Once your organisation has reached a certain size, there truly is no such thing as bad publicity. They just paid a small fee for millions of dollars worth of advertising and awareness-raising. A calculated and deliberate PR disaster, which we're seeing all the time these days. RE: HurricaneShameful. Politicians of any kind always seem to act in terms of short-term benefit, long-term loss.
reply
Tiptoe
(10: 10) Phil I just want you to know 32A to 34DD is not inclusive bra sizes whatsoever. A small is a 32-34. They have no M L or XL band sizes. Also many women have cup sizes up to H. Their brand only includes sized small torsos with big or small boobs relative to their frame. Not very inclusive. You can have a perfectly healthy weight, and still have a DDD+ cup, or larger than 34 band size. No, I don't think its wrong for her, or her shaming women in any way to release a line that limited. 34DD is the average bra size for women, so I'm sure that it was the best range to pick, since her line is brand new. I just wanted to point out that you shouldn't be using the sizes she's selling as an example of inclusive.
reply
(10: 10) Phil I just want you to know 32A to 34DD is not inclusive bra sizes whatsoever. A small is a 32-34. They have no M L or XL band sizes. Also many women have cup sizes up to H. Their brand only includes sized small torsos with big or small boobs relative to their frame. Not very inclusive. You can have a perfectly healthy weight, and still have a DDD+ cup, or larger than 34 band size. No, I don't think its wrong for her, or her shaming women in any way to release a line that limited. 34DD is the average bra size for women, so I'm sure that it was the best range to pick, since her line is brand new. I just wanted to point out that you shouldn't be using the sizes she's selling as an example of inclusive.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
18:20
12:52
16:12
12:19