Lucy: 3. 2 Million Year Old Mother of Man BBC
video description
The reconstructed skull would be recognized by a grade 3 student as falling into the ape family and not the human family f shown skulls of both.
Unfortunately these so called scientific thesis are made by the assumptions that evolution is a scientific fact.
It's always interesting that we manage to find these millions of year old transitional fossils ( 3 foot high apes ) and our closest human relative (Neanderthal / Human) and never the
transitional fossils between them. There should be an unlimited amount of these fossils between the two, and yet all we find are bits and pieces of fossils that belong to the ape family that are presented as early humans. Many of these with only a piece of a jaw or some other piece of bone.
And yes I know, science is self correcting. I'm glad certainly glad that many areas of science such as medicine and engineering abide by what the data shows and make any adjustments needed based on that.
Unfortunately, what is applied to evolutionary science is to pick bits and pieces of data that can fit into the thesis and omit or disregard the rest.
Date: 2020-08-24
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 9
Geo
This guy takes speculations to new a level.
First of all it's fascinating how any accurate depiction can be made from about
40% of a skeleton thats shattered into hundreds of pieces.
But not to fear. This time we get a hairless version of our 3' ft high ape like creature
represented with what appears to be human skin with no body hair.
Sorry, only a fashionable hairdo.
It's fascinating that these evolutionary paleontologists present this biased vivid
depiction of this obvious apelike creature with human features to support
their hypothesis when modern day forensic scientists have difficult job of
establishing a resemblance of their recently deceased subject.
They have the advantage of mass amounts of information, programs developed with
the specific purpose of helping to establish features based on testable subjects
and years of experience working with in some cases, thousands of bodies
over a career.
It; s about time that we recognize this type of nonsense for what it is which
is biased speculation based on an outdated theory that continues to fail
to meet the criteria that's required to meet scientific evidence.
reply
This guy takes speculations to new a level.
First of all it's fascinating how any accurate depiction can be made from about
40% of a skeleton thats shattered into hundreds of pieces.
But not to fear. This time we get a hairless version of our 3' ft high ape like creature
represented with what appears to be human skin with no body hair.
Sorry, only a fashionable hairdo.
It's fascinating that these evolutionary paleontologists present this biased vivid
depiction of this obvious apelike creature with human features to support
their hypothesis when modern day forensic scientists have difficult job of
establishing a resemblance of their recently deceased subject.
They have the advantage of mass amounts of information, programs developed with
the specific purpose of helping to establish features based on testable subjects
and years of experience working with in some cases, thousands of bodies
over a career.
It; s about time that we recognize this type of nonsense for what it is which
is biased speculation based on an outdated theory that continues to fail
to meet the criteria that's required to meet scientific evidence.
reply
Geo
Well, if anything the video shows the incredible leeway given to just about any misinformation or deceptive
presentation that supports the evolutionery ideology. It can be seen in the gross misrepresentation made in
in the video of the 300 other specimens which are represented as a crowd of complete skeletons when in
reality the 300 other specimens are nothing more then fragments of bones that could fit on a kitchen table
including Lucy's. Or the hairless mongol looking artists rendition of this completely bipedal person?
And thru all of these unquestionable postulations made by these obviously extremely bias Experts
Evaluations over a half of a century, these same experts that somehow can discern bipedalism cannot
discern a baboons vertebrate in the last half century of the most studied, examined and scanned fossil
by these Nobel Laurette's.
reply
Well, if anything the video shows the incredible leeway given to just about any misinformation or deceptive
presentation that supports the evolutionery ideology. It can be seen in the gross misrepresentation made in
in the video of the 300 other specimens which are represented as a crowd of complete skeletons when in
reality the 300 other specimens are nothing more then fragments of bones that could fit on a kitchen table
including Lucy's. Or the hairless mongol looking artists rendition of this completely bipedal person?
And thru all of these unquestionable postulations made by these obviously extremely bias Experts
Evaluations over a half of a century, these same experts that somehow can discern bipedalism cannot
discern a baboons vertebrate in the last half century of the most studied, examined and scanned fossil
by these Nobel Laurette's.
reply
Crucem
The bbc, guardian, nytimes etc etc published in 2016, The ancient human ancestor known as Lucy may have met her death more than 3m years ago when she tumbled out of a banana tree and crashed to the woodland floor, claimed by a team of evolutionist US researchers.
Poor monkey.
Lucy the Australopithecus monkey. Cranial capacity 375 cc, heavier musculature of the jawsthose muscles operating the intensive masticatory process for chewing plant material, Conical rib-cage found in today's non-human monkeys, like gorillas and chips. Manipulated bones pelvic girdle.
That's life story of your ancestor lucy, named after her father lucifer, the father of all lies; -)
You can call the monkey whatever you want, you can dress the monkey in silk, it's still a monkey.
reply
The bbc, guardian, nytimes etc etc published in 2016, The ancient human ancestor known as Lucy may have met her death more than 3m years ago when she tumbled out of a banana tree and crashed to the woodland floor, claimed by a team of evolutionist US researchers.
Poor monkey.
Lucy the Australopithecus monkey. Cranial capacity 375 cc, heavier musculature of the jawsthose muscles operating the intensive masticatory process for chewing plant material, Conical rib-cage found in today's non-human monkeys, like gorillas and chips. Manipulated bones pelvic girdle.
That's life story of your ancestor lucy, named after her father lucifer, the father of all lies; -)
You can call the monkey whatever you want, you can dress the monkey in silk, it's still a monkey.
reply
Monique
So in this eye, hermaphadite has a thick skeletal frame not as thick as Neanderthal but not like homo sapien and the nasal cavity lets us know they did not come from a cold climate (looking near the bridge of the nose where Neanderthal was wide) like Neanderthal. And the chosen weather pattern petter dish heat (which effected the beta fish near me) and cesspool was of interest as it seemed to comfort them and stifle humans also it almost killed pharaoh as the acidity in his water climbed too high changing his skin color and according to Machiah hes adapted that now scale color change. Monique Archey, pre history anthropologist and the ocean as former source wife of Machiah Archey
reply
So in this eye, hermaphadite has a thick skeletal frame not as thick as Neanderthal but not like homo sapien and the nasal cavity lets us know they did not come from a cold climate (looking near the bridge of the nose where Neanderthal was wide) like Neanderthal. And the chosen weather pattern petter dish heat (which effected the beta fish near me) and cesspool was of interest as it seemed to comfort them and stifle humans also it almost killed pharaoh as the acidity in his water climbed too high changing his skin color and according to Machiah hes adapted that now scale color change. Monique Archey, pre history anthropologist and the ocean as former source wife of Machiah Archey
reply
BeesKnees
A whole lot of uneducated people in these comments. If you still believe religion is more truthful than science then you gotta be one huge idiot. Religion will eventually die out and there will be no doubters of science. Religion was created so people could blame something or find something to keep them motivated to follow rules and laws. Religion is the biggest deceiver of them all. Science is based on facts, not some talking wizard in the sky.
reply
A whole lot of uneducated people in these comments. If you still believe religion is more truthful than science then you gotta be one huge idiot. Religion will eventually die out and there will be no doubters of science. Religion was created so people could blame something or find something to keep them motivated to follow rules and laws. Religion is the biggest deceiver of them all. Science is based on facts, not some talking wizard in the sky.
reply
Josiah
Lucy was an admited hoax, the man admitted to finding a wide range of bones scattered across three miles, and he put them together. He went specifically to find a missing link, and he fabricated the bone structure with different bones found scattered around the ground. People will stand in awh of anything scientists tell them.
reply
Lucy was an admited hoax, the man admitted to finding a wide range of bones scattered across three miles, and he put them together. He went specifically to find a missing link, and he fabricated the bone structure with different bones found scattered around the ground. People will stand in awh of anything scientists tell them.
reply
Peter
If there was only one Lucy, the interpretations could be challenged. But if there are over 400 individual remains of afarensis, then surely this will provide a strong picture of the species: namely, a relatively small, bipedal transitional species between troglodytes and sapiens.
reply
If there was only one Lucy, the interpretations could be challenged. But if there are over 400 individual remains of afarensis, then surely this will provide a strong picture of the species: namely, a relatively small, bipedal transitional species between troglodytes and sapiens.
reply
Monique
Neanderthals nasal cavity near the bridge was wide as they were in a cold climate and it recycled cold freezing air into warm air so they could breathe. Hermaphadite is different. As is homo sapien. Monique Archey, prehistory anthropologist
reply
Neanderthals nasal cavity near the bridge was wide as they were in a cold climate and it recycled cold freezing air into warm air so they could breathe. Hermaphadite is different. As is homo sapien. Monique Archey, prehistory anthropologist
reply
Al-Ikram
A lot of assumptions but nice try.
There is no feet bone in the pic but the animated pic gave her human like feet as well as, u could argue, a human like body with a shaved chimp head. It's misleading.
reply
A lot of assumptions but nice try.
There is no feet bone in the pic but the animated pic gave her human like feet as well as, u could argue, a human like body with a shaved chimp head. It's misleading.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
