Introduction to Intellectual Property: Crash Course IP 1
video description
Date: 2022-04-04
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 10
Tyler
Intelectual Property. its kind of seems like a made up think. to create a think tank. Like do you know how many catergories or Vocabulary words i could make up or put together, to create think tanks.
I choose to just know people how there intrests and abilities. ( a base ball field as many positions, a basketball team does too, different sizes and different abilities, all put together) its make a intellegence community or team. Thats what was needed. The cool thing about it is, it put everybody else who -bought into the think tank deal, like actually paid for it contracted it- Its put them to work for us, Americans. I seen the FBI logo, on a Intectual property website or contract for example, I heard thepresident talk about -Intellectual Property- for example. It means they bought into the -deal- they got sold.
Heres the stradedgy for hacker or somebody taking over inteclectual property.
I say -cool-, you believe in intelectual property, Im gonna make you stick to that. until your realize it sucks and holding you back, its causing you problems. Put them in there own think tank, then make them hate the think tank. Boom i conquered intelectual property and the people who made it, along with the people they sold it to, along with the contracts and work they have to do to try to keep up, they have to do work, to keep up to speed.
That is why is so important be honest, get your abilities out there, in writing in media, so you can expose the con artists. you get a following from it, its a good thing. A natural progression.
Whats the difference between Intelectual Property and a Entuerpuenuer. nothing really its the exact same word meaning, so why resell entuerpunuer influence, as -intelectual property-.
Trump Fires in California the ones burning up the cities and state, Is that that -Intellectual Property-? if i see it on T. V? a little flame map of the fires that say -Trump FIre- we can make intelectual property believers or professionals -think- about it, put it in there tank. Trump Fire. Alls we had to do is say it. write it or type it. The people he contracted to use Intecetecual Property stuff is going to be used by us, they will make it a -thing- for us for free Presidential Intellectual Property TGB the way i mean it.
They can fight to make it a -thing- if they want, maybe take it through congress a couple times.
Just be -American- its comes with all the good stuff. American intellegence is pretty awesome too. TGB the way i mean it. You guys called A. I. for awhile, i started developing it, American Intellegence TGB the way i mean it
reply
Intelectual Property. its kind of seems like a made up think. to create a think tank. Like do you know how many catergories or Vocabulary words i could make up or put together, to create think tanks.
I choose to just know people how there intrests and abilities. ( a base ball field as many positions, a basketball team does too, different sizes and different abilities, all put together) its make a intellegence community or team. Thats what was needed. The cool thing about it is, it put everybody else who -bought into the think tank deal, like actually paid for it contracted it- Its put them to work for us, Americans. I seen the FBI logo, on a Intectual property website or contract for example, I heard thepresident talk about -Intellectual Property- for example. It means they bought into the -deal- they got sold.
Heres the stradedgy for hacker or somebody taking over inteclectual property.
I say -cool-, you believe in intelectual property, Im gonna make you stick to that. until your realize it sucks and holding you back, its causing you problems. Put them in there own think tank, then make them hate the think tank. Boom i conquered intelectual property and the people who made it, along with the people they sold it to, along with the contracts and work they have to do to try to keep up, they have to do work, to keep up to speed.
That is why is so important be honest, get your abilities out there, in writing in media, so you can expose the con artists. you get a following from it, its a good thing. A natural progression.
Whats the difference between Intelectual Property and a Entuerpuenuer. nothing really its the exact same word meaning, so why resell entuerpunuer influence, as -intelectual property-.
Trump Fires in California the ones burning up the cities and state, Is that that -Intellectual Property-? if i see it on T. V? a little flame map of the fires that say -Trump FIre- we can make intelectual property believers or professionals -think- about it, put it in there tank. Trump Fire. Alls we had to do is say it. write it or type it. The people he contracted to use Intecetecual Property stuff is going to be used by us, they will make it a -thing- for us for free Presidential Intellectual Property TGB the way i mean it.
They can fight to make it a -thing- if they want, maybe take it through congress a couple times.
Just be -American- its comes with all the good stuff. American intellegence is pretty awesome too. TGB the way i mean it. You guys called A. I. for awhile, i started developing it, American Intellegence TGB the way i mean it
reply
Wardler
Intellectual property is bogus. Property rights are derived from our self ownership (which has it's own philosophical reasoning. You cannot believe in individual property rights and intellectual property at the same time.
Intellectual property espouses that if someone has an idea first, then they own that idea and all of it's effects and productions. It means if you have the same idea of any sort in your own mind, that the -original- person who thought it now owns a piece of your person. It means that if you open your mouth to sing, someone else owns the sounds coming from your labor.
Well, this is very clearly not true. Just because you listen to a song does not mean that the performer owns a piece of your person. And just because you sing a song does not mean the original performer now owns your labor. And in the same way if you copy digital bits in the same order as that in a sound file on another computer, that person does not own part of your hard drive.
IP is just another government farce--a mafia style monopoly. It flies in the face of the non-aggression principle. It is hardly different than the first apple farmer preventing a second apple farm from opening on the other side of the country--just because the apples look nearly identical.
reply
Intellectual property is bogus. Property rights are derived from our self ownership (which has it's own philosophical reasoning. You cannot believe in individual property rights and intellectual property at the same time.
Intellectual property espouses that if someone has an idea first, then they own that idea and all of it's effects and productions. It means if you have the same idea of any sort in your own mind, that the -original- person who thought it now owns a piece of your person. It means that if you open your mouth to sing, someone else owns the sounds coming from your labor.
Well, this is very clearly not true. Just because you listen to a song does not mean that the performer owns a piece of your person. And just because you sing a song does not mean the original performer now owns your labor. And in the same way if you copy digital bits in the same order as that in a sound file on another computer, that person does not own part of your hard drive.
IP is just another government farce--a mafia style monopoly. It flies in the face of the non-aggression principle. It is hardly different than the first apple farmer preventing a second apple farm from opening on the other side of the country--just because the apples look nearly identical.
reply
Wardler
Nonphysical property: well there is no such thing. Considering that all data is stored, used, or manipulated in some physical form. Be it a hard drive or groups of neurons in a person's brain, ideas are real physical property. It is hard to imagine that just because someone had a similar grouping of neurons first that they now own a piece of your brain. In the same way it is quite plausible that just because someone arranged bits & bytes in a particular order for a piece of software or a sound file that they now own a piece of your hard drive.
And if it is true that they do not own your brain or your hard drive or in fact your singing voice or artistic pen strokes then it is nothing less than assault under monopolistic intent should they extort money or use force or threats of force to impede on your voluntary and peaceful interaction with other people.
That is why IP is illegitimate. It is poorly disguised form of government mandated monopoly.
reply
Nonphysical property: well there is no such thing. Considering that all data is stored, used, or manipulated in some physical form. Be it a hard drive or groups of neurons in a person's brain, ideas are real physical property. It is hard to imagine that just because someone had a similar grouping of neurons first that they now own a piece of your brain. In the same way it is quite plausible that just because someone arranged bits & bytes in a particular order for a piece of software or a sound file that they now own a piece of your hard drive.
And if it is true that they do not own your brain or your hard drive or in fact your singing voice or artistic pen strokes then it is nothing less than assault under monopolistic intent should they extort money or use force or threats of force to impede on your voluntary and peaceful interaction with other people.
That is why IP is illegitimate. It is poorly disguised form of government mandated monopoly.
reply
Patrick
3: 00 balance the need to incentivise sharing of information and incentivise production of inventions) These two things are not really in opposition. The first doesn't need an incentive. The second is based on the idea that nobody invents things without a profit in mind. This is a specious argument, made by lawyers (who never have ideas) in support of their business. Companies need to start paying inventors without involving lawyers (whose only function is to create conflict.
reply
3: 00 balance the need to incentivise sharing of information and incentivise production of inventions) These two things are not really in opposition. The first doesn't need an incentive. The second is based on the idea that nobody invents things without a profit in mind. This is a specious argument, made by lawyers (who never have ideas) in support of their business. Companies need to start paying inventors without involving lawyers (whose only function is to create conflict.
reply
Navin
While others are busy wasting their time and joking around in the comments, I am going to give you actual feedback Mr. Muller. Please learn to read effectively from the teleprompter. It feels like a robot is reading. You are so fast that even a native English speaker will have to watch it twice to properly understand what the heck are you even saying.
reply
While others are busy wasting their time and joking around in the comments, I am going to give you actual feedback Mr. Muller. Please learn to read effectively from the teleprompter. It feels like a robot is reading. You are so fast that even a native English speaker will have to watch it twice to properly understand what the heck are you even saying.
reply
Michael
So as confusing as it sounds, I am creating training COURSES (multiple videos) that are on one of my websites where those who want to learn the subject pays my business, i. e. me a fee to view the video(s) on the course as an On-Demand. Therefore, do I copyright this, can I copyright it, do I set up a trademark, what?
reply
So as confusing as it sounds, I am creating training COURSES (multiple videos) that are on one of my websites where those who want to learn the subject pays my business, i. e. me a fee to view the video(s) on the course as an On-Demand. Therefore, do I copyright this, can I copyright it, do I set up a trademark, what?
reply
DarkenedWolf
My uncle was the first one to be charged by intelectual law he invented a way to make clean water using cat liter but he didnt alone in his university and when they found out they said it was theres even tho they had nothing to do with it but he got charged as he didnt want to give up the patent mad respect.
reply
My uncle was the first one to be charged by intelectual law he invented a way to make clean water using cat liter but he didnt alone in his university and when they found out they said it was theres even tho they had nothing to do with it but he got charged as he didnt want to give up the patent mad respect.
reply
Wardler
The primary objective of intellectual property law is to stifle innovation and prevent competition so that lazy business owners, writers, artists, or programmers can monopolize a particular product for their own monetary benefit.
reply
The primary objective of intellectual property law is to stifle innovation and prevent competition so that lazy business owners, writers, artists, or programmers can monopolize a particular product for their own monetary benefit.
reply
Tracy-allen
I am still confuseddddddddddddd. -----
Even the thought bubble hasn't helped me understand the concept fully. Why are we so conplexxxxxxxxxxx?
---
I give up. For now though. -
reply
I am still confuseddddddddddddd. -----
Even the thought bubble hasn't helped me understand the concept fully. Why are we so conplexxxxxxxxxxx?
---
I give up. For now though. -
reply
Curiously
I used to memorize phone numbers to everyone that was important to me and same went for them! Now I barely even know my own number since cell phones came out!
reply
I used to memorize phone numbers to everyone that was important to me and same went for them! Now I barely even know my own number since cell phones came out!
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
