Why couldn't Carthage defeat Rome? - The History of The Punic Wars - All Parts (264 BC -146 BC)
video description
The Second Punic War was what catapulted the Roman Republic into a meteoric rise in Mediterranean power. The war weeded out the incompetent and the weak in the Roman army and its leaders, thanks to the unforgiving school of warfare taught by Hannibal. The First Macedonian War actually happened during the Second Punic War and the Second Macedonian War took place after the latter ended. When the Legions were marching around Greece, it counted on a lot of veterans. At the Battle of Cynoscephelae, the Roman leader, Flaminius, was then a military tribune while on campaign against Hannibal in Italy.
On a related note to all this, with the Roman Republic beating Carthage, conquering Greece and beating the major powers of the Hellenic world, expanding their territory and riches? It corrupted the Republic. The Late Roman Republic was long series of social, political problems that would happen within the Republic that would eventually destroy it. The Roman Republic was not destroyed by an external conqueror. The Romans themselves would be its killer.\r\n
Date: 2023-12-16
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 29
-abdullahaltafg
The main reason Rome lost the 2nd Punic war was when Hannibal sent his brother Mago to Carthage to request reinforcements, he was met with displease by Hanno II, the wealthiest aristocrat in Carthage.
Hanno II feared that if Hannibal defeated Rome, he would become the Emperor of the Mediterranean. Placing Hannibal above him in authority.
He rejected the proposal by saying- If Hannibal is so good at winning against Rome, then why is he requesting reinforcements-.
He further insisted that they should establish peace with Rome instead of war.
He was also accused of helping the Romans build their fleet while he kept the Carthaginian navy at bay to buy some time for Rome to complete their fleet.
Also, he bribed aristocrats who were in favor of Hannibal and made every possible move to prevent reinforcements to Hannibal.
This was the main turning point of the war and Rome took advantage of this situation.
They knew Hannibal would not attempt to attack Rome so they assigned Scipio Africanus to attack Spain and force Hannibal out of Italy.
reply
The main reason Rome lost the 2nd Punic war was when Hannibal sent his brother Mago to Carthage to request reinforcements, he was met with displease by Hanno II, the wealthiest aristocrat in Carthage.
Hanno II feared that if Hannibal defeated Rome, he would become the Emperor of the Mediterranean. Placing Hannibal above him in authority.
He rejected the proposal by saying- If Hannibal is so good at winning against Rome, then why is he requesting reinforcements-.
He further insisted that they should establish peace with Rome instead of war.
He was also accused of helping the Romans build their fleet while he kept the Carthaginian navy at bay to buy some time for Rome to complete their fleet.
Also, he bribed aristocrats who were in favor of Hannibal and made every possible move to prevent reinforcements to Hannibal.
This was the main turning point of the war and Rome took advantage of this situation.
They knew Hannibal would not attempt to attack Rome so they assigned Scipio Africanus to attack Spain and force Hannibal out of Italy.
reply
-ziedhmili7196
Except the soviets in world war two there's no nation in history suffered such defeats and casualties like the Romans suffered in the first three years against Hannibal, so Hannibal had already reached his limits against Rome.
Why Carthage couldn't defeat Rome? 2 main reasons for that
First the population of Rome is six time the population of Carthage
Second reason is because the Roman army was composed by citizens soldiers instead of the Carthaginians full of mercenaries.
And yet the Punic wars were a formidable extraordinary fight.
In these wars we saw the biggest naval battle in history before the age of gun powder ( battle of derpana, we saw the crossing of the Alps the most wild move, the biggest ambush in history, Cannae, the extraordinary come back of the Romans in the two first wars, and finally in the last stand of Carthage how the Carthaginians women's cutted their hairs to made ship robes and their mass suicide after the surrender crying - fire and not the shame-.
reply
Except the soviets in world war two there's no nation in history suffered such defeats and casualties like the Romans suffered in the first three years against Hannibal, so Hannibal had already reached his limits against Rome.
Why Carthage couldn't defeat Rome? 2 main reasons for that
First the population of Rome is six time the population of Carthage
Second reason is because the Roman army was composed by citizens soldiers instead of the Carthaginians full of mercenaries.
And yet the Punic wars were a formidable extraordinary fight.
In these wars we saw the biggest naval battle in history before the age of gun powder ( battle of derpana, we saw the crossing of the Alps the most wild move, the biggest ambush in history, Cannae, the extraordinary come back of the Romans in the two first wars, and finally in the last stand of Carthage how the Carthaginians women's cutted their hairs to made ship robes and their mass suicide after the surrender crying - fire and not the shame-.
reply
-andread5560
The reason the cartaginian had not the capacity to defeat Rome was something they didn't undestood. Carthago used the defeated nation as a source of mercenary. Rome was totally different. When the romans conquered another town or country, they forbidden them from the possession of an army but obliged them to sends every year some young man to Rome and be trained to become part of a roman legion they had to wow loyalty to Rome and fight for at least 10 year under the simbol of Rome. This legionaries has in some way installed in to them the loyalty to Rome. When they got back to their town, they bringed the loialty to Rome back with them. That's why the social war was fought. 60 years after the 3rd punic War, the italian 'soci' fought against Rome to get citizenship. They won, and Rome gave them citizenship. Annibal hoped in an Italian rebellion against the roman. he was thinking as a cartaginian he didn't understood that the relationship of the Italian peoples with the romans was different.
reply
The reason the cartaginian had not the capacity to defeat Rome was something they didn't undestood. Carthago used the defeated nation as a source of mercenary. Rome was totally different. When the romans conquered another town or country, they forbidden them from the possession of an army but obliged them to sends every year some young man to Rome and be trained to become part of a roman legion they had to wow loyalty to Rome and fight for at least 10 year under the simbol of Rome. This legionaries has in some way installed in to them the loyalty to Rome. When they got back to their town, they bringed the loialty to Rome back with them. That's why the social war was fought. 60 years after the 3rd punic War, the italian 'soci' fought against Rome to get citizenship. They won, and Rome gave them citizenship. Annibal hoped in an Italian rebellion against the roman. he was thinking as a cartaginian he didn't understood that the relationship of the Italian peoples with the romans was different.
reply
-alex-ff1mp
Carthage lost because of (1) its own deep structure of power. Hannibal was an outsider, a land general disconnected from the maritime power and political power. The Carthage power was focused on trade and not on military. The rise of Hannibal family was considered an internal threat and so Hannibal was not supported in his actions. (2)In defense Carthage didn't had in depth defense - was heavily dependent on its marine; (3) Carthage didn't have the commitment to win this war. Carthage didn't envisioned ever to destroy Rome to the ground, just to subdue and to trade from superior position. (4) Human resources - this is debatable, Roma had the superiority but with alliances Hannibal could match this. (5) Carthage missed the opportunity to make alliances by consider them equals; Rome allows his allies to become romans.
reply
Carthage lost because of (1) its own deep structure of power. Hannibal was an outsider, a land general disconnected from the maritime power and political power. The Carthage power was focused on trade and not on military. The rise of Hannibal family was considered an internal threat and so Hannibal was not supported in his actions. (2)In defense Carthage didn't had in depth defense - was heavily dependent on its marine; (3) Carthage didn't have the commitment to win this war. Carthage didn't envisioned ever to destroy Rome to the ground, just to subdue and to trade from superior position. (4) Human resources - this is debatable, Roma had the superiority but with alliances Hannibal could match this. (5) Carthage missed the opportunity to make alliances by consider them equals; Rome allows his allies to become romans.
reply
-Henry-sd7vd
This is the best example of -tactics wins battles, logistics and strategy wins wars-. Rome was more unified and determined in their will to win and a distinct sense of being Roman. The Carthaginians just didn-t have the will and commitment nor unity to win. They were a mess of self serving merchants too focused on their own advancements. The Romans would-ve been extremely precarious had Hannibal and the senate coordinated and cooperated with each other.
Romans had their self serving individuals but they collectively knew what had to been done when it really mattered.
reply
This is the best example of -tactics wins battles, logistics and strategy wins wars-. Rome was more unified and determined in their will to win and a distinct sense of being Roman. The Carthaginians just didn-t have the will and commitment nor unity to win. They were a mess of self serving merchants too focused on their own advancements. The Romans would-ve been extremely precarious had Hannibal and the senate coordinated and cooperated with each other.
Romans had their self serving individuals but they collectively knew what had to been done when it really mattered.
reply
-ivandicivan4189
Romans already had navy prior to first war with Carthage, romans copyng stranded carthaginian ship is a myth by certain roman historians trying to make their victory appear grater. -
By the middle of third century BC Roman Republic conquered entire Central and Southern Italy which had many coastal cities with ports and naval tradition, many of those cities were Greek, chief of them probably being Tarentum, these cities became allies/vassals of Rome and gave their ships, crews and shipbuilding experience to roman armed forces.
reply
Romans already had navy prior to first war with Carthage, romans copyng stranded carthaginian ship is a myth by certain roman historians trying to make their victory appear grater. -
By the middle of third century BC Roman Republic conquered entire Central and Southern Italy which had many coastal cities with ports and naval tradition, many of those cities were Greek, chief of them probably being Tarentum, these cities became allies/vassals of Rome and gave their ships, crews and shipbuilding experience to roman armed forces.
reply
-Fearmylogic
This was more a video on how Carthage lost to Rome, and much less WHY they couldn't win. What made Carthage unable to mount a lasting defense? Why couldn't they compete with rome on a military level? Would have loved to learn more about Carthage, and less - well, things happened, Spring came around and Scipio launched a new siege, and this time it worked-. Talk about anti-climatic.
Sorry, this video was just too much of a high-level overview of what happened, and doesn't look into why events happened the way they did.
reply
This was more a video on how Carthage lost to Rome, and much less WHY they couldn't win. What made Carthage unable to mount a lasting defense? Why couldn't they compete with rome on a military level? Would have loved to learn more about Carthage, and less - well, things happened, Spring came around and Scipio launched a new siege, and this time it worked-. Talk about anti-climatic.
Sorry, this video was just too much of a high-level overview of what happened, and doesn't look into why events happened the way they did.
reply
-jaydk9321
Something sounds off with your audio. Did you intend to record it this loud, or did you use some other method to increase the volume before posting? in my opinion you need to use a de-esser to make it sound more pleasing at that level and cut back the loudness at least a little bit. And no people just turning down their volume doesnt fix the issue. It's really noticeable after completing your Story of Vlad series. Anway, just some constructive criticism, big fan of this type of history.
reply
Something sounds off with your audio. Did you intend to record it this loud, or did you use some other method to increase the volume before posting? in my opinion you need to use a de-esser to make it sound more pleasing at that level and cut back the loudness at least a little bit. And no people just turning down their volume doesnt fix the issue. It's really noticeable after completing your Story of Vlad series. Anway, just some constructive criticism, big fan of this type of history.
reply
-joegonzalez6241
The same reason they killed Ceasar at first. Then after they lost spain they had to focus on Carthage defense. So going with this frame of mine. You could conclude that he thought he could defeat rome by himself. Ignored his chances to escape and lead his country to ruin. As an overall leader. Not a very good one. As a raider he was successful but didn't know when to quit raiding.
reply
The same reason they killed Ceasar at first. Then after they lost spain they had to focus on Carthage defense. So going with this frame of mine. You could conclude that he thought he could defeat rome by himself. Ignored his chances to escape and lead his country to ruin. As an overall leader. Not a very good one. As a raider he was successful but didn't know when to quit raiding.
reply
knowledgia
Hannibal couldn-t conquer Rome (the city. Besides the very costly venture he was totally isolated from his homeland. No logistics, no replenishment. Carthage only managed to send Hannibal-s brother (Asdrubale) to his rescue, but alas he was intercepted and killed.
The only strategy open to Hannibal was the isolation of Rome from its Allie-s and vassals but even that did not work.
reply
Hannibal couldn-t conquer Rome (the city. Besides the very costly venture he was totally isolated from his homeland. No logistics, no replenishment. Carthage only managed to send Hannibal-s brother (Asdrubale) to his rescue, but alas he was intercepted and killed.
The only strategy open to Hannibal was the isolation of Rome from its Allie-s and vassals but even that did not work.
reply
-bhbluebird
Rome wasn't perfect, but relative to that time, Rome had more flexibility and a power structure that seemed to be less centralized and more merit based than Carthage's fragmented mercantile culture of self interest. Carthage had money, and resources, but Rome had a unifying idea of what Rome was and pragmatically knew how to disseminate it to other members of its hegemony.
reply
Rome wasn't perfect, but relative to that time, Rome had more flexibility and a power structure that seemed to be less centralized and more merit based than Carthage's fragmented mercantile culture of self interest. Carthage had money, and resources, but Rome had a unifying idea of what Rome was and pragmatically knew how to disseminate it to other members of its hegemony.
reply
knowledgia
You can't even fake Americans anymore play fake understand this when can't even understand how the truth protects freedom and Injust protects the just exactly your job and duty as we the people can't even fake Americans anymore disgrace to truth freedom and justice exactly you the problem with the country and the. One could fix and refuse to. So get the hell out
reply
You can't even fake Americans anymore play fake understand this when can't even understand how the truth protects freedom and Injust protects the just exactly your job and duty as we the people can't even fake Americans anymore disgrace to truth freedom and justice exactly you the problem with the country and the. One could fix and refuse to. So get the hell out
reply
-petermannheim6527
And what happened to the Punic folk did all of them get annihilated wouldnt this be a Genocid the Romans did. The Western people are a bit too fanboy like for the Romans it seems. This Nation Killed it seems an immense amount of people. Would be interesting too have some numbers and if they commited Genocides at how many cultures did they?
reply
And what happened to the Punic folk did all of them get annihilated wouldnt this be a Genocid the Romans did. The Western people are a bit too fanboy like for the Romans it seems. This Nation Killed it seems an immense amount of people. Would be interesting too have some numbers and if they commited Genocides at how many cultures did they?
reply
knowledgia
Struggling between Romen Empire and Carthaginian. punic wars tooks several deeply clashes. on Aebrian peninsula and northern Italy. Hannibal threatened rome capital itself. Romance invaded Carthage and imposed its conditions on Carthaginian state. Carthage became subdued vassals while nombedians skirmishes was humbled Carthaginian.
reply
Struggling between Romen Empire and Carthaginian. punic wars tooks several deeply clashes. on Aebrian peninsula and northern Italy. Hannibal threatened rome capital itself. Romance invaded Carthage and imposed its conditions on Carthaginian state. Carthage became subdued vassals while nombedians skirmishes was humbled Carthaginian.
reply
knowledgia
From what I understand, there were only two Italian cities that sided with Hannibal during the Second Punic War, namely Capua and Taranto. Both of these cities were heavily punished at the end of the war. All the inhabitants of the city of Taranto, including women and children, were employed for life in the salt mines.
reply
From what I understand, there were only two Italian cities that sided with Hannibal during the Second Punic War, namely Capua and Taranto. Both of these cities were heavily punished at the end of the war. All the inhabitants of the city of Taranto, including women and children, were employed for life in the salt mines.
reply
-PMMagro
Rome just expanded into Carthege's spheee of influnce (Sicily. Then bit by bit the Romans attacked and crushed Carthege. The -threat- to Rome is ridiculius. Not that Syracuse alone for very long was enough to stop Carthege taking all of Sicily so. if that was them aim why not ally with her instead of threathen her too?
reply
Rome just expanded into Carthege's spheee of influnce (Sicily. Then bit by bit the Romans attacked and crushed Carthege. The -threat- to Rome is ridiculius. Not that Syracuse alone for very long was enough to stop Carthege taking all of Sicily so. if that was them aim why not ally with her instead of threathen her too?
reply
-josephherrera6656
I have to say I am disappointed in this video. The tile says, why couldn't Carthage defeat Rome, so I was looking forward to a well thought out analyst of the Punic wars on why Carthage couldn't win. Instead, I just watch another generalized history video about the three Punic Wars. Real disappointed.
reply
I have to say I am disappointed in this video. The tile says, why couldn't Carthage defeat Rome, so I was looking forward to a well thought out analyst of the Punic wars on why Carthage couldn't win. Instead, I just watch another generalized history video about the three Punic Wars. Real disappointed.
reply
-LorolinAstori
You should have started at the earlier event, with a similar request by Italian mercenaries, yet did not result in Roman intervention.
Your Corvus is too far forward according to Polybius. Hamilcar fought for years during the first war.
Not sure why certain facts are ignored on the narrative.
reply
You should have started at the earlier event, with a similar request by Italian mercenaries, yet did not result in Roman intervention.
Your Corvus is too far forward according to Polybius. Hamilcar fought for years during the first war.
Not sure why certain facts are ignored on the narrative.
reply
knowledgia
I get that using AI art is very convenient for thumbnails, for example, but even i who is far from an expert can tell that the armour used in it is ridiculous and looks nothing like historical Roman and Punic armour. It makes me doubt the historical accuracy of the rest of the video.
reply
I get that using AI art is very convenient for thumbnails, for example, but even i who is far from an expert can tell that the armour used in it is ridiculous and looks nothing like historical Roman and Punic armour. It makes me doubt the historical accuracy of the rest of the video.
reply
knowledgia
The main reason rome won is because they did not believe in giving up and was willing to go as far as it took to get to where they were going I tell people sometimes how far will you go for who you are and what you believe in how far will you go.
reply
The main reason rome won is because they did not believe in giving up and was willing to go as far as it took to get to where they were going I tell people sometimes how far will you go for who you are and what you believe in how far will you go.
reply
-bandit6272
Regarding, -Hannibal-. as his guidance counselor, I think the kid has potential.
We did some aptitude tests and I think I've narrowed down his career choices to cook, or General. Will be interesting to see which he settles on.
reply
Regarding, -Hannibal-. as his guidance counselor, I think the kid has potential.
We did some aptitude tests and I think I've narrowed down his career choices to cook, or General. Will be interesting to see which he settles on.
reply
-thebatt6183
Carthage made mistakes and kept on making them Rome didn't. The Carthage was obsessed on all the wrong things Rome was large beautiful and powerful Carthage was insecure pathetic and weak and it was just what Rome needed
reply
Carthage made mistakes and kept on making them Rome didn't. The Carthage was obsessed on all the wrong things Rome was large beautiful and powerful Carthage was insecure pathetic and weak and it was just what Rome needed
reply
-tahu1349
Rome fell because it abandoned logic, reason and competency in leadership.
It descended into moral and cultural decline in Rome. Leaders indulged themselves in depravity and excess.
reply
Rome fell because it abandoned logic, reason and competency in leadership.
It descended into moral and cultural decline in Rome. Leaders indulged themselves in depravity and excess.
reply
-alexcc8664
Couldve eqsily crushed rome but some historians think he was too passive. He never eanted to crush rome, he just wanted ti force rhem to terms however rome wanted carthage crushed.
reply
Couldve eqsily crushed rome but some historians think he was too passive. He never eanted to crush rome, he just wanted ti force rhem to terms however rome wanted carthage crushed.
reply
-AI-cp1jg
Carthage, while rich, relied too much on mercenaries. Romans seemed to have been much more united as people. Hannibal didn't get much support from his own government.
reply
Carthage, while rich, relied too much on mercenaries. Romans seemed to have been much more united as people. Hannibal didn't get much support from his own government.
reply
-teaguytv
Lets not forget that despite Carthage's losses, Hannibal still marched elephants through the Alps in what could be one of the most wild moves in military history.
reply
Lets not forget that despite Carthage's losses, Hannibal still marched elephants through the Alps in what could be one of the most wild moves in military history.
reply
-hamzaolalekan3057
If Carthage had crush Rome probably Africa would dominate Europe, probably christianity won't have thrive this much. Rome sell Christianity to the world
reply
If Carthage had crush Rome probably Africa would dominate Europe, probably christianity won't have thrive this much. Rome sell Christianity to the world
reply
-ravenmoon5111
They lacked cohesion and focus. They refused to go all in when Hannibal had Rome on its back foot. Meanwhile Rome focused on gong all in as they always did
reply
They lacked cohesion and focus. They refused to go all in when Hannibal had Rome on its back foot. Meanwhile Rome focused on gong all in as they always did
reply
-thomas19994
So, this was a recap of all the Punic wars, and the only thing you didn-t was answering the questions: -why chartage could never win-- pretty useless video.
reply
So, this was a recap of all the Punic wars, and the only thing you didn-t was answering the questions: -why chartage could never win-- pretty useless video.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
