VehiclesFashionRecipesBlogsHuntTravelsSportFunHandmadeITEducation
Mini-Games
x

x
zakruti.com » Humor, fun and entertainment » Looper
The Truth About The Dark Knight Trilogy

The Truth About The Dark Knight Trilogy

FBTwitterReddit

video description

Rating: 4.0; Vote: 1
The Truth About The Dark Knight Trilogy Nickolaus: If one presidential figure, a singular authority, control the fate of a city or does the most, the people depend on him. That's why things get worse or just dysfunctional when they go away or if they die. This is why many good characters and diffuse plot is more functional than a singular savior hero with a plot that serves them or is dominated by them. . If the world depends on one figure and he cannot save it, the world dies. It cannot depend on one man and one man cannot save the people by himself. It takes friends. it takes millions of people, not all good, but all willing to do what's necessary to fight corruption, and overcome their crisis.
Date: 2020-07-14

Comments and reviews: 9


Nolan has no business making conic films. 1. Batman can't be real so a real take is a fail ij itself when everything in the film was no way could be real. 2. Nolan makes up his own characters. Batman lore is huge, doesn't need made up characters. 3. Batman states he doesn't kill but kills in all 3 films. 4. Batman doesn't quit. 5. Batman wouldn't turn his back on Gotham. 6. Batman stops crime. This Batman only cared about the mob. Not the muggers who took his parents. Man the list can go on with these films. I'm glad people love it but it took me years to stomach these films
reply

Trilogy as a whole is highly overrated. The best movie out of the three is definitely Batman Begins (hands down, then it when downhill with the storytelling and inconsistencies. Ledger was great though. Still don't understand why people revere the latter 2 installments of the trilogy. Visually stunning? Yes. Story, pacing and development? Very lacking or even absent.
reply

The Truth About The Dark Knight Trilogy?
It's _wildly_ overrated. A couple great performances (Heath Ledger, obviously, and Anne Hathaway) and some fun set pieces, but it mistakes grim seriousness for intelligence and depth, and prefers plot over logic.

reply

The difference between Batman & Superman is night & day. Batman is a self-made man -- all his abilities were earned. Superman is a character whose gifts were given to him at birth. To simply refer to Batman as dark is grossly mischaracterizing him.
reply

Better than endgame for sure it was full of plotholes
Thanos could have gone way back in 16th century with time stone from doc strange fight in IW, search mind stone before vision and any avenger is born, and boom finish the population

reply

Imagine if Heath Ledger was still alive at the time, couldve returned in in the Dark Knight Rises and Robin wouldve been properly introduced and would partner up with Batman, we probably couldve had 2 more movies
reply

I wanted to enjoy this but couldn't even finish it
You put way too many ads in there. Unbelievable amount of ads and worse. all the same ad. Its unfortunate things have come to this.

reply

15: 25 water can never be full of contagious diseases. Water may contain pathogens that cause disease, but cannot have diseases! The use of the word diseases here is wrong.
reply

It sucked. So. Bad. From Batmans ridiculous voice to Zimmers shitty score. There were some notable exceptions but overall it was laughably, horribly bad.
reply
Add a review, comment






Other channel videos