Intel i5-11600K, i9-11900K, & 11th Gen Price, Specs, Release Date, & Z590 vs. Z490 Differences
video description
Date: 2021-03-16
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 9
denvera1g1
13:33 a foot note missing from the chart: Westmere/Gulftown, the 32nm update to the 45nm Nehalem architecture. This update brought us 6 core 12 threads, higher clocks, 30% faster RAM, and noticeably better IPC to the i7 Xtreme/Xeon SP/DP platform(1366) with some benchmarks seeing as much as a 60% improvement core for core/clock for clock with 4 core variants being significantly more powerful, while using the same or less electricity.
Example: w5590(i7-975) VS x5687, the updated Westmere version that ran 270mhz faster for the same power. In some benchmarks would perform nearly 60% faster for the same power usage. Or the x5672, which ran only 130mhz slower than the Nahalem, but used about 25 less watts, even though it had the same all core turbo speed and still performed about 55% faster in some benchmarks(passmark)
Or take my 95w Xeon x5675, sure the turbo speed was slower than the i7 975x base speed, but that added IPC, and the two extra cores often meant it was twice the performance in many-core workloads, and in modern games that support more than 4 threads
My dual X5690s really blew the pants off of nehalem. In multi-core workloads, there wasnt much competition in the HEDT space until the i7 Xtremem x5960. Sure, this was 8 cores using only 155w, vs 12 cores using 320w but still, when i bought my x5690s, i was able to build an entire computer, plus high end GPU and water cooling, for less than the cost of the i7-5960x+motherboard, which still lost to the pair of Xeon x5690 in most multi-core workloads
reply
13:33 a foot note missing from the chart: Westmere/Gulftown, the 32nm update to the 45nm Nehalem architecture. This update brought us 6 core 12 threads, higher clocks, 30% faster RAM, and noticeably better IPC to the i7 Xtreme/Xeon SP/DP platform(1366) with some benchmarks seeing as much as a 60% improvement core for core/clock for clock with 4 core variants being significantly more powerful, while using the same or less electricity.
Example: w5590(i7-975) VS x5687, the updated Westmere version that ran 270mhz faster for the same power. In some benchmarks would perform nearly 60% faster for the same power usage. Or the x5672, which ran only 130mhz slower than the Nahalem, but used about 25 less watts, even though it had the same all core turbo speed and still performed about 55% faster in some benchmarks(passmark)
Or take my 95w Xeon x5675, sure the turbo speed was slower than the i7 975x base speed, but that added IPC, and the two extra cores often meant it was twice the performance in many-core workloads, and in modern games that support more than 4 threads
My dual X5690s really blew the pants off of nehalem. In multi-core workloads, there wasnt much competition in the HEDT space until the i7 Xtremem x5960. Sure, this was 8 cores using only 155w, vs 12 cores using 320w but still, when i bought my x5690s, i was able to build an entire computer, plus high end GPU and water cooling, for less than the cost of the i7-5960x+motherboard, which still lost to the pair of Xeon x5690 in most multi-core workloads
reply
ChaosHusky
From 13:30 to end of brief dig about Intel's naming: immediate laugh! Haha.. I had an i7-920, too..that's the platform and CPU i went to when converting from AMD, back in 2010! I miss those days sometimes..lol! It took me that long from 2008 when released to 2010 to save up enough to get one/finally realize AMD stuff was really terrible value, though the Phenom II i never got in favour of the i7 wasn't as much of a fail as the first Phenom i had come from! After the many incremental X2+ chips...oof. I wonder how many people forget the first Phenom was DDR2? I had the first native quad core (monolithic die)! Shame Core2 was still better.. And actually cost me a bit more than the i7 did...heh!
reply
From 13:30 to end of brief dig about Intel's naming: immediate laugh! Haha.. I had an i7-920, too..that's the platform and CPU i went to when converting from AMD, back in 2010! I miss those days sometimes..lol! It took me that long from 2008 when released to 2010 to save up enough to get one/finally realize AMD stuff was really terrible value, though the Phenom II i never got in favour of the i7 wasn't as much of a fail as the first Phenom i had come from! After the many incremental X2+ chips...oof. I wonder how many people forget the first Phenom was DDR2? I had the first native quad core (monolithic die)! Shame Core2 was still better.. And actually cost me a bit more than the i7 did...heh!
reply
twocows360
Second/third gen's reputation is definitely well-deserved. I built my budget gaming-oriented desktop in 2011 with a sandy bridge i3 processor (most of my loads are gpu-oriented, so it was fine at the time). It still hasn't failed but I finally swapped it out last year for an ivy bridge i5 with zero issues. Also have several laptops with sandy/ivy bridge that still work fine and are in use. So yeah, while the performance isn't exactly great in 2021, my experience has definitely been those chips are rock solid.
reply
Second/third gen's reputation is definitely well-deserved. I built my budget gaming-oriented desktop in 2011 with a sandy bridge i3 processor (most of my loads are gpu-oriented, so it was fine at the time). It still hasn't failed but I finally swapped it out last year for an ivy bridge i5 with zero issues. Also have several laptops with sandy/ivy bridge that still work fine and are in use. So yeah, while the performance isn't exactly great in 2021, my experience has definitely been those chips are rock solid.
reply
forferdeilig
This is complete speculation, but I wonder if someone made an error with the difference in convention for writing dates with the US vs some other countries, eg, as far as I know the US tend to write dates with month/day/year, and other countries might write them as day/month/year, so a release date that might have been 04/03/2021 in the US might be 3rd of April, but would be 4th of March in other regions
reply
This is complete speculation, but I wonder if someone made an error with the difference in convention for writing dates with the US vs some other countries, eg, as far as I know the US tend to write dates with month/day/year, and other countries might write them as day/month/year, so a release date that might have been 04/03/2021 in the US might be 3rd of April, but would be 4th of March in other regions
reply
oliknow
I still don't see myself buying a new 14nm cpu anymore. My older 9900KF will do just fine until a smaller Process is used by Intel. the ++++++ is only ridiculous. And also I wait for DDR5 until I get my next upgrade. Also I think 125W TDP on the ...900K(F) CPU is just not worth it. 9900K(F) only had 95W, which still a lot for such a small thing.
reply
I still don't see myself buying a new 14nm cpu anymore. My older 9900KF will do just fine until a smaller Process is used by Intel. the ++++++ is only ridiculous. And also I wait for DDR5 until I get my next upgrade. Also I think 125W TDP on the ...900K(F) CPU is just not worth it. 9900K(F) only had 95W, which still a lot for such a small thing.
reply
Baum
Up until the end of 2019 i was using a I7-960 . It was a good processor. I never was a huge AMD friend and was a little bit proud of my old system running that well after all the years. I replaced it with a Ryzen7 3700. I still think that was a brilliant decision when i see the stuff intel is doing Today...
reply
Up until the end of 2019 i was using a I7-960 . It was a good processor. I never was a huge AMD friend and was a little bit proud of my old system running that well after all the years. I replaced it with a Ryzen7 3700. I still think that was a brilliant decision when i see the stuff intel is doing Today...
reply
aboud
Half of the people here don't care much about Intel 11 Gen..
But they more interested in the release date..
Intel 11 Gen release = AMD Ryzen 5000 series Non-X release
5600 non-X version for 220-250 probably 1-2 month from now, personally am more interested in Ryzen 5700 for 350 (65 TDP)
reply
Half of the people here don't care much about Intel 11 Gen..
But they more interested in the release date..
Intel 11 Gen release = AMD Ryzen 5000 series Non-X release
5600 non-X version for 220-250 probably 1-2 month from now, personally am more interested in Ryzen 5700 for 350 (65 TDP)
reply
Lennie
...and I m sure you ll be able to count in millisecond the amount of time it will be in stock once it releases
These guys produce good solid content but it s hard to get interested in a new product release when you ll have to wait weeks or possibly months just to actually buy it
reply
...and I m sure you ll be able to count in millisecond the amount of time it will be in stock once it releases
These guys produce good solid content but it s hard to get interested in a new product release when you ll have to wait weeks or possibly months just to actually buy it
reply
Stefan
Can't wait for Testing on the
10 Different i5s......
And 10 Different 8core CPUs..
They are Probly great
But why just why it's so messy.
Have like 3 different.
One low power
One Middle ground normal
And last one Extreme.
This is just ridiculous
reply
Can't wait for Testing on the
10 Different i5s......
And 10 Different 8core CPUs..
They are Probly great
But why just why it's so messy.
Have like 3 different.
One low power
One Middle ground normal
And last one Extreme.
This is just ridiculous
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
