Amd ryzen 3 3300x vs. 3100 cpu review: an r3 is enough for gaming & clock-for-clock
video description
Date: 2020-05-08
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 10
Jesse
There you go, AMD fanboys. Your beloved 3300x is on par with a three year old ancient Intel quad core and still loses to it when said quad core is overclocked. Can y'all stop your shit now? Such an incessantly annoying and insufferable group of people. They're like your little kid brother who finally beat you at something and won't shut up about it
reply
There you go, AMD fanboys. Your beloved 3300x is on par with a three year old ancient Intel quad core and still loses to it when said quad core is overclocked. Can y'all stop your shit now? Such an incessantly annoying and insufferable group of people. They're like your little kid brother who finally beat you at something and won't shut up about it
reply
Stevey
In the early 2000s it really didn't matter what CPU you used, it's like the same thing now. It's cool, at the same time I'm no longer excited about CPU's. As anything from the past few years from either company will work just fine for games. Looking forward to the next GPU releases, not sure why AMD didn't drop the R5 3500's over here.
reply
In the early 2000s it really didn't matter what CPU you used, it's like the same thing now. It's cool, at the same time I'm no longer excited about CPU's. As anything from the past few years from either company will work just fine for games. Looking forward to the next GPU releases, not sure why AMD didn't drop the R5 3500's over here.
reply
excited
They must now be using pretty much every die they produce. With the 2+2 setup they can use dies where 2 cores in each ccx are bad and with the 3300 they can use dies where one ccx is bad with the 6 core cpus they can use a die where 1 on each is ccx is bad while binning the better ones into the 12 thread cpu.
reply
They must now be using pretty much every die they produce. With the 2+2 setup they can use dies where 2 cores in each ccx are bad and with the 3300 they can use dies where one ccx is bad with the 6 core cpus they can use a die where 1 on each is ccx is bad while binning the better ones into the 12 thread cpu.
reply
Steam
So AMD acknowledge that there is a problem with latency and they still release these two processors, one with latency problems and one without it. They released them so everyone can see the problem. The difference is obvious. The problem is in front of you. Can you see it ?
reply
So AMD acknowledge that there is a problem with latency and they still release these two processors, one with latency problems and one without it. They released them so everyone can see the problem. The difference is obvious. The problem is in front of you. Can you see it ?
reply
Chris
how many cpus will amd release in two years???? another medium to insignificant improvement release....like whta the 2nd gen was to 1st gen....stop producing cpus and fix the damn chipset and gpu drivers.....in ten years we will be at 20th gen if they keep that pace
reply
how many cpus will amd release in two years???? another medium to insignificant improvement release....like whta the 2nd gen was to 1st gen....stop producing cpus and fix the damn chipset and gpu drivers.....in ten years we will be at 20th gen if they keep that pace
reply
HecticGlenn
Do I buy this to pair with a 2070 or better? I'm waiting to buy my next build, I only really play VR and Valve games. I want to future proof and I'm upgrading my Vive to an Index so I need to save money somewhere and maybe the 3300X is that?
reply
Do I buy this to pair with a 2070 or better? I'm waiting to buy my next build, I only really play VR and Valve games. I want to future proof and I'm upgrading my Vive to an Index so I need to save money somewhere and maybe the 3300X is that?
reply
Bhume
I like how they managed to actually have a significant difference between these two CPUs instead of one just being a little bit higher clocked. It makes for interesting testing and seeing how much the latency between CCXs matters.
reply
I like how they managed to actually have a significant difference between these two CPUs instead of one just being a little bit higher clocked. It makes for interesting testing and seeing how much the latency between CCXs matters.
reply
Forecasting
Now the only thing for AMD to do now is to put this CPU intelligence into their graphic cards. That would be awesome to see. Sometimes you are ahead, sometimes you re behind, the race is long. Love seeing AMD s up-spiral
reply
Now the only thing for AMD to do now is to put this CPU intelligence into their graphic cards. That would be awesome to see. Sometimes you are ahead, sometimes you re behind, the race is long. Love seeing AMD s up-spiral
reply
TheRealYochoc
God what an absolute slap to the face. When I built my brother's rig three years ago the best value for high frame rates was the 7700k. Whatever black magic AMD is using, I'm excited to see what it can do for Zen3.
reply
God what an absolute slap to the face. When I built my brother's rig three years ago the best value for high frame rates was the 7700k. Whatever black magic AMD is using, I'm excited to see what it can do for Zen3.
reply
Teardown
Doubt AMD catching on has anything to do with it. More likely it just needed some SKUs to burn chiplets with defective cache slices or multiple defective cores within a single CCX on besides oddball EPYC configurations.
reply
Doubt AMD catching on has anything to do with it. More likely it just needed some SKUs to burn chiplets with defective cache slices or multiple defective cores within a single CCX on besides oddball EPYC configurations.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
