Netflix's Social Dilemma Is a Lie - The Hated One
video description
It would still permit unpersonalized advertising, and still allow companies to collect data for internal processing for a more ethical use, but not allow sharing that data with third parties in any way. All the useless AI models relying on user data would collapse along with the useless companies that run them, and other industries that are heavily dipping into data harvesting for profit (car industry, etc) would be put right back on track. There is absolutely no excuse to allow the mass violation of people's privacy solely for profit.
Date: 2022-03-20
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 8
Erik
9: 12 Kind of makes no sense since ProtonMail and Tutanoa aren't supposed to collect data and sell it anyway. The legislation they propose would merely incentivize smaller businesses from not infringing on your privacy and to build a privacy focused business model like ProtonMail (although ProtonMail has become more and more sketch)
reply
9: 12 Kind of makes no sense since ProtonMail and Tutanoa aren't supposed to collect data and sell it anyway. The legislation they propose would merely incentivize smaller businesses from not infringing on your privacy and to build a privacy focused business model like ProtonMail (although ProtonMail has become more and more sketch)
reply
FXEU
For someone who claims to tell the truth your use of terms (is YouTube -software- or rather a Service/BusinessModel) and facts (Shoshana Zuboff=-25-35 white guy/big tech reject-) is awfully sloppy. Sorry, but all I hear is a deeply flawed call for ad-driven business-models.
reply
For someone who claims to tell the truth your use of terms (is YouTube -software- or rather a Service/BusinessModel) and facts (Shoshana Zuboff=-25-35 white guy/big tech reject-) is awfully sloppy. Sorry, but all I hear is a deeply flawed call for ad-driven business-models.
reply
Chicken
What makes you so sure taxes on data collection wouldnt work? Why wouldnt it disincentivize big tech, even if it cuts into their bottom line? how are you so sure it would impact small businesses more, when they do so much less data collection per customer?
reply
What makes you so sure taxes on data collection wouldnt work? Why wouldnt it disincentivize big tech, even if it cuts into their bottom line? how are you so sure it would impact small businesses more, when they do so much less data collection per customer?
reply
Ronnie
Better than making all open-source is to just remove all the copyrighting laws and let people reverse engineer, copy ideas, whatever, just remove the burden of this unnecessary laws, allowing the market, people prosper
reply
Better than making all open-source is to just remove all the copyrighting laws and let people reverse engineer, copy ideas, whatever, just remove the burden of this unnecessary laws, allowing the market, people prosper
reply
Acethemain777
alas we'll never get the solutions proposed by hated one. This is because publicly traded companies are also partly owned by very rich people, who will bribe politicians to enforce this status quo.
reply
alas we'll never get the solutions proposed by hated one. This is because publicly traded companies are also partly owned by very rich people, who will bribe politicians to enforce this status quo.
reply
lukkash
The solution won't be applied by the most of people coz they would have to get more knowledge of data privacy & security issues.
Some of them think that using incognito window prevents from trackers.
reply
The solution won't be applied by the most of people coz they would have to get more knowledge of data privacy & security issues.
Some of them think that using incognito window prevents from trackers.
reply
LOl
Open soyce come on The hated one your not That hated by the algorithm cause you don-t use the term free software open soyce is a devolpment model not a philphosy
reply
Open soyce come on The hated one your not That hated by the algorithm cause you don-t use the term free software open soyce is a devolpment model not a philphosy
reply
Lalilu
Big corporations never want regulations but then they insist on having patents for their inventions. Patents are regulations! Hypocrisy at its finest.
reply
Big corporations never want regulations but then they insist on having patents for their inventions. Patents are regulations! Hypocrisy at its finest.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
