VehiclesFashionRecipesBlogsHuntTravelsSportFunHandmadeITEducation
Mini-Games
x

x
zakruti.com » Auto & Vehicles » Alex on Autos
2019 Mazda CX-5 Diesel - Its FINALLY Here

2019 Mazda CX-5 Diesel - Its FINALLY Here

FBTwitterReddit

video description

Rating: 4.0; Vote: 1
After years of promises, the impossible is finally around the corner: the 2019 CX-5 Diesel. Coming in July. But, do you really want one anymore? Let me know below. Glenn Stewart: So good to see. However, its a crying shame to see specs given how honest Mazda has been up until now. Back in 2012, Mazda could not get their diesel to meet strict EPA regulations, yet VW waltzed on in. We now know that VW had a trick up their sleeve. They cheated emissions by meeting EPA on a dyno, then failing miserably on the road. The German government and Japanese government (among others, went over their local diesels with a fine tooth comb. Although the German results were never made public, its common knowledge in the industry that all engines failed. In Japan, all failed apart from the diesel on the CX-5. The dyno emissions and road emissions were the same - and very honest. What many dont know is that Mazda is still the only low compression diesel manufacturer, and one of the main reasons for moving to low compression (the topic of numerous university studies, was lower true emissions. What we see in the specifications is Mazda having to serious de-tune, add a DEF and put their engine into submission to truely meet the very strict EPA emissions (which are twice as tough as Europes already tough Euro 6 requirements. To compare, in Australia (which neither need to comply with Euro 6 or EPA) has: 140kW 4, 500rpm, 450Nm 2, 000rpm, Combined 5. 7 L/100kmHighway 5. 2 L/100kmCity 6. 5 L/100kmWhich equates to: 187. 743HP (12% better than EPA killed model)331. 9ft lb (14% better than EPA killed model)Combined 41. 2657mpg (47% better than EPA killed model)Highway 45. 2336mpgCity 36. 1869mpgCost wise, the Australia spec 2. 2L diesel costs USD 2, 145 more than the 2. 5L (G) and USD 214. 5 more than the 2. 5L turbo. Its taken 12 years. The Mazda diesel though (despite this one being choked by the EPA, due to the fact that its the only low compression diesel on the market, is significantly more refined than any other competitor. The low compression means: 1. Significantly higher rpm than any regular compression diesel2. Lighter (which is obvious)3. Has much higher tone. For comparison, if parked between a gasoline Tiguan and a diesel Tiguan, would sound like it sat 1/2 between the two. Infact, when the engine first came out, reviewers in Australia said that the Mazda diesel was almost Tiguan petrol quick and almost Tiguan diesel economic. It has much more torque (in Australia) than the Tiguan, at a lower rpm - and hence made the Tiguan seem lethargic. 4. Unfortunately low compression means difficult cold starts, which is solved by recirculating exhaust on startup. This means that the trade off for one of the quietest diesels on the market, the start up is actually one of the most noisy.
Date: 2019-05-30

Comments and reviews: 9


The price simply isnt right. A forced purchase into a top trim (which I wouldve done anyway) with a 4, 000 increase on top of that will insure that all the money and time spent certifying this engine will be non-recoverable. Youll never sell enough of them to justify the effort. These arent F-150s where there are people willing to spend 50k-70k for loaded out trucks. Nor will enough luxury shoppers fill the showrooms to take up the slack. The compact CUV market isnt that lucrative. If you couldnt do it for 1/2 that (2, 000, it wouldve made more sense to kill off the effort entirely. Someone in marketing shouldve given engineering a target cost. If you cant get it done under that number, stop. I wondered why it took Mazda so long to make an EPA certified diesel. Maybe they were fighting their conscience for putting out such a hard cost proposition to justify. There really wasnt any need to feel guilty because I think few are willing to pay that price anyway. Problem solved. Like diesels but this one is a little too pricey to be competitive. Good luck with it.
reply

As others have noted Mazdas decision to release a diesel engine in the US is puzzling. Unlike most parts of the world diesels have never been popular for passenger vehicles in the US and the popularity they did enjoy was more or less destroyed by Dieselgate. Both Hyundai and KIA canceled plans to offer diesel versions of their (smaller) midsize SUVs (Sorento and Santa Fe) despite the fact that diesel Sorentos are more popular in many markets (e. g. Australia, Europe) than gasoline versions. VW, of course, has abandoned any pretense of selling diesels in North America and Mercedes Benz dropped plans to send several diesel models to the US in 2017. Mazdas own diesels are also popular outside North America so perhaps Mazda is just testing the waters in the hope that the US market is ready to look at diesels again. Otherwise, the only rationale I can imagine is that Mazda hopes to score some points in terms of their fleets CAFE ratings.
reply

Some of the comments on here must be made by people whove never owned a diesel vehicle or dont understand them. A lot of people buying the VW TDIs didnt have a clue what they were doing. They were seeing the words CLEAN DIESEL and jumping on the bandwagon. 1. You BUY a diesel car, you dont lease one. To get the benefit you need to drive the piss out of it and rack on serious miles. Diesel engines dont break in until at least 50k on the odo. So leasing is out. 2. Diesel engines HATE stop / start short driving. Getting a diesel engine hot over long drives is where they shine. Thats where you get the most reliability and MPGs. 3. BUYING a diesel car is a investment. Follow the above steps and youll see a return on that 4k price tag. Plus therell be plenty of life left in the car when the warranty is long gone. Even with the EPA regs, new diesels can still be just as reliable as the old. You just have to know what youre doing.
reply

Everyone is whining that it wont save you money. No, it wont. You are correct. But if you thought it would, you havent been paying attention to every diesel offered in the U. S. forever. Diesel fuel is more expensive than gasoline in the U. S. This has always been the case. Diesel engine options are more expensive to buy than their gasoline counterparts in the U. S. This has always been the case. The only reason to beg for diesel options in the U. S. is if you want to USE less fuel, not PAY less for fuel. Also, the diesel motor will last forever. (The same tired argument of it doesnt make sense to pay more for slightly better fuel economy has also been made when manufacturers offer a hybrid option at a premium to the standard gasoline offering. Again, its about USING less fuel, not PAYING less for fuel. And since there is a finite amount of fuel on this planet, using less is a good thing.
reply

I work at a Mazda Dealership and I will tell you right now no one will be buying one of these at all. We will probably only order one just because we have too. And it will sit. What a lame ass engine. We have waited years for it. Years ago we would have the occasional weirdo coming in asking about when the Diesel engine was going to arrive but they were far and few between. And that was back in 2012 when they promised everyone it was coming. At the time it would of been kinda neat but we werent too excited for it then either. Now with the major price increase and the Turbo 2. 5 engine as standard in the Signature and Reserve model why would you even want to consider a slow tractor motor for more money. Hilarious.
reply

Im sure this will do at least 30 mpg in the real world. Ive owned a couple diesels and they both beat the EPA rating by at least 10+ percent. I do love the characteristics of a diesel engine, but the premium price and the possibility of reliability issues with the high tech emissions systems that are in all modern diesels, it probably wouldnt be my choice. If I was buying a CX-5, Id most likely go with the 2. 5T. If it had more torque than the 2. 5, itd be a different story.
reply

That isnt an economically logical purchase. 4mpg at 4000. Then, for example, where I live the diesel is currently 35 cents a gallon more than gasoline; well I cant even begin to forecast how long youd have to keep that thing before it pays back the additional expense of the diesel. And is it a urea-based diesel where you have to refill that as well? That gets expensive too. So, basically far too little, too late and too expensive Mazda.
reply

If you get the gas 2. 5 turbo, you will probably end up buying premium gas to get the most out of it. That puts you in the same price range as diesel fuel in lots of places. Based on my past TDI experience, this diesel will probably end up getting close to 40 mpg Highway real world cruising. Especially the Mazda 6, with its more aero body. Almost 300 ft lbs of torque is nothing to sneeze at either.
reply

No, it is not worth it. Diesel fuel tends to be more expensive, the purchase price of the vehicle is very high, and I do not even want to think about the repair costs of a twin-turbo diesel engine (considering less than steller history of mazda diesel engines. And one more thing, does it have a DPF (diesel particulate filter? These things are absurdly expensive to replace.
reply
Add a review, comment






Other channel videos