VehiclesFashionRecipesBlogsHuntTravelsSportFunHandmadeITEducation
Mini-Games
x

x
zakruti.com » Knowledge, science, education » TED-Ed
Can you solve Dongle's Difficult Dilemma? - Dennis E. Shasha

Can you solve Dongle's Difficult Dilemma? - Dennis E. Shasha

FBTwitterReddit

video description

Rating: 4.5; Vote: 2
Can you solve Dongle's Difficult Dilemma? According to legend, three galactic terraformers shaped your planet into a paradise. When their work was done, they left the source of their power behind: three golden hexagons, hidden in dungeons full of traps and monsters. If one person were to bring all three together, they could reinvent the world however they saw fit. Can you collect the hexagons before your rival? Dennis E. Shasha shows how
Date: 2021-04-26

Comments and reviews: 10


I think there's a flaw in your solution. If you bet 24 on round 2, Gordon can win by betting also 24, not 25, which makes the gem standings 75-75 going into the silver round. I think what you should do is betting 25 on round 2, so that if Gordon let you wins round 2, the gem standings will be 50-48 as Gordon has to bet 51 on round 3, giving you guaranteed win as well (betting 17 on the first 2 rounds, then 16 on the rest giving you guaranteed win, and if you lost in any of the rounds which you bet 17, you just bet 17 in one of the even rounds where tie= Gordon win. If Gordon also bids 25 in round 2, the gem standings will be 75-74 going into silver round, which is concluded to be our guaranteed win. Correct me if I'm wrong and thanks for reading!
reply

I've been sitting here trying to figure this one out for an hour now and eventually i came to the conclusion its impossible. I then watch the answer and suddenly there is a new rule that you did'nt mention.
- You do not lose any gems if you lose the auktion.
As an afterthought its pretty obvious because that is how auktions work but i did'nt make that assumption since the first bet was 24-0.

reply

The thing is you need 3 of one type to use them at all. Meaning that, since there are only 3 golds and you already got one, the gold round is already over. It is absolutely nonsensical for Gordon or you to waste bids on hexagons that you can't even use, so both of you should bet 0.
At which point, you're left with a gem disatvantage on silver hexagons only and Gordon seems to win )

reply

This reminds me of a certain game with a blonde princess and a blonde knight that get reincarnated for eternity and have to face off a character that is named ganon. Maybe it s just me
reply

My brain: Are you gonna watch a ted Ed riddle?
Me: yes
My brain: you would neither be able to understand it nor solve it
Me: I'm still gonna watch tho

reply

A hexagonal piece of cheese is a lot better than a square piece of cheese. Can someone tell me what is this sentence meaning since my brain is to small to get it
reply

Hmm sorry I m a little confused. For round 2 of gold, why did Gordon bid X on my bid of X, knowing I would win the tie? Wouldn t he rather bid 0 or x+1?
reply

i think Nintendo and their lawyers would like a word. this is a joke from us gamers, if you get offended then you should stay away from the internet.
reply

Seems like Gordon is trying to make me lose all my money so he can have lots to win the crystals. So i have to make him lose his money
reply

Is it just me, or when I see someone sponsored by Brilliant, I feel like I ve been rickrolled and then slapped in the face 100 times?
reply
Add a review, comment






Other channel videos