The Ending Of The Cloverfield Paradox Explained
video description
There's a third dimension where Humans have figured out how to interact with the different dimensions in a controlled manner. Obviously it's not Earth 1 (the main crew's Earth, or Earth 2 (the Earth at war, because if either of those Earths had that kind of ability, they would simply just pull the knowledge they need from a dimension where the Shepard project was already successful.
Why help out other dimensions by lending them a hand?
The Earth that is controlling the disembodied hand has probably already saved itself and is trying to fix the multiverse by manipulating different dimensions in an effort to bring everything back to normal.
If the Cloverfield movies continue to build on a shared sci-fi setting, then eventually in Cloverfield 5 or 6 we might get into a super-advanced inter-dimensional war between the Earths that have saved themselves and the Earths that have fallen to the monsters/aliens.
Date: 2020-07-14
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 9
fanjoy
I enjoyed this movie I found it interesting, but I did not like the ending it was too cheesy. I think the ending of this movie should have been the ending of Cloverfield remember the splash. I think that would have left more mystery to the movie, and a better setup for a part 2/3 and so on.
I could see a part 2 with the Astronauts trying to get back to their HQ to let them know what really happened so maybe the could fix it while having to deal with the Cloverfield monsters. Which I also could see a flying version because too me anyway always looked like a bat without its wing membrane, plus all those flea-like things running around killing people. that could be a lot of fun, and heck maybe they find out their still not home, turn the whole thing into a Netflix version of Sliders crossed with the Mist.
Anyway I like it.
reply
I enjoyed this movie I found it interesting, but I did not like the ending it was too cheesy. I think the ending of this movie should have been the ending of Cloverfield remember the splash. I think that would have left more mystery to the movie, and a better setup for a part 2/3 and so on.
I could see a part 2 with the Astronauts trying to get back to their HQ to let them know what really happened so maybe the could fix it while having to deal with the Cloverfield monsters. Which I also could see a flying version because too me anyway always looked like a bat without its wing membrane, plus all those flea-like things running around killing people. that could be a lot of fun, and heck maybe they find out their still not home, turn the whole thing into a Netflix version of Sliders crossed with the Mist.
Anyway I like it.
reply
Joker
Yes there are God particles in the movie. Mina mentions the accelerator slammed a Higgs boson, and that's what caused the dimensional rift. And, since these particles theoretically can exist in more than one dimension, that's probably how the monsters get here. And, the past may be screwed as well. Also, they didn't save Earth 2. They most likely got a monster infestation as well. Plus, all the 3 movies take place on different Earths. The moment Clover appears in the first movie, THAT'S the exact moment the accelerator is activated in THIS universe. They screwed up all of time, space AND multiple Earths.
Fun fact. If you start Cloverfield and Cloverfield Paradox at the EXACT same time, the Clover monster in the first movie appears at the SAME TIME they activate the accelerator in the third movie!
reply
Yes there are God particles in the movie. Mina mentions the accelerator slammed a Higgs boson, and that's what caused the dimensional rift. And, since these particles theoretically can exist in more than one dimension, that's probably how the monsters get here. And, the past may be screwed as well. Also, they didn't save Earth 2. They most likely got a monster infestation as well. Plus, all the 3 movies take place on different Earths. The moment Clover appears in the first movie, THAT'S the exact moment the accelerator is activated in THIS universe. They screwed up all of time, space AND multiple Earths.
Fun fact. If you start Cloverfield and Cloverfield Paradox at the EXACT same time, the Clover monster in the first movie appears at the SAME TIME they activate the accelerator in the third movie!
reply
Brian
Paradox makes the other films even better IMO. Each film takes place in 3 separate dimensions and time periods. The events of Paradox caused a rift thru not only space, but time itself. So the event in 2028 of dimension #3 (Cloverfield Paradox) caused the monster to appear in 2008 of dimension #1 (Cloverfield) and aliens to appear in 2013 of dimension #2 (10 Cloverfield Lane. The next Cloverfield film will be called Overlord and takes place during WW2 of dimension #4 which will have a different reality most like affected by the Paradox event. Seems as tho there are many more dimensions which have demons, monsters, aliens, etc and the dimensions are all being fused because of the Paradox experiment. Even tho they are making it up as they go, it's still pretty clover. I mean clever.
reply
Paradox makes the other films even better IMO. Each film takes place in 3 separate dimensions and time periods. The events of Paradox caused a rift thru not only space, but time itself. So the event in 2028 of dimension #3 (Cloverfield Paradox) caused the monster to appear in 2008 of dimension #1 (Cloverfield) and aliens to appear in 2013 of dimension #2 (10 Cloverfield Lane. The next Cloverfield film will be called Overlord and takes place during WW2 of dimension #4 which will have a different reality most like affected by the Paradox event. Seems as tho there are many more dimensions which have demons, monsters, aliens, etc and the dimensions are all being fused because of the Paradox experiment. Even tho they are making it up as they go, it's still pretty clover. I mean clever.
reply
Hoganply
It did feel like a repurposed high-concept script for an unrelated sci-fi with the cloverfield connections just tacked on. The dialogue was clunky af, expository character scenes like the first one were redundant, the same exposition appearing later in the film, I was yelling stuff like 'chart the damn constellations, idiots! ' five minutes before the gyroscope-like mcguffin was mentioned. Funamentally, though, the rules of its universe weren't properly established. I thought it was going to explain things like why the nanobots killed Chris O'Dowd like a horror movie monster, like they were reprogrammed by and under the control the villain or something, but it was never explained. I expected them just to rip through him due to the magnetism.
reply
It did feel like a repurposed high-concept script for an unrelated sci-fi with the cloverfield connections just tacked on. The dialogue was clunky af, expository character scenes like the first one were redundant, the same exposition appearing later in the film, I was yelling stuff like 'chart the damn constellations, idiots! ' five minutes before the gyroscope-like mcguffin was mentioned. Funamentally, though, the rules of its universe weren't properly established. I thought it was going to explain things like why the nanobots killed Chris O'Dowd like a horror movie monster, like they were reprogrammed by and under the control the villain or something, but it was never explained. I expected them just to rip through him due to the magnetism.
reply
fanjoy
These movies are great, and I didn't even get into the first one with the shaky cam that much. It's grown into something super cool though now. Paradox and Cloverfield 10 Lane were very cool stories. I guess everyone just assumes that the monsters came from yet another dimension? My first guess was that they came from this other earth, which was why their station wasn't there, cause it had already failed creating their problems? Jensen didn't seem changed by the fact that they were going to help them make theirs work, and sacrificed everything to go after their station. I don't know, just theories, but that's why I love these movies is because of the deep, connected storylines. Which is why I was a Lost fan as well.
reply
These movies are great, and I didn't even get into the first one with the shaky cam that much. It's grown into something super cool though now. Paradox and Cloverfield 10 Lane were very cool stories. I guess everyone just assumes that the monsters came from yet another dimension? My first guess was that they came from this other earth, which was why their station wasn't there, cause it had already failed creating their problems? Jensen didn't seem changed by the fact that they were going to help them make theirs work, and sacrificed everything to go after their station. I don't know, just theories, but that's why I love these movies is because of the deep, connected storylines. Which is why I was a Lost fan as well.
reply
Laviv
When a movie needs explanations, suggestions and picturing of what did not occur on screen, it's just a lame film. Sure, one can create a series of movies from different beholders but leaving the connection to the last few seconds? It's like It is a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity. It is the middle ground between light and shadow, between science and superstition, and it lies between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge. This is the dimension of imagination. It is an area which we call the [Cloverfield] Zone.
reply
When a movie needs explanations, suggestions and picturing of what did not occur on screen, it's just a lame film. Sure, one can create a series of movies from different beholders but leaving the connection to the last few seconds? It's like It is a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity. It is the middle ground between light and shadow, between science and superstition, and it lies between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge. This is the dimension of imagination. It is an area which we call the [Cloverfield] Zone.
reply
Infamousllegacy
I think the first cloverfield and paradox might be in the same universe but at different times. The tagline of the movie is the future started it all, so even if paradox takes place in the future it's still a prequel to the 2008 film. When they ripped open a hole in time in space, they sent a monster back in time and the tageroto company just woke the monster up and back in the paradox movie at the end when they get back to they're earth, the monster is full grown because it's been alive for 18 years or so
reply
I think the first cloverfield and paradox might be in the same universe but at different times. The tagline of the movie is the future started it all, so even if paradox takes place in the future it's still a prequel to the 2008 film. When they ripped open a hole in time in space, they sent a monster back in time and the tageroto company just woke the monster up and back in the paradox movie at the end when they get back to they're earth, the monster is full grown because it's been alive for 18 years or so
reply
Mauro
Basically with that conspiracy speech, all the three movies can be on different timelines and parallel dimensions.
At least two dimensions were afflicted, but why not more? The big alien, on the first film is probably related to that seens at the end of the third, but what about the aliens in 10th Cloverfield Lane? They had an air force and ground hunters, seems a different kind of aliens to me.
In the end, chaos has been unleashed so, there are multiple options avaible to develop the saga further.
reply
Basically with that conspiracy speech, all the three movies can be on different timelines and parallel dimensions.
At least two dimensions were afflicted, but why not more? The big alien, on the first film is probably related to that seens at the end of the third, but what about the aliens in 10th Cloverfield Lane? They had an air force and ground hunters, seems a different kind of aliens to me.
In the end, chaos has been unleashed so, there are multiple options avaible to develop the saga further.
reply
Michael
It is almost as if you didn't even watch the movie. None of this needs explained. The person who coined the phrase cloverfield paradox explained it. The crew explained the god particle problem that created the rip in the fabric of reality.
The way they spoke early on about quantum entanglement and repeating the experiment the same flawed way would undo what they did made me worried they were going to retcon the whole series. I'm glad that didn't happen, at least.
reply
It is almost as if you didn't even watch the movie. None of this needs explained. The person who coined the phrase cloverfield paradox explained it. The crew explained the god particle problem that created the rip in the fabric of reality.
The way they spoke early on about quantum entanglement and repeating the experiment the same flawed way would undo what they did made me worried they were going to retcon the whole series. I'm glad that didn't happen, at least.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
