Top 10 Problems that Aladdin (2019) Fixed
video description
Date: 2023-11-20
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 30
123leyang321
10) Was it even necessary to answer that question? The point in the original was exactly to leave it up to speculation, that's why they took out the original draft part that explicitly shows the merchant as the Genie. Does every mystery need to have a straight up answer now?
9) Are you seriously discussing semantics there, really? It was obvious that they weren't supposed to touch things with the intention of taking them, bumping into things or touching for the sake of moving very clearly wouldn't have had any bad consequences, otherwise the mere act of touching the entrance's stairs with his feet would have caused Aladdin to die inside the cave. Not only that, but you want to commend the entire cave of the new movie over the old one because of mere semantics when the original made the cave look like an actual place of wonders, with so much gold that everything glowed yellow and had a mystic feel, while the new one pales in comparison. Yeah. No, the new cave is worse than the old one in every aspect.
8) Being more accurate to the culture is, of course, a good thing, so, yeah, that is indeed a fix.
7) I wouldn't say at all that the scene was a fix if the one thing you're commending it for is debatable and everything else was executed much worse than the original. The scene was special in the original because the carpet was the one in charge of the ride, not Aladdin, so Aladdin could focus entirely on the princess and enjoy the ride with her. The carpet was a super wingman there, accelerating quickly to get Jasmine to hold onto Aladdin, picking up a flower for him to give her, tossing clouds for them to play with, doing air tricks to bring them closer. The carpet totally set the perfect mood for them, slowing down and going fast at the best moments possible to maximize the romance points. And Aladdin being free from the duty of driving, he got way more direct interactions with Jasmine than in the new movie. So, no, the original is far better.
6) While removing cultural offenses is a good thing, the bit about slavery is more complicated. Yeah, slavery is bad and isn't something to brag about, but back at the time the story takes place in, culturally slavery was seen as good by the nobles, so. Being politically correct would mean not portraying the culture as accurately. When you praised better accuracy in a previous point. I am of the opinion that these aspects should be accurate even if they'll show the ugly side of things. We're not supposed to view slavery as good, we're supposed to feel disgusted that people in the past thought it was.
5) A bit more background on the mother is interesting, just sometimes they end up making it less about the mother and more about the politics without properly elaborating those politics, so in the end, it ends up stalling the story as opposed to giving it more depth. So, 50/50 there.
4) Eh, that's debatable. The sultan in the original was a dimwit, so he'd not ask, the population itself was quite ignorant so they wouldn't ever even think of asking, Jafar did inquire, and Jasmine at first didn't want anything to do with Aladdin, so she didn't bother (she wouldn't even care to meet him, why would she care to know anything about him, and after A Whole New World the story moved so quickly that there was no quiet time to add a scene for that. For an instance, the one time she'd have had a chance to ask him about his kingdom (which would have to be after she at the very least took any interest in him, so after their duet) would be about the time her father announced their marriage, but it was at that precise time Jafar appeared to reveal Aladdin's secret, so. Well, guess the questions she was going to ask are already answered before she got to ask them. But the new movie had different pacing and the characters were modified, so they opted to address that as a subplot. So it's not necessarily a fix, nor is it worse than the original, it's simply a different direction and the decision of whether it was better or not is entirely subjective.
3) Again debatable. You're giving Jafar too much credit, he was no evil genius in the original. His bird came up with some of the schemes in the story. It was entirely acceptable that he could be baited into making that wish, especially since he didn't even listen to the Genie when he tried to talk about the rules. He just had a superficial knowledge about the lamp having a djinn that grants 3 wishes. The thought that becoming a Genie would necessarily make him stuck to a lamp must've never crossed his mind (and it wasn't like that was common knowledge either, as even after being told of all the rules Aladdin still hadn't realized the Genie was stuck; and despite Jafar addressing the Genie as a slave, he could easily have assumed that particular djinn was stuck in a lamp, it's not like he questioned to origins of the lamp and its djinn inside it. Again, the new movie decided to change things, so they went a different path with a more Monkey's paw approach, so, yet again, this was just a different direction, not necessarily a fix or worse, so it's subjective too.
2) Elaborating Jasmine more is a great thing, absolutely. The new character. Not so much. Eh, she was tolerable, but didn't add anything actually interesting to the story, I honestly would have rather seen even more Jasmine and the Sultan interacting and their relationship with each other and Jasmine's mother even more developed than an extra character.
1) Hm, no? In the original the rules were never broken? Aladdin getting out of the cave without a wish by tricking the Genie into showing off was legit. Right after that the Genie warned that there would be no more freebies, so the wish to save Aladdin counts, despite him being unconscious, as it used the same scheme the new movie did to make that wish count (in the original, the Genie pretty much asks Aladdin if he wants to be saved and there's that animation of Aladdin's head floating up then drooping, so the Genie took that as a nod, meaning Yes to his question; in the new movie the Genie summons some magical contract that would bind Aladdin to have his life saved costing a wish regardless of whether he agreed or not and uses Aladdin's hand to sign, again, kinda taking advantage of the fact he was unconscious, so, yeah, the exact same trick and same issue at their core if you look beyond the surface; if anything, in the new movie that's even worse, because at the very least the first movie was more vague about what counts as making a wish, so Aladdin unconsciously nodding could easily be argued as an accidental wish - which would still count; now the new movie makes it that a wish requires rubbing the lamp while saying the wish, so it's a much more precise rule, but the Genie can simply invalidate that rule at will to save his master at the cost of a wish if the master happens to be unconscious.
reply
10) Was it even necessary to answer that question? The point in the original was exactly to leave it up to speculation, that's why they took out the original draft part that explicitly shows the merchant as the Genie. Does every mystery need to have a straight up answer now?
9) Are you seriously discussing semantics there, really? It was obvious that they weren't supposed to touch things with the intention of taking them, bumping into things or touching for the sake of moving very clearly wouldn't have had any bad consequences, otherwise the mere act of touching the entrance's stairs with his feet would have caused Aladdin to die inside the cave. Not only that, but you want to commend the entire cave of the new movie over the old one because of mere semantics when the original made the cave look like an actual place of wonders, with so much gold that everything glowed yellow and had a mystic feel, while the new one pales in comparison. Yeah. No, the new cave is worse than the old one in every aspect.
8) Being more accurate to the culture is, of course, a good thing, so, yeah, that is indeed a fix.
7) I wouldn't say at all that the scene was a fix if the one thing you're commending it for is debatable and everything else was executed much worse than the original. The scene was special in the original because the carpet was the one in charge of the ride, not Aladdin, so Aladdin could focus entirely on the princess and enjoy the ride with her. The carpet was a super wingman there, accelerating quickly to get Jasmine to hold onto Aladdin, picking up a flower for him to give her, tossing clouds for them to play with, doing air tricks to bring them closer. The carpet totally set the perfect mood for them, slowing down and going fast at the best moments possible to maximize the romance points. And Aladdin being free from the duty of driving, he got way more direct interactions with Jasmine than in the new movie. So, no, the original is far better.
6) While removing cultural offenses is a good thing, the bit about slavery is more complicated. Yeah, slavery is bad and isn't something to brag about, but back at the time the story takes place in, culturally slavery was seen as good by the nobles, so. Being politically correct would mean not portraying the culture as accurately. When you praised better accuracy in a previous point. I am of the opinion that these aspects should be accurate even if they'll show the ugly side of things. We're not supposed to view slavery as good, we're supposed to feel disgusted that people in the past thought it was.
5) A bit more background on the mother is interesting, just sometimes they end up making it less about the mother and more about the politics without properly elaborating those politics, so in the end, it ends up stalling the story as opposed to giving it more depth. So, 50/50 there.
4) Eh, that's debatable. The sultan in the original was a dimwit, so he'd not ask, the population itself was quite ignorant so they wouldn't ever even think of asking, Jafar did inquire, and Jasmine at first didn't want anything to do with Aladdin, so she didn't bother (she wouldn't even care to meet him, why would she care to know anything about him, and after A Whole New World the story moved so quickly that there was no quiet time to add a scene for that. For an instance, the one time she'd have had a chance to ask him about his kingdom (which would have to be after she at the very least took any interest in him, so after their duet) would be about the time her father announced their marriage, but it was at that precise time Jafar appeared to reveal Aladdin's secret, so. Well, guess the questions she was going to ask are already answered before she got to ask them. But the new movie had different pacing and the characters were modified, so they opted to address that as a subplot. So it's not necessarily a fix, nor is it worse than the original, it's simply a different direction and the decision of whether it was better or not is entirely subjective.
3) Again debatable. You're giving Jafar too much credit, he was no evil genius in the original. His bird came up with some of the schemes in the story. It was entirely acceptable that he could be baited into making that wish, especially since he didn't even listen to the Genie when he tried to talk about the rules. He just had a superficial knowledge about the lamp having a djinn that grants 3 wishes. The thought that becoming a Genie would necessarily make him stuck to a lamp must've never crossed his mind (and it wasn't like that was common knowledge either, as even after being told of all the rules Aladdin still hadn't realized the Genie was stuck; and despite Jafar addressing the Genie as a slave, he could easily have assumed that particular djinn was stuck in a lamp, it's not like he questioned to origins of the lamp and its djinn inside it. Again, the new movie decided to change things, so they went a different path with a more Monkey's paw approach, so, yet again, this was just a different direction, not necessarily a fix or worse, so it's subjective too.
2) Elaborating Jasmine more is a great thing, absolutely. The new character. Not so much. Eh, she was tolerable, but didn't add anything actually interesting to the story, I honestly would have rather seen even more Jasmine and the Sultan interacting and their relationship with each other and Jasmine's mother even more developed than an extra character.
1) Hm, no? In the original the rules were never broken? Aladdin getting out of the cave without a wish by tricking the Genie into showing off was legit. Right after that the Genie warned that there would be no more freebies, so the wish to save Aladdin counts, despite him being unconscious, as it used the same scheme the new movie did to make that wish count (in the original, the Genie pretty much asks Aladdin if he wants to be saved and there's that animation of Aladdin's head floating up then drooping, so the Genie took that as a nod, meaning Yes to his question; in the new movie the Genie summons some magical contract that would bind Aladdin to have his life saved costing a wish regardless of whether he agreed or not and uses Aladdin's hand to sign, again, kinda taking advantage of the fact he was unconscious, so, yeah, the exact same trick and same issue at their core if you look beyond the surface; if anything, in the new movie that's even worse, because at the very least the first movie was more vague about what counts as making a wish, so Aladdin unconsciously nodding could easily be argued as an accidental wish - which would still count; now the new movie makes it that a wish requires rubbing the lamp while saying the wish, so it's a much more precise rule, but the Genie can simply invalidate that rule at will to save his master at the cost of a wish if the master happens to be unconscious.
reply
Ich
Apart from Jasmine's bigger role, the remake was utter trash. It was a boring mess, the casting was decidedly mediocre, aside from Will Smith as the genie who was fine and Marwan Kenzari as Jafar who was horrible as he lacked even the slightest bit of charisma. Aladdin does not work without a charismatic Jafar!
# 10 the peddler is not a plothole, he is a narrative device. Not every question needs to be answered. He added to the fairy tale feeling of the original, which the remake thoroughly lacks.
# 9 cave of wonders - it is a minor difference. Don't touch anything just works better in a fairy tale and it's still rather obvious what is meant, active touch.
# 8 clothing - that is just character design in an animated movie. More often than not outfits don't change unless there is a narrative reason for it. Aladdin's design in particular is far superior in the animated version in my opinion. Once again for narrative reasons. He literally has nothing, not even a shirt.
# 7 A Whole New World - For a fairy tale, the animated version works better, but the remake does have its merits, a matter of opinion in this case
# 6 Arabian Nights - the racial stereotypes are a fair point, though I do have nostalgic feelings for the original version. But: Owning Slaves was a thing, there's no denying that. And it would have definitely been a status symbol at the time. (Granted, Agrabah is a fictional place set in a vaguely arabian inspired fictional place, but still) It feels disingenuous that the remake on the one hand ruins most of the flair of the movie under the banner of realism and then arbitrarily decides that this one thing that was realistic should not be?
# 5 Jasmine's mother was irrelevant for the original story. Given that the remake attempts to give Jasmine a more active role, these details seem appropriate, I agree.
# 4 Ababwa - unneccessary change. His entourage coming into the city were his credentials. While there were maps in those days and especially arabia had trade relations in impressively far away countries, a country being unknown because it was far away would not have been that outlandish. Besides, narratively, it was supposed to be a flimsy front.
# 3 Jafar's final wish - the original works much better, as it highlights Jafar's arrogance/hubris, making such a mistake being goaded by Aladdin while still riding the high of his rush of power.
# 2 Jasmine's bigger role - fair point from a modern perspective. Her new song was the only part of the remake I enjoyed.
# 1 the wishes - There was no change needed. The exact rules of genies were never specified, nor did they need to be. The genie was obviously compelled to fullfill wishes, but what did or did not constitute a wish seemed to be up to his interpretation when it wasn't obvious. He could obviously use magic outside of wishfullfilling, so the freebie out of the cave works. His assumption that Aladdin would definitely wish to NOT DIE also works within the room of interpretation the genie has. And it would also quite obviously use up one of Aladdin's wishes as the genie may not voluntarily give more freebies - I don't see any problem? Don't try to fix what isn't broken.
reply
Apart from Jasmine's bigger role, the remake was utter trash. It was a boring mess, the casting was decidedly mediocre, aside from Will Smith as the genie who was fine and Marwan Kenzari as Jafar who was horrible as he lacked even the slightest bit of charisma. Aladdin does not work without a charismatic Jafar!
# 10 the peddler is not a plothole, he is a narrative device. Not every question needs to be answered. He added to the fairy tale feeling of the original, which the remake thoroughly lacks.
# 9 cave of wonders - it is a minor difference. Don't touch anything just works better in a fairy tale and it's still rather obvious what is meant, active touch.
# 8 clothing - that is just character design in an animated movie. More often than not outfits don't change unless there is a narrative reason for it. Aladdin's design in particular is far superior in the animated version in my opinion. Once again for narrative reasons. He literally has nothing, not even a shirt.
# 7 A Whole New World - For a fairy tale, the animated version works better, but the remake does have its merits, a matter of opinion in this case
# 6 Arabian Nights - the racial stereotypes are a fair point, though I do have nostalgic feelings for the original version. But: Owning Slaves was a thing, there's no denying that. And it would have definitely been a status symbol at the time. (Granted, Agrabah is a fictional place set in a vaguely arabian inspired fictional place, but still) It feels disingenuous that the remake on the one hand ruins most of the flair of the movie under the banner of realism and then arbitrarily decides that this one thing that was realistic should not be?
# 5 Jasmine's mother was irrelevant for the original story. Given that the remake attempts to give Jasmine a more active role, these details seem appropriate, I agree.
# 4 Ababwa - unneccessary change. His entourage coming into the city were his credentials. While there were maps in those days and especially arabia had trade relations in impressively far away countries, a country being unknown because it was far away would not have been that outlandish. Besides, narratively, it was supposed to be a flimsy front.
# 3 Jafar's final wish - the original works much better, as it highlights Jafar's arrogance/hubris, making such a mistake being goaded by Aladdin while still riding the high of his rush of power.
# 2 Jasmine's bigger role - fair point from a modern perspective. Her new song was the only part of the remake I enjoyed.
# 1 the wishes - There was no change needed. The exact rules of genies were never specified, nor did they need to be. The genie was obviously compelled to fullfill wishes, but what did or did not constitute a wish seemed to be up to his interpretation when it wasn't obvious. He could obviously use magic outside of wishfullfilling, so the freebie out of the cave works. His assumption that Aladdin would definitely wish to NOT DIE also works within the room of interpretation the genie has. And it would also quite obviously use up one of Aladdin's wishes as the genie may not voluntarily give more freebies - I don't see any problem? Don't try to fix what isn't broken.
reply
keke
Aladdin was a small Chinese thief, he didn't even have a monkey and there is no parrot or flying carpet mentioned in the story, the action takes place in China, not in India or Arabia. The princess that Aladdin saw was never in love with Aladdin, only that Aladdin wanted her as his wife and did not hesitate to send his mother to ask for her from the King with the help of the spirit of the lamp that did not fulfill three wishes but how many the one who had the lamp wanted. Besides, the king had a suitor, but from the story it appears that Aladdin made the spirit of the lamp torment the poor prince. The wizard who found Aladdin could not enter the cave with the enchanted lamp, because the lamp was intended for Aladdin, however this wizard, apparently from Africa, collected magical objects and this was his main desire to get his hands on Aladdin's lamp. This wizard gives Aladdin a magic ring to help him if he gets into trouble while taking the lamp from the cave. I am disappointed by the change of story of Aladdin which is much more exciting than this ideal version of they lived happily ever after, this story is not a love story. Aladdin married the princess after many proofs of wealth were demanded of him, but their marriage was never for love.
reply
Aladdin was a small Chinese thief, he didn't even have a monkey and there is no parrot or flying carpet mentioned in the story, the action takes place in China, not in India or Arabia. The princess that Aladdin saw was never in love with Aladdin, only that Aladdin wanted her as his wife and did not hesitate to send his mother to ask for her from the King with the help of the spirit of the lamp that did not fulfill three wishes but how many the one who had the lamp wanted. Besides, the king had a suitor, but from the story it appears that Aladdin made the spirit of the lamp torment the poor prince. The wizard who found Aladdin could not enter the cave with the enchanted lamp, because the lamp was intended for Aladdin, however this wizard, apparently from Africa, collected magical objects and this was his main desire to get his hands on Aladdin's lamp. This wizard gives Aladdin a magic ring to help him if he gets into trouble while taking the lamp from the cave. I am disappointed by the change of story of Aladdin which is much more exciting than this ideal version of they lived happily ever after, this story is not a love story. Aladdin married the princess after many proofs of wealth were demanded of him, but their marriage was never for love.
reply
Alexandra
People complain about Jafar not being an obvious villain, but in many ways that's actually an improvement. In the original film, it's so mind blowing (at least to me) that no one suspected Jafar as a villain. But in the remake he's much more careful with how he presents himself to others. He manipulates events, and is mostly calm and collected. This allows the people around him to fall into his traps more easily. I can get why people are dissapointed, and I am a little seeing as I love the original aladdin, but I can see some benefits to Jafar's change. He's not some demon of pure evil. He's just a guy who wants power. He's smart about what he does, and makes sure people don't see him as a threat to the sultans rule.
reply
People complain about Jafar not being an obvious villain, but in many ways that's actually an improvement. In the original film, it's so mind blowing (at least to me) that no one suspected Jafar as a villain. But in the remake he's much more careful with how he presents himself to others. He manipulates events, and is mostly calm and collected. This allows the people around him to fall into his traps more easily. I can get why people are dissapointed, and I am a little seeing as I love the original aladdin, but I can see some benefits to Jafar's change. He's not some demon of pure evil. He's just a guy who wants power. He's smart about what he does, and makes sure people don't see him as a threat to the sultans rule.
reply
Genevieva
maybe it did fix some things, but that came with new plot holes and new issues. like, how would the new Jasmine not know how puchases work? how did they know Aladdin was the diamond in the rough? Jafar knew because Iago told him, but how did Iago know? also, this Aladdin's personality made it harder to believe he actually was the diamond in the rough. he didn't seem to be all that sorry about hesitating to set Genie free. and i really think in the original the dynamic between Jasmine and Aladdin-as-Prince-Ali worked better. in the new movie the whole thing seemed unsalvageable after the introduction scene. yet somehow it was resolved quite quickly once they spoke in private.
reply
maybe it did fix some things, but that came with new plot holes and new issues. like, how would the new Jasmine not know how puchases work? how did they know Aladdin was the diamond in the rough? Jafar knew because Iago told him, but how did Iago know? also, this Aladdin's personality made it harder to believe he actually was the diamond in the rough. he didn't seem to be all that sorry about hesitating to set Genie free. and i really think in the original the dynamic between Jasmine and Aladdin-as-Prince-Ali worked better. in the new movie the whole thing seemed unsalvageable after the introduction scene. yet somehow it was resolved quite quickly once they spoke in private.
reply
Buster
8: 00 there's grey area everywhere even in the recreation. Part of the wish is what the wisher is thinking in his head. It makes sense in the first one because, he became something quite powerful already and had complete control of the situation, he would of thought this was just an add-on, not realising that there are restraints regardless how powerful you are. He never speaks to the genie about his restraints anyway. You could argue Thanos, was dumb with destroying half of all life but the key too all evil masterminds is the belief they are right and never can be wrong
reply
8: 00 there's grey area everywhere even in the recreation. Part of the wish is what the wisher is thinking in his head. It makes sense in the first one because, he became something quite powerful already and had complete control of the situation, he would of thought this was just an add-on, not realising that there are restraints regardless how powerful you are. He never speaks to the genie about his restraints anyway. You could argue Thanos, was dumb with destroying half of all life but the key too all evil masterminds is the belief they are right and never can be wrong
reply
Ernesto
1992 version is just better. and no there was no need in even more emancipated princess when the original one from 1992 already did as she pleased and said no to old rules. Its just nothing more than a populistic insert into 2019 version. Love Will Smith but a rpaer trying to copy a great comedian doesnt work that well. Slavery is bad yes but its how it worked back then. There is no value in castrated imanciapted MODERN interpritations in every cartoon or movie. Its always getting better with drama and complexity not the other way around.
reply
1992 version is just better. and no there was no need in even more emancipated princess when the original one from 1992 already did as she pleased and said no to old rules. Its just nothing more than a populistic insert into 2019 version. Love Will Smith but a rpaer trying to copy a great comedian doesnt work that well. Slavery is bad yes but its how it worked back then. There is no value in castrated imanciapted MODERN interpritations in every cartoon or movie. Its always getting better with drama and complexity not the other way around.
reply
Buster
5: 48 ah. slaves and servants, it's more complicated than you think, in past times slaves were people who were forced servants because of a crime they committed usually, to be fare a lot of the law in the past was poorly defined and leaders kinda made up their own law on the spot so you can say the slaves were mistreated. But put simply like in Thor 3 the prisoners with Jobs, but I guess you shouldn't celebrate the prisoner's you have in a song, then again it's called poetic licence, LEAVE IT ALONE
reply
5: 48 ah. slaves and servants, it's more complicated than you think, in past times slaves were people who were forced servants because of a crime they committed usually, to be fare a lot of the law in the past was poorly defined and leaders kinda made up their own law on the spot so you can say the slaves were mistreated. But put simply like in Thor 3 the prisoners with Jobs, but I guess you shouldn't celebrate the prisoner's you have in a song, then again it's called poetic licence, LEAVE IT ALONE
reply
Buster
3: 30 honestly did not notice that reference with the dress. But I get it with not showing off everything in a live action movie but when it comes to animated who cares, not just that but hand drawing more details into every character so that certain character stands out takes ever much longer. I think the creative choices they took were fine and I thoroughly enjoyed it as a kid and still do today.
reply
3: 30 honestly did not notice that reference with the dress. But I get it with not showing off everything in a live action movie but when it comes to animated who cares, not just that but hand drawing more details into every character so that certain character stands out takes ever much longer. I think the creative choices they took were fine and I thoroughly enjoyed it as a kid and still do today.
reply
ahevex
No offense to anyone, to Disney, to the live action actors, but the 2019 Jafar was some shit. Not menacing at all, not scary at all, not villainous at all, not anything at all. His performance, voice, personality, aura and all that etc. (plus clothing and wardrobe too) really made him stand out and be different in the original animated version, where as in the new remake it was the exact opposite.
reply
No offense to anyone, to Disney, to the live action actors, but the 2019 Jafar was some shit. Not menacing at all, not scary at all, not villainous at all, not anything at all. His performance, voice, personality, aura and all that etc. (plus clothing and wardrobe too) really made him stand out and be different in the original animated version, where as in the new remake it was the exact opposite.
reply
iseeyou
The slavery part got removed are politically removed (not mad about it) but in the arab culture slavery was never a shaming matter, slaves were family, some of them are also parents to children and they have all the human rights. Some of those slaves ruled kingdoms. Slaves was not anything bad and never exclusive to a specific race and they can be easily freed.
reply
The slavery part got removed are politically removed (not mad about it) but in the arab culture slavery was never a shaming matter, slaves were family, some of them are also parents to children and they have all the human rights. Some of those slaves ruled kingdoms. Slaves was not anything bad and never exclusive to a specific race and they can be easily freed.
reply
Kahena
Jasmine is one of the Awesome Disney Princesses because she stands up for what she believes in, and she is compassionate, strong and independent plus she is one of my favorites and I love how she will never up and doing whats best for her Family and Friends and she does have the same characteristics with some of the princess like Ariel and Mulan.
reply
Jasmine is one of the Awesome Disney Princesses because she stands up for what she believes in, and she is compassionate, strong and independent plus she is one of my favorites and I love how she will never up and doing whats best for her Family and Friends and she does have the same characteristics with some of the princess like Ariel and Mulan.
reply
Ravi
Please add subtitles because auto generated captions are not very accurate.
I agree with Foxy. I also thought sailor was just a commoner who had heard these tales and was now telling those tales to children.
I thought Will Smith was playing two different characters just like Jake Nicholson in Mars Attacks.
reply
Please add subtitles because auto generated captions are not very accurate.
I agree with Foxy. I also thought sailor was just a commoner who had heard these tales and was now telling those tales to children.
I thought Will Smith was playing two different characters just like Jake Nicholson in Mars Attacks.
reply
Sammie
I saw the 2019 Aladdin in the theater. I'm 31 and sadly I didn't think the live action one was as good as the original. Robin Williams was especially a way better genie than Will Smith. A Whole New World especially was a lot sweeter and better in the original and Jafar was more of a villain in the original too
reply
I saw the 2019 Aladdin in the theater. I'm 31 and sadly I didn't think the live action one was as good as the original. Robin Williams was especially a way better genie than Will Smith. A Whole New World especially was a lot sweeter and better in the original and Jafar was more of a villain in the original too
reply
Taisha
I likes how Aladdin knew right away she was from the palace, and jasmine pretending to be the handmaid was so cool. Also though it makes it more foolish for Aladdin to not tell her the truth when she loved him and pretended for him before he was a prince.
reply
I likes how Aladdin knew right away she was from the palace, and jasmine pretending to be the handmaid was so cool. Also though it makes it more foolish for Aladdin to not tell her the truth when she loved him and pretended for him before he was a prince.
reply
Nadira
I feel that Jafar was more of a drama king in the live remake, I kinda wished he was more fleshed out but will not deny it is a great movie. Ido understand how difficult it is to fit everything in a single movie, even one as long as 2. 5hours.
reply
I feel that Jafar was more of a drama king in the live remake, I kinda wished he was more fleshed out but will not deny it is a great movie. Ido understand how difficult it is to fit everything in a single movie, even one as long as 2. 5hours.
reply
Buster
4: 45 It's a magic carpet it might have properties that slow down time when your on it. With modern tech for this live action, they could easily add in detail, again same as previous point about time and energy to create a diverse landscape
reply
4: 45 It's a magic carpet it might have properties that slow down time when your on it. With modern tech for this live action, they could easily add in detail, again same as previous point about time and energy to create a diverse landscape
reply
Will
Honestly though with a whole new world it made sense to see the animated version because that's what started the TV show and series as you can't get away with that having it local in Agrabah in a live spin-off series of Aladdin.
reply
Honestly though with a whole new world it made sense to see the animated version because that's what started the TV show and series as you can't get away with that having it local in Agrabah in a live spin-off series of Aladdin.
reply
Johnathan
This is why the live action movies are better. More back story for characters, stronger character development, the princess is not a damsel in distress, princess is stronger and more relatable and doesn't cry like a child.
reply
This is why the live action movies are better. More back story for characters, stronger character development, the princess is not a damsel in distress, princess is stronger and more relatable and doesn't cry like a child.
reply
KD
This movie is actually great. It is my top 1 live action disney. Because they are all very flexible especially in the singing and dancing performance. Next to it is maleficent 1&2 then 3rd is Cinderella.
reply
This movie is actually great. It is my top 1 live action disney. Because they are all very flexible especially in the singing and dancing performance. Next to it is maleficent 1&2 then 3rd is Cinderella.
reply
Buster
1: 40 I never thought this was a problem. And it has been common for animated movies to use more than one actor to do multiple voices in factor Robin enjoyed doing that. Ever watched Mrs. Doubtfire?
reply
1: 40 I never thought this was a problem. And it has been common for animated movies to use more than one actor to do multiple voices in factor Robin enjoyed doing that. Ever watched Mrs. Doubtfire?
reply
Gnolihz
major change i think is the first do you trust me scene (on Aladdin house) that removed in live action version. Disney replace it with Aladdin touch Jasmine hair to make Jasmin recognise him
reply
major change i think is the first do you trust me scene (on Aladdin house) that removed in live action version. Disney replace it with Aladdin touch Jasmine hair to make Jasmin recognise him
reply
Buster
5: 25 as long as it's all catchy, then well done but why was the Sunday to Friday thing not changed for the VHS, was it something only brought up over decade later?
reply
5: 25 as long as it's all catchy, then well done but why was the Sunday to Friday thing not changed for the VHS, was it something only brought up over decade later?
reply
ShampootheSpider
I had complaints when using the update was pistons not pushing slime blocks and honey blocks, I think this couldve been mean end of flying piston machine
reply
I had complaints when using the update was pistons not pushing slime blocks and honey blocks, I think this couldve been mean end of flying piston machine
reply
Julia
I Love Princess Jasmine So much Because She is So Cute and Awesome and Cool and Beautiful and Pretty and She is My Favorite Character From Disney Aladdin
reply
I Love Princess Jasmine So much Because She is So Cute and Awesome and Cool and Beautiful and Pretty and She is My Favorite Character From Disney Aladdin
reply
Buster
2: 34 alright 'touch nothing' your just nitpicking now, English is a poor language, and one phrase can mean multiple things, it requires context.
reply
2: 34 alright 'touch nothing' your just nitpicking now, English is a poor language, and one phrase can mean multiple things, it requires context.
reply
ReyTheJediLady
I liked the update on Jasmine and the sultan. In 1992, the sultan was kind of naive. This new one is more serious and more aware of things
reply
I liked the update on Jasmine and the sultan. In 1992, the sultan was kind of naive. This new one is more serious and more aware of things
reply
STG
Why would she dance Arab princess dont dance in front of ppl the women who dance called jaria they dance for men back then that was their job why i
reply
Why would she dance Arab princess dont dance in front of ppl the women who dance called jaria they dance for men back then that was their job why i
reply
cool
Ever since I watched the behind the scenes of this movie, I haven't been able to keep a straight face whenever the 'a whole new world' comes up
reply
Ever since I watched the behind the scenes of this movie, I haven't been able to keep a straight face whenever the 'a whole new world' comes up
reply
ReyTheJediLady
I also liked that they gave Jasmine a bestie. More often than not, Disney Princesses dont have anyone to confide in that isnt animal
reply
I also liked that they gave Jasmine a bestie. More often than not, Disney Princesses dont have anyone to confide in that isnt animal
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
