A point about the Cybertruck (seriously)
video description
Date: 2026-04-12
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 20
aragusea
As a Latin American, I feel like current times especially regarding the U. S. and its treatment of Latin America and the rest of the world resemble a dark past. It feels as if the future is actually a return to a time when the USA funded far-right dictatorships that brutalized and colonized people in the name of a country that believes it is the good guy.
They see the rest of the world as their backyard and the people within it as powerless, subhuman beings. I hope the USA reinvents itself into something better. The world deserves one less tyrant, and the good-hearted citizens of the U. S. deserve a country that represents them, rather than a billionaire-led, fascist-wannabe autocracy.
For me, the future isn't an electric car made by a billionaire oligarch like the ones in the Gilded Age or the first Industrial Revolution (including their racism, eugenics, and colonialist ideas, with this car being the embodiment of this billionaire's belief in a mythical past of greatness (also one of the first pillars of fascism. For me, the future is an end to the tyranny of countries over others and an end to the hegemony of a power over its hostages. The future is a multipolar world with greater mutual respect, humanity, cooperation, capacity, and real freedoms. I thought your phrase saying that the future was a great, hard achievement of collaboration and mutual effort reminded me of a part of a Brazilian poem by Carlos Drummond de Andrade:
man
(will he be equipped)
The most difficult, most dangerous voyage
From himself to himself:
To set foot on the ground
Of his own heart
To test
To colonize
To civilize
To humanize
The man
Discovering in his own unexplored entrails
The perennial, unsuspected joy
Of existing and co-existing.
The future is a world where we learn the art of co-existing among ourselves, the world, and nature, a world past barbarity, billionaires, poverty, and anthropocentrism.
reply
As a Latin American, I feel like current times especially regarding the U. S. and its treatment of Latin America and the rest of the world resemble a dark past. It feels as if the future is actually a return to a time when the USA funded far-right dictatorships that brutalized and colonized people in the name of a country that believes it is the good guy.
They see the rest of the world as their backyard and the people within it as powerless, subhuman beings. I hope the USA reinvents itself into something better. The world deserves one less tyrant, and the good-hearted citizens of the U. S. deserve a country that represents them, rather than a billionaire-led, fascist-wannabe autocracy.
For me, the future isn't an electric car made by a billionaire oligarch like the ones in the Gilded Age or the first Industrial Revolution (including their racism, eugenics, and colonialist ideas, with this car being the embodiment of this billionaire's belief in a mythical past of greatness (also one of the first pillars of fascism. For me, the future is an end to the tyranny of countries over others and an end to the hegemony of a power over its hostages. The future is a multipolar world with greater mutual respect, humanity, cooperation, capacity, and real freedoms. I thought your phrase saying that the future was a great, hard achievement of collaboration and mutual effort reminded me of a part of a Brazilian poem by Carlos Drummond de Andrade:
man
(will he be equipped)
The most difficult, most dangerous voyage
From himself to himself:
To set foot on the ground
Of his own heart
To test
To colonize
To civilize
To humanize
The man
Discovering in his own unexplored entrails
The perennial, unsuspected joy
Of existing and co-existing.
The future is a world where we learn the art of co-existing among ourselves, the world, and nature, a world past barbarity, billionaires, poverty, and anthropocentrism.
reply
Idiomatick
It's wild to bash Musk for looking back instead of to the future and saying he doesn't understand how the future comes. He gave the world electric cars, self driving vehicles, cheaper power storage, cheap spaceflight (95% reduction in price, is working on the cutting edge for AI (created OpenAI and xAi/Grok) and humanoid robotics, made the most advanced brain-machine interface working on curing paraplegia and blindness, and just announced they will be making their own computer chips.
He is the only interesting thing to happen in tech in the US in the last 30 or 40 years. Everything else has been slow, safe incremental change chasing profit margins, which can bring the future eventually maybe.
Before Tesla, cars were making slow tiny steps improving gas mileage for 50 years with few fundamental changes. He started electric and cut part count by over 90%, vehicle build man hours by 90%. The cybertruck, ignoring the exterior finish has more technical progress in it than Ford had in its last decade.
SpaceX is even more dramatic. The shuttle was designed in the 70s and launched in 81. That was cutting edge when SpaceX was created in the mid 2000s. Today, SpaceX does almost all launches globally. Almost all satellites are SpaceX's (bringing internet to millions of people that had none in past. SpaceX is in late testing for the most powerful rocket in human history to go to Mars. They have the most advanced lander. They have the most efficient high pressure engines. The fly-back boosters are so advanced that before they did it, NASA wasn't sure if it was physically possible.
Who cares if he likes stainless steel and the letter X
Bash him for his politics of course. He's a nightmare. But pretending like he isn't literally almost all of future tech right now is silly.
reply
It's wild to bash Musk for looking back instead of to the future and saying he doesn't understand how the future comes. He gave the world electric cars, self driving vehicles, cheaper power storage, cheap spaceflight (95% reduction in price, is working on the cutting edge for AI (created OpenAI and xAi/Grok) and humanoid robotics, made the most advanced brain-machine interface working on curing paraplegia and blindness, and just announced they will be making their own computer chips.
He is the only interesting thing to happen in tech in the US in the last 30 or 40 years. Everything else has been slow, safe incremental change chasing profit margins, which can bring the future eventually maybe.
Before Tesla, cars were making slow tiny steps improving gas mileage for 50 years with few fundamental changes. He started electric and cut part count by over 90%, vehicle build man hours by 90%. The cybertruck, ignoring the exterior finish has more technical progress in it than Ford had in its last decade.
SpaceX is even more dramatic. The shuttle was designed in the 70s and launched in 81. That was cutting edge when SpaceX was created in the mid 2000s. Today, SpaceX does almost all launches globally. Almost all satellites are SpaceX's (bringing internet to millions of people that had none in past. SpaceX is in late testing for the most powerful rocket in human history to go to Mars. They have the most advanced lander. They have the most efficient high pressure engines. The fly-back boosters are so advanced that before they did it, NASA wasn't sure if it was physically possible.
Who cares if he likes stainless steel and the letter X
Bash him for his politics of course. He's a nightmare. But pretending like he isn't literally almost all of future tech right now is silly.
reply
TheJackOfFools
I've said that the capacitive touch screens that we got in 2008 were basically Star Trek pads. And in less than 20 years they became so ubiquitous that people aren't still amazed we have a friggin magic box in our pockets with access to nearly the sum of human experience in seconds, with a trivial amount of effort. And this is the worst possible implementation of this technology, too! Its not standardized at all, its all made to be actively hostile to repair, and is designed explicitly to fail early to encourage more purchases. Its the worst version and its still basically magic for all the effort it takes to use and access information!
Also, I fully believe that the kind of billionaire that genuinely believes that genetic superiority/eugenics stuff would have little trouble telling a kid you should die for my convenience to their face if they thought that kid was part of some genetically inferior group of humans. But I think the real cause of that isn't their crappy belief system, but their wealth. Being wealthy literally changes you, and nobody should be able to amass that kind of wealth for any reason. Because all the evidence we can see points to it making you monstrous. And it doesn't really matter if its the wealth that makes you that way, or if only certain kinds of people are willing to exploit others in the ways necessary to become truly wealthy. There is no level of self-made man that deserves to be a billionaire in a world where no nation has eradicated hunger, or homelessness, or other inequality. Where you can post billions in company profits while your employees have to rely on government financial aid for daily life.
reply
I've said that the capacitive touch screens that we got in 2008 were basically Star Trek pads. And in less than 20 years they became so ubiquitous that people aren't still amazed we have a friggin magic box in our pockets with access to nearly the sum of human experience in seconds, with a trivial amount of effort. And this is the worst possible implementation of this technology, too! Its not standardized at all, its all made to be actively hostile to repair, and is designed explicitly to fail early to encourage more purchases. Its the worst version and its still basically magic for all the effort it takes to use and access information!
Also, I fully believe that the kind of billionaire that genuinely believes that genetic superiority/eugenics stuff would have little trouble telling a kid you should die for my convenience to their face if they thought that kid was part of some genetically inferior group of humans. But I think the real cause of that isn't their crappy belief system, but their wealth. Being wealthy literally changes you, and nobody should be able to amass that kind of wealth for any reason. Because all the evidence we can see points to it making you monstrous. And it doesn't really matter if its the wealth that makes you that way, or if only certain kinds of people are willing to exploit others in the ways necessary to become truly wealthy. There is no level of self-made man that deserves to be a billionaire in a world where no nation has eradicated hunger, or homelessness, or other inequality. Where you can post billions in company profits while your employees have to rely on government financial aid for daily life.
reply
EmmanuelEytan
There is a serious point to be made that in the last fifty years or so, the physical world has been progressing a lot less than it did in the hundred and fifty preceding years. From the mid-nineteenth century to about the seventies people could see more progress in the physical world than we can. Trains and reliable public transportation arrived. Public health departments with much better organized sewage. A move from newspapers to the wireless to television to color TV to cable. The appearance of the motion picture to sound pictures to color to 3D. (3D was available in the 50s but didn't take off then)The automobile, trains, and even spaceships were developed. If someone jumped from 1890 to 1920, the world would be shockingly different to them. Much more than someone who jumped from 1990 to 2020. The innovation we have now mostly happens in the realm of information. We have steaming instead of TV, cell phones, but our focus is much more invested within software and data. One of the reasons for that may be that we've moved from an economy of production to an economy of investment. So, yes, the future has kept becoming different, but to a great extent, it's stopped looking different.
reply
There is a serious point to be made that in the last fifty years or so, the physical world has been progressing a lot less than it did in the hundred and fifty preceding years. From the mid-nineteenth century to about the seventies people could see more progress in the physical world than we can. Trains and reliable public transportation arrived. Public health departments with much better organized sewage. A move from newspapers to the wireless to television to color TV to cable. The appearance of the motion picture to sound pictures to color to 3D. (3D was available in the 50s but didn't take off then)The automobile, trains, and even spaceships were developed. If someone jumped from 1890 to 1920, the world would be shockingly different to them. Much more than someone who jumped from 1990 to 2020. The innovation we have now mostly happens in the realm of information. We have steaming instead of TV, cell phones, but our focus is much more invested within software and data. One of the reasons for that may be that we've moved from an economy of production to an economy of investment. So, yes, the future has kept becoming different, but to a great extent, it's stopped looking different.
reply
glenhillier5826
I don't think Elon is a bad as you have pegged him. If you follow what he is essentially trying to do, it is mostly honorable for humanity as a whole. The problem is that he was left with 2 poor choices in the last election. Pick his original party (the democratic party, and he would have been actively law-fared into oblivion. Pick the republican party and you get a despot, but a despot that would open a market to people who would otherwise not even know what an EV is! Make no mistake, it's the despot that allowed Elon to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse. Unfortunately, Elon's definition of waste fraud and abuse are different than mine or your definition. Elon is one of the few billionaires that actually puts his wealth where his mouth is. He is all in and doesn't waste his wealth on private islands, mega-yachts, and mansions. Elon is actually doing what should have been done 50 years ago in space. The world needs more people like him to make the world a better place, IMO. I don't like the looks of the cyber-truck, but it drives better than a race car!
reply
I don't think Elon is a bad as you have pegged him. If you follow what he is essentially trying to do, it is mostly honorable for humanity as a whole. The problem is that he was left with 2 poor choices in the last election. Pick his original party (the democratic party, and he would have been actively law-fared into oblivion. Pick the republican party and you get a despot, but a despot that would open a market to people who would otherwise not even know what an EV is! Make no mistake, it's the despot that allowed Elon to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse. Unfortunately, Elon's definition of waste fraud and abuse are different than mine or your definition. Elon is one of the few billionaires that actually puts his wealth where his mouth is. He is all in and doesn't waste his wealth on private islands, mega-yachts, and mansions. Elon is actually doing what should have been done 50 years ago in space. The world needs more people like him to make the world a better place, IMO. I don't like the looks of the cyber-truck, but it drives better than a race car!
reply
stevenneiman1554
8: 10 it's also important to remember that foreign aid isn't just a matter of bleeding-heart benevolence, it's also good statesmanship. The US did in part become a global superpower because we were ahead of the world at the end of the world wars by virtue of not being devastated by a war that was mostly fought in europe, but we didn't maintain that strength by being so powerful nobody could challenge us, we maintained it by having allies who will stand with us against our enemies and enough goodwill to keep the neutrals neutral. US foreign aid is partially motivated by, and largely marketed to the American public as, altruism, but it's also one of the most cost-effective ways to buy the goodwill that has let us keep our position as a global superpower since the 50s, and even if you regard American citizens as the only morally relevant human beings slashing our foreign aid programs is the kind of inept statesmanship which is the reason we aren't likely to be a global superpower for much longer.
reply
8: 10 it's also important to remember that foreign aid isn't just a matter of bleeding-heart benevolence, it's also good statesmanship. The US did in part become a global superpower because we were ahead of the world at the end of the world wars by virtue of not being devastated by a war that was mostly fought in europe, but we didn't maintain that strength by being so powerful nobody could challenge us, we maintained it by having allies who will stand with us against our enemies and enough goodwill to keep the neutrals neutral. US foreign aid is partially motivated by, and largely marketed to the American public as, altruism, but it's also one of the most cost-effective ways to buy the goodwill that has let us keep our position as a global superpower since the 50s, and even if you regard American citizens as the only morally relevant human beings slashing our foreign aid programs is the kind of inept statesmanship which is the reason we aren't likely to be a global superpower for much longer.
reply
Zoltri
I've been doing some self exploring, and something I heard which I think is kind of grounding, and relevant here is that the Past and Future don't exist, only the present.
Which is to say, the past is a Memory, it happened, but its no longer happening. Its gone and won't ever come back.
The future is just a fantasy, an idea of what tomorrow might be, but we're never promised it. We can dream and plan all we want, but we never truly know what tomorrow will look like, plans fall apart, people drift away, dreams fizzle out to reality. Living your life aspiring for a future while neglecting the present and trying to make the most of it is the same as chasing a dream.
Its good to aspire to things and to try and make those dreams a reality, but not at the cost of today.
If we want those fantasies of the future to come true, it requires working today to lay the groundwork to make it happen.
reply
I've been doing some self exploring, and something I heard which I think is kind of grounding, and relevant here is that the Past and Future don't exist, only the present.
Which is to say, the past is a Memory, it happened, but its no longer happening. Its gone and won't ever come back.
The future is just a fantasy, an idea of what tomorrow might be, but we're never promised it. We can dream and plan all we want, but we never truly know what tomorrow will look like, plans fall apart, people drift away, dreams fizzle out to reality. Living your life aspiring for a future while neglecting the present and trying to make the most of it is the same as chasing a dream.
Its good to aspire to things and to try and make those dreams a reality, but not at the cost of today.
If we want those fantasies of the future to come true, it requires working today to lay the groundwork to make it happen.
reply
abhinambiar1501
The only problem with this argument is that the cybertruck is actually very advanced. Yes it's ugly and it's unfortunate that Elon Musk became a Nazi and so we have to hate everything that he has created. Having a very low coefficient of drag, using drive-by-wire technology, multiple cameras and a very advanced driver assistance package. Even if the full self driving is an unrealized goal, it is a worthy one to attempt. And clinging to internal combustion garbage that has parts from 400 different suppliers is not the answer. The answer is to encourage other OEMs to pursue battery electric vehicles that integrate all the various components to create a better competitor. If it looks pretty, that's the cherry on top.
reply
The only problem with this argument is that the cybertruck is actually very advanced. Yes it's ugly and it's unfortunate that Elon Musk became a Nazi and so we have to hate everything that he has created. Having a very low coefficient of drag, using drive-by-wire technology, multiple cameras and a very advanced driver assistance package. Even if the full self driving is an unrealized goal, it is a worthy one to attempt. And clinging to internal combustion garbage that has parts from 400 different suppliers is not the answer. The answer is to encourage other OEMs to pursue battery electric vehicles that integrate all the various components to create a better competitor. If it looks pretty, that's the cherry on top.
reply
hudsonja
Can you imagine floating cars with how poorly people even pay attention to the laws around drones You think drunk drivers are bad now Imagine millions of people with no driving lanes, no guardrails, no exit signs, just a singular thought of i need to be at X place in X amount of time, get me there now.
We can't even get AI to navigate regular streets yet, or even generate images with correct spelling on a consistent basis. People would be dying left and right, and even walking wouldn't be safe with the threat of a random car falling on you out of nowhere.
Let's figure out how to get people health care before we worry about futuristic cars.
reply
Can you imagine floating cars with how poorly people even pay attention to the laws around drones You think drunk drivers are bad now Imagine millions of people with no driving lanes, no guardrails, no exit signs, just a singular thought of i need to be at X place in X amount of time, get me there now.
We can't even get AI to navigate regular streets yet, or even generate images with correct spelling on a consistent basis. People would be dying left and right, and even walking wouldn't be safe with the threat of a random car falling on you out of nowhere.
Let's figure out how to get people health care before we worry about futuristic cars.
reply
JirkaKunst
Ok, but for real: Why does our present not look like the 'future' people imagined 50 years ago In all the pulp magazine stories they thought we would get a revolution in energy. Clean and sustainable power for every home and appliance! Cars that never run out of fuel, laser beam guns and force fields, personal jet packs! Instead, we got a revolution in information. We got computers, smart phones, internet. If you told someone 100 years ago, that we would be able to look inside a human body in real time without cutting it open first, they would laugh at you. And yet, there is an MRI machine in every hospital nowadays.
reply
Ok, but for real: Why does our present not look like the 'future' people imagined 50 years ago In all the pulp magazine stories they thought we would get a revolution in energy. Clean and sustainable power for every home and appliance! Cars that never run out of fuel, laser beam guns and force fields, personal jet packs! Instead, we got a revolution in information. We got computers, smart phones, internet. If you told someone 100 years ago, that we would be able to look inside a human body in real time without cutting it open first, they would laugh at you. And yet, there is an MRI machine in every hospital nowadays.
reply
IlChaz
Interesting take. I agree with the overall view about the mistaken desire for a promised future that didn't arrive.
I would quibble a bit about the CT's design. All design is cyclical, so saying that angular designs are old and from the 1980s ignores that they're been new/futuristic AND old/reto many times over. The 1888 Marcus car or Ford Model T are super boxy and angular, while a Bugatti Type 57C from 1936 is incredibly swoopy, a 55 Chevy Bel Air is fundamentally a box again, a 74 Citroen DS is a lozenge/ufo, an 87 Renault Espace is a rectangular prism, a third gen Taurus is a gumdrop, and on and on.
reply
Interesting take. I agree with the overall view about the mistaken desire for a promised future that didn't arrive.
I would quibble a bit about the CT's design. All design is cyclical, so saying that angular designs are old and from the 1980s ignores that they're been new/futuristic AND old/reto many times over. The 1888 Marcus car or Ford Model T are super boxy and angular, while a Bugatti Type 57C from 1936 is incredibly swoopy, a 55 Chevy Bel Air is fundamentally a box again, a 74 Citroen DS is a lozenge/ufo, an 87 Renault Espace is a rectangular prism, a third gen Taurus is a gumdrop, and on and on.
reply
nickm2558
I agree, imagine bringing a modern touch screen back to the 1980s. I remember my dad spent over 1000 dollars on a zenith television in the early 80s, it was only 27 inch crt, with a remote. now I have a 15 year old 55 inch lcd flat screen that was 800 and by todays standards that is low tech and expensive compared to what is on offer today. Heart surgery used to be a major surgery, now much can be done via cath. Children can be born at 25 weeks and survive regularly. Our tech is very advanced. I feel our societal development has not progressed much.
reply
I agree, imagine bringing a modern touch screen back to the 1980s. I remember my dad spent over 1000 dollars on a zenith television in the early 80s, it was only 27 inch crt, with a remote. now I have a 15 year old 55 inch lcd flat screen that was 800 and by todays standards that is low tech and expensive compared to what is on offer today. Heart surgery used to be a major surgery, now much can be done via cath. Children can be born at 25 weeks and survive regularly. Our tech is very advanced. I feel our societal development has not progressed much.
reply
genehenson8851
5: 25 it’s worth noting that I’m watching this on a mobile device 1/2 thick that magically shows tv shows without being plugged into the wall. I’m watching you record this on a camera better than anything around in the 80s but is magically small enough to fit in you pocket and that super computer sitting in your lap has more processing power than the entirety of IRL super computers in the 80s. So, yeah, the future is always unrecognizable. You should look up predictions about the future from the 1800s.
reply
5: 25 it’s worth noting that I’m watching this on a mobile device 1/2 thick that magically shows tv shows without being plugged into the wall. I’m watching you record this on a camera better than anything around in the 80s but is magically small enough to fit in you pocket and that super computer sitting in your lap has more processing power than the entirety of IRL super computers in the 80s. So, yeah, the future is always unrecognizable. You should look up predictions about the future from the 1800s.
reply
Idiomatick
Bladerunner was based on a lawless city in china called Kowloon town that literally existed at the time. It wasn't futuristic, nor was it meant to be aside from minor tweaks is was supposed to be apocalyptic, as if the whole world looked like the Kowloon town trashheap. it was demolished by the government like 20 years ago.
Japan, Tokyo that you point to is effectively unchanged since the 90s. It is not futuristic in any sense. Those neon signs are many decades old.
reply
Bladerunner was based on a lawless city in china called Kowloon town that literally existed at the time. It wasn't futuristic, nor was it meant to be aside from minor tweaks is was supposed to be apocalyptic, as if the whole world looked like the Kowloon town trashheap. it was demolished by the government like 20 years ago.
Japan, Tokyo that you point to is effectively unchanged since the 90s. It is not futuristic in any sense. Those neon signs are many decades old.
reply
hazardous-g2j
The reason the future does not look like the future is due to money. Companies want to make money, and its less risk to lower costs and focus on such issues such as planed obsolescence. New and latest costs money. There are insane levels of new things been created but it takes a long time before they get integrated into the modern offering from a company and only if it is cheaper. Few companies compete on having a better product unless the product is insanely better.
reply
The reason the future does not look like the future is due to money. Companies want to make money, and its less risk to lower costs and focus on such issues such as planed obsolescence. New and latest costs money. There are insane levels of new things been created but it takes a long time before they get integrated into the modern offering from a company and only if it is cheaper. Few companies compete on having a better product unless the product is insanely better.
reply
R0nin77
The cyber truck looks the way it does because it's folded cold rolled steel. Its origami, and like origami its going to have hard edged geometry which limits it's styling options. Which is a very cool and futuristic at least when it comes to automotive technology. Its not just retro future nostalgia. Also calling his son's name racist is kind of jumping to the most uncharitable possiblity right off the bat, and honestly says as much about Adam as it does Elon Musk.
reply
The cyber truck looks the way it does because it's folded cold rolled steel. Its origami, and like origami its going to have hard edged geometry which limits it's styling options. Which is a very cool and futuristic at least when it comes to automotive technology. Its not just retro future nostalgia. Also calling his son's name racist is kind of jumping to the most uncharitable possiblity right off the bat, and honestly says as much about Adam as it does Elon Musk.
reply
DeltaWho4
I like my 2013 Scion tC. It’s nothing fancy and the ride quality is mid, but it’s fairly reliable and I got it for free since it used to belong to my brother. It has 120k miles. It’s new enough to have automatic transmission, defrost, and USB port where you can play songs from your phone through the speakers, but old enough to have a real key and no pointless screens. It honestly feels more like a car from 2005 but I don’t mind that.
reply
I like my 2013 Scion tC. It’s nothing fancy and the ride quality is mid, but it’s fairly reliable and I got it for free since it used to belong to my brother. It has 120k miles. It’s new enough to have automatic transmission, defrost, and USB port where you can play songs from your phone through the speakers, but old enough to have a real key and no pointless screens. It honestly feels more like a car from 2005 but I don’t mind that.
reply
erikp5481
Adam is infected by the algorithmic rage bait. If you calm down and realize Elon is both bad and good. Cybertruck bad, AI Datacenters bad/good, firing employees mercilessly bad, pioneering electric cars EXTREMELY GOOD, building a car company that can make electric cars for a profit, and under the average price of a car (50k) Extremely good, providing global high speed internet to the world very good. so many ha8ers. Yall need to calm down
reply
Adam is infected by the algorithmic rage bait. If you calm down and realize Elon is both bad and good. Cybertruck bad, AI Datacenters bad/good, firing employees mercilessly bad, pioneering electric cars EXTREMELY GOOD, building a car company that can make electric cars for a profit, and under the average price of a car (50k) Extremely good, providing global high speed internet to the world very good. so many ha8ers. Yall need to calm down
reply
ubqtous
Adam I hate to say I haven't watched you for few years (I religiously started watching since your first Pizza video) because life happened (baby and stuff) and whatever, but now that life is front and center and is more important to me than cooking videos, I watched this all the way through and it reminded me why I fell in love with your videos from the very beginning. This is something I can listen to while I do real life shit. Thank you.
reply
Adam I hate to say I haven't watched you for few years (I religiously started watching since your first Pizza video) because life happened (baby and stuff) and whatever, but now that life is front and center and is more important to me than cooking videos, I watched this all the way through and it reminded me why I fell in love with your videos from the very beginning. This is something I can listen to while I do real life shit. Thank you.
reply
justgot2go4now
The unfortunate thing is that while I agree with everything you have said in this video, the people who need to have a change of mind simply do not care. They would stare at a child and tell them they need to die and would not feel bad about it. They do it all the time already and have been doing so for a very long time. There is nothing we can say to change them but there are infinite things we can do to fight them.
reply
The unfortunate thing is that while I agree with everything you have said in this video, the people who need to have a change of mind simply do not care. They would stare at a child and tell them they need to die and would not feel bad about it. They do it all the time already and have been doing so for a very long time. There is nothing we can say to change them but there are infinite things we can do to fight them.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
