
Off Grid Pallet Wood Homestead Build - Pallet Wood Projects at The Cabin
video description
Date: 2019-09-10
Comments and reviews: 10
Robin Claus Beyer
As for the credibility of research: There is no single they. Yes, privately funded research out of the industry is to always be taken with a grain of salt. Not even necessarily because of intentional falsification, but because of researchers bias or because unwanted results are simply not published (publication bias. But all scientific papers will note their funding. Also, probably the largest bulk of any research is publicly funded aka by academia. Now, some researchers still might have personal biases (i. e. proving their own theories, but that has little effect on the body of knowledge as a whole, since most scientists will refrain from strong assertions until research has been replicated enough for meta-analysis. (Which is why pop-science is so annoying to scientists, since it is quite often an over-generalization of an over-hyped single study with possibly bad design) Note that one of the largest lobbies in the world, Big Tobacco, was unable to stop the public knowledge of the harms of smoking. God knows they tried and god knows researchers fought an uphill battle. But the truth won out. As it almost always does. I would also like to note how fiercely competitive scientific research is. To discredit a longstanding belief of even a theory or find a major health risk is just too delicious. Alzheimers: I don't believe Alzheimers has really changed over the years. Higher ages and better diagnosis increase numbers and average age. Its main property is the accumulation of senile plaque in the central nervous system. While causes are not as well understood as in other diseases, there seems to be a strong genetic factor, tho environmental factors may also play a role. While its effects are most distinct in some areas of the brain, it generally effects the entire brain and it does not favor a particular size. (The areas of the brain is also a widely misunderstood concept, btw. A little bit more complicated than that) Much like with cancer, it is most likely an accumulation of factors, which will be slightly different in each individual patient. Mobile phones: The idea of mobile phones heating up anything, has been widely discredited. I believe the belief came about, because they technically function within the microwave frequency, which everyone obviously associates with the appliance. No studies have found a link here. And it wouldn't have anything to do with Alzheimers anyway. I believe the only real controversial topics with mobiles is certain types of cancer and male fertility. At the very least, there seems to be no correlation between moderate mobile use and cancer, and also no correlation to sperm quality. (The decline in the latter likely has more to do with changes in lifestyles, such as increased stress and body wight) All in all, my judgement is that there is likely no health risk at all or it es very negligible. There are more than enough common health risks we have to combat first, which have a much larger public effect.
reply
As for the credibility of research: There is no single they. Yes, privately funded research out of the industry is to always be taken with a grain of salt. Not even necessarily because of intentional falsification, but because of researchers bias or because unwanted results are simply not published (publication bias. But all scientific papers will note their funding. Also, probably the largest bulk of any research is publicly funded aka by academia. Now, some researchers still might have personal biases (i. e. proving their own theories, but that has little effect on the body of knowledge as a whole, since most scientists will refrain from strong assertions until research has been replicated enough for meta-analysis. (Which is why pop-science is so annoying to scientists, since it is quite often an over-generalization of an over-hyped single study with possibly bad design) Note that one of the largest lobbies in the world, Big Tobacco, was unable to stop the public knowledge of the harms of smoking. God knows they tried and god knows researchers fought an uphill battle. But the truth won out. As it almost always does. I would also like to note how fiercely competitive scientific research is. To discredit a longstanding belief of even a theory or find a major health risk is just too delicious. Alzheimers: I don't believe Alzheimers has really changed over the years. Higher ages and better diagnosis increase numbers and average age. Its main property is the accumulation of senile plaque in the central nervous system. While causes are not as well understood as in other diseases, there seems to be a strong genetic factor, tho environmental factors may also play a role. While its effects are most distinct in some areas of the brain, it generally effects the entire brain and it does not favor a particular size. (The areas of the brain is also a widely misunderstood concept, btw. A little bit more complicated than that) Much like with cancer, it is most likely an accumulation of factors, which will be slightly different in each individual patient. Mobile phones: The idea of mobile phones heating up anything, has been widely discredited. I believe the belief came about, because they technically function within the microwave frequency, which everyone obviously associates with the appliance. No studies have found a link here. And it wouldn't have anything to do with Alzheimers anyway. I believe the only real controversial topics with mobiles is certain types of cancer and male fertility. At the very least, there seems to be no correlation between moderate mobile use and cancer, and also no correlation to sperm quality. (The decline in the latter likely has more to do with changes in lifestyles, such as increased stress and body wight) All in all, my judgement is that there is likely no health risk at all or it es very negligible. There are more than enough common health risks we have to combat first, which have a much larger public effect.
reply
Taloquin
Ok dad, here's an answer to your question. I want you to prime yourself for this. Breath deep many times. Oxygenate your blood as much as you can without passing out. Once you feel ready, I want you to hold your breath for 60 seconds. In your mind, I want you to count to 60. Once you're done, take a deep breath and relax until you recover. During those 60 seconds you held your breath the radiation you absorbed from background sources here on Earth and from the universe in general is magnitudes more than you will likely ever absorb from a cellphone, and the oxygen deprivation you suffered in those 60 seconds will cause more damage than a cellphone likely ever could. Unless, of course, you happen to buy a cellphone laced with weapons grade Plutonium. AFAIK those don't come out until 2022. ;)IMO it's not so much about cell phones and electronics in general as it is what we eat and breath. I can all but guarantee you eat or drink from something almost every day that is made of plastic or something made with plastic from a questionable source. Not only that but the food you eat is not as natural as you would expect. We willingly expose ourselves to countless questionable chemical processes every day. You think your air is clean? It's not nearly as clean as it was 200 years ago. And your food? There is no comparison. You could sit in a room with yellowcake (a form of uranium) for hours, even days, without issue. But if you were to ingest even 1/1000th of a gram of it, you would likely be in the hospital in short order. The point is, it's not so much our surroundings or what we surround ourselves with, it's what we put into our bodies. Our bodies break things down for use at such a miniscule level that it inevitably winds up a part of us, especially if we eat or drink it. Another way to look at it is that there are more people on Earth now than there has ever been at one time. The more people there are, the more farming needs to happen. The more farming needs to happen, the more surface area of the Earth needs to be used. The more surface area used, the more exposure to underground toxins that occurs. The place you buy your produce from could have grown their crops on soil with underground toxins in it that previously were covered by rocky deposits, they just cleared it to make more farmland. Those farmlands may even have yellowcake in the soilAll of this is pure conjecture of course, but it is no more conjecture than believing that cellphones cook our brains. ;)
reply
Ok dad, here's an answer to your question. I want you to prime yourself for this. Breath deep many times. Oxygenate your blood as much as you can without passing out. Once you feel ready, I want you to hold your breath for 60 seconds. In your mind, I want you to count to 60. Once you're done, take a deep breath and relax until you recover. During those 60 seconds you held your breath the radiation you absorbed from background sources here on Earth and from the universe in general is magnitudes more than you will likely ever absorb from a cellphone, and the oxygen deprivation you suffered in those 60 seconds will cause more damage than a cellphone likely ever could. Unless, of course, you happen to buy a cellphone laced with weapons grade Plutonium. AFAIK those don't come out until 2022. ;)IMO it's not so much about cell phones and electronics in general as it is what we eat and breath. I can all but guarantee you eat or drink from something almost every day that is made of plastic or something made with plastic from a questionable source. Not only that but the food you eat is not as natural as you would expect. We willingly expose ourselves to countless questionable chemical processes every day. You think your air is clean? It's not nearly as clean as it was 200 years ago. And your food? There is no comparison. You could sit in a room with yellowcake (a form of uranium) for hours, even days, without issue. But if you were to ingest even 1/1000th of a gram of it, you would likely be in the hospital in short order. The point is, it's not so much our surroundings or what we surround ourselves with, it's what we put into our bodies. Our bodies break things down for use at such a miniscule level that it inevitably winds up a part of us, especially if we eat or drink it. Another way to look at it is that there are more people on Earth now than there has ever been at one time. The more people there are, the more farming needs to happen. The more farming needs to happen, the more surface area of the Earth needs to be used. The more surface area used, the more exposure to underground toxins that occurs. The place you buy your produce from could have grown their crops on soil with underground toxins in it that previously were covered by rocky deposits, they just cleared it to make more farmland. Those farmlands may even have yellowcake in the soilAll of this is pure conjecture of course, but it is no more conjecture than believing that cellphones cook our brains. ;)
reply
Davy Jones
Here in northern Minnesota USA you would need to climatize that pallet hut. We used logs to built cabins. The old saw mills use to mill square logs to built with. Many of the old finlanders used them for homes. Some new homes are just spray foam over a chicken wire form. that are very warm. But it was on an Indian reservation I saw a YURT straw home. He had erected 4 posts in a square and had 8 posts in and octagon surrounding the square. The posts were holding bales of hay/straw in a wall. He had stucco cement over them. The posts also held a roof and loft/ceiling/2nd floor. He had a chain saw to make boards. His son was building himself a yurt too. There was a very large one used as a garage and shop. They used an old timber jack log skidded (tractor that lift logs and drags them out of the woods with a small dozer blade to clear land and build roads. to bring logs to an area they could process them. A old hay baler and tractor mower made the bales. Divorce laws had forced the men unto the reservation land where the law could not take their processions and property for child support rip-offs by courts run by anti male judges. The system is not fair as money collected is heavily charge for administration fees and what is left may go to the wife/family. IF she is on welfare, they hold any excess in the government purse and only give her program minimums funds. Those that are partial Indian escape to Indian land and work Indian jobs where they are exempt from white man laws. Yurts are one exemption from building codes. The yurts require a new coat of stucco now and them. They are very warm any easier to build then a cabin. Lifting is easy as the posts can become like a ships mast. To put up a pole. dig a hole below the frost line using a very long hand spade and a very long handle scoop spoon with a frost bar Once you have a hole dig a ramp ditch to halfway down one side and place a long board in the hole. Lay the post butt against the board over the ditch. lift and pike the pole to upright until it flips into the hole. Pull out the board and plumb post and tamp in dirt to set. Use as a lifting mast is optional.
reply
Here in northern Minnesota USA you would need to climatize that pallet hut. We used logs to built cabins. The old saw mills use to mill square logs to built with. Many of the old finlanders used them for homes. Some new homes are just spray foam over a chicken wire form. that are very warm. But it was on an Indian reservation I saw a YURT straw home. He had erected 4 posts in a square and had 8 posts in and octagon surrounding the square. The posts were holding bales of hay/straw in a wall. He had stucco cement over them. The posts also held a roof and loft/ceiling/2nd floor. He had a chain saw to make boards. His son was building himself a yurt too. There was a very large one used as a garage and shop. They used an old timber jack log skidded (tractor that lift logs and drags them out of the woods with a small dozer blade to clear land and build roads. to bring logs to an area they could process them. A old hay baler and tractor mower made the bales. Divorce laws had forced the men unto the reservation land where the law could not take their processions and property for child support rip-offs by courts run by anti male judges. The system is not fair as money collected is heavily charge for administration fees and what is left may go to the wife/family. IF she is on welfare, they hold any excess in the government purse and only give her program minimums funds. Those that are partial Indian escape to Indian land and work Indian jobs where they are exempt from white man laws. Yurts are one exemption from building codes. The yurts require a new coat of stucco now and them. They are very warm any easier to build then a cabin. Lifting is easy as the posts can become like a ships mast. To put up a pole. dig a hole below the frost line using a very long hand spade and a very long handle scoop spoon with a frost bar Once you have a hole dig a ramp ditch to halfway down one side and place a long board in the hole. Lay the post butt against the board over the ditch. lift and pike the pole to upright until it flips into the hole. Pull out the board and plumb post and tamp in dirt to set. Use as a lifting mast is optional.
reply
Andy Dreher
Hey guys, I stop by your videos every once in a while and enjoy watching the content. Thought I might have something to add to the alzheimer's/mobile phone correlation your dad brought up. I can really only speak about the neurophysiological symptoms of the disease instead of any research or data on the relationship between the two subjects. As far I know the cause of alzheimer's is largely unknown, with lots of hypotheses including a genetic, protein, or neuroglia factor. Whether or not things like our diet with processed food, smoking, over exposure to certain chemicals or some combination of genetic and environmental precursors is still up for debate and a heavy topic in a cure for the disease. Your dad mentioned some paper or article referencing the side of the brain heating up while using phones. This would be your temporal lobe which processes sensory and language inputs and aids in memory. Alzheimer's does affect this area but also many other parts of the cortex including some of the structures below it. The neurons that communicate with each other throughout the brain that create a unique human experience degenerate and leads to a loss of function. I think someone else brought it up but I believe the change in phone technology like getting rid of antennas and hands-free technology were all consumer based. I don't have a link for you but I also believe there's been studies done that dismiss the notion of radio waves or any type of electromagnetic interference damaging cells. Now, an interesting question to me might be examining the social influences on the disease. Are people that talk on the phone constantly maybe at a higher risk than say someone who engages in more personal social activities? I suppose the invention of handheld phones is still a relatively new construct so a longitudinal case study might not be around for a while. There's so many things that we don't understand about Alzheimer's and it's an incredibly complex disease but hopefully as time goes on we can start to get some concrete answers and work towards a cure or prevention.
reply
Hey guys, I stop by your videos every once in a while and enjoy watching the content. Thought I might have something to add to the alzheimer's/mobile phone correlation your dad brought up. I can really only speak about the neurophysiological symptoms of the disease instead of any research or data on the relationship between the two subjects. As far I know the cause of alzheimer's is largely unknown, with lots of hypotheses including a genetic, protein, or neuroglia factor. Whether or not things like our diet with processed food, smoking, over exposure to certain chemicals or some combination of genetic and environmental precursors is still up for debate and a heavy topic in a cure for the disease. Your dad mentioned some paper or article referencing the side of the brain heating up while using phones. This would be your temporal lobe which processes sensory and language inputs and aids in memory. Alzheimer's does affect this area but also many other parts of the cortex including some of the structures below it. The neurons that communicate with each other throughout the brain that create a unique human experience degenerate and leads to a loss of function. I think someone else brought it up but I believe the change in phone technology like getting rid of antennas and hands-free technology were all consumer based. I don't have a link for you but I also believe there's been studies done that dismiss the notion of radio waves or any type of electromagnetic interference damaging cells. Now, an interesting question to me might be examining the social influences on the disease. Are people that talk on the phone constantly maybe at a higher risk than say someone who engages in more personal social activities? I suppose the invention of handheld phones is still a relatively new construct so a longitudinal case study might not be around for a while. There's so many things that we don't understand about Alzheimer's and it's an incredibly complex disease but hopefully as time goes on we can start to get some concrete answers and work towards a cure or prevention.
reply
THExNEKOxCHAN
I'm no doctor or expert, but most of the Alzheimer's information I've found doesn't suggest that it's a particular zone, but an all over shrinkage of the brain and hippocampus. In early stages, as the hippocampus degenerates (the hippocampus is located deep within the center of the brain) short term memory loss begins to occur, and from there it seems to spread throughout the cerebral cortex until it is all affected. Certain protein structures in the nerve cells collapse, and plaques form between the neurons as well, instead of being broken and down and removed normally. That said, when searching for news of this hypothesis, I've found everything from It might, to No, probably not and even a Maybe it's actually good for us in regards to the waves that are created by the mobile phones. So, really, I am not sure if anyone really knows yet if it's actually causing Alzheimer's disease, but it sounds like it may be under research. Also, Neko Tengu's point about the keto diet and the sugar/wheat industry influencing health guidelines is a pretty good one. I don't at all trust the big companies to have our well being in mind when they are keen on making all the money they can. Great topicEdited to add: Ryan Abrahams comments further down in the feed also mentions that's Alzheimers is genetic. The cause of Alzheimer's disease is genetics (specifically the APOE-e4 gene. This is set in from birth, basically, and changing this would require ionizing radiation, which cell phones don't create.
reply
I'm no doctor or expert, but most of the Alzheimer's information I've found doesn't suggest that it's a particular zone, but an all over shrinkage of the brain and hippocampus. In early stages, as the hippocampus degenerates (the hippocampus is located deep within the center of the brain) short term memory loss begins to occur, and from there it seems to spread throughout the cerebral cortex until it is all affected. Certain protein structures in the nerve cells collapse, and plaques form between the neurons as well, instead of being broken and down and removed normally. That said, when searching for news of this hypothesis, I've found everything from It might, to No, probably not and even a Maybe it's actually good for us in regards to the waves that are created by the mobile phones. So, really, I am not sure if anyone really knows yet if it's actually causing Alzheimer's disease, but it sounds like it may be under research. Also, Neko Tengu's point about the keto diet and the sugar/wheat industry influencing health guidelines is a pretty good one. I don't at all trust the big companies to have our well being in mind when they are keen on making all the money they can. Great topicEdited to add: Ryan Abrahams comments further down in the feed also mentions that's Alzheimers is genetic. The cause of Alzheimer's disease is genetics (specifically the APOE-e4 gene. This is set in from birth, basically, and changing this would require ionizing radiation, which cell phones don't create.
reply
Craig Symington
Dad reminds me of my granddad. He and I built all sorts of things together. He taught me to respect and use tools as an extension of yourself. Sadly we lost him after her retired when I was only 12 years old. He didn't make it to 70, I believe firmly that he died of boredom, confined to a small 4th story flat. He worked in the motor industry all his life, but his life was his family and the large garden with massive compost beds and veggies for Africa (he was a Scot who grew up in Africa. Anyway, I love the Brit dry sense of humor. So I guess that's why I keep watching; )I probably know too much regarding cell phones and the effect on one's health. My generation of 40 somethings seems hardest hit, we were duped into a false sense of security with regards to the effects of tech, GMOs and margarine, to mention a few. My kids were vaccinated and are both fine, We are leaving Africa soon to New Zealand so I can give them more of the great outdoors as I grew up with, without it being overly expensive and so life threatening. Thanks again for the great work you blokes do. PS Mum in-law, a Brit, was on and on about the land use and cutting of saplings. I understand her viewpoint, large parts of natural, rural Britain could get decimated if left unchecked, but great to see you out there living life and being boys
reply
Dad reminds me of my granddad. He and I built all sorts of things together. He taught me to respect and use tools as an extension of yourself. Sadly we lost him after her retired when I was only 12 years old. He didn't make it to 70, I believe firmly that he died of boredom, confined to a small 4th story flat. He worked in the motor industry all his life, but his life was his family and the large garden with massive compost beds and veggies for Africa (he was a Scot who grew up in Africa. Anyway, I love the Brit dry sense of humor. So I guess that's why I keep watching; )I probably know too much regarding cell phones and the effect on one's health. My generation of 40 somethings seems hardest hit, we were duped into a false sense of security with regards to the effects of tech, GMOs and margarine, to mention a few. My kids were vaccinated and are both fine, We are leaving Africa soon to New Zealand so I can give them more of the great outdoors as I grew up with, without it being overly expensive and so life threatening. Thanks again for the great work you blokes do. PS Mum in-law, a Brit, was on and on about the land use and cutting of saplings. I understand her viewpoint, large parts of natural, rural Britain could get decimated if left unchecked, but great to see you out there living life and being boys
reply
Davy Jones
Telephone: years ago we had a wall telephone with a crank in a wooden box hanging on the wall. You cranked he handle tossed a AC voltage to ring bells on the line. Their was 8 users and a system of long and shorts to identify who was the call for. A steak long crank was for the operator to answer who was a sun-up to sun down in her house operator with access lines to the outside world. The old females were on the phone all day long wearing out the batteries in the phone box on the wall. Phone was -48vdc and ring was 90vac+. Later we got a battery less phone as the line had the dc voltage. Finally a dial phone came, but it was a party line too. But only 4 parties. Private lines were rare I the rural areas. Only the cities had that luxury. as wire was costly to run, so we have to share. Families like to share with other family members the same wire. The string wire was replaced by unshielded open wire cables, 8 or 25 if I remember right. The telephone pole were like 25' or less and very thin poles.
reply
Telephone: years ago we had a wall telephone with a crank in a wooden box hanging on the wall. You cranked he handle tossed a AC voltage to ring bells on the line. Their was 8 users and a system of long and shorts to identify who was the call for. A steak long crank was for the operator to answer who was a sun-up to sun down in her house operator with access lines to the outside world. The old females were on the phone all day long wearing out the batteries in the phone box on the wall. Phone was -48vdc and ring was 90vac+. Later we got a battery less phone as the line had the dc voltage. Finally a dial phone came, but it was a party line too. But only 4 parties. Private lines were rare I the rural areas. Only the cities had that luxury. as wire was costly to run, so we have to share. Families like to share with other family members the same wire. The string wire was replaced by unshielded open wire cables, 8 or 25 if I remember right. The telephone pole were like 25' or less and very thin poles.
reply
Wolfy Wolf
Alzheimers starts in the Hippocampus which is in the central part of the brain just above the brain stem, analog mobiles of the day used 824 megahertz and 894 megahertz which is approximately 1/3 of the frequency of a microwave oven, now I know that quarters matter when it comes to radio frequency transceivers ie; - you can have a waveform that is 1 meter in length, you can still recieve and transmit on a 1/4 wave antenna at 25 cm. Now 37cm is the ideal airiel length for an analog mobile phone, or, 1/2 of, or 1/4 of that 37cm with reduction in quality of signal, so would a 3rd of a microwave frequency still work as a microwave but much slower, dont forget that microwaves cook from the inside out. food for thought, Digital phones use. 698-806 MHz (700 MHz Band)806-849/851-896 MHz (800 MHz Band)1850-1910/1930-1990 MHz (PCS Band)17101755/21102155 MHz (AWS Band)Now the AWS band is very close to microwave tech and frequency so I will leave it to you to decide if they cook your brain; )
reply
Alzheimers starts in the Hippocampus which is in the central part of the brain just above the brain stem, analog mobiles of the day used 824 megahertz and 894 megahertz which is approximately 1/3 of the frequency of a microwave oven, now I know that quarters matter when it comes to radio frequency transceivers ie; - you can have a waveform that is 1 meter in length, you can still recieve and transmit on a 1/4 wave antenna at 25 cm. Now 37cm is the ideal airiel length for an analog mobile phone, or, 1/2 of, or 1/4 of that 37cm with reduction in quality of signal, so would a 3rd of a microwave frequency still work as a microwave but much slower, dont forget that microwaves cook from the inside out. food for thought, Digital phones use. 698-806 MHz (700 MHz Band)806-849/851-896 MHz (800 MHz Band)1850-1910/1930-1990 MHz (PCS Band)17101755/21102155 MHz (AWS Band)Now the AWS band is very close to microwave tech and frequency so I will leave it to you to decide if they cook your brain; )
reply
Muva
Alzheimer affects hippocampus, which is located in the center of a brain. Now for the telephone part: Old dial up telephones won't affect the brain because the signal was traveling through a wire. The cell phones are transferring signals through waves. There was a theory about these waves causing cancer, but multiple studies showed that the waves are too large to divide body cells, from which a tumor starts to form. As for the Alzheimer's disease, it develops through toxic change in the brain, which causes healthy neurons to stop functioning, and they lose connection to other neurons. So I don't think it's possible for a phone to cause Alzheimer's. The reason for increased rate of the disease may be the unhealthy lifestyle people live by today. I apologize if I made grammatical mistakes. English is not my native tongue.
reply
Alzheimer affects hippocampus, which is located in the center of a brain. Now for the telephone part: Old dial up telephones won't affect the brain because the signal was traveling through a wire. The cell phones are transferring signals through waves. There was a theory about these waves causing cancer, but multiple studies showed that the waves are too large to divide body cells, from which a tumor starts to form. As for the Alzheimer's disease, it develops through toxic change in the brain, which causes healthy neurons to stop functioning, and they lose connection to other neurons. So I don't think it's possible for a phone to cause Alzheimer's. The reason for increased rate of the disease may be the unhealthy lifestyle people live by today. I apologize if I made grammatical mistakes. English is not my native tongue.
reply
Cllaws 889
Alzheimers is characterized by diffuse cortical atrophy from a diagnostic standpoint. Research as to which sides are affected wouldnt be too useful due to the fact the damage is equal across the cerebrum. It would be more useful to look into the relationship of cell phone emission and abnormal deposition of amyloid plaque in the brain. As well as inflammatory response that causes the actual damage in the brain. We really arent sure what causes the actual inflammation yet (were pretty sure but not exactly convicted to one answer) Its more than likely that cell phone use is not relevant to this disease and comorbid conditions are, such as type 2 diabetes, viral diseases, or other neurological diseases are.
reply
Alzheimers is characterized by diffuse cortical atrophy from a diagnostic standpoint. Research as to which sides are affected wouldnt be too useful due to the fact the damage is equal across the cerebrum. It would be more useful to look into the relationship of cell phone emission and abnormal deposition of amyloid plaque in the brain. As well as inflammatory response that causes the actual damage in the brain. We really arent sure what causes the actual inflammation yet (were pretty sure but not exactly convicted to one answer) Its more than likely that cell phone use is not relevant to this disease and comorbid conditions are, such as type 2 diabetes, viral diseases, or other neurological diseases are.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos















