VehiclesFashionRecipesBlogsHuntTravelsSportFunHandmadeITEducation
Mini-Games
x

x
zakruti.com » Knowledge, science, education » Weird History
What It Was Like to Be A Medieval Soldier

What It Was Like to Be A Medieval Soldier

FBTwitterReddit

video description

Rating: 4.0; Vote: 1
When called to battle during the Middle Ages in Europe, soldiers expected to be surrounded by unpleasant, if not downright unspeakable, sights. Much like medieval executioners, medieval soldiers witnessed blood, carnage, and death on an up-close-and-personal level. Accounts of the great medieval battles not only detail soldiers' lives and the conditions they faced, but also reveal the damage they inflicted on their enemies and noncombatants alike
Date: 2022-12-29

Comments and reviews: 20


There is no such thing as a 'medieval' soldier.
In the part about the horses you speak of research on horses from the 4th to 17th century, if that is the timespan we are considering then there is so much difference in the war experience that it is ridiculous to generalise it.
Take the Franks, we're talking tribal invasions there, the time of the wandering of the peoples.
Or 1066, probably the highwater mark of feudal warfare.
And if you're gonna call the people that did the fighting 'soldiers', then you'd have to move up to 1645 (not really medieval now, isn't it) with the formation of the New Model Army. At that point firearms and cannon were pretty common.

reply

You completely left out the development of armor, from chain maille to full plate armor! This also led to an evolution in weapons, and a sort of Medieval arms race. As armor became increasingly protective, cutting attacks with the sword became almost obsolete. As a response, swords became narrower, and pointier at the tip, and fencing began to emphasize using the sword to stab through the joints and other gaps in the plate armor. For example: look at a Viking Age sword, and compare it to a 15th/Late Medieval sword.
reply

They didn't bring those small horses that stood at 4'10 into battle. Those were horses used for more comfortable travel. Their trot was very steady and smooth and barely moved vertically which all the full sized horse breeds do. Traveling just a few miles on a full sized horse can give your back a pounding. War horses were a real thing in Medieval times and they were full sized Arabians for the most part.
reply

I'm sorry, but reading Wikipedia would give more knowledge than most of these medieval videos of yours. I honestly don't even want to know how you research your videos, although it's most likely just taking the most absurd title of a non-sourced article and going with that. You're actively misinforming thousands of clueless people about major topics in history and it's disgraceful
reply

It was just a payed extended vacation. You had the chance to acquire souvenirs on the road to your holiday destination. Some nitpickers call that looting. You could have a good workout. That's literally, you had to work outside. You trained your skills. You had to otherwise you were dead. You see it wasn't all gloom and doom.
reply

It's just not true that common soldiers were untrained. There is lots of anecdotal evidence that martial arts such as wrestling, boxing and stick fighting were a big part of men and boys culture back then. In a time when it was not uncommon for extreme violence to happen at any time. you had to know how to fight.
reply

Wow jousting is equal to kickball huh. I do remember as a kid fearing for my life as the ball approached, Just put a nice kick nothing to fancy and then before I knew it I'm one leg short and kickball is no longer a viable means to glory. Looking back if only I played a more civil game like monopoly.
reply

we really need to remind ourselves how good we truly have it nowadays. even when times are really rough our THIRD world problems are a joke (yes i said THIRD. not even gonna mention how got the first world has it.
reply

Fakt check your sourcess, that ponny study was not in all defining war horse as ponny! Rather as animal used in military. Thats a difference. So. Dont spread nonsense. There is miriad of other sourcess.
reply

isnt it strange how a horse size of a current day pony could carry a grown man equipped with 50 kilos af weapons and armor? while also armored. with all the horse riding equipment?
reply

At least Europe was not multiculti back in them days. Imagine walking on the streets in your country and only see real Europeans. Now it looks like northern Africa
reply

Back when kings and lords fought right alongside their men. Now they hide in the White House and let young men they don't care about die for their political agendas.
reply

Yea the pony thing. i did some digging. Your making it sound more concrete than it is. Iconography for one, vastly disagrees as well as primary sources.
reply

The soldiers didnt supply anything. The lords the king was calling upon did. Most people could barely afford to eat let alone buy a sword and shield
reply

Ponies don't take up that much space on a ship, its why the Vikings had the small horses as well, it beats walking when you get over the sea.
reply

Both in Iraq and Afghanistan during the winter months the fighting against coalition forces would seize due to lack of morale and equipment.
reply

Smaller horses where more nimble on the battlefield, it was a well known tactic in the Ancient world right through to medieval times
reply

There was a squabble over a shoe that led to the slaughter of 6, 000 people during the crusades. Who says they werent petty?
reply

Lol first talk about the Revolution in Europe in 1838 I thank that was you lots arrival full of shit the lot of you
reply

how did those fights look like it seemed they got like 0 training, did they even know what a formation was?
reply
Add a review, comment






Other channel videos