The Ending Of Harry Potter Finally Explained
video description
One piece of charcoal in a fireplace is a good thing but only for the person who puts it in the fireplace. Many people find that religion conflicts with the good stuff. Well, according to some books religion is finery but a lesser one. As the press and market began taking over and certain things became more widely available religious institutions began to lose their luster. The world has many fine things but fine things do not necessarily come with instructions or fine utensils and much goes to waste. What it begins to come down to is many don't want to settle for a lesser thing. It begins to seem unfair or deceptive and, well, sometimes that is a fine thing also. Many wars seem to be about who has fine things including religious ones. Science. maths, Occult, rhetoric, metalsmithing, history, and other things are deceptive in that they are fine things but present themselves to many as cheap alternatives. If you cannot understand a thing you cannot enjoy it. Most fine things require expensive understandings or they go to waste. Fine things require devotion, skill, and cunning and once you begin you will see giants of their industry and at the end of a journey, it all returns to the earth and loses some but gains much. Institutions such as scouting and religion provide many rungs to young people but they sometimes cannot climb the ladder to its extent. They may become semi-traditional and turn into surrealist garbage or even violent attackers of taste and quality. On the other hand, who will give a voice to the innocent, like the victims of nuclear waste, or the goose less Tiny Tim? The rungs seem pretty essential and I have climbed them myself to whatever extent I could. You cannot just jump up a mountain or cross a bridge. Would eliminating the rungs or blowing up the bridge help anyone but them? Hock-e-ty Pock-e-ty. annoying as ever. if you eliminate these rungs it's alike a 10-ton exploding pastry on the less-fortunate and the young. I'm not sure that would help anything.
Date: 2020-07-14
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 9
Pedro
When the basilisk bit Harry the horcruxe in side him should have being destroyed? No?
This is what I think.
Voly made a unwanted horcruxe which was Harry. Because they became intertwine Harry is volys and his own horcruxes. Meaning that volys soul is Harrys holcruxe; which is divided in all of volys horcruxes. When the basilisk bit Harry, both volys and harrys horcruxe was destroyed/canceled out. In the the woods when harry was killed he came back because voly is his horcruxe. When Voly tried to kill Harry as a baby his body vanished. Harrys lifeless body was next to his horcruxe. He didnt need to go though the process of getting a new one like voly did. ;D
What do you guys think?
reply
When the basilisk bit Harry the horcruxe in side him should have being destroyed? No?
This is what I think.
Voly made a unwanted horcruxe which was Harry. Because they became intertwine Harry is volys and his own horcruxes. Meaning that volys soul is Harrys holcruxe; which is divided in all of volys horcruxes. When the basilisk bit Harry, both volys and harrys horcruxe was destroyed/canceled out. In the the woods when harry was killed he came back because voly is his horcruxe. When Voly tried to kill Harry as a baby his body vanished. Harrys lifeless body was next to his horcruxe. He didnt need to go though the process of getting a new one like voly did. ;D
What do you guys think?
reply
Stanley
Can someone explain why Voldemort died here? I just don't know enough
about how wand dueling obviously. Voldemort uses a killing spell, Avra
Kadavra, while Harry only uses a disarm spell, Expellearmis. Why did
Voldemort die if Harry didn't use a killing spell. With the snake dead,
Voldie still had powers, but much weaker, and a body but he was still
alive before he was disarmed. So long question short, how did a disarm
spell kill Voldemort at the end? Shouldn't he have just lost his wand?
reply
Can someone explain why Voldemort died here? I just don't know enough
about how wand dueling obviously. Voldemort uses a killing spell, Avra
Kadavra, while Harry only uses a disarm spell, Expellearmis. Why did
Voldemort die if Harry didn't use a killing spell. With the snake dead,
Voldie still had powers, but much weaker, and a body but he was still
alive before he was disarmed. So long question short, how did a disarm
spell kill Voldemort at the end? Shouldn't he have just lost his wand?
reply
NaYawkr
In the actual Last Book the final battle between Voldemort and Harry was inside the Hogwarts Castle, and Voldemort's Dead Body was intact, never flaked away as the movie invented. This bogus movie tale was not the actual end of Voldemort found by all who read books authored by J. K. Rowling. Let us all hope someday another better movie will be made that follows the story written by J. K. Rowling and not some hollyweird screen play composer's Lame-O Invention to keep costs down and maximize profits.
reply
In the actual Last Book the final battle between Voldemort and Harry was inside the Hogwarts Castle, and Voldemort's Dead Body was intact, never flaked away as the movie invented. This bogus movie tale was not the actual end of Voldemort found by all who read books authored by J. K. Rowling. Let us all hope someday another better movie will be made that follows the story written by J. K. Rowling and not some hollyweird screen play composer's Lame-O Invention to keep costs down and maximize profits.
reply
SativaGamer420
This still doesnt explain why harry didnt die in the forest. The Book does a much better job of explaining it but it is because voldemort took harrys blood to revive himself in the goblet of fire. In doing so they now both have the protection that harrys mother gave him, meaning that as long as voldemort lived, harry could not die. At least not until the connection between them broke, which it did when voldemort killed harry, hence the shriveled piece of voldemort in kings cross
reply
This still doesnt explain why harry didnt die in the forest. The Book does a much better job of explaining it but it is because voldemort took harrys blood to revive himself in the goblet of fire. In doing so they now both have the protection that harrys mother gave him, meaning that as long as voldemort lived, harry could not die. At least not until the connection between them broke, which it did when voldemort killed harry, hence the shriveled piece of voldemort in kings cross
reply
dollyliv
If I'm being honest, all the movies and books up until The Goblet Of Fire were amazing, but then from there it just went downhill. It was supposed to be a magical place not a damn mass murder. Everyone who didn't read the books or seen the movies, I only recommend; The Sorcerer's Stone, The Chamber Of Secrets, The Prisoner Of Azkaban and The Goblet Of Fire. For the rest don't bother because it gets worse and most of the great characters are die: / I'm very disappointed.
reply
If I'm being honest, all the movies and books up until The Goblet Of Fire were amazing, but then from there it just went downhill. It was supposed to be a magical place not a damn mass murder. Everyone who didn't read the books or seen the movies, I only recommend; The Sorcerer's Stone, The Chamber Of Secrets, The Prisoner Of Azkaban and The Goblet Of Fire. For the rest don't bother because it gets worse and most of the great characters are die: / I'm very disappointed.
reply
HazzaK
4: 02 What? This makes no sense since Harry and Draco dueled before Draco confronted Dumbledore. And the point you make about Draco disarming Dumbledore to gain possession of the Elder Wand is far fetch since it suggests that witches and wizards lose possession of their wands whenever they are disarmed not matter the situation. Meaning students take possession of their fellow students' wands when disarming each other in class and for practice, which is just plain wrong.
reply
4: 02 What? This makes no sense since Harry and Draco dueled before Draco confronted Dumbledore. And the point you make about Draco disarming Dumbledore to gain possession of the Elder Wand is far fetch since it suggests that witches and wizards lose possession of their wands whenever they are disarmed not matter the situation. Meaning students take possession of their fellow students' wands when disarming each other in class and for practice, which is just plain wrong.
reply
Flying
When Harry asked if it was in his head, I don't think he was talking about the entire adventure, from when he first got his letter to then, I think he was talking about his discussion with Dumbledore after he was struck by Avada Kedavra after all he should have been dead. Besides Dumbledore says 'why should that make it any less real. ' I don't believe the OH IT WAS ALL A DREAM ending at all. That also just strips the magic off of everything.
reply
When Harry asked if it was in his head, I don't think he was talking about the entire adventure, from when he first got his letter to then, I think he was talking about his discussion with Dumbledore after he was struck by Avada Kedavra after all he should have been dead. Besides Dumbledore says 'why should that make it any less real. ' I don't believe the OH IT WAS ALL A DREAM ending at all. That also just strips the magic off of everything.
reply
Jayce
Harry not dying because he was a Horcrux is a common misconception, and only a film theory. Harry didnt die because Voldemort possessed Harrys blood, which hosted Lilys protective charm she cast on Harry when she died for him. So long as Voldemort was alive and kept that enchantment active, it anchors Harry to life unless Harry chooses not to live. The part of Voldemorts soul vanquishing in Harry when he got hit was an added bonus.
reply
Harry not dying because he was a Horcrux is a common misconception, and only a film theory. Harry didnt die because Voldemort possessed Harrys blood, which hosted Lilys protective charm she cast on Harry when she died for him. So long as Voldemort was alive and kept that enchantment active, it anchors Harry to life unless Harry chooses not to live. The part of Voldemorts soul vanquishing in Harry when he got hit was an added bonus.
reply
noripsni81
A wizard cant be killed by their own wand and the elder wants allegiance was to Harry, so Voldemort instead killed the shard of his soul deep inside of Harry. Also, Voldemort didnt die from the snake dying. His spell rebounded (which you can see if you look closely) because the elder want failed him because its allegiance was still to Harry. Dumbledore set this all up and won in the end.
reply
A wizard cant be killed by their own wand and the elder wants allegiance was to Harry, so Voldemort instead killed the shard of his soul deep inside of Harry. Also, Voldemort didnt die from the snake dying. His spell rebounded (which you can see if you look closely) because the elder want failed him because its allegiance was still to Harry. Dumbledore set this all up and won in the end.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
