Bloopers That Actually Cost The Filmmakers A Ton Of Money
video description
Date: 2020-07-14
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 9
Kevin
I've always been curious about the blooper I saw in the original Sleepless in Seattle. I went to the move theatre when it first came out and was surprised to see the blooper. It's near the end of the movie when Meg Ryan was in a high rise restaurant with her fiance. She has to excuse herself so she can meet with Tom Hanks in the next scene. Imagine the theatre audience surprise when the complete scene is shot with the boom microphone hanging over the table during the Etire Scene! I should have got a free movie pass out of that one, but I never said anything to anybody. Oddly enough movie goers didn't really talk to one another back then either. So we all just went home and chalked it up to a Hollywood oversight that past the editing room.
reply
I've always been curious about the blooper I saw in the original Sleepless in Seattle. I went to the move theatre when it first came out and was surprised to see the blooper. It's near the end of the movie when Meg Ryan was in a high rise restaurant with her fiance. She has to excuse herself so she can meet with Tom Hanks in the next scene. Imagine the theatre audience surprise when the complete scene is shot with the boom microphone hanging over the table during the Etire Scene! I should have got a free movie pass out of that one, but I never said anything to anybody. Oddly enough movie goers didn't really talk to one another back then either. So we all just went home and chalked it up to a Hollywood oversight that past the editing room.
reply
JT
those Bond guys were really dumb. They could've just change the line to instead of saying it was coded to his palmprint, to have some other sort of code, like perhaps microdermal chip implanted on his hand or maybe Bond's heat signature or even maybe his glove has something that also transmits to his gun. Heck, having his gun coded to his palmprint means Bond could never be using any gloves ever to use it so he would not be able to go to any really cold place or would have to remove any special gloves to use it which would be really inconvenient. Its really a story flop
reply
those Bond guys were really dumb. They could've just change the line to instead of saying it was coded to his palmprint, to have some other sort of code, like perhaps microdermal chip implanted on his hand or maybe Bond's heat signature or even maybe his glove has something that also transmits to his gun. Heck, having his gun coded to his palmprint means Bond could never be using any gloves ever to use it so he would not be able to go to any really cold place or would have to remove any special gloves to use it which would be really inconvenient. Its really a story flop
reply
dmo224
The Bond Skyfall glove story is false; it's an interior scene on an interior set which was more likely too hot with all the production lights than too cold, begging the question why gloves? One can see raw, behind-the-scenes footage of the scene question in the special features, wherein Danial Craig can be seen not wearing any gloves.
reply
The Bond Skyfall glove story is false; it's an interior scene on an interior set which was more likely too hot with all the production lights than too cold, begging the question why gloves? One can see raw, behind-the-scenes footage of the scene question in the special features, wherein Danial Craig can be seen not wearing any gloves.
reply
Robert
Another blooper (not from a movie): In season two of thr grand tour? Richard hammond filled a supercar with water instead of gas. He noticed it when the engine started making weird noises but the car was already destroyed. Costs: not mentioned but probably a few hunderd thousend
reply
Another blooper (not from a movie): In season two of thr grand tour? Richard hammond filled a supercar with water instead of gas. He noticed it when the engine started making weird noises but the car was already destroyed. Costs: not mentioned but probably a few hunderd thousend
reply
Smallvillefreak616
Every single time I see a looper video, I know they have no clue how to stick to the definition of the very thing they're listing. Yet every time I click to watch and see if they used their heads this time. Every time I am disappointed to learn that they have not.
reply
Every single time I see a looper video, I know they have no clue how to stick to the definition of the very thing they're listing. Yet every time I click to watch and see if they used their heads this time. Every time I am disappointed to learn that they have not.
reply
DwaynetheWayne
as far as superman cgi is concern. you guys should know the cost was only on paper. the money was actual taken by the corrupt executives of warner bros or u should say warner butchers the most corrupted, greedy production house in hollywood today from gold to shit
reply
as far as superman cgi is concern. you guys should know the cost was only on paper. the money was actual taken by the corrupt executives of warner bros or u should say warner butchers the most corrupted, greedy production house in hollywood today from gold to shit
reply
owtena
blooper = a funny mistake made by an actor during the making of a film or television programme and usually removed before the film or programme is shown.
Where was a funny mistake made by an actor? I missed it! Broken arm? Yeah, it's a funny mistake.
reply
blooper = a funny mistake made by an actor during the making of a film or television programme and usually removed before the film or programme is shown.
Where was a funny mistake made by an actor? I missed it! Broken arm? Yeah, it's a funny mistake.
reply
Andrew
After I bought a car for my film with an intention to smash it in the tree it soon died. So I had to buy another car. But instead of smashing the new car in the tree I decided to smash it in the old car. So I lost a bit of money but it was more fun.
reply
After I bought a car for my film with an intention to smash it in the tree it soon died. So I had to buy another car. But instead of smashing the new car in the tree I decided to smash it in the old car. So I lost a bit of money but it was more fun.
reply
rajvader
Why didn't they just re-dub Q to say that 007's smart-gun would only fire if it were within a meter of his wristwatch or something? Much cheaper and easier than animating fake Bond hands.
How long does it take Cavil to re-grow a mustache?
reply
Why didn't they just re-dub Q to say that 007's smart-gun would only fire if it were within a meter of his wristwatch or something? Much cheaper and easier than animating fake Bond hands.
How long does it take Cavil to re-grow a mustache?
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
