VehiclesFashionRecipesBlogsHuntTravelsSportFunHandmadeITEducation
Mini-Games
x

x
zakruti.com » Sport, fitness, workout » Jeff Cavalier
Your Cardio Machines are LYING To You!

Your Cardio Machines are LYING To You!

FBTwitterReddit

video description

Rating: 4; Vote: 3
Did you know that your cardio machines are lying to you? In this video, I am going to show you how the cardio machines you are using are incorrectly displaying the number of calories you are burning. In fact, the number of calories displayed may be grossly overestimated. I am also going to show you which machines are the worst at doing this, and which ones you might want to spend your time on instead. First thing is first, if you are using cardio as your main method of creating a caloric deficit to lose weight, you are making a big mistake. The fact of the matter is that nothing is going to be as effective of creating a caloric deficit as keeping your nutrition in check. I talk about it all the time; you can t outrun a bad diet. Make your caloric cuts through your diet to get the best results when trying to lose weight. Where do the inaccuracies sit when it comes to the caloric display? Well, if the machine is not asking you for your weight, it s already off to a bad start. The cardio machine is calculating the caloric burn based on something called a MET. This unit is multiplied based on the activity, but is calculated using a standard number for weight input; 154 lbs. If your weight is different, then your caloric readout is inaccurate! The next way that your cardio machines are lying to you is by fudging the math a little bit. How so? Well, the number displayed is based on including something called the REE; the amount of calories you burn at rest. By including this number, the machine is inflating the number of calories burned. This will make you think that you are burning more calories and doing more work than you actually are. How else is are they lying to you? Well, this one comes from something you are likely doing that the machine can t account for and that is your posture. By leaning over and resting on the handles of a bike or a treadmill, then you are actually unweighting yourself and doing less work. This can actually lead to a 50% difference in the calories you think you are burning. The fix is easy; stand up straight and perform the exercise with good posture. Next, you have to pay attention to the range of motion when you are performing the work on the cardio machine. You would obviously be performing more work by taking the exercise through the full range of motion as opposed to an abbreviated one. It s no different when it comes to cardio. On a step mill: taking short, choppy steps instead of driving the foot down and getting to full hip extension. Look at an elliptical machine; it is likely locking you into an abbreviated range of motion based on the design of the machine itself. When it comes to a bike, standing up is how you would be achieving full range of motion while further weighting yourself to perform more work meaning more calories burnt. So, what cardio machines are lying to you the least? The stationary bike is the most accurate, overestimating the calories burnt by only 7%. The mathematical equations used to measure force output (watts) in combination with a weight input leads to a more accurate reading. Next up, is the stair master with a 12% overestimation on the calories burnt. Second to last is the treadmill, off by 13-20% which is compounded by the poor posture often included with this machine. Lastly, the most inaccurate of all these machines is the elliptical - a whopping 42%! Some of this is due to discrepancies in the range of motion from machine to machine. What can we do to nullify the inaccuracies of the machines? Well, for starters, we can look to other cardio machines. Which ones we should be focusing our efforts on is based simply on the amount of effort you need to perform them. For example; using an air-bike, a rowing machine, or ski-ERG. They may require more work, but the more work done, the more calories burnt, so these are the best cardio machine options. If you want to stick to the machines you are using right now but want to make it more accurate; try to find a machine that asks for you to input your weight to give a reading that is closer to the truth. You can also gauge the work you are doing by your heart rate (the higher it is, the more effort you are expending. Finally, you can take the output the display is reading and cut it in half and use that in your caloric intake guidelines. Don t think that your wearable calorie counters are all that accurate either with a 20-96% inaccuracy range!
Date: 2022-07-26

Comments and reviews: 14


My smart watch always seemed to be pretty accurate, and it does have more data than a treadmill. I listen to the calorie burn it says ad I lose, maintain, or gain weight accordingly. The thing about a treadmill is that it doesn't tell you whether it's including your baseline BMR into the calorie burn estimates. If you jog for a half hour and your BMR is 2000, that's 42 calories that may or may not be included in the treadmills estimation. That isn't a perfect guess because calorie burn that's part of your BMR varies depending on whether you're sleeping or not too.
You can outrun a bad diet too. I have a physical job and run a lot with maybe 3 days strength training a week. I eat a lot of healthy food, but still manage to eat a decent amount of less healthy carbs. It's likely more to do with the active job than the running though.

reply

I ignore the machine and feel that relying on my own smart watch recording is better. it is setup for me, my weight, my VO2 etc over time, and keeps my data in one place for me to reference. if I choose an indoor trainer workout compared to riding a road bike, with a chest HR monitor, and power meter, I feel it is much more accurate than any gym machine where you have to hold the bars to get the HR data. also, the watch can help me with training plans, duration, HIIT intervals etc. so it is a companion that makes any generic gym machine unattractive. only time I get on a gym bike or rower is to do a warm up for weights. cardio is more of a science for me, and my Garmin Fenix is what works for me at this point. at home, or out in the real world, climbing real hills, with real tailwinds and headwinds. not the A/C on high at the gym.
reply

Well well. When you're training using an ergometer the shown calorie burn is based on the wattage applied to the magnetic brake and the force and rpms you had during your training. Then an ergometer asumes your body has a 25% efficiency which is quite high an will mostly be achieved by very good trained profi bikers. So, if you are not Lance Armstrong, the amount of calories you burn will be higher than what an ergometer shows you. And the fact that a training device may call itself ergometer ensures the accuracy of the wattage used and the measures calory burn. So riding for an hour at 300W on an ergometer will at least burn 1000kcal. Which is the energy equivalent of one complete meal.
reply

Few years ago i tried this app on my phone that calculates calories based on terrain and so forth. And i noticed that when i was running, i spent about the same amount of calories as when i was just walking, which made no sense. I sent them an email complaining about this, because i thought it was a bug. But no, apparently they include REE in their calculations, so spending more time on a certain distance walking then equals spending a shorter time while running, which turns out is almost the same total calorie usage. I just uninstalled the damn thing, it just made calculating way more difficult, as i already knew my total REE for the day.
reply

I have some questions. After a week of training and you know your fatigued, for example your range of motion is suffering and you have no adrenaline draw on, what forms of exercise will slow down recovery? Bruce Lee on his rest days would still remain active. If I do one of your 10 minute ab workouts will that slow down my recovery or is the increase in activity beneficial? Also my shoulders tend to take a beating because they are usually required in most of the exercises I do, is there a way to take better care those joints on a regular basis either nutrition or stretching wise?
reply

One more suggestion of a good workout equipment that will not lie to you a lot is a bike on an indoor direct drive trainer. The software from garmine and wahoo factors, targeted wats, age, weight. heart rate off of heart rate strap and level of exertion. Completely agree that no exercise matters given that your diet is crap. No don't eat less and exercise more, eat whole foods, lower sugar and seek more movement (walking is a great way to start)
reply

I always viewed cardio as second rate in comparison with resistance training when it comes to increasing metabolism and burning calories even when resting. My interpretation of cardio was always the best thing to do for your heart. I have heard to increase effectiveness of a cardio workout in regards to heart health would be to do 30 minutes or more. Is the information floating around in my head accurate or am I holding on to false information.
reply

I've been diagnosed with kyphosis - a posterior/anterior curvature of the spine. With hard work, I have found that my workouts have really helped to correct my imbalanced posture and straighten the spine. While I have seen good results from my workouts, I wonder if I'm approaching it all wrong - should I focus on corrective exercises or continue with my hypertrophy training and heavy lifting to help fix the problem? Thanks fellas.
reply

I solved the problem of my elliptical not asking for my weight. The caloric burn it reports is so low after a 30-minute, intense session (with no leaning on the machine, that I only use it as a cardio workout (breathing, heart, lungs, endurance. I use my treadmill (which does ask for my weight) for burning calories, along with walking dozens of miles (outside) every week, and, of course, eating clean 'most' of the time.
reply

Wearables have improved significantly since that 2017 study. Nowadays a considerable number of wearables tend to underestimate how many calories you're burning during an exercise (since they aren't as accurate as medical-grade equipment at picking all the slight changes in heartrate. Peer-reviewed publications tend to be too slow on this aspect; the limit should be anything published within the past one year.
reply

When u compared the stair master or stepper to doing bicep curls, saying full extension is better, wouldn t fully extending your leg give u a quick rest period as you re lifting less weight the straighter your leg is, whereas you re actually keeping more leg muscles engaged by not fully extending them? Kind of like locking out your legs on a leg press compared to keeping a slight bend and the end of the rep
reply

As always another great video. The only reason I even look at the screen is for heart rate to see if I'm hitting my target heart rate. I always put the treadmill at an incline and on the stair stepper I do a few minutes of skipping every other step. As far as leaning on the machine, these folks probably lean on counters, shopping carts. at every opportunity which is also horrible for posture.
reply

Question for ANYONE: Ive always felt like these machines were not telling the truth. But how accurate are fitness trackers like an Apple Watch in comparison? I usually use that to track calories burned over the machines themselves. Oddly enough the what the watch says is always pretty close to what the machines read as well. And I dont have the watch synced up with the machines at all.
reply

I used to use the elliptical and would shift effort from legs to arms intermittently, as well as exaggerate upper body movement (twisting at the waist) instead of simply moving my arms. The machine had body weight input and I Always used heart rate and respiratatory levels as my guides to how I was improving, and always increased resistance levels when I stagnated. It worked!
reply
Add a review, comment






Other channel videos