VehiclesFashionRecipesBlogsHuntTravelsSportFunHandmadeITEducation
Mini-Games
x

x
zakruti.com » Blogs and People » Philip DeFranco
The Disgusting and Treasonous Trump Putin Conference, Joe Walsh, Sacha Baron Cohen, & More

The Disgusting and Treasonous Trump Putin Conference, Joe Walsh, Sacha Baron Cohen, & More

FBTwitterReddit

video description

Rating: 4.0; Vote: 1
The Disgusting and Treasonous Trump Putin Conference, Joe Walsh, Sacha Baron Cohen, & More Badger Mcblasty: The main issue here is: Who gave the DNC e-mails to WikiLeaks? Handpicked analysts from three intelligence agencies assess that the Russians hacked into the DNC, but provide no hard evidence for this. We think back to the evidence-free assessments 15 years ago before the attack on Iraq. Several high-confidence intelligence judgments had been fraudulently fixed to dovetail with the Bush/Cheney agenda for war. In June 2008, the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee released a bipartisan report five years in the making. Mincing no words, he wrote: In making the case for war, the Administration repeatedly presented intelligence as fact when in reality it was unsubstantiated, contradicted, or even non-existent. We worry that this may be happening again. Adding to our concern, in recent years we have seen false-flag attacks carried out to undergird a political narrative and objectiveto blame the Syrian government for chemical attacks, for example. Forensic evidence suggests that this tried-and-tested technique (in this instance, simply pasting in a Russian template with telltale signs) may have been used to show that Russia hacked into the DNC computers last June. For more than a year, we have been pointing out that any data acquired by a hack would have had to come across the Internet. The blanket coverage of the Internet by the NSA, its UK counterpart GCHQ, and others would be able to produce copies of that data and show where the data originated and where it went. But US intelligence has produced no evidence that hacking by Russia led to it acquiring the DNC e-mails and passing them on to WikiLeaks. Historically, the United States has disclosed classified information when it has suited its purposes. One need not go all the way back to the release of U-2 photography during the Cuban missile crisis, or to President Ronald Reagans decision to sacrifice a lucrative source (which enabled us to intercept and decipher Libyan communications) to prove that Libya was behind the April 5, 1986, bombing of a Berlin disco that killed two and wounded 79 US servicemen. Much more recently, in 2014 and 2015, the United States released significant details to verify the successful hack by which China stole over 21. 5 million official records, including security background investigations, from the Office of Personnel Management. Independent research into the metadata associated with the July 5, 2016, cyber-event that was blamed on Russian hacking shows that what actually took place was a copy onto an external storage device, and that the copy took place on the East Coast of the United States by someone with physical access to the DNC server or computers. Most curiously, the FBI did not have access to the DNC computers to do its own forensics, even though prominent politicians were calling the alleged Russian hack an act of war. After examining the recent forensic findings, Skip Folden, co-author of the VIPS memo titled Was the Russian Hack an Inside Job, sent a more detailed technical report to the offices of Special Counsel Robert Mueller and of Attorney General Jeff Sessions, asking them to investigate the latest findings. We will not dwell on the nontechnical evidence at hand, but we would be remiss if we did not mention something that has recently been in the public eye. Julian Assange has denied that the source is the Russian government or any other state party, and, truth be told, his record of credibility compares favorably with the records of those who demonize him. An associate of Assange, former UK ambassador Craig Murray, has said the WikiLeaks source was a leak from an insider. To my certain knowledge, said Murray, neither the DNC nor the Podesta leaks involved Russia. Oddly, Murray has not been questioned by any US official or journalist.
Date: 2019-11-01

Comments and reviews: 9


Russians stole data? wait we have confirmations that the info was leaked, not hacked, and was victim of a phishing scam and it was confirmed by the people that the FBI isnt letting talk in court about the server. only 3-4 out of 17 US Intel Communities even think russia did anything, and even saying that we have confirmation that the FBI contacted the Media to help push a narrative before the whole thing hit the fan. and funny thing, theres no extradition procedure between Russia and the United States so how are Un named Russian Military members getting Extradited? we have no treaty making such a legal action to be valid, so saying several anonymous people are indicted on charges that they cant be extradited is utterly meaningless and awkwardly seeming like its just made up to continue the whole RussiaGate Narrative that the Democrats are using to distract what happened to Bernie, What happened with the Emails and Election Rigging and to distract us from what bad things the Democrats were caught doing behind closed doors. Additionally id like to add, on the Russians who posted propaganda online, they both put out positive and negative things on Trump, Hillary, Bernie and Putin and its completely unrelated to any Military operation or election hacking. and honestly this isnt even on the scale of interference the US has had in foreign elections in south america, africa and france so why are we even talking about this? it smells fishy to me but im honestly not buying it, not a supporter of trump, however his recent successes are making it hard not to like him, however i was a adamant BurnieBro back when the election started and now an adamant left leaning libertarian.
reply

It's kinda nice that in our country we once again had more big-name, superpower Presidents discussing, since we have a unique connection between Russia and the EU, not to mention our capital can make those big events in a rather short notice (Not to mention it was pretty good deal in our parts, since more tourism and a chance that our capital started a new, better direction towards better country relations. In another note, it's rather obvious to choose a guy that tries to make a more friendlier connection with your country, rather than hostile Hillary against them, who has already threatened them before when dealing with terrorism back in the day. But as for Americans having this such hostile look on Russians, even if we were like the only country to wage in actual war with them with Winter War/Continuation War, etc. We still have better connections to them than Russia. However we're not really gonna deny that Russia has ton political 'connections', since one of KGB's general's helped one of our other presidents (Who later became the most famous and well-loved, with lot of positive changes, though had a bit of controversy) become to power, Kekkonen. However there is still doubt towards them, however it's better for us to keep that balance with them and the EU.
reply

Philip, you are so bottom of the barrel basic in your assessment of the Russian Collusion Delusion. All of the politicians you quoted, and apparently just take them at their word, are about as corrupt and Anti-American as they claim Russia to be. Stop for a minute, and seriously look into all of the Democratically elected governments our intelligence community savagely overthrew in recent history. Putin isn't an enemy of Democracy, he's been under attack by the US because he wants sovereignty for his nation. The sanctions basically put russia into a long term recession. I would be pissed and fight back at some point. Fck being fair. I'm more concerned with China at this point than Russia. Their economy is in shards, and we've been working with them militarily sharing secrets since the cold war. This whole thing is like saying Sports Teams try to steal each other's playbooks. No sht sherlock. If you get offended at it and claim Trump is disgusting for not verbally attacking the leader of a NUCLEAR POWER on international TV, and pushing for a Nuclear War with Russia. then you're no friend of America either.
reply

As far as Who is America goes, I don't think we can really have any viewpoint unless the raw footage is released. For all we know, this may have been portrayed as a gag to some of these people, and was cut to make them look like they really supported it. Can't say that for all of them, but who knows what really happened? Also, politicians are taught to get votes and not put off potential voters, so they kind of just go along with things sometimes. Not smart. That's why I don't like politicians much. I would say that putting a gun in a child's hands is a bad idea. Anyone remember that poor nine year old that shot her instructor because she couldn't control the UZI SHE WAS SHOOTING? I do, however, feel that teaching kids about the reality of guns early on may save lives down the road. Accidental firearm deaths would be lowered if kids were taught that guns aren't toys and cool things like they seem to be in movies, T. V, and games. They are dangerous, and should never be played with, EVER. Now mortars. I can't see the need for that in American schools. lolThoughts?
reply

A little late on this, but I'll call it out into the ether. Israel is a completely different place with completely different concerns. This is a area where people are using kites to fire bomb people and there is a war raging in the streets. In that kind of situation, the sooner you can defend yourself the better. Let's frame this a little differently, go back in time a bit our go to an area where the life expectancy is close to thirty and older women typically die during childbirth. In that situation, it's acceptable for an older man to marry a teenager, because that's just the reality of their situation. In an area where women die in their late twenties or early thirties, it seems less awful for a twenty-thirty something man to marry a fourteen year old girl. That is the standard that they live in. If we move them to our civilization, our standard, our way of life, we wouldn't let those kids handle guns and we would all line up to curb stomp that pedophile to death (As we should. It might seem wrong, but allotments need to be made for extreme situations.
reply

I generally like Elon Musk. I think he genuinely wants to help humanity and the world. And I think he was genuinely trying to come up with a helpful solution to rescue the kids trapped in the cave. I don't think the backlash he recieved from many people for trying to help is fair, and I think that, mixed with the fact that the British diver came off like a huge prick, made him lash back out. When you feel attacked, you have a gut reaction to attack back. That's just human nature. Musk had a chance to be classier than those attacking him, but instead fell into base human reaction. It happens to the best of us. The only thing we can do in those instances is admit we lost our cool, apologize, and move forward with the best of intentions and try to be better next time. I think history will remember Elon Musk for the good he will accomplish, and things like this will be an insignificant footnote.
reply

The pro Trump people are going to still be pro-trump the anti-trump people are going to still be anti Trump. As for me I'm going to wait and watch his actions. He says a lot of things I don't like but more often than not somehow manages to affect change in the direction that I want. I don't know if it's because of skill or dumb luck for the overzealous haters somehow giving him the win on accident. I mean it wasn't that many months ago that he was supposed to be starting nuclear war with Russia and somehow North Korea was going to crippled the US with its Mighty nuclear Arsenal. Merely electing Trump was supposed to put our economy in an unsalvageable talespin. Predicting Trump seems to be harder than predicting the weather in the Fly Over States. So maybe we should not lie to her hair on fire and see what happens.
reply

Everyone was losing their mind when Trump was trading tweets with, and publicly mocking North Korea. Look how that turned out. Now, Trump has everyone losing their mind over how he's publicly dealing with Putin. Maybe. just MAYBE. Trump is a stable genius and is superb at reading people, and finding unconventional ways to manipulate them on the deepest psychological levels. Keep in mind just how wrong the press has been for some two years now. Trump simply doesn't fit into any standard or widely accepted standard. Keep this in mind as we watch how things turn out with Russia/US relations. I am quite certain that had Hillary been elected, we'd be at war with Russia right now, and perhaps even dealing with an ally having come under nuclear attack from North Korea. Do the ends justify the means? That is the question.
reply

Im an independent (voted third party) but the coverage of Russia here was extremely biased. The intelligence agencies have shown themselves to be untrustworthy and zero evidence of collusion, then indict random Russians of phishing? (Expected behavior, btw, and not at all a bombshelllook at what Obama did in the UK remain campaign for example. Also, the only collusion proved so far with Russia is the Clinton campaign buying a fake dossier. You seem a little biased. I went into the Russia probe with no expectations and without a dog in the race, the findings have been shocking. Mueller threw Russians under the bus. Without examining the DNC server (it was denied to the FBI, how would they know? The whole investigation seems very fishy, but you seem very keen to continue to push narratives with zero evidence.
reply
Add a review, comment






Other channel videos