How Article 13 Could Ruin The Internet And Why You Should Care About The EUCD.
video description
Date: 2019-11-01
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 9
Sarah Azzawi
This is such a hard subject since the internet is made of memes which are essentially made of reposted content related to existing content. But I do get where they're coming from. I mean when for example the Slow Mo Guys put an amazingly beautiful visual video but the internet take only the 3 seconds of the video and turn them in gifs for twitter and facebook. That's horrible and very harmful for the actual creators of the videos since all their goes to people who highlighted (/stole) their content. I mean sure one could argue that its great advertisement too but I feel like it's up to the actual creators to chose the form of marking they want. The copyright limit is incredibly unified so I agree that there is a need to work on it. It does need to be reworked. there should be a certain degree of how okay copied content is. (Maybe Youtube can solve the problem by giving videos to both actual creator and the copier, I don't know. It may be scary to lose memes but this may encourage creative original content am kinda pro that. And again am very pro the fact this might be extremely benifutucal to the actual creator Isn't it a shame if you work hard to create something but then it doesn't get the credit it should? isn't this practically the same?
reply
This is such a hard subject since the internet is made of memes which are essentially made of reposted content related to existing content. But I do get where they're coming from. I mean when for example the Slow Mo Guys put an amazingly beautiful visual video but the internet take only the 3 seconds of the video and turn them in gifs for twitter and facebook. That's horrible and very harmful for the actual creators of the videos since all their goes to people who highlighted (/stole) their content. I mean sure one could argue that its great advertisement too but I feel like it's up to the actual creators to chose the form of marking they want. The copyright limit is incredibly unified so I agree that there is a need to work on it. It does need to be reworked. there should be a certain degree of how okay copied content is. (Maybe Youtube can solve the problem by giving videos to both actual creator and the copier, I don't know. It may be scary to lose memes but this may encourage creative original content am kinda pro that. And again am very pro the fact this might be extremely benifutucal to the actual creator Isn't it a shame if you work hard to create something but then it doesn't get the credit it should? isn't this practically the same?
reply
ShadowXgaming
Lawmakers have an absolutely unacceptable lack of understanding with modern technology and the internet. Seriously, see the U. S. Congress trials for Mark Zuckerburg or Sundar Pichai. Lawmakers are lacking in even the most fundamental tech knowledge and I seriously believe that all lawmakers - in both the E. U. and the U. S. - MUST be required to have at least a basic education in the fields of technology and internet infrastructure before being elected. Seriously, why should we trust incompetents to make laws and regulations for something they have absolutely no understanding of? Why should we trust an Uber driver (who has never flown a plane) fly our airplane? I highly suggest you copy and paste this message and spread the ideas of this message as far and wide as you can if you agree with me. Heck, even a like to make this message more exposed helps quite a bit. I encourage you all to stop these madmen from flying our airplanes into the Pacific. -Shadow out
reply
Lawmakers have an absolutely unacceptable lack of understanding with modern technology and the internet. Seriously, see the U. S. Congress trials for Mark Zuckerburg or Sundar Pichai. Lawmakers are lacking in even the most fundamental tech knowledge and I seriously believe that all lawmakers - in both the E. U. and the U. S. - MUST be required to have at least a basic education in the fields of technology and internet infrastructure before being elected. Seriously, why should we trust incompetents to make laws and regulations for something they have absolutely no understanding of? Why should we trust an Uber driver (who has never flown a plane) fly our airplane? I highly suggest you copy and paste this message and spread the ideas of this message as far and wide as you can if you agree with me. Heck, even a like to make this message more exposed helps quite a bit. I encourage you all to stop these madmen from flying our airplanes into the Pacific. -Shadow out
reply
Inspire Design
The articles' texts were updated in the last few weeks. Only big platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Google, Pinterest, Twitter etc) are affected by them. Small and Micro platforms are NOT affected by these new laws. For the joy of everyone, Wikipedia, open source platforms and Memes are NOT affected as well. Now, if you want to share editor's content on big platforms, you have to agree to pay a fee to the platform that will have then to redistribute royalties to the editors. Keep in mind that also snippet of text (not sure on that, but at least more than 6-7 words) are subject to royalties. (That includes tweets too)Lastly, the laws don't want automated filters through AI, but require manual reports from users that will be checked and verified by people, therefore NOT machines.
reply
The articles' texts were updated in the last few weeks. Only big platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Google, Pinterest, Twitter etc) are affected by them. Small and Micro platforms are NOT affected by these new laws. For the joy of everyone, Wikipedia, open source platforms and Memes are NOT affected as well. Now, if you want to share editor's content on big platforms, you have to agree to pay a fee to the platform that will have then to redistribute royalties to the editors. Keep in mind that also snippet of text (not sure on that, but at least more than 6-7 words) are subject to royalties. (That includes tweets too)Lastly, the laws don't want automated filters through AI, but require manual reports from users that will be checked and verified by people, therefore NOT machines.
reply
Peter Koinzell
It seems like this law disconnects the world from each other a bit. I hate plagiarism but I never considered a 30 sec clip plagiarism. I thought the owners would consider it free advertisement. I watched Citizen Cane b/c of a clip, definitely not because of a trailer on tv. I imagine musician probably being the ones who would make the most out of A. 13 due to every song being on youtube. In a scenario like this where the creators will always be less then the consumers. I regrettably have to admit, it'd be fair if their vote be worth more than mine. And how about video gameplay videos? Would that still be a thing cause I kinda enjoy those. Still don't get it. Don't really like it.
reply
It seems like this law disconnects the world from each other a bit. I hate plagiarism but I never considered a 30 sec clip plagiarism. I thought the owners would consider it free advertisement. I watched Citizen Cane b/c of a clip, definitely not because of a trailer on tv. I imagine musician probably being the ones who would make the most out of A. 13 due to every song being on youtube. In a scenario like this where the creators will always be less then the consumers. I regrettably have to admit, it'd be fair if their vote be worth more than mine. And how about video gameplay videos? Would that still be a thing cause I kinda enjoy those. Still don't get it. Don't really like it.
reply
Creative Name
End AI plot: Youtube and other streaming sites should just stop using an AI. Have a team of people, yes humans, input various search terms such as full movie or reupload all day every day, in shifts, to collect and sort truly copyrighted content from truly parodied or non-copyrighted content. In the cases of clickbait, one can always reverse a claim normally, and should even be able to reverse strikes or consequence. Representatives comb through content at a good pace given enough manpower; rinse, repeat, Article 13 quelled, good day sir(The fourth and final video Im posting this text to. Youtube, pay attention. Bots are flimsy and unreliable)
reply
End AI plot: Youtube and other streaming sites should just stop using an AI. Have a team of people, yes humans, input various search terms such as full movie or reupload all day every day, in shifts, to collect and sort truly copyrighted content from truly parodied or non-copyrighted content. In the cases of clickbait, one can always reverse a claim normally, and should even be able to reverse strikes or consequence. Representatives comb through content at a good pace given enough manpower; rinse, repeat, Article 13 quelled, good day sir(The fourth and final video Im posting this text to. Youtube, pay attention. Bots are flimsy and unreliable)
reply
Andrew Kendall
Well, I dunno really. Frankly, the lobbying is less about freedom of expression and more about self-interest - whether you are an individual, so-called 'creator' or media-controlling behemoth. If you want to recycle copyrighted material for your own amusement and don't expect money for it, fair enough, but if this is about earning a living my advice would be: Go get a job. Receiving cash from advertising just for spouting off in front of a webcam has only been possible for barely fifteen years, so maybe just enjoy the ride while it lasts; otherwise you risk joining the ever-growing throng of the self-entitled.
reply
Well, I dunno really. Frankly, the lobbying is less about freedom of expression and more about self-interest - whether you are an individual, so-called 'creator' or media-controlling behemoth. If you want to recycle copyrighted material for your own amusement and don't expect money for it, fair enough, but if this is about earning a living my advice would be: Go get a job. Receiving cash from advertising just for spouting off in front of a webcam has only been possible for barely fifteen years, so maybe just enjoy the ride while it lasts; otherwise you risk joining the ever-growing throng of the self-entitled.
reply
Russtafa B
The EU have it in for Google/Facebook and the other large conglomerates. Do not expect any favours in this Article 13 legislation What does Youtube expect, peace and ongoing harmony with the EU who have it for you on many fronts. In the UK there has been a lot of adverse publicity against Youtube, videos that should have been taken down earlier, ton of other stuff. Youtube need to be more proactive and get their PR right, also not making a select band of creators millionaires. Spread it around a bit more will do your reputation a power of good.
reply
The EU have it in for Google/Facebook and the other large conglomerates. Do not expect any favours in this Article 13 legislation What does Youtube expect, peace and ongoing harmony with the EU who have it for you on many fronts. In the UK there has been a lot of adverse publicity against Youtube, videos that should have been taken down earlier, ton of other stuff. Youtube need to be more proactive and get their PR right, also not making a select band of creators millionaires. Spread it around a bit more will do your reputation a power of good.
reply
1DarkAndroid1817
so a American knows it better? LOL don't believe this dude, the EU won't break the internet not even if they tried, nothing will change other then making it easier for EU companies to say ''pay me for my content or i want you to remove it'' sites already remove content when notified about it, but with this law they actually have to do it anyway which they already do, auto blocking will NOT happen, you are a idiot if you think EU wants sites to block all content because that will cost money actually. and no one wants that after all: l
reply
so a American knows it better? LOL don't believe this dude, the EU won't break the internet not even if they tried, nothing will change other then making it easier for EU companies to say ''pay me for my content or i want you to remove it'' sites already remove content when notified about it, but with this law they actually have to do it anyway which they already do, auto blocking will NOT happen, you are a idiot if you think EU wants sites to block all content because that will cost money actually. and no one wants that after all: l
reply
X1X Riptide
Im a starting YouTuber myself (thanks to mat pat, miniladd, and Jacksepticeye) and if you ask me this is COMPLET BULLST So everyone if you have a YouTube account you should upload a video full of memes ever day when possible it could be one minute or an hour long it doesnt matter I think that if we all come together and spam the shit out of everything that starts to use article 13 we might be able to override the system enough to make those small dk frs who thought that this thing was a good idea so whos with me #SAVEYOURINTERNET
reply
Im a starting YouTuber myself (thanks to mat pat, miniladd, and Jacksepticeye) and if you ask me this is COMPLET BULLST So everyone if you have a YouTube account you should upload a video full of memes ever day when possible it could be one minute or an hour long it doesnt matter I think that if we all come together and spam the shit out of everything that starts to use article 13 we might be able to override the system enough to make those small dk frs who thought that this thing was a good idea so whos with me #SAVEYOURINTERNET
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
12:19
13:47
14:30
12:51