The Tfue FaZe Clan Lawsuit Could Massively Change The Future Of Entertainment, SCAM Alert, & More
video description
Date: 2019-11-01
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 9
Tails Clock
The number one argument I see for allowing business to discriminate is that we the people will show them with our money that we don't tolerate their intolerance. That they should have the freedom to do awful things, and the freedom to suffer the consequences. Well being barred from certain places was one of those consequences but is now being called discrimination? I suppose people also doing to restaurants further away could be called discrimination too. Because, I guess it is? But why is this all being grouped together. Since when was intolerance of the hateful something to feel shame for? The world runs on intolerance rules, with violent people not allowed to work with vulnerable people. With paedophiles not allowed to work in schools. With bigotted restaurants working in airports. If we start labeling this as discrimination then that's a slippery slope to every rule being labeled that. It is okay to be intolerant of bigots. Where has common sense gone.
reply
The number one argument I see for allowing business to discriminate is that we the people will show them with our money that we don't tolerate their intolerance. That they should have the freedom to do awful things, and the freedom to suffer the consequences. Well being barred from certain places was one of those consequences but is now being called discrimination? I suppose people also doing to restaurants further away could be called discrimination too. Because, I guess it is? But why is this all being grouped together. Since when was intolerance of the hateful something to feel shame for? The world runs on intolerance rules, with violent people not allowed to work with vulnerable people. With paedophiles not allowed to work in schools. With bigotted restaurants working in airports. If we start labeling this as discrimination then that's a slippery slope to every rule being labeled that. It is okay to be intolerant of bigots. Where has common sense gone.
reply
Tango185
First, I get what youre saying about whats on the paper being important in the favor of Tfue, it also favors FaZe and probably more significantly. The fact he signed the contract in the first place is on him and if he isnt happy with the terms now thats ultimately on him. FaZe is in their legal rights to take those percentages based on those specific situations. Second, in a lawsuit like this Tfue has to be able to prove damages, which there are none. Only in the case where FaZe took MORE than the contracted amount would this be the case but so far it doesnt appear any such case exists. In my opinion, this is an over the top attempt at either forcing FaZe into a contract that hurts them or at getting out of his current contract without having to remain in FaZe. Either way, this shows how unprofessional Tfue is as a businessman.
reply
First, I get what youre saying about whats on the paper being important in the favor of Tfue, it also favors FaZe and probably more significantly. The fact he signed the contract in the first place is on him and if he isnt happy with the terms now thats ultimately on him. FaZe is in their legal rights to take those percentages based on those specific situations. Second, in a lawsuit like this Tfue has to be able to prove damages, which there are none. Only in the case where FaZe took MORE than the contracted amount would this be the case but so far it doesnt appear any such case exists. In my opinion, this is an over the top attempt at either forcing FaZe into a contract that hurts them or at getting out of his current contract without having to remain in FaZe. Either way, this shows how unprofessional Tfue is as a businessman.
reply
GMBeaulac
The San Antonio law question is in my eyes basically this: Does the Government have the right to bar businesses from operating on the basis of disliking their views? Forget how you feel about Chick fil A, this should be an easy one. How is the first amendment real if a Republican government can shut down Democrat supporting business, or vice versa? How is religious freedom real if practicing it means the government can take away your ability to support your livelihood? Retaliation bars free expression just as easily as direct laws. The first amendment already has this covered, but like all our freedoms, it's constantly under attack. Regardless of party, I'm proud of those lawmakers who stand up and defend it.
reply
The San Antonio law question is in my eyes basically this: Does the Government have the right to bar businesses from operating on the basis of disliking their views? Forget how you feel about Chick fil A, this should be an easy one. How is the first amendment real if a Republican government can shut down Democrat supporting business, or vice versa? How is religious freedom real if practicing it means the government can take away your ability to support your livelihood? Retaliation bars free expression just as easily as direct laws. The first amendment already has this covered, but like all our freedoms, it's constantly under attack. Regardless of party, I'm proud of those lawmakers who stand up and defend it.
reply
EcnalKcin
15: 24 I have a friend that works as a producer in the film industry, I remember him talking about bait and switches, and how they happen a lot in the film industry. Specifically a rental company agreed to rent at a reduced rate for half a dozen movie cars for a certain number of days. Then when he brought the cars back they tried to charge him their much higher standard rate. Thing is, he had them edit the original contract when he rented the cars to reflect the bulk rental rate, and despite them making a bunch of noise about it, he basically told them to go screw themselves. Ironically, they kind of did, as now he, and everyone he works with, knows not to use their rental company in the future.
reply
15: 24 I have a friend that works as a producer in the film industry, I remember him talking about bait and switches, and how they happen a lot in the film industry. Specifically a rental company agreed to rent at a reduced rate for half a dozen movie cars for a certain number of days. Then when he brought the cars back they tried to charge him their much higher standard rate. Thing is, he had them edit the original contract when he rented the cars to reflect the bulk rental rate, and despite them making a bunch of noise about it, he basically told them to go screw themselves. Ironically, they kind of did, as now he, and everyone he works with, knows not to use their rental company in the future.
reply
Ciborium
Democrats are the real racists and bigots. They are all for discrimination, as long as they approve the discrimination. SB1978 prevents the government from taking adverse action against a law-abiding business simply because of thought crimes. The Democrats will be 100% responsible for the expensive legal challenges to a law that is a good law that prevents discrimination based on one's First Amendment exercise of religion. Anyone voting AGAINST SB1978 are personally responsible for the cost to the taxpayers. And SHAME on the Democrats (as if Democrats are capable of feeling shame) on threatening taxpayers to support their opposition to a law that prohibits discrimination.
reply
Democrats are the real racists and bigots. They are all for discrimination, as long as they approve the discrimination. SB1978 prevents the government from taking adverse action against a law-abiding business simply because of thought crimes. The Democrats will be 100% responsible for the expensive legal challenges to a law that is a good law that prevents discrimination based on one's First Amendment exercise of religion. Anyone voting AGAINST SB1978 are personally responsible for the cost to the taxpayers. And SHAME on the Democrats (as if Democrats are capable of feeling shame) on threatening taxpayers to support their opposition to a law that prohibits discrimination.
reply
ONE TAKE TAY Music
I understand where the Texas government is coming from its funny nobody mention that they arent even open on Sundays which is I guess nobody is supposed to work on Sundays dont quote me but I mean for a company/ food chain that closes there doors every Sunday because of religious beliefs you better believe they aint having that LGBT it all starts at the top. We shouldnt be seeing Chick fel la we should be seeing the owners/ CEOs of the company they wrote the handbook its what they feel is right and the people think is wrong. Thats my take. If it doesnt make sense to you people please, eat my ass And yes Im straight
reply
I understand where the Texas government is coming from its funny nobody mention that they arent even open on Sundays which is I guess nobody is supposed to work on Sundays dont quote me but I mean for a company/ food chain that closes there doors every Sunday because of religious beliefs you better believe they aint having that LGBT it all starts at the top. We shouldnt be seeing Chick fel la we should be seeing the owners/ CEOs of the company they wrote the handbook its what they feel is right and the people think is wrong. Thats my take. If it doesnt make sense to you people please, eat my ass And yes Im straight
reply
Grey Heart
Let me just say Erin is an amazing woman I personally know her and her team and they are amazing people I know she and the rest of the caucus will not allow a discriminatory bill to be passed without a fight Im not too worried about any LGBT bills in Texas I testify when I can and talk with my representatives being a teen who testifies it really gives these law makers a perspective on how these bills effect me and other lgbt kids and teens. So in short Im not worried about this bill and I know that there is no way that anybody will let this bill through without some sort of non discrimination claus
reply
Let me just say Erin is an amazing woman I personally know her and her team and they are amazing people I know she and the rest of the caucus will not allow a discriminatory bill to be passed without a fight Im not too worried about any LGBT bills in Texas I testify when I can and talk with my representatives being a teen who testifies it really gives these law makers a perspective on how these bills effect me and other lgbt kids and teens. So in short Im not worried about this bill and I know that there is no way that anybody will let this bill through without some sort of non discrimination claus
reply
upstatelee18
There may not be any regulation in e-sports but there is plenty of regulation in anything else related to sports in general. The fact that someone is well known in California invokes certain laws in certain situations, contract law of course has an ancient history, companies could start to insure players against injury or require that they do not do certain things that could harm their money making potential, and there are various laws regarding the miss-use of copyrighted content. So there may not be specific laws on e-sports but it may not be necessary with the other legal routes one may take.
reply
There may not be any regulation in e-sports but there is plenty of regulation in anything else related to sports in general. The fact that someone is well known in California invokes certain laws in certain situations, contract law of course has an ancient history, companies could start to insure players against injury or require that they do not do certain things that could harm their money making potential, and there are various laws regarding the miss-use of copyrighted content. So there may not be specific laws on e-sports but it may not be necessary with the other legal routes one may take.
reply
Mariah Bowen
With the Chick-fil-a bill, I have mixed feelings. As a member of the LGBT+ community, I abhor Chick-fil-a. That being said, Chick-fil-a is not directly discriminating against the community, just using profits to donate to other companies that do. It's a slippery slope if we ban this one business for religious beliefs if the business isn't directly contributing to discrimination. The people of San Antonio with speak with their money if they really believe that Chick-fil-a shouldn't be in business. Feel free to have a civil discussion below. I'm definitely open to other points.
reply
With the Chick-fil-a bill, I have mixed feelings. As a member of the LGBT+ community, I abhor Chick-fil-a. That being said, Chick-fil-a is not directly discriminating against the community, just using profits to donate to other companies that do. It's a slippery slope if we ban this one business for religious beliefs if the business isn't directly contributing to discrimination. The people of San Antonio with speak with their money if they really believe that Chick-fil-a shouldn't be in business. Feel free to have a civil discussion below. I'm definitely open to other points.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
23:8
13:18
16:12
12:55
13:56