VehiclesFashionRecipesBlogsHuntTravelsSportFunHandmadeITEducation
Mini-Games
x

x
zakruti.com » Knowledge, science, education » History Matters
Why didn't Japan annex Siberia during the Russian Civil War?

Why didn't Japan annex Siberia during the Russian Civil War?

FBTwitterReddit

video description

Rating: 4.5; Vote: 2
When Russia was divided in the wake of its 1917 revolution, the Entente powers intervened and occupied parts of the country. In Siberia, Japan sent a very large force and took control over a large chunk of it. But it didn't hang around and fully withdrew after a few short years. So why did it leave instead of trying to hold on to all of that resource-rich land? To find out watch this short and simple animated history documentary. James: The last White regime in the region was defeated in 1923. General Anatoly Pepelyayev surrendered and was originally sentenced to death, but got reprieved and served ten years before being released. But a few years later he got rearrested and executed during Stalin's purges in the late 1930s! What a dirty trick--letting him think he'd paid his debt, then killing him anyway.
Date: 2023-03-19

Comments and reviews: 14


Japan wasn't really fully committed into war unlike Germany, Japanese official's was actually shock when the army force Japan to went war with China. Then many Prime Minister of Japan who oppose the military was assassinated. Also Japanese voted for liberalized and doesn't vote for militaristic politicians. That's why even Japan has still 5 million strong Army in Mainland Japan and has still functioning air force and can defend their island longer. The fact that Japan has still Millions outside of Japan that still occupied many territories.
Even if Japan had brutal history during WW2. Because of Japan occupation and putting puppet government that being lead by the locals. Ar the prime reason why nationalism and independence sprang in South East Asia.
Without WW2 there is no possible way that decolonization would occur.

reply

I suspect that one of the most politically powerful groups in Japan, that being the IJN and its supporting industrialists, would have bitterly opposed the occupation of Siberia. It would have regarded aland war with the Soviet union as an existential threat, to the IJN. You can't bomb pearl harbor with tanks and you can't reach lake baikal with battleships. Japan didn't have the resources to build massive numbers of both. Committing Japan to a land war with the Soviet union would have ensured the ascendancy of the army and reduced the navy to a coastal defense force. No battleships or aircraft carriers. Land based naval aircraft and patrol craft only.
What fleet admiral wants to fly his flag from a patrol boat?

reply

We should try to stop using American to refer specifically to people from the United States (who are Americans, but in the sense that Mexicans, Brazilians, and French Guianese among many others) It's anglocentric aprobriation of an entire continent. Todos somos americanos. I realized this when I met a foreign girl in the United States with similar semblance to mine, who said, with a straight face, I'm African. I didn't think she was serious.
reply

annex is not an accurate term in this case
annex means two parties of equal terms get together it s a term that the japanese empire used in order to fool the Korean Empire s people
they don t use the term for taiwan or manchuria cause they were not countries in the first place

reply

Re 2: 47, as I understand it, Japan continued to occupy northern Kurafuto/Sakhalin (after its withdrawal from the other Siberian territories) because of the Nikolayevsk incident. But why did it later withdraw from the northern two-thirds of that island in 1925?
reply

Ironically the oil production of Sakhalin island, which the japanese held half of until 1945, produces more oil than the Dutch East Indies did prior to the second world war, and seizing that was that Japanese empires single most important goal of ww2
reply

This brings up a great point to why Japan doesn t take responsibility for its war crimes in East Asia. The Japanese government didn t trust the army, and that lead to them loosing control of the army entirely after the Mukden incident.
reply

I thought this was going to be about the other war. If Japan had stayed in Siberia History might have been very different! An ongoing conflict with the USSR would have helped Germany in the next war while keeping Japan too busy to attack the US.
reply

We want you to join the intervestion against commies
No thanks. We don't want a war near our homeland.
Well then we'll take vladivostok right in front of your home and it'll be only us and-
EY NOT FAIR

reply

I'm struggling to understand the joke with the newspaper showing a map of Ireland with the caption Pictured: Japan, can someone explain it to me?
(Apologies for sounding like an eejit, I'm just genuinely curious)

reply

Given how things played out for Japan in the end they honestly probably should have kept it before the USSR got too powerful, or at least Sakhalin and Vladivostok if the international response was too great
reply

And ten years later. they were desperate for land and raw resources, so they launched a brutal war of attrition against China. Somehow I think taking some Siberian land would have worked out better for them.
reply

Sparing the government vs. army debate/rivalry, this is one of the few events in WWI history that I ve heard, where a nation makes their choices based on regional stability, rather than self interest.
reply

Why is the Japanese Yen specified in currency markets in denominations of 100s instead of units like other currencies?
Can be a topic for another short history matters video

reply
Add a review, comment






Other channel videos