VehiclesFashionRecipesBlogsHuntTravelsSportFunHandmadeITEducation
Mini-Games
x

x
zakruti.com » Knowledge, science, education » RealLifeLore
Why You Can-t Measure the Coastline of Britain

Why You Can-t Measure the Coastline of Britain

FBTwitterReddit

video description

Rating: 4.0; Vote: 1
Why You Can-t Measure the Coastline of Britain I could be wrong, (I usually am-lol) but what is you came up with a definition like -usable land-. What I mean is only measure the parts of any coast that have parameters such as -can be accessed by connected lands- which would eliminate all of the little islands and spots on the coast that cannot be utilized in any fashion. And take the average between tides to plot where the water stops and the land begins on open parts of the coast. Just a thought.
Date: 2023-12-14

Comments and reviews: 29


Self similarity can refer to multiple things, what you were referring to was statistical self similarity, as only the statistical properties remain the same, which is the most limited form. An infinite Sierpinski triangle would have scale invariance, the most extreme form of self similarity and what people usually think of when hearing that word.
reply

1. Divide coastline into tiny segments, not necessarily equal but something walkable in length (e. g. 1 km)
2. Let volunteers measure each segment with measuring wheel by walking along the coast
3. Add lengths of all the segments together
4. ?
5. PROFIT!
_would take some time but still more reliable than a ruler and a map_

reply

I thought if this very same paradox on my own, not with the borders of coastline, but with lines and perspective in general. I called in the SCOPE PARADOX and even started writing about it recently to submit for review. It is comforting to know that someone had already thought of this and I wasn-t the only one.
reply

What if the length of the measuring stick was set to a sliding scale based on the area of land?
Example
(Area (km2) / 1, 000, 000) -. 25) - 200
Alaska Area: 1, 723, 000 km2 -- Measuring stick for Alaska: 229km
Britain Area: 243, 610km2 -- Measuring stick for Britain: 140km
Seems fair

reply

The thing about trying to find the nothing parts is that once you get close enough to measure the nothing you negate the nothing with the something that you are.
Someone else looking is like, hey, look at that ignoramus over there with the measuring tape trying to measure the nothing.

reply

As a math teacher, I LOVE THIS. This is a very very good video. And similar to Reimann Sums used in integration.
On a philosophical level, it is very very hard to actually define things, isn-t it? And math may not be as cut and dry as the average person seems to think it is. --

reply

Why can't you just take high-res satellite imagery, and then use a computer to calulate the length of each country's coastline, following the lines of most prominent coastal contrast? Pretty sure that AI could help get that even more precise.
reply

So come up with a standard ruler length then, say 1 km, or 100 m (or whatever you chose) and start at the northernmost point and proceed counter-clockwise. This would provide repeatability and a measurable distance.
reply

Why don-t they just trace the coast at a constant speed and just take how many hours it took, and then take the speed of kilometers or miles they were consistently going and multiply them together
reply

I'm earnestly confused my this issue because. why are they adding individual isles to the mainline coast measurement? They aren't attached to the mainland so surely wouldn't be added.
reply

just get the function defining the coastline and the do a line integral, there, done and dusted. infinitesimaly small segments, that measure the perfect length of a curve
reply

1: 48 - I learned recently that Finland isn't Scandinavia. It's a Nordic country (Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, Finland, but isn't Scandinavia (Sweden, Denmark, Norway)
reply

The size of northern and southern countries are out of proportion. You'd think that Greenland (not so green land) neighboring Canada is massive but it's smaller than Libya.
reply

It's quite simple. Have a universal standard unit of measure, (feet or metres) and measure the coastline at high tide excluding all islands. Job done. You're welcome.
reply

For once It's nice to hear the creator behind RLL having a good time with a video and not worrying about existential geopolitical drama. The guy deserves a breather.
reply

To add a layer of complexity to an already complex problem.
The coast line length is not, in reality, a fixed measurement. you've got tides and erosion.

reply

1: 54: If you're wondering how Sweden has so many islands, it's because Sweden has a lot of rivers, so many that they create islands. Which you can see at 2: 17.
reply

just comes down to calculus too curve line if you take shorter segments you get closer and closer to the real value but for coastlines there's just too many
reply

This is the perfect embodiment of the difference between accuracy and precision. Both are equally accurate, yet the NOAA measurements are much more precise.
reply

real life lore says oldest not changed border in history is Portuguese and Spanish border which while the iberian union was the 15 century (ad)
reply

That is a silly paradox and if these people are the one's in charge we're in trouble. You don't ignore land mass in favor of a straight ruler.
reply

Why don't international scientists all just agree to use an eg. 1km ruler. That way every cosst will be measured using a standardised method.
reply

What if theres a island that perfectly shaped rectangle or circle? Does the paradox still apply? Or why we don't measure using ribbon ruler?
reply

obviousley there has to be a point where making the measurements smaller doesn't change the total, so no, it doesn't become infinite.
reply

Solution: make a Bezier curve to describe the coastline, then do all the estimation of elliptic integral part then your done
reply

Learnt how different governments and departments use different measurements for coastlines and territorial boundaries.
reply

So why not just get a few of the lads together with one of those wheel measuring things to walk along the coast
reply

Just measure the most landside part of the coast possible smoothly around and that gives you a practical number
reply

I believe AI can already solve this Island Paradox by brute forcing and looking at each piece of coastline.
reply
Add a review, comment






Other channel videos