The Most Controversial Movie Endings Of All Time
video description
The problem with the trailor is that it asked a completely different Dramatic Question, than the movie. The trailers made it seem as if the guy was with lawn enforcement on some sort of assignment, think do I. Despite that, the movie was still enjoyable to me. Critics are bought shills, and should be absolutely ignored. Sure they may not be paid all the time but how is the reader supposed to know when the critic is giving an honest review? Regardless, they typically live in a New York, L. A, Hollywood, or et cetera bubble and have very little knowledge of the thoughts favored by the supermajority of citizens.
Date: 2020-07-14
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 9
Shadow
I dont care what anyone says, Deckard was ALWAYS a replicant. I figured that out when I was 12. Remember when Gaff approached Deckard at the beginning of the movie? Deckard was eating noodles, Gaff (Edward James Olmos) tells him that hes being called in to work a case. Deckard half heartedly tries to get out of it, but he knows he cant. Finally, Deckard turns tomBaff and says:
No choice, huh?
Gaff: No choice.
Yeah yeah yeah. I know what happens next, when Deckard meets with Capt. Bryant. It makes no difference! LOL. Deckard WAS DIFFERENT, just like Rachael (Sean Young. In order for him to function as effectively as they needed, he could NEVER KNOW that he was a replicant.
JUST LIKE RACHAEL.
So, when the Captain made the threat about Deckard either cooperating, or being small people, its a trigger. It sounds to anyone listening, and even to Deckard, like he just getting bullied into it. BUT ONLY BECAUSE HE WAS NEVER SUPPOSED TO KNOW WHAT HE WAS.
He was ALWAYS supposed to be a replicant, I dont care they said. LOL.
reply
I dont care what anyone says, Deckard was ALWAYS a replicant. I figured that out when I was 12. Remember when Gaff approached Deckard at the beginning of the movie? Deckard was eating noodles, Gaff (Edward James Olmos) tells him that hes being called in to work a case. Deckard half heartedly tries to get out of it, but he knows he cant. Finally, Deckard turns tomBaff and says:
No choice, huh?
Gaff: No choice.
Yeah yeah yeah. I know what happens next, when Deckard meets with Capt. Bryant. It makes no difference! LOL. Deckard WAS DIFFERENT, just like Rachael (Sean Young. In order for him to function as effectively as they needed, he could NEVER KNOW that he was a replicant.
JUST LIKE RACHAEL.
So, when the Captain made the threat about Deckard either cooperating, or being small people, its a trigger. It sounds to anyone listening, and even to Deckard, like he just getting bullied into it. BUT ONLY BECAUSE HE WAS NEVER SUPPOSED TO KNOW WHAT HE WAS.
He was ALWAYS supposed to be a replicant, I dont care they said. LOL.
reply
CoolCommentator
I have to disagree with the Passengers criticism. Pratt made a flawed, but human decision to not live alone. They dated and fell in love long before the truth was found out, making it plausible that Lawrence would be conflicted. In the end. if Lawrence hadn't have been woken up, no one on the ship would have survived, because it took more than 1 person to fix the situation. Knowing that would have changed the judgement. Pratt repents and offered her a choice, which she refused. I think living a life of love would have been better than returning to earth with everyone you have known long dead (which was Lawrence's original plan. I think the controversy is mostly a me too kind of controversy, trying to say an empowered female would have chosen differently. I think it ended reasonably. as the opposite would have been. 1 dark ending or 1 happy ending. I think this is the choice that anger offers everyone.
reply
I have to disagree with the Passengers criticism. Pratt made a flawed, but human decision to not live alone. They dated and fell in love long before the truth was found out, making it plausible that Lawrence would be conflicted. In the end. if Lawrence hadn't have been woken up, no one on the ship would have survived, because it took more than 1 person to fix the situation. Knowing that would have changed the judgement. Pratt repents and offered her a choice, which she refused. I think living a life of love would have been better than returning to earth with everyone you have known long dead (which was Lawrence's original plan. I think the controversy is mostly a me too kind of controversy, trying to say an empowered female would have chosen differently. I think it ended reasonably. as the opposite would have been. 1 dark ending or 1 happy ending. I think this is the choice that anger offers everyone.
reply
Janos
I didn't like Passengers too much overall but the ending sort-of made sense. 1: Never underestimate the Stockholm Syndrome (thus the woman was genuinely in love with the man for a while, either organically, due to SS or both) which technically remained in effect forever. 2: On a purely logical basis, there was absolutely no point of continuing their lives in isolation and/or hatred. 3: After a while, the woman probably started feeling just as lonely as the man did before he woke her up. At that point she probably understood why he did it and was more willing to forgive. With all these factors summed together I believe the ending was very plausible.
reply
I didn't like Passengers too much overall but the ending sort-of made sense. 1: Never underestimate the Stockholm Syndrome (thus the woman was genuinely in love with the man for a while, either organically, due to SS or both) which technically remained in effect forever. 2: On a purely logical basis, there was absolutely no point of continuing their lives in isolation and/or hatred. 3: After a while, the woman probably started feeling just as lonely as the man did before he woke her up. At that point she probably understood why he did it and was more willing to forgive. With all these factors summed together I believe the ending was very plausible.
reply
nannette
I really liked Passengers. Eventhough he woke her so he wouldn't be alone anymore seemed unforgivable. She was already in love with him before she found that out. She watched friends recorded messages saying that they hope she will find a way to be happy and settle down. Since she seems to keep searching for something. After they saved the ship, they made a life together. I wish they had kids to welcome the crew and passengers as they woke. Adam and Eve scenario.
As for the Mist. The whole theater gasped in horror as the soldiers showed up.
reply
I really liked Passengers. Eventhough he woke her so he wouldn't be alone anymore seemed unforgivable. She was already in love with him before she found that out. She watched friends recorded messages saying that they hope she will find a way to be happy and settle down. Since she seems to keep searching for something. After they saved the ship, they made a life together. I wish they had kids to welcome the crew and passengers as they woke. Adam and Eve scenario.
As for the Mist. The whole theater gasped in horror as the soldiers showed up.
reply
Will
I thoght the ending to the Watchmen fim was better than the comic book version. First of all the one in the book was just ripped off from an old episode of the Outer Limits Also I never understood why anyone would think that what was presented as essentially an accidental incursion by an otherdimesional creature would guarantee peace. By framing Dr. Manhatten Ozymandias created the idea of a global Watchman, keeping an eye on the world and making sure governments behaved themselves, as Nite-owl pointed out to Laurie at the end.
reply
I thoght the ending to the Watchmen fim was better than the comic book version. First of all the one in the book was just ripped off from an old episode of the Outer Limits Also I never understood why anyone would think that what was presented as essentially an accidental incursion by an otherdimesional creature would guarantee peace. By framing Dr. Manhatten Ozymandias created the idea of a global Watchman, keeping an eye on the world and making sure governments behaved themselves, as Nite-owl pointed out to Laurie at the end.
reply
Siva
I don't understand why the movie passengers is pretty much panned by all. Its an amazing movie. It has Sci-fi, drama, and has a good rational ending. What else is wrong with it? Even if the movie takes up more of a Sci-fi than drama, there are plenty of movies out there that are in the same way. The only way the movie could have a dark ending is the Bartending robot falling in love with Jenifer Lawrence and it kills Chris Pratt. Is that the ending you guys hoping for?
reply
I don't understand why the movie passengers is pretty much panned by all. Its an amazing movie. It has Sci-fi, drama, and has a good rational ending. What else is wrong with it? Even if the movie takes up more of a Sci-fi than drama, there are plenty of movies out there that are in the same way. The only way the movie could have a dark ending is the Bartending robot falling in love with Jenifer Lawrence and it kills Chris Pratt. Is that the ending you guys hoping for?
reply
Armani
I dont care what the critics/ people say, I loved the ending of passengers.
What he did was terrible but at the end of the day he risked his life to save a bunch of people who will never even know how close they came to oblivion.
He made amends for his sin and she forgave him. Considering he basically killed himself so that she and everyone else can live, her forgiving him is not unbelievable.
Keeping him alive was also in her best interest.
reply
I dont care what the critics/ people say, I loved the ending of passengers.
What he did was terrible but at the end of the day he risked his life to save a bunch of people who will never even know how close they came to oblivion.
He made amends for his sin and she forgave him. Considering he basically killed himself so that she and everyone else can live, her forgiving him is not unbelievable.
Keeping him alive was also in her best interest.
reply
looper
The 'Titanic' one never made sense to me either. I mean Jack, and Rose were running through the ship being shot at, and trying to avoid drowning. Than the ship breaks in half, and than Jack has to save Rose from someone dragging her under the water. I don't see how any of them could have thought rationally. Not only that, but Rose was also lucky she didn't freeze to death on that door! She was still soaked in water!
reply
The 'Titanic' one never made sense to me either. I mean Jack, and Rose were running through the ship being shot at, and trying to avoid drowning. Than the ship breaks in half, and than Jack has to save Rose from someone dragging her under the water. I don't see how any of them could have thought rationally. Not only that, but Rose was also lucky she didn't freeze to death on that door! She was still soaked in water!
reply
Diane
If I have to watch another Mike Bloomberg ad, I'll go postal. Bloomberg is one of the MOST CORRUPT demoncraps to ever walk the Earth. He & Obamanation are out to destroy America. Bloomberg is making promises he cannot legally keep. And MOST are lies, as he takes credit for things he never did. Vote ALL demoncraps OUT! Abolish & destroy the perverse and evil demoncrap party, OUT!
reply
If I have to watch another Mike Bloomberg ad, I'll go postal. Bloomberg is one of the MOST CORRUPT demoncraps to ever walk the Earth. He & Obamanation are out to destroy America. Bloomberg is making promises he cannot legally keep. And MOST are lies, as he takes credit for things he never did. Vote ALL demoncraps OUT! Abolish & destroy the perverse and evil demoncrap party, OUT!
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
