Friends with Benefits (2011) vs No Strings Attached (2011)
video description
Date: 2023-11-20
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 28
AwkwardlyJani
I think FWB was more hollywood and NSA was slightly more realistic. maybe I lack more romance in my life, but flashmobs as a grand gesture is way unrealistic for me. though having watched FWB when it came out and only watch NSA a couple years later, I prefer FWB cus I found Jamie's character a bit less annoying than Emma's. Emma's constant rejection of someone who is CLEARLY interested in her and then suddenly trying to have a real relationship with someone else was annoying (Ashton's character was very clearly into her while they were carrying on their NSA relationship.
reply
I think FWB was more hollywood and NSA was slightly more realistic. maybe I lack more romance in my life, but flashmobs as a grand gesture is way unrealistic for me. though having watched FWB when it came out and only watch NSA a couple years later, I prefer FWB cus I found Jamie's character a bit less annoying than Emma's. Emma's constant rejection of someone who is CLEARLY interested in her and then suddenly trying to have a real relationship with someone else was annoying (Ashton's character was very clearly into her while they were carrying on their NSA relationship.
reply
sunkara
I always thought not strings attached was a copy of friends with benefits. but Turned out No strings attached was released on January and Friends with Benefits on July of the same year. So I was clearly wrong but it but. I recently rewatched No strings attached after i binge watched Two and Half men tv show i felt close to No strings attached. But I like the way FWB showcased the differences between New York city and Los Angeles. i mean more about where they live effects the way they behave sort of thing. Both movies are awesome tho.
reply
I always thought not strings attached was a copy of friends with benefits. but Turned out No strings attached was released on January and Friends with Benefits on July of the same year. So I was clearly wrong but it but. I recently rewatched No strings attached after i binge watched Two and Half men tv show i felt close to No strings attached. But I like the way FWB showcased the differences between New York city and Los Angeles. i mean more about where they live effects the way they behave sort of thing. Both movies are awesome tho.
reply
Gabrielle
I do not know why, but I just like friends with benefits more. While it is tropey, it is more entertaining and for some reason feels more relatable than no strings attached. The chemistry between the actors helps too.
While I like the maturity of no strings attached, I could not get into it. I believe it was the pacing. It was slow and boring and I could not continue watching. I tuned out a bit. The story was good as well as the writing, but slow.
Dont get me wrong. I like some show paced movies, just not this one.
reply
I do not know why, but I just like friends with benefits more. While it is tropey, it is more entertaining and for some reason feels more relatable than no strings attached. The chemistry between the actors helps too.
While I like the maturity of no strings attached, I could not get into it. I believe it was the pacing. It was slow and boring and I could not continue watching. I tuned out a bit. The story was good as well as the writing, but slow.
Dont get me wrong. I like some show paced movies, just not this one.
reply
Padme
I would totally agree with your objective (kind of) point of view if my all-time favorite actress in the world and beyond wasn't starring in No strings attached. So no objective view, sorry. Besides, it's one of the really few romantic comedies she's ever starred in, let alone movies with a happy ending. So nope, No strings attached for life. Though Friends with benefits is still amazing
reply
I would totally agree with your objective (kind of) point of view if my all-time favorite actress in the world and beyond wasn't starring in No strings attached. So no objective view, sorry. Besides, it's one of the really few romantic comedies she's ever starred in, let alone movies with a happy ending. So nope, No strings attached for life. Though Friends with benefits is still amazing
reply
Empress
Ehhh idk Friends With Benefits was more over the top and you could sometimes see how Mila didn't really care for Justin in real life AND Natalie Portman in No Stings Attached was better than I expected. No Strings Attached for the win imo!
reply
Ehhh idk Friends With Benefits was more over the top and you could sometimes see how Mila didn't really care for Justin in real life AND Natalie Portman in No Stings Attached was better than I expected. No Strings Attached for the win imo!
reply
MsMojo
Since it's the 10th anniversary of both of these films, we thought it would be fun to do a VERSUS video and choose which one we think is better! Do you agree with our verdict? Let us know your thoughts below!
reply
Since it's the 10th anniversary of both of these films, we thought it would be fun to do a VERSUS video and choose which one we think is better! Do you agree with our verdict? Let us know your thoughts below!
reply
Rebecca
Ive always liked No Strings Attached better. I like that Ashtons character is not afraid to be caring. And the whole cupcake and period mix scene is hilarious. And the supporting cast is A-MAZ-ING.
reply
Ive always liked No Strings Attached better. I like that Ashtons character is not afraid to be caring. And the whole cupcake and period mix scene is hilarious. And the supporting cast is A-MAZ-ING.
reply
Kenneth
Both movies from 2011, Friends With Benefits and No Strings Attached had dramatization, but I wish Chloe Grace Moretz and Jack Black would have aided Mila Kunis in Friends With Benefits.
reply
Both movies from 2011, Friends With Benefits and No Strings Attached had dramatization, but I wish Chloe Grace Moretz and Jack Black would have aided Mila Kunis in Friends With Benefits.
reply
Heather
I adore both those movies, but No Strings Attached is more relatable. In the since of their dynamic. Plus I love how Emma goes off on the other girl and calls her a pumpkin
reply
I adore both those movies, but No Strings Attached is more relatable. In the since of their dynamic. Plus I love how Emma goes off on the other girl and calls her a pumpkin
reply
Eidde
I've watched both and I prefer Friends with Benefits. Fun fact: Mila Kunis once said in an interview that Natalie Portman is the only person to have ever kissed Ashton & her.
reply
I've watched both and I prefer Friends with Benefits. Fun fact: Mila Kunis once said in an interview that Natalie Portman is the only person to have ever kissed Ashton & her.
reply
fanjoy
If u have watched nsa first it would be ur fav but if u have watched fwb first then it would be ur fav that is how it works its just like fault in our stars vs 5 feet apart
reply
If u have watched nsa first it would be ur fav but if u have watched fwb first then it would be ur fav that is how it works its just like fault in our stars vs 5 feet apart
reply
RedLightning17
You should know. if you come any closer. I'm not letting you go.
One of the best Rom-Com finale one liners I've ever heard. That alone should win this debate.
reply
You should know. if you come any closer. I'm not letting you go.
One of the best Rom-Com finale one liners I've ever heard. That alone should win this debate.
reply
Walter
I know Friends with Benefits won this battle, but No Strings Attached was my best of the two. Better storytelling, plus the fact that FWB wasn't really funny to me.
reply
I know Friends with Benefits won this battle, but No Strings Attached was my best of the two. Better storytelling, plus the fact that FWB wasn't really funny to me.
reply
Joy
HEY MSMOJO YOU GUYS NEED TO INCLUDE MORE LOVE AND HIP HOP MOMENTS. I never see you guys include them in your reality tv moments nor mention any of the celebrities.
reply
HEY MSMOJO YOU GUYS NEED TO INCLUDE MORE LOVE AND HIP HOP MOMENTS. I never see you guys include them in your reality tv moments nor mention any of the celebrities.
reply
Benjamin
Of course it's Friends with Benefits. No Strings Attached isn't really good but I watch it a lot. Also one of the category should have been 'best chemistry'
reply
Of course it's Friends with Benefits. No Strings Attached isn't really good but I watch it a lot. Also one of the category should have been 'best chemistry'
reply
Justin
very very great fun list I like it a lot very great job mis mojo one of my very favorite list ever I like friends with benefits better than n s a
reply
very very great fun list I like it a lot very great job mis mojo one of my very favorite list ever I like friends with benefits better than n s a
reply
Andrea
I saw both but I prefer No Strings Attached I liked that for a change it was the Man who falls in love first and the truth is I love Adam and Emma
reply
I saw both but I prefer No Strings Attached I liked that for a change it was the Man who falls in love first and the truth is I love Adam and Emma
reply
Dominic
I don't think I've ever clicked on a Ms. Mojo video so quickly. I love both these movies and needed a impartial judge to weigh in on it for me
reply
I don't think I've ever clicked on a Ms. Mojo video so quickly. I love both these movies and needed a impartial judge to weigh in on it for me
reply
Muskaan
I loved Friends with benefits. It was fun great chemistry! And watched that movie many times. No strings attached was boring for me!
reply
I loved Friends with benefits. It was fun great chemistry! And watched that movie many times. No strings attached was boring for me!
reply
George
Jamie: Why don't they ever make a movie that shows what happens after the big kiss?
Dillon: They do, it's called porn.
reply
Jamie: Why don't they ever make a movie that shows what happens after the big kiss?
Dillon: They do, it's called porn.
reply
CorCor
I can't believe Ms. Mojo finally made this video. I think I requested it about 5-6 years ago. This makes me happy: )
reply
I can't believe Ms. Mojo finally made this video. I think I requested it about 5-6 years ago. This makes me happy: )
reply
akshaya
No strings attached is my forever favorite. And it is definitely far far better than the friends with benefits.
reply
No strings attached is my forever favorite. And it is definitely far far better than the friends with benefits.
reply
weirdlycute
I prefer Friends with Benefits cause of their chemistry, I think is waaaay better than Ashton and Natalies
reply
I prefer Friends with Benefits cause of their chemistry, I think is waaaay better than Ashton and Natalies
reply
David
I'd love to know how to get real-life FWB/NSA action. Every girl I've suggested it to has angrily rejected it.
reply
I'd love to know how to get real-life FWB/NSA action. Every girl I've suggested it to has angrily rejected it.
reply
Armani
Who wouldve thought that Mila and Ashton started out as friends with benefits and ended married with kids
reply
Who wouldve thought that Mila and Ashton started out as friends with benefits and ended married with kids
reply
CJ
I've seen them both, I prefer Friends with Benefits.
Justin's and Mila's chemistry is so good in the movie.
reply
I've seen them both, I prefer Friends with Benefits.
Justin's and Mila's chemistry is so good in the movie.
reply
Calm
I know that NSA isnt original or spectacular, but that movie is great in my book. I prefer it over FWB.
reply
I know that NSA isnt original or spectacular, but that movie is great in my book. I prefer it over FWB.
reply
Name
No strings attached is the best romantic for me if you come any closer I will not letting you go OMG!
reply
No strings attached is the best romantic for me if you come any closer I will not letting you go OMG!
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
