Range Rover Evoque SUV 2018 review - Mat Watson
video description
For me the rear cabin in the 5 door could do with 3 inches of legroom and about inch deeper footwell, and it would be a hell of a lot better prospect. the front is fantastic, and although the BM and Merc cabins have a higher quality feel The Merc is like the inside of a mafia bosses funeral casket and the BM just boring.
Date: 2022-04-11
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 9
redrum
Nobody should buy this car. It is a piece of shit. Mine has been back to the dealership on 7 occasions over 18 months. The land rover dealership refuse to exchange or reject and Land Rover refuse to help in anyway. They say i have to go through the dealership with any issues. Pathetic customer service, pathetic reliability. Absolute nightmare of a car. Stay well clear!
reply
Nobody should buy this car. It is a piece of shit. Mine has been back to the dealership on 7 occasions over 18 months. The land rover dealership refuse to exchange or reject and Land Rover refuse to help in anyway. They say i have to go through the dealership with any issues. Pathetic customer service, pathetic reliability. Absolute nightmare of a car. Stay well clear!
reply
Robert
How much was you paid to tell us lies the ride is boring when corning it lerches and you get a lot of road noise in the back the seats are ok but controls are far to close together the trim is of poor quality inside and a mixed bag of leather the info screen nasty and low quality. How to I know this 500 miles in a day glad to get out of the dam thing.
reply
How much was you paid to tell us lies the ride is boring when corning it lerches and you get a lot of road noise in the back the seats are ok but controls are far to close together the trim is of poor quality inside and a mixed bag of leather the info screen nasty and low quality. How to I know this 500 miles in a day glad to get out of the dam thing.
reply
martin
Okay, now I'm really confused. I came to this Evoque review straight from your 2013 Evoque review. It's as though you were talking about 2 completely different cars. Even down to plenty of leg room, to not enough leg room. Oh well, back to the drawing board. Looking for a 4X4 (because I will be going off road) I want one that gives more than 40 MPG.
reply
Okay, now I'm really confused. I came to this Evoque review straight from your 2013 Evoque review. It's as though you were talking about 2 completely different cars. Even down to plenty of leg room, to not enough leg room. Oh well, back to the drawing board. Looking for a 4X4 (because I will be going off road) I want one that gives more than 40 MPG.
reply
Lucas
Sorry, I'm a lost American, but to British people measure MPG differently because I watched a review on the Audi A3 done by a british person who said it gets around 60, but on the AUDI USA website it only says something like 32. Also, the Range Rover Evoque im pretty sure is advertised as getting 29 MPG. Can someone from across the pond help me out?
reply
Sorry, I'm a lost American, but to British people measure MPG differently because I watched a review on the Audi A3 done by a british person who said it gets around 60, but on the AUDI USA website it only says something like 32. Also, the Range Rover Evoque im pretty sure is advertised as getting 29 MPG. Can someone from across the pond help me out?
reply
Chris
Your an idiot and biased. I have owned an X5M, X3 and Evoque Black Pack and can say my Black Pack rivals my X5M and trumps ALL X3s. 100% fact. You drove the base model so your review is not even close to the truth. Try driving the Autobiography or Black Pack Dynamic. The Pure is $30, 000-$40, 000 less than either of the top modes. Get a clue kid.
reply
Your an idiot and biased. I have owned an X5M, X3 and Evoque Black Pack and can say my Black Pack rivals my X5M and trumps ALL X3s. 100% fact. You drove the base model so your review is not even close to the truth. Try driving the Autobiography or Black Pack Dynamic. The Pure is $30, 000-$40, 000 less than either of the top modes. Get a clue kid.
reply
Kirk
Let's face it. the Evoque is for soccer moms or people that can't afford a proper range rover!
Useless bag of shit that shares the same pointless space as an X3 or a freelander on the market.
Land rover used to be a trademark for British design and flagship, now they're embarrassing!
I rest my case with the new defender. -
reply
Let's face it. the Evoque is for soccer moms or people that can't afford a proper range rover!
Useless bag of shit that shares the same pointless space as an X3 or a freelander on the market.
Land rover used to be a trademark for British design and flagship, now they're embarrassing!
I rest my case with the new defender. -
reply
Jay
This geeza-s an obvious BMW fanboy! Usually like his reviews but this one was so negative! I-ve had BMW X3 and currently own an Evoque. And for me, the Evoque pisses all over the Beemer in most departments!
reply
This geeza-s an obvious BMW fanboy! Usually like his reviews but this one was so negative! I-ve had BMW X3 and currently own an Evoque. And for me, the Evoque pisses all over the Beemer in most departments!
reply
MagicPants
The Discovery Sport looks better on the outside imo but the interior is nicer in the Evoque. I feel like the Evoque kind of just exists for us peasants to be able to afford a Range Rover at all lol
reply
The Discovery Sport looks better on the outside imo but the interior is nicer in the Evoque. I feel like the Evoque kind of just exists for us peasants to be able to afford a Range Rover at all lol
reply
MartinV
So I just watched your review for RR Evoque 2013 and that review is completely different from this one when talking about space but nothing changed from then in terms od space. It'a the same car.
reply
So I just watched your review for RR Evoque 2013 and that review is completely different from this one when talking about space but nothing changed from then in terms od space. It'a the same car.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
