The Lele Pons Kylie Jenner Divide, 3D Ghost Gun Dilemma, & The French Smartphone Ban
video description
Date: 2019-11-01
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 9
Dominick Jasso
Ok look 2 things and before I start there's no right answer it's gonna be a rabbit hole, like I'm not even that smart and I made one right after high school it took me a week to get it running and it could of made a gun if I wanted it too, if I could get that far ur not gonna stop anyone that wants it done and has money. Second point is u might say ok then we ban those files or maybe the parts. Well, all the parts are basic consumer electronics and are very simple to get. Or with the files u don't really need them because guess what, all u have to do is get a real one to scan (could be a variety of ways that wouldn't be that hard, could be a model made out of anything as long as it has the right dimensions. so now ur thinking well we just have to ban all printers somehow right? Well, there's not just plastic or metal ones. What about biological ones that could develope a new treatment or method of saving lives(yours or someone in ur family. who knows) Are those banned? I'm Shure those could be developed to a point to where those could be at home. But then what if someone uses it to make viruses (not even like a plague or anything, just basic ones he weaponizes and sends wherever he finds would cuase the most harm. I mean this isnt gonna stop anytime soonI would say this shifts the argument real quick to are prioritization of making education (real education because the situation of that is another can of worms)our main focus.
reply
Ok look 2 things and before I start there's no right answer it's gonna be a rabbit hole, like I'm not even that smart and I made one right after high school it took me a week to get it running and it could of made a gun if I wanted it too, if I could get that far ur not gonna stop anyone that wants it done and has money. Second point is u might say ok then we ban those files or maybe the parts. Well, all the parts are basic consumer electronics and are very simple to get. Or with the files u don't really need them because guess what, all u have to do is get a real one to scan (could be a variety of ways that wouldn't be that hard, could be a model made out of anything as long as it has the right dimensions. so now ur thinking well we just have to ban all printers somehow right? Well, there's not just plastic or metal ones. What about biological ones that could develope a new treatment or method of saving lives(yours or someone in ur family. who knows) Are those banned? I'm Shure those could be developed to a point to where those could be at home. But then what if someone uses it to make viruses (not even like a plague or anything, just basic ones he weaponizes and sends wherever he finds would cuase the most harm. I mean this isnt gonna stop anytime soonI would say this shifts the argument real quick to are prioritization of making education (real education because the situation of that is another can of worms)our main focus.
reply
exaltdragon
Sorry Phil but you've made some mistakes. It really isn't that simple, making a 3d printed firearm. Clearances, plastic shrinkage, part strength, failed prints, etc all present significant technical limitations. Look up Barnacules Nergasm's video attempt to make an ar-15 lower, and he has an Ultimaker 2, one of the best, most expensive printers for home users out there. It's not as simple as clicking print and hey presto the machine spits out a working ar-15 lower. Even a criminal can appreciate the technical difficulty that this presents. Barnacules has significant experience in additive fabrication and even he struggled to make one. Also the cody wilson liberator is not fully 3d printed. the firing pin, cartridge case, bullet, primer, propellant, and metal insert block are all not 3d printed. In almost every conceivable way a metal ar-15 made using traditional subtractive manufacturing is superior, which is why people resort to making a gun from an 80% lower, and assembling it with commercially manufactured parts. That's just a cold hard fact, additive manufacturing will never make a part superior to subtractive manufacturing.
reply
Sorry Phil but you've made some mistakes. It really isn't that simple, making a 3d printed firearm. Clearances, plastic shrinkage, part strength, failed prints, etc all present significant technical limitations. Look up Barnacules Nergasm's video attempt to make an ar-15 lower, and he has an Ultimaker 2, one of the best, most expensive printers for home users out there. It's not as simple as clicking print and hey presto the machine spits out a working ar-15 lower. Even a criminal can appreciate the technical difficulty that this presents. Barnacules has significant experience in additive fabrication and even he struggled to make one. Also the cody wilson liberator is not fully 3d printed. the firing pin, cartridge case, bullet, primer, propellant, and metal insert block are all not 3d printed. In almost every conceivable way a metal ar-15 made using traditional subtractive manufacturing is superior, which is why people resort to making a gun from an 80% lower, and assembling it with commercially manufactured parts. That's just a cold hard fact, additive manufacturing will never make a part superior to subtractive manufacturing.
reply
Mopsey Girl
Im studying to be a teacher in Australia. In every classroom it is a fight for attention right now, students find it easy to just check their phones or slip in wireless headphones that it becomes so easy to disengage from the class. Laptops and tablets are normally able to be integrated into classroom activities but the phones always tend to be a distraction. It is also another thing that teacher have to always be aware of, in every class students will attempt hide them in order to be able to use them. The internet is an amazing thing however, it also contains a lot of easy consumable content compared to what they would be learning. We challenge learners so they are better problem solvers and are more informed of the world however, human brains by design would rather activities that is familiar and easy which means that every student will prefer any distraction that the content and phones are tend to be always easily accessible. I know that majority of teachers that I have worked with would jump for joy if a law was similar was developed here.
reply
Im studying to be a teacher in Australia. In every classroom it is a fight for attention right now, students find it easy to just check their phones or slip in wireless headphones that it becomes so easy to disengage from the class. Laptops and tablets are normally able to be integrated into classroom activities but the phones always tend to be a distraction. It is also another thing that teacher have to always be aware of, in every class students will attempt hide them in order to be able to use them. The internet is an amazing thing however, it also contains a lot of easy consumable content compared to what they would be learning. We challenge learners so they are better problem solvers and are more informed of the world however, human brains by design would rather activities that is familiar and easy which means that every student will prefer any distraction that the content and phones are tend to be always easily accessible. I know that majority of teachers that I have worked with would jump for joy if a law was similar was developed here.
reply
rjc0234
lol fully semi automatic really really really having to push the use of the English language to make it sound scarier than it really is. its a gun capable of firing one shot before breaking. you still need the ammo, you still need a 3D printer, and for the Armalite rifle, you need every single other component. to make a traditional ghost gun, mostly involves lots of pipe and a saw. can you cut a bit of thick walled pipe to lenght? yes? you have a ghost gun. can you operate a complicated electronic device, requiring months of training to figure out how to use it? great. you have 15 failed attempts at making a ghost gun. and of course the government would LOVE to control peoples ability to produce items on their own without requiring government. and bear in mind, most people are more than happy to serialise things they make or buy, but EVERY SINGLE TIME some moron talks about banning guns, you just think oh, they are going to use the list i signed up to, so people just retreat even more.
reply
lol fully semi automatic really really really having to push the use of the English language to make it sound scarier than it really is. its a gun capable of firing one shot before breaking. you still need the ammo, you still need a 3D printer, and for the Armalite rifle, you need every single other component. to make a traditional ghost gun, mostly involves lots of pipe and a saw. can you cut a bit of thick walled pipe to lenght? yes? you have a ghost gun. can you operate a complicated electronic device, requiring months of training to figure out how to use it? great. you have 15 failed attempts at making a ghost gun. and of course the government would LOVE to control peoples ability to produce items on their own without requiring government. and bear in mind, most people are more than happy to serialise things they make or buy, but EVERY SINGLE TIME some moron talks about banning guns, you just think oh, they are going to use the list i signed up to, so people just retreat even more.
reply
Michele Nichols
Nothing against these youtubers as I am one, but I'm an actress first & use my youtube as a way of marketing for my career, but generally the reason I think celebrities get more money is because they have more national & maybe global influence based on all the other things they do in the marketplace besides posts & videos. So yes an actual professional model who's a celebrity is going to get more for a photo than a instagram star who got good as selfies. If these influencers want to make more money they're going to need to expand their universe and become more well known outside a few social media platforms. As the blurring between universe lines continues that might start to equalize but that's where we are now. Lele grew on vine and switched to youtube/instagram & got famous for making content. That's not as much pull as a Britney spears who was already famous before joining instagram & had an over 20 year career in the music industry of work behind her.
reply
Nothing against these youtubers as I am one, but I'm an actress first & use my youtube as a way of marketing for my career, but generally the reason I think celebrities get more money is because they have more national & maybe global influence based on all the other things they do in the marketplace besides posts & videos. So yes an actual professional model who's a celebrity is going to get more for a photo than a instagram star who got good as selfies. If these influencers want to make more money they're going to need to expand their universe and become more well known outside a few social media platforms. As the blurring between universe lines continues that might start to equalize but that's where we are now. Lele grew on vine and switched to youtube/instagram & got famous for making content. That's not as much pull as a Britney spears who was already famous before joining instagram & had an over 20 year career in the music industry of work behind her.
reply
DSlyde
That was not what caused the rise of the AR15, and you're seriously misrepresenting what 3d printed guns actually change. Right now, a criminal can buy the parts for a slam fired shotgun for about 10 from any hardware store, its basically pipes and a nail. The gun they make from that will be infinitely safer for them, far cheaper, last essentially forever, be far more deadly, be just as legal and much less obviously a firearm. It also takes far less expertise than operating a 3D Printer to do it. 3d printed guns doesn't lower the barrier to entry at all, because the barrier is can you slide one pipe onto another smaller pipe. Meanwhile for the price of one 3d printer, that cartel could by 5 or 6 cheap real receivers that won't fail after use. Its easier for them to just get someone to just use straw purchasers and get real guns. I'm actually a little disappointed with your fact checking on this one.
reply
That was not what caused the rise of the AR15, and you're seriously misrepresenting what 3d printed guns actually change. Right now, a criminal can buy the parts for a slam fired shotgun for about 10 from any hardware store, its basically pipes and a nail. The gun they make from that will be infinitely safer for them, far cheaper, last essentially forever, be far more deadly, be just as legal and much less obviously a firearm. It also takes far less expertise than operating a 3D Printer to do it. 3d printed guns doesn't lower the barrier to entry at all, because the barrier is can you slide one pipe onto another smaller pipe. Meanwhile for the price of one 3d printer, that cartel could by 5 or 6 cheap real receivers that won't fail after use. Its easier for them to just get someone to just use straw purchasers and get real guns. I'm actually a little disappointed with your fact checking on this one.
reply
Ignyte
I agree with the phone ban in schools. They would be a means for distraction as well as a tool for research and education. Why I think they should still be banned though is because school will still have computers available to students for research and the likes. You can't moderate the students' use of their own device but you can moderate their use on school computers. Additionally, it would reduce the amount of cheating in tests, and ensure that student's either use their brains to work out the answer or take the time and effort to research the topic further rather than googling the answer, which requires little thought or effort. If we give them a magic device that can essentially give them the answer to virtually any question, then in my opinion, we're training professional googlers rather than moulding critical thinkers and problem solvers. I dunno, just my immediate thoughts on it.
reply
I agree with the phone ban in schools. They would be a means for distraction as well as a tool for research and education. Why I think they should still be banned though is because school will still have computers available to students for research and the likes. You can't moderate the students' use of their own device but you can moderate their use on school computers. Additionally, it would reduce the amount of cheating in tests, and ensure that student's either use their brains to work out the answer or take the time and effort to research the topic further rather than googling the answer, which requires little thought or effort. If we give them a magic device that can essentially give them the answer to virtually any question, then in my opinion, we're training professional googlers rather than moulding critical thinkers and problem solvers. I dunno, just my immediate thoughts on it.
reply
Wolvenclad
We live in a world where almost every week there are new school shootings, teachers are being caught abusing their power with students, etc. Too many things are going on in the world for people to just ban phones from school. Phones are often times a form of protection where children can film things that should not be happening and report them. If anything, the schools should be implementing a new system where phones are used as a warning system for any dangerous events that might be taking place. I see this all over the place already, where if you connect to a businesses wifi, they can send you special messages that advertise for them. Why cant school do the same thing only instead of advertisements they send red alerts to students so that they know if a shooter is in the school, or a fire, or any other dangerous event that, with warning, can save lives?
reply
We live in a world where almost every week there are new school shootings, teachers are being caught abusing their power with students, etc. Too many things are going on in the world for people to just ban phones from school. Phones are often times a form of protection where children can film things that should not be happening and report them. If anything, the schools should be implementing a new system where phones are used as a warning system for any dangerous events that might be taking place. I see this all over the place already, where if you connect to a businesses wifi, they can send you special messages that advertise for them. Why cant school do the same thing only instead of advertisements they send red alerts to students so that they know if a shooter is in the school, or a fire, or any other dangerous event that, with warning, can save lives?
reply
Kirstyn Loftus
Instagram: personally I think that yes, some celebrities do deserve to make more than others. HOWEVER, It shouldn't matter HOW they make said living. If it impacts the world, either positively or negativity, it should be correctly rewardedFrench phone ban: I personally think this should depend on the student. If they don't have any mental disabilities, then they should be expected to be off their phones when someone is teaching. However, if someone does have a mental disability (eg ADHD/ADD, Anxiety) then they should be allowed to take breaks as needed as long as they are being monitored. Personally I have ADHD and find that I perform better in school when I have breaks rather than just listening ALL day long. Ghost gun: it's messed up how making your own is basically illegal but buying one isn't. A gun is a gun and we need better laws.
reply
Instagram: personally I think that yes, some celebrities do deserve to make more than others. HOWEVER, It shouldn't matter HOW they make said living. If it impacts the world, either positively or negativity, it should be correctly rewardedFrench phone ban: I personally think this should depend on the student. If they don't have any mental disabilities, then they should be expected to be off their phones when someone is teaching. However, if someone does have a mental disability (eg ADHD/ADD, Anxiety) then they should be allowed to take breaks as needed as long as they are being monitored. Personally I have ADHD and find that I perform better in school when I have breaks rather than just listening ALL day long. Ghost gun: it's messed up how making your own is basically illegal but buying one isn't. A gun is a gun and we need better laws.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
19:58
13:47
14:24
17:20
16:13