VehiclesFashionRecipesBlogsHuntTravelsSportFunHandmadeITEducation
Mini-Games
x

x
zakruti.com » Knowledge, science, education » Historical films
Eadric Streona: Anglo-Saxon England's Greatest Villain?

Eadric Streona: Anglo-Saxon England's Greatest Villain?

FBTwitterReddit

video description

Rating: 4.0; Vote: 1
Eadric Streona: Anglo-Saxon England's Greatest Villain? Alexander: Any use of historic case examples, as a method of wining wars, and even decision-making in social actions, is entirely too complex and non-analogous to the true world, as it is. These case examples and/or stories may be useful to learn facts, and possibly new concepts, but applying one, or even several historical examples to a current situation, usually always has a conflict with its application. This false analogy; some past occurrence is, plainly, not exactly the same today. All people are different, all laws are different/differently interpreted (society has advanced, and all people have their autonomy. The chance that all people are going to behave exactly like a historical case example is extremely unlikely, given people's rights, and their autonomy. Thus, overall is the concept of the logical fallacy, the false [and/or faulty] analogy The use of fictional stories can even be more flawed, as these fictional stories may not be complete in their depiction of reality. One quality may be attractive, but is this being, as one may say hooked on a feeling, making decisions based on emotions instead of facts, and somewhat hedonistic, truly what is best? But if this quality, if it is action, revenge, love, (and others) even the best feeling to guide one's decision-making? People are self-aware. What happens when people find out, and understand sources people are making their decision from? This may be more relevant if a person is/was taking more steps towards recreating this reality, than merely playing one part. Such as truly assigning labels, and roles to other people. Still, all people are free to define themselves, or at least should be, and some more specific conversation uses references to literature and other media as a way merely to conversate about certain topics. What if people were using legal terms, and even court rooms, to recreate their favorite books? Even without completely being aware? Couldn't this be harmful? With awareness to these topics as separate works of art, and not true life. What then? As a leader, what are people truly creating? What exactly is one creating their society into? Is making decisions this way limiting other people into roles they have not chose for themselves? Should people learn, and or be explained, more specific forms of conversation? Thanks for reading.
Date: 2022-09-10

Comments and reviews: 19


Well looks like I gonna have comment here too. Hallo again from Denmark history time. As you Said in video about professional viking armies are true. In a decade before Ethelred the unready took the English throne. Denmark had just been unified into a single state under Harold Bluetoth around 965(also the year Harold converted to Christianity. Even though it woud take another 150 years befor Odin, Thor and the went went away. Harold was powerfull enough to make the rulers of Zealand (and the Island ) and scania(in modern sweden. That area was danish untill 1660. When Denmark lost the scanian wars with sweden ) and norway submit to his rule. Suddenly the King of Denmark coud raise huge armies. And fist recorded raid viking in ethelreds reign took place in 983. So it wasnt Svend Forkbeard Who started the viking raids in England to collect danegeld. But his father Harold Bluetoth. But in 986 Harold was overthrown and killed on Svend orders after rebillion/civil war. And Svend took the danish Crown for himself. Svend was around 26 at the time. And some years where Svend conslidsted his rule and becoming the most powerfull ruler in Scandinavia. We still consider him of our greatest rulers here in Denmark. Thats when the raids started. in 990es started. But Svend didnt start it. His father did.
reply

I find it interesting that when my ancestors left Scandinavia and settled Scotland, Normandy, and the Danelaw, the local population reacted much the same way as modern European nationalists react to Syrian and African refugees. and yes, my ancestors really DID come to steal the Saxon people's land and money and women! The Saxons did the same thing to Roman Britain, and the Romans did the same to the Celts, and later generations of Britons did exactly the same thing to the Native Americans. Really, pretty much all of history consists of people from one country travelling to another country to take their land and their money and their women. so why should modern Europe buck the trend? Trade and population migration are good for the gene pool and the economy, and leads to an influx of new technologies and cultural ideas, while the best elements of the original culture generally remain strong. Hey, Canada was built on immigration!
reply

The descendents of of these hords fighters Chieftens Kings and their names are still with us, The siol Alpine of the picktish clans anointed their kings on the stone of Scoon, The linyedge of their past kings was recited to them they were given a sword to protect there followers. The battle call was repeated Cumragh Bass Alpine, Remember the death of Alpin. One of those kings was Malkam Can more Can Cath Ma Ch Dubithagh
Mac Duffy. The grand farther of Mac Beath, So Shakespeare left a taunt, Huble bubble toil and trouble, Fire burn and cauldron bubble, For something wicked this way comes.

reply

Then it seems that greed, disregard and disloyalty eventually decided his fate. I think Cnut himself wanted rid of this man, afraid of what he achieved from so little, and for the fact that he was ready to betray even the king who supplied him with all that power. Also, leaving him alive could have caused a great political disruption for Cnut, especially because many noblemen already hated/mistrusted him, which could have eventually developed into a civil war.
reply

Great Video and here is a like. One small criticism. As you tell the tale you don't really hint that this is an awful brutal Villain. Eadric sounds like most other Ambitious nobles during these times. Maybe add some flair to add to his Villainy. Please more of this History, as an American with Irish English Scottish Scandinavian descent its great to hear of this part of history.
reply

PauL A. JuLes III
BUT DO YOU BeLieve in JeHoVah GOD? Of Course=>
To the PeoPLes of the WORLD, here then is WHY, I WILL
Vote for DonaLd Trump & ALL RePubs, come Nov. 3, 2020!
Here is How a Sodo who Votes for Joe Biden, Answers
a Question====>
By Sod 0 Mite, PauL A. JuLes III,
to me(Martyr) Quote=>( Suck My Anus! )

reply

Aethelred truly was unready to be king since he was only 12 when he became king. My 13 year old would never be ready to be a king at this age. 12 & 13 year olds have just hit puberty. They are trying to figure out their own bodies. So I know they lack the maturity to rule well.
reply

I wrote an essay on Cnut in high school, each time I wrote his name spell check would suggest Cunt.
It was then that I learnt how to adjust spell check settings.
Before I handed the paper in I did a word search for Cunt, it appeared about 3 times!

reply

the Martyr has to be one of the worst titles to get. Had Aethelred not been so unready the English language would be quite different as William the Conqueror would not have had much claim to the throne
reply

To be honest, he did what he could to survive, this Eadric Streona. Sure he was a dick for switching sides, almost reminding me of Lu Bu again, but still, he was being. pragmatic with his choices.
reply

Thanks for letting me know that I am not 2 crazy I always knew that I was gonna run across the information on past life. I have problems with everything n the rock that lets us stay
reply

Ironside could of won if this traitor hadnt turned tail. If he won the conquerer wouldnt of had a claim to England, and we could see a far different future for the Anglo Saxon england
reply

Thing always gets me is Britain gets a rough ride over their empire days but people are quick to forget the saxons Roman's Vikings.
Wheres our repatriation monies.

reply

Eadric was like Richard Neville, Earl of Warwick with his turncoat behavior & trying to manipulate kings & like Lord Stanley who sided with the winner during a battle.
reply

I'm sure the Eadric planned that retreat to facilitate Cnut's victory. That' what Edward Ironside got for trusting someone who would betray his own kin.
reply

Great video once again! Have you considered touching on Matilda of Tuscany and the investiture controversy? A very underrated figure and time in European history.
reply

Anglo saxons didnt get wiped the normans actually recruited and let the anglo saxons breed still thats why The British still have the Anglo Saxon blood
reply

Tar very much! These tales satisfy my Mercian self and my Viking ancestry both. I demand we bring back some of these excellent names too!
reply

With the Early English and Vikings looking so much alike in battle one wonders how they were able to tell each other apart.
reply
Add a review, comment






Other channel videos