Why Only 1 Gram Of This Material Is Worth $25 Billion Dollars
video description
Date: 2023-12-14
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 24
-DavidRLentz
Antimatter is -not- an element. Hydrogen, helium, lithium, are the simplest elements. Carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen are perhaps the most important. We have another 100-plus elements.
I do not understand the details, but one conceivably could find atoms comprised of anti-particles (anti-protons, positrons, anti-neutrons, etc.
reply
Antimatter is -not- an element. Hydrogen, helium, lithium, are the simplest elements. Carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen are perhaps the most important. We have another 100-plus elements.
I do not understand the details, but one conceivably could find atoms comprised of anti-particles (anti-protons, positrons, anti-neutrons, etc.
reply
-danielclv97
well, the material implied in this video is anti-hidrogen; if you want the most expensive material to be ever created, try anti-gold or anti-LSD XD it's a bit funny to put a price on something we couldn't create even if we use all the resources we have on the planet though. Like, that price is for aliens?
reply
well, the material implied in this video is anti-hidrogen; if you want the most expensive material to be ever created, try anti-gold or anti-LSD XD it's a bit funny to put a price on something we couldn't create even if we use all the resources we have on the planet though. Like, that price is for aliens?
reply
-outerrealm
3: 00 No, that-s a lie, antimatter is not produced in the atmosphere. Only anti particles are created. Individual anti particles are not antimatter. Anti particles would have to combine into atoms in order to form antimatter, and that doesn-t happen. This creator is an a$$.
reply
3: 00 No, that-s a lie, antimatter is not produced in the atmosphere. Only anti particles are created. Individual anti particles are not antimatter. Anti particles would have to combine into atoms in order to form antimatter, and that doesn-t happen. This creator is an a$$.
reply
-jamesmaddison4546
The tsar bomba weighed 27 tons. Explosive force=3300 Hiroshima bombs. 1kg of antimatter as a bomb-1 tsar bomba. 27tons of antimatter as a bomb=80, 850, 000 Hiroshima bombs.
Uhm. yeah. thats more than a planet breaker -
reply
The tsar bomba weighed 27 tons. Explosive force=3300 Hiroshima bombs. 1kg of antimatter as a bomb-1 tsar bomba. 27tons of antimatter as a bomb=80, 850, 000 Hiroshima bombs.
Uhm. yeah. thats more than a planet breaker -
reply
reallifelore
At 2: 30. If the closest star is roughly 4 light years away and antimatter can accelerate us to 50% of the speed of light, then it we take us about 8 years to get there, not 2. (Half the speed means double the time)
reply
At 2: 30. If the closest star is roughly 4 light years away and antimatter can accelerate us to 50% of the speed of light, then it we take us about 8 years to get there, not 2. (Half the speed means double the time)
reply
-jantonisito
Imagine some aliens watching this video - marvelling how primitive humanity must to struggle with such trivial matter as antimatter containment and recoiling from revulsion at all that talk about bullets and bombs.
reply
Imagine some aliens watching this video - marvelling how primitive humanity must to struggle with such trivial matter as antimatter containment and recoiling from revulsion at all that talk about bullets and bombs.
reply
-DavidRLentz
The nearest star is round 4. 25 light-years away. Travelling at 0. 5c will require well over two years. (That time would pass just one light-year) The passage in your example I cite above would need 8. 5 years.
reply
The nearest star is round 4. 25 light-years away. Travelling at 0. 5c will require well over two years. (That time would pass just one light-year) The passage in your example I cite above would need 8. 5 years.
reply
-adamiwaniec3072
2: 32 correction: it would take -8. 5 years to reach the closest star at 50% of the speed of light. The closest star is -4. 25 light years away.
it's a bit late for this but whatever haha
reply
2: 32 correction: it would take -8. 5 years to reach the closest star at 50% of the speed of light. The closest star is -4. 25 light years away.
it's a bit late for this but whatever haha
reply
-dankthegank4315
I was paying 20 bucks per g for heroin but I had the plug it usually goes for 60 if you just buy one g. And not in bulk like half o. So idk where people get 200 per g. No.
reply
I was paying 20 bucks per g for heroin but I had the plug it usually goes for 60 if you just buy one g. And not in bulk like half o. So idk where people get 200 per g. No.
reply
-nikitachirich7985
I-ll save you the 7 minutes, 1 gram or anti-gram of anti-matter contains 1. 76 Gj/s of subatomic energy and takes 175x10-5 TeV to produce. Was I right about the video?
reply
I-ll save you the 7 minutes, 1 gram or anti-gram of anti-matter contains 1. 76 Gj/s of subatomic energy and takes 175x10-5 TeV to produce. Was I right about the video?
reply
-outerrealm
It-s not possible to find or make any measurable amount of antimatter. It can only be made one particle at a time, and they disappear immediately. So this video is absurd.
reply
It-s not possible to find or make any measurable amount of antimatter. It can only be made one particle at a time, and they disappear immediately. So this video is absurd.
reply
-HH-hc7mg
but dmt is more expensive than lsd, since lsd is measured in microgram so it costs 3-3 euro / 100-200 ug if you get it in the dark net. Dmt is very expensive
reply
but dmt is more expensive than lsd, since lsd is measured in microgram so it costs 3-3 euro / 100-200 ug if you get it in the dark net. Dmt is very expensive
reply
-outerrealm
4: 34 the robo narrator fake voice mispronounced NASA-GODDARD. F, uck this video and the lazy A$$ creator who hasn-t got his facts straight.
reply
4: 34 the robo narrator fake voice mispronounced NASA-GODDARD. F, uck this video and the lazy A$$ creator who hasn-t got his facts straight.
reply
-patbrennan6572
Maybe if we got hold of Scotty on the USS Enterprise and worked out a deal with him, he has an anti mater making machine, 'aye captain'
reply
Maybe if we got hold of Scotty on the USS Enterprise and worked out a deal with him, he has an anti mater making machine, 'aye captain'
reply
-limabravo6065
Antimatter is not $25 Billion per gram, that would cheap, no its $25 Trillion per gram, at least according to the people at CERN
reply
Antimatter is not $25 Billion per gram, that would cheap, no its $25 Trillion per gram, at least according to the people at CERN
reply
-bravehome4276
Minor correction: at 50% lightspeed the spaceship will take four minutes to travel to the nearest star (Which is the sun, bro.
reply
Minor correction: at 50% lightspeed the spaceship will take four minutes to travel to the nearest star (Which is the sun, bro.
reply
-addymant
Not even a mention of the fact that if the only source of it is to produce it, then it isn't an energy source, it's a battery.
reply
Not even a mention of the fact that if the only source of it is to produce it, then it isn't an energy source, it's a battery.
reply
-meatcrimes-42069
-antimatter can treat certain types of cancer- i know that-s not what it means but i pictured blowing up the cancer
reply
-antimatter can treat certain types of cancer- i know that-s not what it means but i pictured blowing up the cancer
reply
reallifelore
Humanity: -Looks at nothing- Humanity: -OMG THIS STUFF IS PRICELESS! We'll call it Anti-Matter cuz it doesn't exist! -
reply
Humanity: -Looks at nothing- Humanity: -OMG THIS STUFF IS PRICELESS! We'll call it Anti-Matter cuz it doesn't exist! -
reply
reallifelore
Wait, how would the antibullet work, though? You can-t have an antimatter atom touch matter, so how would that work?
reply
Wait, how would the antibullet work, though? You can-t have an antimatter atom touch matter, so how would that work?
reply
-minetieplays2092
i feel like an antimatter galaxy colliding with any amount of matter would probably destroy the entire universe
reply
i feel like an antimatter galaxy colliding with any amount of matter would probably destroy the entire universe
reply
-stayshk7794
Isn't the nearest star to earth 4 light years away? How can %50 of light speed reach it with less than 4 years?
reply
Isn't the nearest star to earth 4 light years away? How can %50 of light speed reach it with less than 4 years?
reply
reallifelore
wouldn-t the antimatter just come into contact with the air and explode before you could do anything with it?
reply
wouldn-t the antimatter just come into contact with the air and explode before you could do anything with it?
reply
reallifelore
-Drops a planklentgh long of animatter- WHAT F--; -%; ---; ;(-&-; -&( -(&-'; -&%%-8; :%FQYYCDUQVHGIYGUI: =%$
reply
-Drops a planklentgh long of animatter- WHAT F--; -%; ---; ;(-&-; -&( -(&-'; -&%%-8; :%FQYYCDUQVHGIYGUI: =%$
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
