VehiclesFashionRecipesBlogsHuntTravelsSportFunHandmadeITEducation
Mini-Games
x

x
zakruti.com » Knowledge, science, education » TED-Ed
The psychology behind irrational decisions - Sara Garofalo

The psychology behind irrational decisions - Sara Garofalo

FBTwitterReddit

video description

Rating: 4.0; Vote: 1
Often people make decisions that are not rational from a purely economical point of view meaning that they dont necessarily lead to the best result. Why is that? Are we just bad at dealing with numbers and odds? Or is there a psychological mechanism behind it? Sara Garofalo explains heuristics, problem-solving approaches based on previous experience and intuition rather than analysis. Lesson by Sara Garofalo Cardboard: This is the first Ted Ed video I have completely disagreed with. When not really. I mean every choice I made was the less common correct one. And the anchoring effect is only because we rightfully assume that the age of the person is a significant property of the person in the question. If you found real life examples of the question I think youd find that the age of death was irregular. Nobody would ask someone to guess the age of death or if they died before 140 in the real world unless it was Significant.
Date: 2020-08-22

Comments and reviews: 7


The decisions are not irrational they have a deeper evolutionary back up and that is the aversion of loss. In nature, loss is a much more detrimental effect because it usually means the loss of extreme energy and efford investement for humans which is not the same as money won in a game which are basically pure random profit. The decision of the players to flip the coin is commanded from the same instict that would make a human risk his or her life to save the life of their child, even though if you lose at this risk you usually end up losing it all (your life and posibly your children's life, the energy investment on a child is big enough to make the risk worthwhile and this behaviour favoured by evolution. Human insticts translate bad in a game like this but they are not fallacies in general, they are rational choices in a world that works in a different way than a TV game.
reply

Sprint: gEt a 0 pHoNE If U sWiTch For oNlY 30 a liNE
Bruh its even worse cuz ur forced to pay 30 if u want the phone and the line but if its 15 a line and 15 a phone per month, then I would just get the line

reply

In order to get 2000 in the 2nd round, the player should flip the coin and win. However, if the player flipped the coin and did not win, the round 2 doesn't exist since the money would remain 1000.
reply

If you choose to do both coin flips, would the probablitily of landing on head and tails be 50/50. If I were to win on the first coin flip the rational decision would be to take a sure loss.
reply

Everyone who likes this should read Thinking fast and slow by Daniel Kahneman, the concept of prospect theory is explained well there. A read of a lifetime
reply

''Consider that the intuitive answer might not be the right one after all''
I experienced just the opposite in every single test I took

reply

i think that is why chidi in the good place have a hard time making decisions because he knows the consequences of heuristics
reply
Add a review, comment






Other channel videos