VehiclesFashionRecipesBlogsHuntTravelsSportFunHandmadeITEducation
Mini-Games
x

x
zakruti.com » Knowledge, science, education » Weird History
Ways Medieval Armor Was More Dangerous Than Wearing Nothing

Ways Medieval Armor Was More Dangerous Than Wearing Nothing

FBTwitterReddit

video description

Rating: 4.0; Vote: 1
Chain mail and suits of armor were some of the most recognizable parts of medieval warfare. Created in response to swordplay, the dominant form of combat at the time, they've become somewhat legendary for their striking appearance on the battlefield. A good suit of plate armor was considered invincible in many ways, but there were several tactics combatants could use to kill their opponent
Date: 2022-12-29

Comments and reviews: 20


LOL at all the garbage you said in this video. like what the heck are you actually trying to say here? Listen you said someone with a hammer with enough force could give someone wearing a helmet a concusion? WHAT IF THEY WERE NOT WEARING THE HELMET IN THE FIRST PLACE? WOULD THEY HAVE A HEAD? lol this video is littered with garbage and inaccuracies and I hope people can do there own common sense research. Armor typically weighed like 20-50lbs not 100's of lbs. Modern day soldiers carry more weight than they did in full plate armor. At least with 4 million subs you would think you would have the time to research your topic before spewing 90% nonsense. If you hit someone with plate armor hard enough to cave it in it could break their bones. well what the hell would it do to them if they didnt have it on? blow their lungs out of there body? stop acting like armor is bad and pointless becuase if it was no one literally would have worn it. Long bows were also not invented by the English. Learn some hostory.
reply

Arrows piercing plate armour.
So called armour piercing arrow heads were made to pierce mail, arrows had almost not change of penetrating proper plate armour.
Not only were the armours shaped in ways that made blows and projectiles skid across it, but the shafts of arrows at the time were wooden. Wood absorbs a lot of energy. The arrows would bounce and/or shatter. MAYBE you could pierce some of the thiner plates, like around the joints, and sometimes arrows could skid off the plate and end up in the neck or eye-slits etc. But thats exactly why eye-slits were made so small and later breastplates had a flared V shape so arrows would skid away from your neck.
Also. Longbows are NOT the best bows at all.
Almost everything in this video is entirely false

reply

Normally I enjoy your videos but you guys seriously dropped the ball hard on this one. You know why people wore armor back then? BECAUSE IT WORKED! I blame Hollywood for this ridiculousness the armor back then literally saved lives. Also the harness that they wore under plate armor distributed the weight to the point you can run just fine in it. Also the heat could easily be taken care of by wearing a tabard. This is like saying wearing a modern plate carrier or kevlar is more dangerous than wearing nothing. You should do yourselves a favor and delte the video this is straight up misinformation.
reply

If your argument that being dead is less painful than living with injuries, then this video makes perfect sense.
Guys, if you take a hammer to your unprotected head, you won't feel a thing after it kills you. If you wear a helm, you could end up with brain damage because you'll survive with an injury.
In which case, if you're afraid of suffering injuries and permanent biological disorders brought upon by warfare, then maybe don't enlist. Just a thought.
People who enlist in the military who are afraid of injuries and/or death are probably not the best suited to it.

reply

Ranker Presents Yeah, that's the website you want to get your history and facts from, a website where random people vote up or down on what items they have presented, not everything, of their opinion on it. Keys there being that any random person visiting the site and they vote on their opinion, which is subjective, rather than the articles being about facts, which are objective.
reply

This was one of the most misinformed videos Ive ever seen. It feels like someone described to you the idea of suits of armor through a game of telephone and you made a video on it filling in details where you saw fit. So many different errors and mistakes in this, even ones someone with the most basic knowledge of medieval warfare (myself) could point out.
reply

Weird History, what you have just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this chat is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no likes, and may God have mercy on your soul.
reply

reasons having stone walls are worse than nothing.
1. Walls have been around for a long time.
2. You could get hot behind the wall.
3. You can climb over walls.
4. You can't leave during a siege without dying.
5. catapults could destroy walls.
6. you can't see through walls.
7. Ballistic missiles ended the age of walls.

reply

Why is this video still up, it is such a travesty of FAKE information it is frightening. A truly AWFUL video that was made by a narrator who was given lines by a marketing team who didn't like real history, 'it isn't Hollywood enough'. Seriously, ANYONE watching this please do so as a comedy sketch, as that is what this is. SH! T!
reply

Arrows and lances can still kill you They can still kill you if youre not wearing it so whats the point? You can still get beaten to death You can still get beaten to death without wearing it so whats your point? Guns can kill you YOU CAN STILL GET KILLED WITHOUT WEARING ARMOR SO WHATS YOUR POINT?
reply

Wow. This is ridiculously bad! You're basically saying, all the ancient soldiers were idiots. But we're smart. Bahahahaha
Idiots tend to think they're so smart they miss the obvious. If armor created more problems than wearing nothing, why have we done it for millennia and still do?

reply

This content is a parody, right? You guys, if this is meant to be serious then you need to fact check. Literally all of the issues you mention do not take into account that without the armour, you're killed instantly in like 90% of your examples. Nah, crap.
reply

Did these guys ever inform everybody in the middle east and other arid areas that covering yourself in cloth could possibly kill them? Those idiots keep covering themselves up too, when the sun is blazing in the sky.
reply

Right so who ever made this do me a favor put on a steel toe boot and just a sock on the other foot. Then hit your toe with a hammer on both feet. Feel free to do so as hard as you like. Let me know what happened.
reply

Is that why the neked primatives historically defeated the armored peoples? Oh wait they didn't, it was completely lopsided victories for the armored civilizations against the neked tribes peoples.
reply

It's oddly inspiring that a video can lie so much and still get 250k views, like anyone can make an educational video and find success without doing anything as tiresome as research.
reply

Can you please make a decent or at least ANY research before you make a video next time? This is such a disgrace. unbelievably low quality of information. I am stunned.
reply

If armour was so bad, humans wouldn't have used it for thousands of years, from antiquity all the way to modern helmets and the bulletproof gear we know today.
reply

Do you or your team do any real research? It seems a lot of your videos you watch a few movies and make a LOT of assumptions and think those are facts.
reply

Thank you for creating this video and showing that living in a hole without any attempt to do research still allows you to spread disinformation.
reply
Add a review, comment






Other channel videos