What If We Nuked Mars?
video description
Date: 2023-11-26
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 24
Lightening
No for Mars to ever be habitable and remain that way it would need to be the size and mass of a super earth class of planet, a huge problem with Mars is that it is too small to maintain an atmosphere.
And to small to generate a magnetic field to protect it from space Whether, so Mars mass and size would first need to be increased to at least 1. 3 to 1. 5 times the mass and size of earth Minimum maybe close to 1. 7 to 2. 0 times the size and mass.
Then it would be able to retain an atmosphere and generate a magnetic field to protect it.
Till that happens Mars could never be terraformed to become habitable no matter how many nuke's it was hit with, you would first need to add ever asteroid in the asteroid belt and some of the gas giant and ice giants moons as well to the Mars, then a load of the icy bodies like Pluto, Eris, Makemake and other T. N. O's.
reply
No for Mars to ever be habitable and remain that way it would need to be the size and mass of a super earth class of planet, a huge problem with Mars is that it is too small to maintain an atmosphere.
And to small to generate a magnetic field to protect it from space Whether, so Mars mass and size would first need to be increased to at least 1. 3 to 1. 5 times the mass and size of earth Minimum maybe close to 1. 7 to 2. 0 times the size and mass.
Then it would be able to retain an atmosphere and generate a magnetic field to protect it.
Till that happens Mars could never be terraformed to become habitable no matter how many nuke's it was hit with, you would first need to add ever asteroid in the asteroid belt and some of the gas giant and ice giants moons as well to the Mars, then a load of the icy bodies like Pluto, Eris, Makemake and other T. N. O's.
reply
Sithemperor
First. Conduct rocket trails unmanned but crew capable able to land on the surface.
Next: Send astronauts in batches to test the surface, nature, conditions, gravitational effects, etc and other phenomenon.
If possible, next, instead of nuking, establish a continuous rocket shipping line, and slowly begin setting up factories near the poles, using water from polar ice caps and other resources obtained from earth. The factories release massive CO2 as production booms. Delivering resources to earth while CO2 emissions thicken the atmosphere. Melting of polar icecaps gradually and through sectioned melting divert gas and water towards the equator.
The infrastructure though would take multiple lifetimes
reply
First. Conduct rocket trails unmanned but crew capable able to land on the surface.
Next: Send astronauts in batches to test the surface, nature, conditions, gravitational effects, etc and other phenomenon.
If possible, next, instead of nuking, establish a continuous rocket shipping line, and slowly begin setting up factories near the poles, using water from polar ice caps and other resources obtained from earth. The factories release massive CO2 as production booms. Delivering resources to earth while CO2 emissions thicken the atmosphere. Melting of polar icecaps gradually and through sectioned melting divert gas and water towards the equator.
The infrastructure though would take multiple lifetimes
reply
jbyrd655
How? Syggest you compare the energy released by the largest 'nuclear' bomb ever built with the energy released by a volcano or hurricane. Obviously (or at least it should be) the only 'way' to terraform Mars would be to steer some comets or lasso a few 'ice heavy' asteroids to impact the red planet. 'Course you'd then have to wait a billion years for the atmosphere to (never) develop because of the lighter gravity and the absence of a magnetic field on Mars. Simply Muskian loony tunes
Clickbait.
reply
How? Syggest you compare the energy released by the largest 'nuclear' bomb ever built with the energy released by a volcano or hurricane. Obviously (or at least it should be) the only 'way' to terraform Mars would be to steer some comets or lasso a few 'ice heavy' asteroids to impact the red planet. 'Course you'd then have to wait a billion years for the atmosphere to (never) develop because of the lighter gravity and the absence of a magnetic field on Mars. Simply Muskian loony tunes
Clickbait.
reply
Mario
Lets just send most of our carbon dioxide to mars. We have too much and its negatively affecting our planet and sending it to mars would be helping mars get an ozone of its own. As for the poles of mars simply start industrializing mars and force all the excess heat from machines to go into the ice caps (while taking some of that cold air back the other way, no AC needed just stealing from the poles to help them warm up and distribute thermal energy in a beneficial way)
reply
Lets just send most of our carbon dioxide to mars. We have too much and its negatively affecting our planet and sending it to mars would be helping mars get an ozone of its own. As for the poles of mars simply start industrializing mars and force all the excess heat from machines to go into the ice caps (while taking some of that cold air back the other way, no AC needed just stealing from the poles to help them warm up and distribute thermal energy in a beneficial way)
reply
NEAL
Why do all the dickheads r hellbent on nuking mars? Terraform it first jerks. Redirect meteors asteroids towards it by using those very nukes. increase its mass. send drilling expeditions. get the subterranean water out on the surface. It painstakingly long process but it will be worth it! And also make the US use the earthquake generator on mars for terraforming it further.
reply
Why do all the dickheads r hellbent on nuking mars? Terraform it first jerks. Redirect meteors asteroids towards it by using those very nukes. increase its mass. send drilling expeditions. get the subterranean water out on the surface. It painstakingly long process but it will be worth it! And also make the US use the earthquake generator on mars for terraforming it further.
reply
Laura
Hi I please you to take out this film and similar films from internet about doing Mars and more planets like Earth. This is my idea of business. I registered this in one Foundation some years ago that I will do this. Somebody steal my this idea from this Foundation and do films. I please to take out this film and similar films from internet. With greetings.
reply
Hi I please you to take out this film and similar films from internet about doing Mars and more planets like Earth. This is my idea of business. I registered this in one Foundation some years ago that I will do this. Somebody steal my this idea from this Foundation and do films. I please to take out this film and similar films from internet. With greetings.
reply
Maha
Not only should we nuke Mars is to send dead bodies of humans animals such as asiatic lions Bengal tigers cheetahs Amur leopards simmental cattle Belgian blue cattle pietrain pigs wildebeest African hippos border Leicester sheep Wicklow cheviot sheep southern white rhinoceros as they all contain bacteria essential for life
reply
Not only should we nuke Mars is to send dead bodies of humans animals such as asiatic lions Bengal tigers cheetahs Amur leopards simmental cattle Belgian blue cattle pietrain pigs wildebeest African hippos border Leicester sheep Wicklow cheviot sheep southern white rhinoceros as they all contain bacteria essential for life
reply
Look
Wherever humans go, there is destruction. Humans are actually like viruses of the Universe. There are reasons why other planets around Earth are unlivable, humans failed Earth, we can't even take good care of poor Earth and humans are not welcome on any planet else for good.
reply
Wherever humans go, there is destruction. Humans are actually like viruses of the Universe. There are reasons why other planets around Earth are unlivable, humans failed Earth, we can't even take good care of poor Earth and humans are not welcome on any planet else for good.
reply
-Shizaki
The bigger problem with Mars is it's very poor magnetic field
That's the reason it's losing its atmosphere
And settling on Mars would be extremely dangerous because of radiation, and radiation means mutation and even worse. Cancer
reply
The bigger problem with Mars is it's very poor magnetic field
That's the reason it's losing its atmosphere
And settling on Mars would be extremely dangerous because of radiation, and radiation means mutation and even worse. Cancer
reply
Flying
What if we did this and it actually worked. If it did Mars might be made easier for us to colonize however Mars would also be able to create life of its own. Humans might then live alongside dinosaurs and then we-d have another problem.
reply
What if we did this and it actually worked. If it did Mars might be made easier for us to colonize however Mars would also be able to create life of its own. Humans might then live alongside dinosaurs and then we-d have another problem.
reply
Kyle
If we nuke mars, we are basically opening the doors to hell. Hell will have no choice but to respond by invading earth. Then we will need the Doom guy. Do we have a Doom guy? Better make sure we do -
reply
If we nuke mars, we are basically opening the doors to hell. Hell will have no choice but to respond by invading earth. Then we will need the Doom guy. Do we have a Doom guy? Better make sure we do -
reply
Gunaditya
I'm always amazed by the idea that we have legit done so much research and are ready to spend shit load of money to live on a new planet instead of caring about Earth, lmao.
reply
I'm always amazed by the idea that we have legit done so much research and are ready to spend shit load of money to live on a new planet instead of caring about Earth, lmao.
reply
AdamaxEP
Another issue is that mars is smaller than earth so a 62% reduction in gravity might not be healthy for longterm living. Our bodies work best at current gravitational forces.
reply
Another issue is that mars is smaller than earth so a 62% reduction in gravity might not be healthy for longterm living. Our bodies work best at current gravitational forces.
reply
rohitash
How about we nuke this pervert idea? Why do u have to be so destructive. Creating something beautiful takes efforts and skills. Idle dumb minds think of destruction
reply
How about we nuke this pervert idea? Why do u have to be so destructive. Creating something beautiful takes efforts and skills. Idle dumb minds think of destruction
reply
Nayan
Lol. ridiculous earthlings talking about destruction of a harmless planet! The narrator is not even sparing yet another planet as the video ends!
reply
Lol. ridiculous earthlings talking about destruction of a harmless planet! The narrator is not even sparing yet another planet as the video ends!
reply
Randall
What if we took water from earth's oceans to Venus to cool it off? We'd probably lose all are water in a failed attempt most likely
reply
What if we took water from earth's oceans to Venus to cool it off? We'd probably lose all are water in a failed attempt most likely
reply
Nicholas
Can you show what if we increase the amount of light to Mars so that it kick off the dinamo reaction in the centre of the planet
reply
Can you show what if we increase the amount of light to Mars so that it kick off the dinamo reaction in the centre of the planet
reply
bewmdogg
I say nuke the moon. The only reason it hasn't happened yet is because I assume there is a really good idea of why not to do it.
reply
I say nuke the moon. The only reason it hasn't happened yet is because I assume there is a really good idea of why not to do it.
reply
radi
nuking mars is as to make a hole in the sea using atomic bomb, can you make a hole in sea using a bomb? Same would happen in mars
reply
nuking mars is as to make a hole in the sea using atomic bomb, can you make a hole in sea using a bomb? Same would happen in mars
reply
santie2303
What if you guys just leave that plant alone and let nature take its course.
Oh wait! greedy corporations won't wait.
reply
What if you guys just leave that plant alone and let nature take its course.
Oh wait! greedy corporations won't wait.
reply
John
Mars has global dust storms, so wouldn't the radioactivity spread globally and make Mars unlivable? Sounds like a crazy idea.
reply
Mars has global dust storms, so wouldn't the radioactivity spread globally and make Mars unlivable? Sounds like a crazy idea.
reply
arvedui1
Imagine you are nuking a place which you have never been to and also have almost no idea and assume that it will work: )
reply
Imagine you are nuking a place which you have never been to and also have almost no idea and assume that it will work: )
reply
Legion
It would most likely heat up Mars because of the deposit of co2 and other green house gasses. Or just drop methane on it
reply
It would most likely heat up Mars because of the deposit of co2 and other green house gasses. Or just drop methane on it
reply
kaden
this is why aliens haven't made contact with us. they're afraid we're going to nuke them for no reason.
reply
this is why aliens haven't made contact with us. they're afraid we're going to nuke them for no reason.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
