The Insane Plan to Build a Sea in the Sahara With Nukes
video description
Date: 2023-12-14
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 21
-HailAnts
Considering they would be MT-range thermonuclear bombs they could be made extremely clean, solving the radiation problem.
The nukes would not have to be detonated all at once (and never would be) so the worry about 'disturbing the Arabian plate' would not be an issue (even doing them all at once it wouldn't be an issue, tectonic plates laugh at nuclear bombs.
So mainly it would never happen strictly for political reasons.
reply
Considering they would be MT-range thermonuclear bombs they could be made extremely clean, solving the radiation problem.
The nukes would not have to be detonated all at once (and never would be) so the worry about 'disturbing the Arabian plate' would not be an issue (even doing them all at once it wouldn't be an issue, tectonic plates laugh at nuclear bombs.
So mainly it would never happen strictly for political reasons.
reply
reallifelore
Is not that expensive to put one pipe from methiteranium to this plase there. Is not even needed to be under the sea level. Just put bot side inder the sea level, the output sude be lower and drag the water ti the output and will star going until it reach the sea level. The Red sea dosent evaporate so that sude fill two. But what that will be the oposed of that what Netherland do, But i gues water is beter then sand.
reply
Is not that expensive to put one pipe from methiteranium to this plase there. Is not even needed to be under the sea level. Just put bot side inder the sea level, the output sude be lower and drag the water ti the output and will star going until it reach the sea level. The Red sea dosent evaporate so that sude fill two. But what that will be the oposed of that what Netherland do, But i gues water is beter then sand.
reply
-samuelstrunk5525
So the only real problem to it was money, right? But at the same time it would be able to bring huge amounts of electricity in the region, to be sold no neihbour states. Hmm. seems like this actually should be possible if really needed/wanted in an considerably smaller time than they thought it takes when they first thought of it.
reply
So the only real problem to it was money, right? But at the same time it would be able to bring huge amounts of electricity in the region, to be sold no neihbour states. Hmm. seems like this actually should be possible if really needed/wanted in an considerably smaller time than they thought it takes when they first thought of it.
reply
-CPTAnonymous
Using nukes to create bodies of water in the Middle East is an absolutely FANTASTIC idea. We can hydrate the area, and cut down the population there at the same time. It's a total win for civilized society. The only issue is one of naming these bodies of water. Tehran Lake? Sea of Baghdad? Meh. whatever works.
reply
Using nukes to create bodies of water in the Middle East is an absolutely FANTASTIC idea. We can hydrate the area, and cut down the population there at the same time. It's a total win for civilized society. The only issue is one of naming these bodies of water. Tehran Lake? Sea of Baghdad? Meh. whatever works.
reply
-maxwarboy3625
in some unrelated context, Neil DeGrasse Tyson said that as opposed to the first nukes (like the ones dropped on Jpan, second generation H(hydrogen)-bombs cause negligible radiation from their blasts. so, if Egypt still wanted to go the cheap, quick, and dangerous route, they actually might be able to
reply
in some unrelated context, Neil DeGrasse Tyson said that as opposed to the first nukes (like the ones dropped on Jpan, second generation H(hydrogen)-bombs cause negligible radiation from their blasts. so, if Egypt still wanted to go the cheap, quick, and dangerous route, they actually might be able to
reply
-paulwilly4203
You wouldn-t have to dig a canal you would just have to dig a little Stream that would pick up and then the sand would erode and with that amount of water rushing into the whole the river would get quite big only thing is all that sand that would get pushed into the whole may have an affect on it
reply
You wouldn-t have to dig a canal you would just have to dig a little Stream that would pick up and then the sand would erode and with that amount of water rushing into the whole the river would get quite big only thing is all that sand that would get pushed into the whole may have an affect on it
reply
reallifelore
If there are unstable mines in the area. why not use those instead as part of the explosive capabilities needed to render easier the digging of the canal trench? I get a land mine won't displace much land but if there's enough of them, it'd make for a good start
reply
If there are unstable mines in the area. why not use those instead as part of the explosive capabilities needed to render easier the digging of the canal trench? I get a land mine won't displace much land but if there's enough of them, it'd make for a good start
reply
-VTuberThings
Minus the nukes obviously honestly I don't see with the Egyptian government hasn't thought to revisit this idea assuming they haven't with more modern technology it probably wouldn't take as long or cost as much as it would have back in the nineteen hundreds.
reply
Minus the nukes obviously honestly I don't see with the Egyptian government hasn't thought to revisit this idea assuming they haven't with more modern technology it probably wouldn't take as long or cost as much as it would have back in the nineteen hundreds.
reply
-noelht1
It doesn-t allow the North Africans to expand their influence deeper south. It allows a bunch of Savage murderous bastards to do some savage murdering things further north. Which is exactly why the Sahara should stay as it is
reply
It doesn-t allow the North Africans to expand their influence deeper south. It allows a bunch of Savage murderous bastards to do some savage murdering things further north. Which is exactly why the Sahara should stay as it is
reply
-damiendehorn6350
Shifting that much water to that depression in the desert would also help lower the sea levels caused by global warming. It would create a inland sea for Egypt.
reply
Shifting that much water to that depression in the desert would also help lower the sea levels caused by global warming. It would create a inland sea for Egypt.
reply
-siddharthsahu7123
How it will affect to global sea level rising problem.
Some countries like maldives are at danger of going under water soon can this idea solve it.
reply
How it will affect to global sea level rising problem.
Some countries like maldives are at danger of going under water soon can this idea solve it.
reply
reallifelore
Where did they plan on getting the nukes? -- doesn't posses any. Let alone +200. At least I think I'm right. I feel like Israel wouldn't let that happen
reply
Where did they plan on getting the nukes? -- doesn't posses any. Let alone +200. At least I think I'm right. I feel like Israel wouldn't let that happen
reply
-majorgeneral7009
5: 34 that will still not be the greatest explosion in human history because the blast of Tsar Bomba is the greatest explosion in human history
reply
5: 34 that will still not be the greatest explosion in human history because the blast of Tsar Bomba is the greatest explosion in human history
reply
-rblxtutorials1881
i-m from 2023 and there is a line splitting through africa which also goes through the sahara desert. Meaning there is a sea there now
reply
i-m from 2023 and there is a line splitting through africa which also goes through the sahara desert. Meaning there is a sea there now
reply
-jovanmalic9259
I don't know if it's true but I think, long time ago, I heard about bombs that are as powerful as nuclear ones but without radiation.
reply
I don't know if it's true but I think, long time ago, I heard about bombs that are as powerful as nuclear ones but without radiation.
reply
-sadeqalbana6933
if such a project ever happened, I would gladly open it to public funding, we're really in need for it here.
reply
if such a project ever happened, I would gladly open it to public funding, we're really in need for it here.
reply
-amazingamx1255
why cant the water from the nile be diverted and have a freshwater lake? how much would it lower sea levels?
reply
why cant the water from the nile be diverted and have a freshwater lake? how much would it lower sea levels?
reply
-USSFFRU
I'd want to know how radioactive the Sahara would be if it would be Green. Probably more radioactive than Chrynobyl
reply
I'd want to know how radioactive the Sahara would be if it would be Green. Probably more radioactive than Chrynobyl
reply
-dankyleg4933
This would help in so many ways, and if they wanted to they could use smaller scale bombs to excavate early on
reply
This would help in so many ways, and if they wanted to they could use smaller scale bombs to excavate early on
reply
-richtrm3177
5: 06 Annoying People: Oh mY GoD! rEaL LiFe lOrE SwOrE In a vIdEo!
Literally Everyone Else: Eh, shut up!
reply
5: 06 Annoying People: Oh mY GoD! rEaL LiFe lOrE SwOrE In a vIdEo!
Literally Everyone Else: Eh, shut up!
reply
reallifelore
I-m glad he didn-t do it cause I don-t think no one should nuke something right next to Cairo or Alexandria
reply
I-m glad he didn-t do it cause I don-t think no one should nuke something right next to Cairo or Alexandria
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
