Photoelectric Effect: History of Einstein's Revolutionary View of Light
video description
Date: 2022-12-27
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 20
Michael
The speed of the electromagnetic wave is 186, 282 miles per second vs Einstein's projectile light particle proton at 186, 000 miles per second. Is this a coincidence or did Einstein plagiarize yet another phenomenon to fit the math of relativity? Electromagnetic waves in space can neither slow down or speed up, this is consistent with the law of conservation of energy. If light slowed down, its energy would decrease, thereby violating the law of conservation of energy so the speed of light is instantaneous and cannot travel slower than it does. If Einstein's projectile light (particle photon) had mass it's light and images would be distorted and could not travel across the universe. The Hubble and James Webb telescope mirrors would only magnify these distortions, but most likely the high-speed particles would break the mirrors before we received the first distorted images, debunking the speed of light, Big Bang, Einstein's relativity and any science that uses relativity in their theories. Einstein's relativity is wrong light has no limitation of speed; it cannot be slowed down because it isn't moving. From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in both directions. You have now left the Einstein Zone.
Everyone knows cell phone electromagnetic radio waves travel both ways, yet Einstein's disciples believe time energy, mass and light can only travel one way back in time. If you simply run the Big Bang theory in reverse you reveal the insanity of Einstein's relativity and Big Bang theory. If the expansion of the Big Bang were true, time, energy, mass and light would be in the future from the vantage point of an expanding singularity-Big Bang and planet Earth would now reside in a past dimension of Einstein's time dilation (moving clocks run slow) space-time 13. 8 billion years ago: -. Disciples, remember thy 1st commandment, thou shalt not question thy lawgiver of relativity for blasphemers are the devil's pawn. Let thee not dwell in dissension of our Lord, shun them, drive them back to their jungle lair amen.
Will the James Webb Telescope view the birth of the first galaxies? Nope, the universe goes on to infinity. Neither time, the atom, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. The James Webb Space Telescope is not a time machine, you cant travel back in time to view the beginning of the universe with telescopes that were made in the future: -. Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. If science uses Einstein's wrongly theorized speed of light like an odometer to calculate past dimensions of distance and time, then using that same method to calculate forward dimensions of distance and time would mean the Big Bang was created and expanded in the future before time existed. Unlike a television or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of still image frames that hypothetical Einstein projectile light particles photons create to give us the appearance of a moving image: -.
It's truly amazing how the science and politics of the left are able to keep people denying reality, there are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space, yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just recorded images of the past 13. 8 billion years. Pretending not to notice the gross contradictions-pseudoscience in Relativity is typical of Einstein's disciples, devaluing the source of any information that's in contradiction with their beliefs-theories. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. If the light from the universe travels to past dimensions of time then it's light is also traveling into future dimensions of time (instantaneously. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. a state of superposition where time and gravity run inwardly, outwardly, in all directions in the same time frame, similar to the electromagnetic field having no beginning and no end. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End Revelation 22: 13.
If black holes reside is a region of Einstein's theorized space-time where gravity and mass are so dense that nothing, neither mass-particles nor electromagnetic radiation such as light can escape then how could it be possible for the entire mass of our universe to escape the unimaginable density of the proposed Big Bang? According to general relativity sufficient compact mass-density will deform space-time to form a black hole which obviously debunks both Big Bang theory and relativity! Big Bang theorists rely on red shift to support the hypothesis that the universe is expanding, the very phenomena that supports the hypothesis of a (non-expanding static universe.
Gravitational lensing occurs in all wavelengths of light including (red shift-microwave background radiation. Gravity from huge celestial objects of galaxies bend, curve and expand light giving the appearance of what Einstein wrongly theorized as time dilation-space-time-debunking the big bang. Mass from galaxies, planets and black hole electromagnet fields bend, curve and expand light giving the appearance of what Einstein wrongly theorized as time dilation-space-time dimensions. Light like all electromagnetic radiation and electricity is the result of moving electrons, as moving electrons of charged electromagnetic waves-light travel through the plasma of the universe each lump (or quanta) of energy in the electromagnetic waves are charged then discharged to the next lump, eventually the energy dissipates creating the appearance of time dilation - the appearance of longer wavelengths in red shift much like sound waves.
Light waves unlike a particle can stretch, bend-curve and occupy a state of superposition so the hypothetical Einstein projectile light particle (photon, a particle that has never been observed cannot be both a particle and a wave. There are no space-time fantasy unions or gravity waves that can join a particle, wave and time together then bend, curve and stretch them like a rubber band. Neither time nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. Time and space are independent of each other, not material bodies or fantasy unions that magically stretch time like a rubber band into space-time dimensions. The James Webb Space Telescope is not a time machine, you cant travel back in time to view the beginning of the universe with telescopes that were made in the future. Great Scott Marty, astronauts on the moon experience the same communication delays to earth but logic tells us they are not time traveling back from the future! :-)
If gravity is the result of mass then before the universe came into being gravity couldn't have existed simply because mass was not yet created! Galaxies with massive gravity from the early Big Bang would have been gravitationally bound like the Andromeda galaxy is to the Milky Way galaxy, the sun, moon and planets in all solar systems in the universe yet these early galaxies were able to somehow escape these massive gravitational forces continuing to expand at an increasingly faster rate. Into what, nothing? Nothing has no properties! Neither the atom, universe nor time can be created or destroyed. Albert Einstein an autistic violinist patent clerk that had access to more papers than Suzanne Somers litter box yet creates theories with more bugs than Terminix. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. a state of superposition where time, and gravity run inwardly, outwardly, in all directions in the same time frame, similar to the electromagnetic field having no beginning and no end. - Magnetron
reply
The speed of the electromagnetic wave is 186, 282 miles per second vs Einstein's projectile light particle proton at 186, 000 miles per second. Is this a coincidence or did Einstein plagiarize yet another phenomenon to fit the math of relativity? Electromagnetic waves in space can neither slow down or speed up, this is consistent with the law of conservation of energy. If light slowed down, its energy would decrease, thereby violating the law of conservation of energy so the speed of light is instantaneous and cannot travel slower than it does. If Einstein's projectile light (particle photon) had mass it's light and images would be distorted and could not travel across the universe. The Hubble and James Webb telescope mirrors would only magnify these distortions, but most likely the high-speed particles would break the mirrors before we received the first distorted images, debunking the speed of light, Big Bang, Einstein's relativity and any science that uses relativity in their theories. Einstein's relativity is wrong light has no limitation of speed; it cannot be slowed down because it isn't moving. From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in both directions. You have now left the Einstein Zone.
Everyone knows cell phone electromagnetic radio waves travel both ways, yet Einstein's disciples believe time energy, mass and light can only travel one way back in time. If you simply run the Big Bang theory in reverse you reveal the insanity of Einstein's relativity and Big Bang theory. If the expansion of the Big Bang were true, time, energy, mass and light would be in the future from the vantage point of an expanding singularity-Big Bang and planet Earth would now reside in a past dimension of Einstein's time dilation (moving clocks run slow) space-time 13. 8 billion years ago: -. Disciples, remember thy 1st commandment, thou shalt not question thy lawgiver of relativity for blasphemers are the devil's pawn. Let thee not dwell in dissension of our Lord, shun them, drive them back to their jungle lair amen.
Will the James Webb Telescope view the birth of the first galaxies? Nope, the universe goes on to infinity. Neither time, the atom, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. The James Webb Space Telescope is not a time machine, you cant travel back in time to view the beginning of the universe with telescopes that were made in the future: -. Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. If science uses Einstein's wrongly theorized speed of light like an odometer to calculate past dimensions of distance and time, then using that same method to calculate forward dimensions of distance and time would mean the Big Bang was created and expanded in the future before time existed. Unlike a television or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of still image frames that hypothetical Einstein projectile light particles photons create to give us the appearance of a moving image: -.
It's truly amazing how the science and politics of the left are able to keep people denying reality, there are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space, yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just recorded images of the past 13. 8 billion years. Pretending not to notice the gross contradictions-pseudoscience in Relativity is typical of Einstein's disciples, devaluing the source of any information that's in contradiction with their beliefs-theories. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. If the light from the universe travels to past dimensions of time then it's light is also traveling into future dimensions of time (instantaneously. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. a state of superposition where time and gravity run inwardly, outwardly, in all directions in the same time frame, similar to the electromagnetic field having no beginning and no end. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End Revelation 22: 13.
If black holes reside is a region of Einstein's theorized space-time where gravity and mass are so dense that nothing, neither mass-particles nor electromagnetic radiation such as light can escape then how could it be possible for the entire mass of our universe to escape the unimaginable density of the proposed Big Bang? According to general relativity sufficient compact mass-density will deform space-time to form a black hole which obviously debunks both Big Bang theory and relativity! Big Bang theorists rely on red shift to support the hypothesis that the universe is expanding, the very phenomena that supports the hypothesis of a (non-expanding static universe.
Gravitational lensing occurs in all wavelengths of light including (red shift-microwave background radiation. Gravity from huge celestial objects of galaxies bend, curve and expand light giving the appearance of what Einstein wrongly theorized as time dilation-space-time-debunking the big bang. Mass from galaxies, planets and black hole electromagnet fields bend, curve and expand light giving the appearance of what Einstein wrongly theorized as time dilation-space-time dimensions. Light like all electromagnetic radiation and electricity is the result of moving electrons, as moving electrons of charged electromagnetic waves-light travel through the plasma of the universe each lump (or quanta) of energy in the electromagnetic waves are charged then discharged to the next lump, eventually the energy dissipates creating the appearance of time dilation - the appearance of longer wavelengths in red shift much like sound waves.
Light waves unlike a particle can stretch, bend-curve and occupy a state of superposition so the hypothetical Einstein projectile light particle (photon, a particle that has never been observed cannot be both a particle and a wave. There are no space-time fantasy unions or gravity waves that can join a particle, wave and time together then bend, curve and stretch them like a rubber band. Neither time nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. Time and space are independent of each other, not material bodies or fantasy unions that magically stretch time like a rubber band into space-time dimensions. The James Webb Space Telescope is not a time machine, you cant travel back in time to view the beginning of the universe with telescopes that were made in the future. Great Scott Marty, astronauts on the moon experience the same communication delays to earth but logic tells us they are not time traveling back from the future! :-)
If gravity is the result of mass then before the universe came into being gravity couldn't have existed simply because mass was not yet created! Galaxies with massive gravity from the early Big Bang would have been gravitationally bound like the Andromeda galaxy is to the Milky Way galaxy, the sun, moon and planets in all solar systems in the universe yet these early galaxies were able to somehow escape these massive gravitational forces continuing to expand at an increasingly faster rate. Into what, nothing? Nothing has no properties! Neither the atom, universe nor time can be created or destroyed. Albert Einstein an autistic violinist patent clerk that had access to more papers than Suzanne Somers litter box yet creates theories with more bugs than Terminix. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. a state of superposition where time, and gravity run inwardly, outwardly, in all directions in the same time frame, similar to the electromagnetic field having no beginning and no end. - Magnetron
reply
Tom
Psy phy physics from a sci fi writer! THE LITTLE TEAR!
During the Big Bang, Dark Energy broke out of Dimp, the singularity before the Big Bang, and started the universe. But did it explode or tear?
Photons made the first pair conversion, and it tore into nothingness and nudged space apart. This made more Dark Energy / vacuum energy - expansion began! Consider this the first grain of rice on the chess board analogy! The second pair conversion expanded space more. Every point of new space made by more pair conversions, allowed more space and vacuum energy that allowed more pair conversions to pop up. Soon pair conversion was not a single Big Bang event, but an explosion of pair conversions as space ballooned up exponentially. This started a recurring cycle - the first pair conversion made more space, which made more dark energy / vacuum energy, which made more pair conversion, which made more space. Finally let's rename it the LITTLE TEAR instead of the BIG BANG!
LITTLE TEAR IN SPACE. Photons that are outside space-time, enter our universe of space-time, and make a pair of particles that expand in opposite directions! This TEAR IN SPACE, EXPANDS the UNIVERSE and MAKES A BIT MORE ROOM! That suggests that PAIR CONVERSION creates SPACE! The pair annihilate almost immediately, MOST of the time, and that SEWS UP THE TEAR!
The pair of particles tear space time apart with both the creation of space and distance between the two. Photons in eternal Dimp, through pair conversion of positrons and electrons, create distance, space, and time!
But even though pair conversion usually does not last, it did during the Little Tear, and sometimes it does today too because we know that DARK ENERGY continues to expand the universe today; and IT'S GOING FASTER! So the Big Bang, or better yet, the Little Tear, is going even stronger than ever.
reply
Psy phy physics from a sci fi writer! THE LITTLE TEAR!
During the Big Bang, Dark Energy broke out of Dimp, the singularity before the Big Bang, and started the universe. But did it explode or tear?
Photons made the first pair conversion, and it tore into nothingness and nudged space apart. This made more Dark Energy / vacuum energy - expansion began! Consider this the first grain of rice on the chess board analogy! The second pair conversion expanded space more. Every point of new space made by more pair conversions, allowed more space and vacuum energy that allowed more pair conversions to pop up. Soon pair conversion was not a single Big Bang event, but an explosion of pair conversions as space ballooned up exponentially. This started a recurring cycle - the first pair conversion made more space, which made more dark energy / vacuum energy, which made more pair conversion, which made more space. Finally let's rename it the LITTLE TEAR instead of the BIG BANG!
LITTLE TEAR IN SPACE. Photons that are outside space-time, enter our universe of space-time, and make a pair of particles that expand in opposite directions! This TEAR IN SPACE, EXPANDS the UNIVERSE and MAKES A BIT MORE ROOM! That suggests that PAIR CONVERSION creates SPACE! The pair annihilate almost immediately, MOST of the time, and that SEWS UP THE TEAR!
The pair of particles tear space time apart with both the creation of space and distance between the two. Photons in eternal Dimp, through pair conversion of positrons and electrons, create distance, space, and time!
But even though pair conversion usually does not last, it did during the Little Tear, and sometimes it does today too because we know that DARK ENERGY continues to expand the universe today; and IT'S GOING FASTER! So the Big Bang, or better yet, the Little Tear, is going even stronger than ever.
reply
Joe
Sorry. his view of light was NOT at all revolutionary. Not only that he is wrong. And his misunderstanding stems and yet our acceptance of his mistake stems from the majority love affair with Einstein.
Let's start with his light is a particle view. That is not at all revolutionary. Newton thought light was a particle. He called it corpusules instead of photons. But after maxwell, it was well accepted that light was a wave.
Einstein and rest of humanity blundered. They assumed aether. But no aether, meant light couldn't be a wave. So Einstein forced back to particle. He then thought the solution was quantizing maxwell equations but failed.
All he did was then postulate light was a particle. And nothing more than a curve fitting exercise proposed the E=hv and then said minimum energy needed requires particle to explain. No it does not. And because of Einstein gravitas in the scientific community we are left saying light is a particle and a wave.
Light is a wave. Under certain experimental geometry it is easier to analyze light as a particle. But, while a bit more difficult, the same answer can be obtained with light as a wave. However when light behaves like what it is - a wave - no math exists to force particle view. Wave, therefore it must be.
And his revolutionary SR was published by Poincare about 3 years prior to 1905 paper. Lorentz was adamant that Poincare discovered the SR principles not Einstein.
reply
Sorry. his view of light was NOT at all revolutionary. Not only that he is wrong. And his misunderstanding stems and yet our acceptance of his mistake stems from the majority love affair with Einstein.
Let's start with his light is a particle view. That is not at all revolutionary. Newton thought light was a particle. He called it corpusules instead of photons. But after maxwell, it was well accepted that light was a wave.
Einstein and rest of humanity blundered. They assumed aether. But no aether, meant light couldn't be a wave. So Einstein forced back to particle. He then thought the solution was quantizing maxwell equations but failed.
All he did was then postulate light was a particle. And nothing more than a curve fitting exercise proposed the E=hv and then said minimum energy needed requires particle to explain. No it does not. And because of Einstein gravitas in the scientific community we are left saying light is a particle and a wave.
Light is a wave. Under certain experimental geometry it is easier to analyze light as a particle. But, while a bit more difficult, the same answer can be obtained with light as a wave. However when light behaves like what it is - a wave - no math exists to force particle view. Wave, therefore it must be.
And his revolutionary SR was published by Poincare about 3 years prior to 1905 paper. Lorentz was adamant that Poincare discovered the SR principles not Einstein.
reply
YK
To a given bias voltage between anode and cathode sealed inside a low pressure (vacuum) tube and the observed electric charge flow varies in proportion to excitation light frequency at near uV range should be taken as a frequency response in the whole system and not because of light energy increases by light frequency. That is a selective process to reach some conclusion to an experiment we dont know the whole truth. e=hf is an example of that.
Celebrity and celebrated science are products subject to be investigated and refuted by each one of us before further celebrations or worshipping is applied.
reply
To a given bias voltage between anode and cathode sealed inside a low pressure (vacuum) tube and the observed electric charge flow varies in proportion to excitation light frequency at near uV range should be taken as a frequency response in the whole system and not because of light energy increases by light frequency. That is a selective process to reach some conclusion to an experiment we dont know the whole truth. e=hf is an example of that.
Celebrity and celebrated science are products subject to be investigated and refuted by each one of us before further celebrations or worshipping is applied.
reply
kEYBAWD
Another totally fascinating and informative video. Having learned all this in a classroom, how wonderful it is to see it come to life with photos, potted biographies, original papers and documents, and your own special way of narration -WOW! These videos should be available to schools. I think that this kind of approach to science might encourage all those students who reject it as 'too difficult' just learning formula dry. It might make them realise that Science is the longest and most gripping Sherlock Holmes story there is! I jest. But there is truth in it. Thank you.
reply
Another totally fascinating and informative video. Having learned all this in a classroom, how wonderful it is to see it come to life with photos, potted biographies, original papers and documents, and your own special way of narration -WOW! These videos should be available to schools. I think that this kind of approach to science might encourage all those students who reject it as 'too difficult' just learning formula dry. It might make them realise that Science is the longest and most gripping Sherlock Holmes story there is! I jest. But there is truth in it. Thank you.
reply
Ole
Like your remarked about Albert still in his old age did not understand what a proton is. It is a mystery. If there are real photons there must be some fysisk that explain why light would bundle in bundles of E= h f other than that they are emittet and absorbed in quanta. Looking at very distant stars we see the redshift explained by the expansion of space indicating that there is a rest energy in the photon that help the univers expand. Sounds alluring but what is then this process exactly?
reply
Like your remarked about Albert still in his old age did not understand what a proton is. It is a mystery. If there are real photons there must be some fysisk that explain why light would bundle in bundles of E= h f other than that they are emittet and absorbed in quanta. Looking at very distant stars we see the redshift explained by the expansion of space indicating that there is a rest energy in the photon that help the univers expand. Sounds alluring but what is then this process exactly?
reply
Graeme
Another excellent video - especially the interconnections between all of the people and their theories, ideas and discoveries. I tended to learn about each principle in isolation, as needed to explain the subject at hand.
As for your presentation, your pronunciation of some names is acceptable to me because you do much better than I could attempt. A rule I was taught was if you stumble, just power on and most people won't even notice.
reply
Another excellent video - especially the interconnections between all of the people and their theories, ideas and discoveries. I tended to learn about each principle in isolation, as needed to explain the subject at hand.
As for your presentation, your pronunciation of some names is acceptable to me because you do much better than I could attempt. A rule I was taught was if you stumble, just power on and most people won't even notice.
reply
Eric
Light is nature mean God and it is not created but rather it is hidden in all part and light only revealed but not created because in the Book of John the light came into the darkness although the darkens not knowing it and in reality light appear when space are torn by two cross frequency mean open up to show up the light beneath everything and that is how everyone had consciousness
reply
Light is nature mean God and it is not created but rather it is hidden in all part and light only revealed but not created because in the Book of John the light came into the darkness although the darkens not knowing it and in reality light appear when space are torn by two cross frequency mean open up to show up the light beneath everything and that is how everyone had consciousness
reply
Girija
please stop
making excuses about messing up. . you're the most fascinating science reporter ever and so much fun to listen to. The human connections behind all this science work is truly what life is all about. please continue messing up or not
And i vote not messing up!
As you breathe life into the scientific world. we all appreciate you for that
reply
please stop
making excuses about messing up. . you're the most fascinating science reporter ever and so much fun to listen to. The human connections behind all this science work is truly what life is all about. please continue messing up or not
And i vote not messing up!
As you breathe life into the scientific world. we all appreciate you for that
reply
Tim
From a 9th grade dropout, I say. huh? Actually, you made things clearer for me regarding how 'Solar Panels' work. (The theory behind them, that is) Quantum Mechanics, (Spooky action at a distance, et al, is, IMO, the next, not final, frontier. The final frontier will be when physicality and spiritualty marry. Be not deceived.
reply
From a 9th grade dropout, I say. huh? Actually, you made things clearer for me regarding how 'Solar Panels' work. (The theory behind them, that is) Quantum Mechanics, (Spooky action at a distance, et al, is, IMO, the next, not final, frontier. The final frontier will be when physicality and spiritualty marry. Be not deceived.
reply
Lucien
I said it again and again anytime a particle moves away from another particle with the speed of light it' creates a vacuum in the sea of akash (eather) it's creates light which is an emission which is not bigger than the electron, away from the source which created it with the speed of light
reply
I said it again and again anytime a particle moves away from another particle with the speed of light it' creates a vacuum in the sea of akash (eather) it's creates light which is an emission which is not bigger than the electron, away from the source which created it with the speed of light
reply
Sivarama
Kathy, there's a great hero in this story, an Indian, which is why I'm proding this. Satyendranath Bose, a fellow country man, who we may attribute to first understanding the statistics of photons. Without the statistics, photons are not, photons, just mystic energy packets.
reply
Kathy, there's a great hero in this story, an Indian, which is why I'm proding this. Satyendranath Bose, a fellow country man, who we may attribute to first understanding the statistics of photons. Without the statistics, photons are not, photons, just mystic energy packets.
reply
Charles
You are fantastic! I need to hear each video an infinite number of times to get it, and I will: ? So great to hear about the stories and the development of science and its explorations. ! The truth emerges! Such great people behind it all. Thank you!
reply
You are fantastic! I need to hear each video an infinite number of times to get it, and I will: ? So great to hear about the stories and the development of science and its explorations. ! The truth emerges! Such great people behind it all. Thank you!
reply
MICHAEL
Hands are definitely a distraction. Would help if you would occasionally look away from the teleprompter. The data is old hat. Except for the 85, 015 Indian students who appreciate the effort. Don't sell yourself short by apologizing for nothing
reply
Hands are definitely a distraction. Would help if you would occasionally look away from the teleprompter. The data is old hat. Except for the 85, 015 Indian students who appreciate the effort. Don't sell yourself short by apologizing for nothing
reply
GP
Its ironic that Einsteins theories both special and general relativity challenged Newtonian ideas yet on this one agreed with Newton. I refer to the fact that Newton regarded light as corpuscles of light and explained all his optics in that manner.
reply
Its ironic that Einsteins theories both special and general relativity challenged Newtonian ideas yet on this one agreed with Newton. I refer to the fact that Newton regarded light as corpuscles of light and explained all his optics in that manner.
reply
Dream
The photo-electric effect can be explained without any need for particles of light. There is no evidence that photons exist. All the slit and double slit experiments show that light is waves at all frequencies, never particles.
reply
The photo-electric effect can be explained without any need for particles of light. There is no evidence that photons exist. All the slit and double slit experiments show that light is waves at all frequencies, never particles.
reply
Rik
When we get to the point where nothing can be measured in more than one dimension without being able to measure its other dimensions at the same time, then we must abandon the idea that anything can be a discrete particle.
reply
When we get to the point where nothing can be measured in more than one dimension without being able to measure its other dimensions at the same time, then we must abandon the idea that anything can be a discrete particle.
reply
matneu27
Thanks to your videos I ve learned so much about the great scientists, especially in physics. I like your lessons because you also talk about the person and their faith. What about the great Stephen Hawkins?
reply
Thanks to your videos I ve learned so much about the great scientists, especially in physics. I like your lessons because you also talk about the person and their faith. What about the great Stephen Hawkins?
reply
Alonzo
I'm writing this in 2022, so I imagine it's been mentioned by someone else--when you're in front of the camera, your hands are like a windmill. Is this just a personal habit? Excellent videos otherwise!
reply
I'm writing this in 2022, so I imagine it's been mentioned by someone else--when you're in front of the camera, your hands are like a windmill. Is this just a personal habit? Excellent videos otherwise!
reply
arjan
In the name of Mileva I didn't notice a wrong pronunciation, but the name of her daughter Lieserl didn't even come close. But I always love your presentations
reply
In the name of Mileva I didn't notice a wrong pronunciation, but the name of her daughter Lieserl didn't even come close. But I always love your presentations
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
