Entropy: Origin of the Second Law of Thermodynamics
video description
THE REVERSE OF THIS IS SATAN'S WORLD WHERE THOSE THAT BELIEVE AND WORSHIP SATAN BELIEVE FROM CHOAS COMES ORDER. SPEAKINJG OF SATANISTS, I BELIEVE THE FREEMASON'S SCOTTISH RITE USES LATIN TO CREATE THEIR MOTTO: 'ORDO ab CHAO' - ORDER OUT OF CHAOS. WE MUST REMEMBER ANYTHING THAT GOES OPPOSITE OF GOD'S NATURAL WORLD IS SATANIC AND MUST BE CALLED OUT AND DEFIED. UNFORTUNATELY, THIS LESSON IN LIFE IS SORELY FORGOTTEN IN TODAY'S UPSIDE DOWN WORLD.
.
Date: 2022-12-27
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 19
Kevin
I have to respect the knowledge and talent of the author. I would like to suggest a follow-up video that takes the 2nd Law to the next level by adding the work of Ilya Prigogine on non-equilibrium self-organizing systems. That would add higher order differential terms to the classical 1st order differential expression of the 2nd Law (applicable only under equilibrium because it is an approximation with only the 1st order term, and thereby give a mathematical description to explain how order can be created from randomness by the transfer of heat in systems far away from equilibrium as found in the real-world, where negative higher order differential terms can become more dominant and actually can decrease randomness (self-organizing.
reply
I have to respect the knowledge and talent of the author. I would like to suggest a follow-up video that takes the 2nd Law to the next level by adding the work of Ilya Prigogine on non-equilibrium self-organizing systems. That would add higher order differential terms to the classical 1st order differential expression of the 2nd Law (applicable only under equilibrium because it is an approximation with only the 1st order term, and thereby give a mathematical description to explain how order can be created from randomness by the transfer of heat in systems far away from equilibrium as found in the real-world, where negative higher order differential terms can become more dominant and actually can decrease randomness (self-organizing.
reply
Pastor
We know mankind is degenerating at a rapid rate due to bad mutations acclimatizing with each new generation. This means we as the human race are getting weaker and dying. We will soon become extinct as a people, which is consistent with the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
However, there are those who propose we are getting better, stronger. They say we are ascending, that natural selection cures all. This conflicts with what the scientific evidence shows, that we are descending, that we are in fact dying as the human race and it can not be stopped. It's called Genetic Entropy.
.
If you combine the great Laws of Science, and from that you draw bad conclusions, all you really have is a bad (wrong) theory.
reply
We know mankind is degenerating at a rapid rate due to bad mutations acclimatizing with each new generation. This means we as the human race are getting weaker and dying. We will soon become extinct as a people, which is consistent with the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
However, there are those who propose we are getting better, stronger. They say we are ascending, that natural selection cures all. This conflicts with what the scientific evidence shows, that we are descending, that we are in fact dying as the human race and it can not be stopped. It's called Genetic Entropy.
.
If you combine the great Laws of Science, and from that you draw bad conclusions, all you really have is a bad (wrong) theory.
reply
Rick
I've never been quite happy with the 'laws' of thermodynamics - are they in fact merely axioms, like Euclid's, which have been rather undercut by Lobachevskian geometry etc? - or Newtonian physics, now largely displaced by relativity? Do these 'laws' in fact withstand things like quantum theory - which is now accepted as rather more than 'just a theory'? I'm sure they do help in understanding and explaining some processes, but I get worried when people like Brian Cox start saying that 'x' is impossible because it would break the second law of thermodynamics (I'd be happier if he'd said 'x' is unlikely to be possible because. )
Thanks for the great explanation of the history though!
reply
I've never been quite happy with the 'laws' of thermodynamics - are they in fact merely axioms, like Euclid's, which have been rather undercut by Lobachevskian geometry etc? - or Newtonian physics, now largely displaced by relativity? Do these 'laws' in fact withstand things like quantum theory - which is now accepted as rather more than 'just a theory'? I'm sure they do help in understanding and explaining some processes, but I get worried when people like Brian Cox start saying that 'x' is impossible because it would break the second law of thermodynamics (I'd be happier if he'd said 'x' is unlikely to be possible because. )
Thanks for the great explanation of the history though!
reply
Richard
The difference between energy and entropy, it seems to me is the idea of flow. The 1st Law describes no net flow; just equal and opposite reactions. Energy in Newton's laws of motion is not expended or consumed. But heat flow is an idea of velocity, since something is traveling in one direction and irreversibly from temp one to temp 2. Clausius equation compares joules of heat energy per degree as a ratio to miles per hour. Just as the distance e from here to Chicago falls as one approaches Chicago, the temperature falls as heat approaches temperature equilibrium.
reply
The difference between energy and entropy, it seems to me is the idea of flow. The 1st Law describes no net flow; just equal and opposite reactions. Energy in Newton's laws of motion is not expended or consumed. But heat flow is an idea of velocity, since something is traveling in one direction and irreversibly from temp one to temp 2. Clausius equation compares joules of heat energy per degree as a ratio to miles per hour. Just as the distance e from here to Chicago falls as one approaches Chicago, the temperature falls as heat approaches temperature equilibrium.
reply
eBaab
I would like to make a particular statement about entropy, with respect to the assertion that entropy always increases. I do think it is true in dead systems, but do not see it as true in systems where there is life. From chaos comes the living organism, that continues to organize while it remains alive, and so decreases the entropy of the universe. I see this as a very fundamental piece missing from an understanding of the universe. Even in the death of the organism it is normal for new life to utilize parts of the organism to create new life and decrease entropy.
reply
I would like to make a particular statement about entropy, with respect to the assertion that entropy always increases. I do think it is true in dead systems, but do not see it as true in systems where there is life. From chaos comes the living organism, that continues to organize while it remains alive, and so decreases the entropy of the universe. I see this as a very fundamental piece missing from an understanding of the universe. Even in the death of the organism it is normal for new life to utilize parts of the organism to create new life and decrease entropy.
reply
Richard
Great stuff thanks! My only complaint is the reflection of the 'ring light' off the surface of Kathy's eyes. It is so distracting! Sorry, It just looks creepy, which is sad because Kathy is really IMHO providing some really valuable information in a medium that verbal junkies like myself appreciate. This stuff is really hard to communicate, verbally and is usually presented as a very dense set of ma thematic equations. The translation of the math into discourse is of great value, but not often successfully achieved.
reply
Great stuff thanks! My only complaint is the reflection of the 'ring light' off the surface of Kathy's eyes. It is so distracting! Sorry, It just looks creepy, which is sad because Kathy is really IMHO providing some really valuable information in a medium that verbal junkies like myself appreciate. This stuff is really hard to communicate, verbally and is usually presented as a very dense set of ma thematic equations. The translation of the math into discourse is of great value, but not often successfully achieved.
reply
Dick
I have a PhD in chemical physics, decades ago, retrained as an epidemiologist, now retired. And I am cycling back to physics and having so much fun with your videos. I think more teaching of science from a historical perspective would enhance understanding and definitely enhance retention. All of us scientists stand on the shoulders of giants and those of lesser contributors, but both need to be recognized and studied as to how they came up with all this stuff. Thank you for making these wonderful videos.
reply
I have a PhD in chemical physics, decades ago, retrained as an epidemiologist, now retired. And I am cycling back to physics and having so much fun with your videos. I think more teaching of science from a historical perspective would enhance understanding and definitely enhance retention. All of us scientists stand on the shoulders of giants and those of lesser contributors, but both need to be recognized and studied as to how they came up with all this stuff. Thank you for making these wonderful videos.
reply
Sajia
Well, everyone in the comment section is saying it was a great explanation, which is making me feel dumb cause I didn't fully understand it.
I study in 12th grade and I have studied all these stuffs, but still don't understand clearly.
Can someone explain a bit more elaborately what it meant at 6: 04 in the video? Clausius decided that there must be some mathematical way to make twe heat transformations equivalent if you did them in the opposite order they would work in the opposite way
reply
Well, everyone in the comment section is saying it was a great explanation, which is making me feel dumb cause I didn't fully understand it.
I study in 12th grade and I have studied all these stuffs, but still don't understand clearly.
Can someone explain a bit more elaborately what it meant at 6: 04 in the video? Clausius decided that there must be some mathematical way to make twe heat transformations equivalent if you did them in the opposite order they would work in the opposite way
reply
RustyBolts
Hi again Kathy. Over the past 10 years I have been experimenting with the laws of entropy/probability and Murphy's law. Main observation so far is that not one object ever turns the right way round but always upside down, even if the chances are only 50/50. This is against probability and I am still trying to explain the phenomena. Do you have any ideas as to why this is so?
reply
Hi again Kathy. Over the past 10 years I have been experimenting with the laws of entropy/probability and Murphy's law. Main observation so far is that not one object ever turns the right way round but always upside down, even if the chances are only 50/50. This is against probability and I am still trying to explain the phenomena. Do you have any ideas as to why this is so?
reply
Professor
If, as you say, Clausius read Carnot's paper in 1849, then Carnot, who died in 1832, could hardly be called long-deceased. True, from our perspective in the next millennium, they are both long-deceased. But from Clausius' point of view, Carnot died when he, Clausius, was ten years old, hardly ancient history.
reply
If, as you say, Clausius read Carnot's paper in 1849, then Carnot, who died in 1832, could hardly be called long-deceased. True, from our perspective in the next millennium, they are both long-deceased. But from Clausius' point of view, Carnot died when he, Clausius, was ten years old, hardly ancient history.
reply
Johnny
Thanks so much! I do have a hard time wrapping my head around entropy.
Could you explain what constant entropy is on a refrigerant ph chart is?
My guess is it means there is no transfer of heat between inside the system and outside the system. The temperature is only increased by pressure
reply
Thanks so much! I do have a hard time wrapping my head around entropy.
Could you explain what constant entropy is on a refrigerant ph chart is?
My guess is it means there is no transfer of heat between inside the system and outside the system. The temperature is only increased by pressure
reply
Blue
Is entropy a state of disorder, a state of messiness?
If I have everything smooth, homogenous, equal, the same, spread out evenly, is that order or disorder?
If you have an environment in which one side have and the other side does not have. do you call that state of imbalance order?
reply
Is entropy a state of disorder, a state of messiness?
If I have everything smooth, homogenous, equal, the same, spread out evenly, is that order or disorder?
If you have an environment in which one side have and the other side does not have. do you call that state of imbalance order?
reply
ZEE
Heat cannot converted into work (mechanical work. is what is always implicit)
Heat is converted in pressure. than in work. ;-)
If the entropy of closed system can only increase.
what happen when is at the max possible value? did it increase further? ;-)
reply
Heat cannot converted into work (mechanical work. is what is always implicit)
Heat is converted in pressure. than in work. ;-)
If the entropy of closed system can only increase.
what happen when is at the max possible value? did it increase further? ;-)
reply
JC
Just a comment. 2nd Law does not state that entropy of a closed system can only increase as you mentioned twice in the video.
What it states is that entropy can not decrease. Therefore there IS room for reversible processes.
Thank you for the video.
reply
Just a comment. 2nd Law does not state that entropy of a closed system can only increase as you mentioned twice in the video.
What it states is that entropy can not decrease. Therefore there IS room for reversible processes.
Thank you for the video.
reply
Bill
This is a wonderful video that untangles a lot of difficulties of entropy. I can attest, however, that entropy is taught to chemical engineers as Q/T, not Boltzmann's Equation, and forms the basis of many, many calculations in industrial applications.
reply
This is a wonderful video that untangles a lot of difficulties of entropy. I can attest, however, that entropy is taught to chemical engineers as Q/T, not Boltzmann's Equation, and forms the basis of many, many calculations in industrial applications.
reply
Jerry
Can the 2nd law be applied to living things? at a cellular level? Messy being another way of saying disorganization? disorganization became organized over time and more advanced? Or is it meaning all life is decaying over time and then dies?
reply
Can the 2nd law be applied to living things? at a cellular level? Messy being another way of saying disorganization? disorganization became organized over time and more advanced? Or is it meaning all life is decaying over time and then dies?
reply
Nat
YES. GRAVITY IS IN VIOLATION OF THE 1ST LAW.
do a vid on that.
The heliocentrists will have a big fat shit on that g theory. with no impiricle scientific evidence.
world is all about scientism or thientithm
reply
YES. GRAVITY IS IN VIOLATION OF THE 1ST LAW.
do a vid on that.
The heliocentrists will have a big fat shit on that g theory. with no impiricle scientific evidence.
world is all about scientism or thientithm
reply
justgivemethetruth
Great video.
Clausius was awesome, but Lord Kelvin's Thunderstorm still blows me away the most. Entropy always confuses me, but your video actually helped simplify it a little bit.
reply
Great video.
Clausius was awesome, but Lord Kelvin's Thunderstorm still blows me away the most. Entropy always confuses me, but your video actually helped simplify it a little bit.
reply
richa
Forty years ago, my thermodynamics instructor Chris (last name not remembered) described the first law as You cant get ahead you can only break even, and the second law as You cant break even.
reply
Forty years ago, my thermodynamics instructor Chris (last name not remembered) described the first law as You cant get ahead you can only break even, and the second law as You cant break even.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
