WOW Logan Paul Interview Backlash, Yanet Garcia, Cohen, Trump, Toronto, Duckboat Disaster & More
video description
Date: 2019-11-01
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 9
J_Jammer
I would rather have more Logan Pauls than people that get upset over who is showing up at a university to speak to a group. Those protesters are far more volatile and worse than Logan Paul. I do not understand why people care so much about him or what he does. Just like I do not understand why people care what Roseanne tweeted. Just like I don't understand why people need who they like (actors) to be mean to who they don't like (random people they disagree with. It's weird. Logan Paul, Roseanne, Complements to people you don't like by people you do. all things that have not harmed anyone but people's moral code. That, by the way, is not even a standard moral code. It's a made up one I do not have to follow nor do I understand why anyone promotes it as one that is infallible. I would suggest (for less stress) you not worry so much about what other people say and worry more about what they're doing. EDIT: I cannot stand when someone repeats themselves over and over again (such as saying they're a brand) but I also didn't like Brad Pitt when he first started doing interviews either. He said YOU KNOW every other sentence. You have to be able to give an interview in order to sound smart. You can be smart, but you may not sound it. Brad Pitt ended up doing better as he got the hang of how to do interviews. I learned not to be bothered too much by interviews. I give more leeway for mistakes and annoyances. It's easy to mock someone that's being interviewed. Especially if you dislike them.
reply
I would rather have more Logan Pauls than people that get upset over who is showing up at a university to speak to a group. Those protesters are far more volatile and worse than Logan Paul. I do not understand why people care so much about him or what he does. Just like I do not understand why people care what Roseanne tweeted. Just like I don't understand why people need who they like (actors) to be mean to who they don't like (random people they disagree with. It's weird. Logan Paul, Roseanne, Complements to people you don't like by people you do. all things that have not harmed anyone but people's moral code. That, by the way, is not even a standard moral code. It's a made up one I do not have to follow nor do I understand why anyone promotes it as one that is infallible. I would suggest (for less stress) you not worry so much about what other people say and worry more about what they're doing. EDIT: I cannot stand when someone repeats themselves over and over again (such as saying they're a brand) but I also didn't like Brad Pitt when he first started doing interviews either. He said YOU KNOW every other sentence. You have to be able to give an interview in order to sound smart. You can be smart, but you may not sound it. Brad Pitt ended up doing better as he got the hang of how to do interviews. I learned not to be bothered too much by interviews. I give more leeway for mistakes and annoyances. It's easy to mock someone that's being interviewed. Especially if you dislike them.
reply
TwoWheelDrive
I don't think Logan is changing or has changed. I do think he's gotten better at PR and damage control, and has learned that people remember things (words, people, brands, etc) when they are repeated over and over. Just the other day I saw his name graffiti-ed on a power box in the street. What people will probably remember most from that interview with Casey is Logan's name and that he has a brand, and that's a marketing/psychological tactic. Trump did (does) it as well. Example: crooked Hillary. Also, transforming himself from a person into a brand makes it easier to distance himself from any flak he might get as a result of scandals. People change and brands change, but to shift himself from a physical human being into a brand is like putting on a mask that people will target instead when the man behind it is in the spotlight. In a way it's like emotional protection -- discuss the brand instead of me, attack the brand instead of me. I'm all for giving the dude more chances to straighten up, but no, I don't think he's sincere at this moment in time.
reply
I don't think Logan is changing or has changed. I do think he's gotten better at PR and damage control, and has learned that people remember things (words, people, brands, etc) when they are repeated over and over. Just the other day I saw his name graffiti-ed on a power box in the street. What people will probably remember most from that interview with Casey is Logan's name and that he has a brand, and that's a marketing/psychological tactic. Trump did (does) it as well. Example: crooked Hillary. Also, transforming himself from a person into a brand makes it easier to distance himself from any flak he might get as a result of scandals. People change and brands change, but to shift himself from a physical human being into a brand is like putting on a mask that people will target instead when the man behind it is in the spotlight. In a way it's like emotional protection -- discuss the brand instead of me, attack the brand instead of me. I'm all for giving the dude more chances to straighten up, but no, I don't think he's sincere at this moment in time.
reply
Casey Gunn
Regarding the FaZe story, I don't think people have given him enough credit for recognizing that throwing himself all-in to his work would ultimately hurt his significant other. He didn't dump her because he lost interest or video games mean more, he recognized that staying with her would be a disservice to her, because she made it clear over the course of their relationship that she needed a certain level of attention or affection and he isn't capable of providing that for her /and/ doing 110% for his career. It is completely okay to want to focus on one's career instead of pursuing a relationship; and further, it's awesome that he isn't one of those people that feels like he has to be in a relationship to be happy, that he can find fulfillment outside of another person. I don't even watch the dude, but I wish him all the best. That shit is hard.
reply
Regarding the FaZe story, I don't think people have given him enough credit for recognizing that throwing himself all-in to his work would ultimately hurt his significant other. He didn't dump her because he lost interest or video games mean more, he recognized that staying with her would be a disservice to her, because she made it clear over the course of their relationship that she needed a certain level of attention or affection and he isn't capable of providing that for her /and/ doing 110% for his career. It is completely okay to want to focus on one's career instead of pursuing a relationship; and further, it's awesome that he isn't one of those people that feels like he has to be in a relationship to be happy, that he can find fulfillment outside of another person. I don't even watch the dude, but I wish him all the best. That shit is hard.
reply
DJ Shazkira
Love what you said about Faze Censor. Before I met my husband people would just laugh when I tried to explain how much time I played games. Luckily my husband is a gamer too otherwise on game launch days we wouldn't see eachother for hours or days. People don't get it unless you are a gamer who gets really into the game. I'm no professional and don't get paid for it so I can't imagine how much time he must need to commit to his games in order to be the best he can. Surely it's better that he admits he wouldn't be around in a relationship where only one party is a gamer? it's definitely less selfish to break up so she can find someone who will be around to spend time with if, as Phil said, that's the legitimate reason for the break up.
reply
Love what you said about Faze Censor. Before I met my husband people would just laugh when I tried to explain how much time I played games. Luckily my husband is a gamer too otherwise on game launch days we wouldn't see eachother for hours or days. People don't get it unless you are a gamer who gets really into the game. I'm no professional and don't get paid for it so I can't imagine how much time he must need to commit to his games in order to be the best he can. Surely it's better that he admits he wouldn't be around in a relationship where only one party is a gamer? it's definitely less selfish to break up so she can find someone who will be around to spend time with if, as Phil said, that's the legitimate reason for the break up.
reply
SolidSapphire
I have a theory that Logan and Jake Paul have developed some sort of fame-driven minor psychopathy where theyve somehow gained the ability to remove themselves emotionally from reality. Both are extremely egocentric, do not seem to show genuine displays of empathy or remorse for their actions (even if at first it may seem like it, and both dont learn from their past transgressions. While they are not violent explicitly, theyve both done things that are borderline cruel and dangerous. And Ive come away from the fact that I cant stand them more so into a category of mild fascination at who they became and how they became this way, psychologically. Thats my hot take. Hope you enjoyed. Lol.
reply
I have a theory that Logan and Jake Paul have developed some sort of fame-driven minor psychopathy where theyve somehow gained the ability to remove themselves emotionally from reality. Both are extremely egocentric, do not seem to show genuine displays of empathy or remorse for their actions (even if at first it may seem like it, and both dont learn from their past transgressions. While they are not violent explicitly, theyve both done things that are borderline cruel and dangerous. And Ive come away from the fact that I cant stand them more so into a category of mild fascination at who they became and how they became this way, psychologically. Thats my hot take. Hope you enjoyed. Lol.
reply
Zubiila
Doug's reasoning for the breakup seemed very sincere and to me it makes a lot of sense. Besides the points that Phil hit on, what I get from listening to Doug is he feels unable to give the attention and time his girlfriend deserves. I've heard others, in other situations hit on the same point. Ultimately, they seem to be at a point where they're both very focused on their careers and he feels their relationship is not sustainable enough to survive it. Sometimes it's a good thing to hang in there and desperately try to make the relationship work, sometimes it better to cut it off before someone gets hurt. And the only ones who can know if this was the right decision is them.
reply
Doug's reasoning for the breakup seemed very sincere and to me it makes a lot of sense. Besides the points that Phil hit on, what I get from listening to Doug is he feels unable to give the attention and time his girlfriend deserves. I've heard others, in other situations hit on the same point. Ultimately, they seem to be at a point where they're both very focused on their careers and he feels their relationship is not sustainable enough to survive it. Sometimes it's a good thing to hang in there and desperately try to make the relationship work, sometimes it better to cut it off before someone gets hurt. And the only ones who can know if this was the right decision is them.
reply
Miss Moxie
This has nothing to do with a brand and everything to do with a bunch of idiots that filmed a dead person, had hours upon hours of editing to rethink their actions, then released the video with the intro with buckle up were about to make history. Logan Paul is NOT original and weve seen gimmicks like him before. Every single one of them experience flash in the pan success but after a while people get used to their shtick and move on to someone else. I get a lot of people who say Ive never heard of someone who does shocking stuff for our entertainment before. Of course you havent because they didnt stand the test of time.
reply
This has nothing to do with a brand and everything to do with a bunch of idiots that filmed a dead person, had hours upon hours of editing to rethink their actions, then released the video with the intro with buckle up were about to make history. Logan Paul is NOT original and weve seen gimmicks like him before. Every single one of them experience flash in the pan success but after a while people get used to their shtick and move on to someone else. I get a lot of people who say Ive never heard of someone who does shocking stuff for our entertainment before. Of course you havent because they didnt stand the test of time.
reply
Andrea PK
logan paul is only sorry some people hated him. He doesn't care about mental health, if he did he would have mentioned it before his Aokigahara video or even in the vomitive intro of the video. Everything he and his team are doing is PR; logan sees his followers as money sacks or tools to nourish his narcissistic issues. I think it's sad that an important issue like mental health and suicide can easily and evidently be buried under layers of PR to help a selfish person make money and get followers (that will think what he does is ok) and months later we are still wondering if he might be honest.
reply
logan paul is only sorry some people hated him. He doesn't care about mental health, if he did he would have mentioned it before his Aokigahara video or even in the vomitive intro of the video. Everything he and his team are doing is PR; logan sees his followers as money sacks or tools to nourish his narcissistic issues. I think it's sad that an important issue like mental health and suicide can easily and evidently be buried under layers of PR to help a selfish person make money and get followers (that will think what he does is ok) and months later we are still wondering if he might be honest.
reply
Rose from UK
I wish I could talk to you about Logan Paul, because the truth is far far simpler than it appears. First, he is a brand, he is hungry to promote and make money, its the ultimate form of self exploitation. I dont think he is ANYTHING like he portrays himself BUT, like all participant observation gone wrong, and experiments like the prison experiment, oh too soon the role paying becomes more and more real to the the participant. I could go a lot deeper, but I am not here to argue or discus, just to express my surprise that no one else seems to be able to see the wood for the trees.
reply
I wish I could talk to you about Logan Paul, because the truth is far far simpler than it appears. First, he is a brand, he is hungry to promote and make money, its the ultimate form of self exploitation. I dont think he is ANYTHING like he portrays himself BUT, like all participant observation gone wrong, and experiments like the prison experiment, oh too soon the role paying becomes more and more real to the the participant. I could go a lot deeper, but I am not here to argue or discus, just to express my surprise that no one else seems to be able to see the wood for the trees.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
14:23
19:58
13:47
14:24
17:20