Jake Paul CRIMINALLY CHARGED In Connection To Riots, Mattis Speaks Out, COVID-19 Protest Concerns
video description
It saddens me that he's no longer SECDEF, but I understand how infuriating it must be to deal with an administration that treats military volunteers as a resource to be exploited and expended without having a single care about the human beings in those uniforms.
Date: 2020-06-05
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 9
Arhen
I wouldn't say Trump is trying to divide the people, but he isn't trying to unite it either. He has his opinions, some are good, most are ignorant.
Now if you really want to have a conversation about people dividing this country, my entire life so far(which is only 33 years) the MSM and non presidential/VP politicians have been constantly dividing the public on every issue. But I guess the other 99% of politicians don't need to be held to the same standards as the president. Neither does the groups with hundreds of times more influence over the populace than the president.
Hell, even just on the topic of riots vs protests, and not letting a few outliers defeat the purpose and reason for the protest, there's the Charlottesville protest. Did some racist or white supremacist show up? Yeah. Were all the protesters violent evil Nazi's? No. They showed up with protective gear expecting Antifa to show up with weapons, and they were right. But the armed and violent Antifa protesters were called peaceful and the peaceful protesters, regardless of weather they were white supremacists or not, were all label violent thugs and Nazi's.
Meanwhile, Antifa all over the country right now are using the protests as an excuse to riot, to burn and to loot, while also associating the protesters with them, hurting the message of the protesters. But only this time are they acknowledged for being instigators and a problem. Not when it happened to people with opinions you don't like. A very hypocritical and socially destructive mind set.
And with everything currently going on, some people are once again trying to remove historic statues in the south, because the statues represent slavery or something negative in their eyes. Which will lead to white people protesting against the removal and then this country will truly be headed towards a race war.
Also, if having statues and monuments of people who once owned slaves is really so bad, why not instead of starting with a statue of some general, start with Mount Rushmore. Have 2 of the faces removed. Actually, since they were all white and 2 were probably descendant from slave owners just remove all 4 faces. If they really cared about people who had ties to slavery in any form, they really would be against Mount Rushmore too. And since it's such a large and well respected monument, it should also be a larger target. But it isn't, they are only going after statues of generals, or parks/buildings named after generals who fought for the south, by choice or because they were forced into it.
reply
I wouldn't say Trump is trying to divide the people, but he isn't trying to unite it either. He has his opinions, some are good, most are ignorant.
Now if you really want to have a conversation about people dividing this country, my entire life so far(which is only 33 years) the MSM and non presidential/VP politicians have been constantly dividing the public on every issue. But I guess the other 99% of politicians don't need to be held to the same standards as the president. Neither does the groups with hundreds of times more influence over the populace than the president.
Hell, even just on the topic of riots vs protests, and not letting a few outliers defeat the purpose and reason for the protest, there's the Charlottesville protest. Did some racist or white supremacist show up? Yeah. Were all the protesters violent evil Nazi's? No. They showed up with protective gear expecting Antifa to show up with weapons, and they were right. But the armed and violent Antifa protesters were called peaceful and the peaceful protesters, regardless of weather they were white supremacists or not, were all label violent thugs and Nazi's.
Meanwhile, Antifa all over the country right now are using the protests as an excuse to riot, to burn and to loot, while also associating the protesters with them, hurting the message of the protesters. But only this time are they acknowledged for being instigators and a problem. Not when it happened to people with opinions you don't like. A very hypocritical and socially destructive mind set.
And with everything currently going on, some people are once again trying to remove historic statues in the south, because the statues represent slavery or something negative in their eyes. Which will lead to white people protesting against the removal and then this country will truly be headed towards a race war.
Also, if having statues and monuments of people who once owned slaves is really so bad, why not instead of starting with a statue of some general, start with Mount Rushmore. Have 2 of the faces removed. Actually, since they were all white and 2 were probably descendant from slave owners just remove all 4 faces. If they really cared about people who had ties to slavery in any form, they really would be against Mount Rushmore too. And since it's such a large and well respected monument, it should also be a larger target. But it isn't, they are only going after statues of generals, or parks/buildings named after generals who fought for the south, by choice or because they were forced into it.
reply
Diema
Governor Doug Ducey ensured us at the start of Covid in Arizona, every action moving forward would be merited and supported by the data and nothing else. We started off reasonably, cases grew slow with there exponential increase and it was a good couple weeks between Covid entering AZ to our unfortunate first death. As the cases grew, he temporarily closed schools, enforced social distancing, some entertainment was still available with new sanitary and distancing policies. it seemed to be handled rather well, at least compared to our neighbor state of CA. As we received more testing and cases and deaths grew, he prolonged that enforcement/closures around AZ and became more serious about it when he placed our state-at-home order and only essential employees worked. In honesty i believe that had we done so earlier, or had we had a shelter-in-place order instead, we wouldn't see our numbers rising anyway near as high as they are now. Yet while i felt comfortable with the actions he took, i felt he couldve done more. Even as people grew upset that our stay-at-home order kept being prolonged, he ensured us that this was the best course of act of action in response to the data.
Then President Trump visited Phoenix in early may and after that, it was nothing but REOPEN ARIZONA, despite the data showing that our numbers continued growing and we have yet to hit our peak. It was only after trump showed his face in phoenix, that ducey decided to reopen dining restaurants, select department stores, mall plazas and much more. In doing so, not even a week later we had a shooting in Glendale, AZ at Westgate Entertainment District luckily only injuring 3. in doing so, our covid case numbers are growing exponentially again. For more than a month we were limited to our houses, yet have we really improved? NO. These are scary times, and we look to our leaders for guidance and security. But Gov Ducey turned his back on AZ and its residents by ignoring the data and reopening too early and for what? So that Trump can tell him he's doing a great job or something? How can I have Ducey speak for me and represent me if he's too busy sucking off trump? It's just not right. With our current stats, and with them about to spike again soon due to protest, i fear for what's to come to phoenix, let alone the state of arizona.
reply
Governor Doug Ducey ensured us at the start of Covid in Arizona, every action moving forward would be merited and supported by the data and nothing else. We started off reasonably, cases grew slow with there exponential increase and it was a good couple weeks between Covid entering AZ to our unfortunate first death. As the cases grew, he temporarily closed schools, enforced social distancing, some entertainment was still available with new sanitary and distancing policies. it seemed to be handled rather well, at least compared to our neighbor state of CA. As we received more testing and cases and deaths grew, he prolonged that enforcement/closures around AZ and became more serious about it when he placed our state-at-home order and only essential employees worked. In honesty i believe that had we done so earlier, or had we had a shelter-in-place order instead, we wouldn't see our numbers rising anyway near as high as they are now. Yet while i felt comfortable with the actions he took, i felt he couldve done more. Even as people grew upset that our stay-at-home order kept being prolonged, he ensured us that this was the best course of act of action in response to the data.
Then President Trump visited Phoenix in early may and after that, it was nothing but REOPEN ARIZONA, despite the data showing that our numbers continued growing and we have yet to hit our peak. It was only after trump showed his face in phoenix, that ducey decided to reopen dining restaurants, select department stores, mall plazas and much more. In doing so, not even a week later we had a shooting in Glendale, AZ at Westgate Entertainment District luckily only injuring 3. in doing so, our covid case numbers are growing exponentially again. For more than a month we were limited to our houses, yet have we really improved? NO. These are scary times, and we look to our leaders for guidance and security. But Gov Ducey turned his back on AZ and its residents by ignoring the data and reopening too early and for what? So that Trump can tell him he's doing a great job or something? How can I have Ducey speak for me and represent me if he's too busy sucking off trump? It's just not right. With our current stats, and with them about to spike again soon due to protest, i fear for what's to come to phoenix, let alone the state of arizona.
reply
Anthony
I may not be a political person nor a wise person, I'm only like 18 but I seriously think that we all need to step back and look over the great things we've done in this country and all the things that we need to fix, and this problem with police brutality and racism, not just of the black community but of all communities, there needs to be unity, their needs to be loved, no harm should come to those who risk their lives to stand up for what is right, men and women die for causes, but now at this time no one should die, we need to cherish and save lives, people who support putting civilians at risk over people who are looting should not be done, if this movement is important to the country then everyone will get behind it peacefully. I may be a white child who had never gone through these turmoils but I myself am sorry for actions of others, I may not be able to do anything to change what has happened but I want people to know that I am here to support their cause, you need your justice, you need it now more than ever, you should have received this justice when racism was abolished during the civil rights movement but now we need to open our eyes to see that we only got so far and that we need to continue to push to finally live in a free world, in a world where we can love one another and not have to discriminate over the color of ones skin. if you managed to read all of this, I thank you, I will take any hate or conflict that this may create, I am open to listen. not talk
reply
I may not be a political person nor a wise person, I'm only like 18 but I seriously think that we all need to step back and look over the great things we've done in this country and all the things that we need to fix, and this problem with police brutality and racism, not just of the black community but of all communities, there needs to be unity, their needs to be loved, no harm should come to those who risk their lives to stand up for what is right, men and women die for causes, but now at this time no one should die, we need to cherish and save lives, people who support putting civilians at risk over people who are looting should not be done, if this movement is important to the country then everyone will get behind it peacefully. I may be a white child who had never gone through these turmoils but I myself am sorry for actions of others, I may not be able to do anything to change what has happened but I want people to know that I am here to support their cause, you need your justice, you need it now more than ever, you should have received this justice when racism was abolished during the civil rights movement but now we need to open our eyes to see that we only got so far and that we need to continue to push to finally live in a free world, in a world where we can love one another and not have to discriminate over the color of ones skin. if you managed to read all of this, I thank you, I will take any hate or conflict that this may create, I am open to listen. not talk
reply
inertiaMS
What this has all told us was that YES, there were reasons to justify risking covid spread, we've just seen a lot of the left support big covid risks for the support of black lives. And i appreciate this, the issue was only a few weeks ago we were mocking the right for their beliefs as to what were their reasons as to why we should risk the covid spread. Were there's justified like the lefts? Well that's a matter of perspective, but the narrative has definitely changed from there's no reason to risk the spread to well there's some reasons to risk the spread.
The anti-lockdown supporters wanted to open businesses and promote social exercise, things that without have caused a huge spike in suicide cases. The improvement to racial inequalities are being used to justify the health benefits that outweigh the negatives to covid exposure, but we argued with anti-lockdown supporters when they made a case about mental health. I'm not sure exactly where this fits into this and i don't want to be presumptuous but last time i checked suicide effected white people 4x more than minorities, and men more than women. Maybe this says a lot about our priorities when we're OK with excepting a rise to a disease which disproportionately effects white men, but ok with protests that improve the health of minorities.
reply
What this has all told us was that YES, there were reasons to justify risking covid spread, we've just seen a lot of the left support big covid risks for the support of black lives. And i appreciate this, the issue was only a few weeks ago we were mocking the right for their beliefs as to what were their reasons as to why we should risk the covid spread. Were there's justified like the lefts? Well that's a matter of perspective, but the narrative has definitely changed from there's no reason to risk the spread to well there's some reasons to risk the spread.
The anti-lockdown supporters wanted to open businesses and promote social exercise, things that without have caused a huge spike in suicide cases. The improvement to racial inequalities are being used to justify the health benefits that outweigh the negatives to covid exposure, but we argued with anti-lockdown supporters when they made a case about mental health. I'm not sure exactly where this fits into this and i don't want to be presumptuous but last time i checked suicide effected white people 4x more than minorities, and men more than women. Maybe this says a lot about our priorities when we're OK with excepting a rise to a disease which disproportionately effects white men, but ok with protests that improve the health of minorities.
reply
Kisama
Antifa doesn't have a leader. It's just people who show up wearing typically black balaclavas and target right wing assemblies of people - assemblies that are usually interpreted by the left as collections of far-right-wing persons. A police officer does not equal right-winger, as much as the justice department seems to think it does. Nor has a single sighting of antifa been noted/claimed - if there had been, then we'd see convincing evidence immediately following Barr and Trump's claim. Out intelligence community is insanely robust and efficient (when it's given direction); the evidence would be dripping with proof. For them to make these kinds of claims, and only point to footage of random looters, and for their supporters to BELIEVE them. terrifying.
These people. if their dog was shot by a random person, and Trump showed up and said, Nancy Pelosi ordered that shot, they'd believe it - no questions asked. Terrifying idiocy.
Note: quotes are to illustrate that in all instances involving these groups (left, right, antifa) in regards to when we see antifa in the news, the traits that define them were blurry.
reply
Antifa doesn't have a leader. It's just people who show up wearing typically black balaclavas and target right wing assemblies of people - assemblies that are usually interpreted by the left as collections of far-right-wing persons. A police officer does not equal right-winger, as much as the justice department seems to think it does. Nor has a single sighting of antifa been noted/claimed - if there had been, then we'd see convincing evidence immediately following Barr and Trump's claim. Out intelligence community is insanely robust and efficient (when it's given direction); the evidence would be dripping with proof. For them to make these kinds of claims, and only point to footage of random looters, and for their supporters to BELIEVE them. terrifying.
These people. if their dog was shot by a random person, and Trump showed up and said, Nancy Pelosi ordered that shot, they'd believe it - no questions asked. Terrifying idiocy.
Note: quotes are to illustrate that in all instances involving these groups (left, right, antifa) in regards to when we see antifa in the news, the traits that define them were blurry.
reply
Beacon
I m pretty sure the whole Put the horrible views in the sunlight and it will disinfect it is not true, human beings are creatures of habbit, the more we hear something (no matter if it s true or not) the more likely we are to believe it. There s another saying which rings more true, Any publicity is good publicity that goes for political/ideological views too, the more people who hear about them the higher the chance/risk that someone will take your side.
That being said, I don t want censorship, but we cannot pretend that censorship doesn t work just because we don t like it, censoring things is extremely effective at supressing political views.
Personally I see no reason for NYT to publish that but that s because right now I see basically the whole republican party as the enemy (congrats to Trump for that) and I find publishing enemy propaganda as extremely unproductive. I don t want to see republicans as the enemy, but recent times has made it very very hard not to.
reply
I m pretty sure the whole Put the horrible views in the sunlight and it will disinfect it is not true, human beings are creatures of habbit, the more we hear something (no matter if it s true or not) the more likely we are to believe it. There s another saying which rings more true, Any publicity is good publicity that goes for political/ideological views too, the more people who hear about them the higher the chance/risk that someone will take your side.
That being said, I don t want censorship, but we cannot pretend that censorship doesn t work just because we don t like it, censoring things is extremely effective at supressing political views.
Personally I see no reason for NYT to publish that but that s because right now I see basically the whole republican party as the enemy (congrats to Trump for that) and I find publishing enemy propaganda as extremely unproductive. I don t want to see republicans as the enemy, but recent times has made it very very hard not to.
reply
John
There's some interesting research on vitamin D and respiratory infections. Most Americans are deficient and African Americans are much more likely to be due to melanin blocking the UV light that catalyzes vitamin D.
We can hypothesize that African Americans may be dying from Covid-19 at a greater rate in part because of Vitamin D deficiency.
Why isn't this being researched? Molecules that are produced by the body often cannot be patented because scientists cannot claim that they invented them. This means scientists can't monopolize profits on supplements like vitamin D in the same way they could with drug discovery or vaccine creation. This means that scientists have a strong economic incentive to not study natural products, even if they're more effective than a synthesized treatment.
To be clear, everyone should make sure they're not deficient in vitamins and minerals whether or not there is a pandemic. Vitamin D research on Covid-19 in specific is very sparse.
reply
There's some interesting research on vitamin D and respiratory infections. Most Americans are deficient and African Americans are much more likely to be due to melanin blocking the UV light that catalyzes vitamin D.
We can hypothesize that African Americans may be dying from Covid-19 at a greater rate in part because of Vitamin D deficiency.
Why isn't this being researched? Molecules that are produced by the body often cannot be patented because scientists cannot claim that they invented them. This means scientists can't monopolize profits on supplements like vitamin D in the same way they could with drug discovery or vaccine creation. This means that scientists have a strong economic incentive to not study natural products, even if they're more effective than a synthesized treatment.
To be clear, everyone should make sure they're not deficient in vitamins and minerals whether or not there is a pandemic. Vitamin D research on Covid-19 in specific is very sparse.
reply
F4PTR
Uh, let s yes 1, 000, 000% deploy the nat l guard? You do not have to worry about being shot by ducking soldiers! At all, ever!
The rules of engagement for soldiers is so high, unless you go out of your way to conduct warfare and shoot them, they are forbidden from shooting you back or first! If they shoot first even in self-defense they will be court-martialed and imprisoned and discharged dishonorably. Our fighting men and women deserve your respect entirely. We need the stability now more than ever, we are not turning our country into a warzone. There is no war here, only civil unrest.
Cops don t operate under rules of engagement and essentially they are free to shoot first, and rarely face punishment.
Cops are not soldiers, they are civilians. They do not get court-martialed and cannot be dishonorably discharged.
Please deploy the national guard, please!
reply
Uh, let s yes 1, 000, 000% deploy the nat l guard? You do not have to worry about being shot by ducking soldiers! At all, ever!
The rules of engagement for soldiers is so high, unless you go out of your way to conduct warfare and shoot them, they are forbidden from shooting you back or first! If they shoot first even in self-defense they will be court-martialed and imprisoned and discharged dishonorably. Our fighting men and women deserve your respect entirely. We need the stability now more than ever, we are not turning our country into a warzone. There is no war here, only civil unrest.
Cops don t operate under rules of engagement and essentially they are free to shoot first, and rarely face punishment.
Cops are not soldiers, they are civilians. They do not get court-martialed and cannot be dishonorably discharged.
Please deploy the national guard, please!
reply
Ioannis
Tbh, I feel bad for the ppl reporting that Jake Paul was at the protests. We, collectively, send the message we damn those who participate in these uprisings, when we find the worst possible senario to hate on famous ppl. I don't like what this dude represents (h3h3 ftw), BUT, now was the time at least acknowledge that he didn't do it as part of a project or promo, but cuz he felt that nobody should be murdered on his streets by 4 police officers in the daylight. I didn't watch the JP vid, but he is actually the victim, the poor guy was thinking: Now, if anyone says I'm a sociopath, low-key I ll tell them I was in a riot bro. Every day!
reply
Tbh, I feel bad for the ppl reporting that Jake Paul was at the protests. We, collectively, send the message we damn those who participate in these uprisings, when we find the worst possible senario to hate on famous ppl. I don't like what this dude represents (h3h3 ftw), BUT, now was the time at least acknowledge that he didn't do it as part of a project or promo, but cuz he felt that nobody should be murdered on his streets by 4 police officers in the daylight. I didn't watch the JP vid, but he is actually the victim, the poor guy was thinking: Now, if anyone says I'm a sociopath, low-key I ll tell them I was in a riot bro. Every day!
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
15:43
15:8
16:44
15:46
