VehiclesFashionRecipesBlogsHuntTravelsSportFunHandmadeITEducation
Mini-Games
x

x
zakruti.com » Blogs and People » Philip DeFranco
UHOH New YouTube Crackdown Incoming, Chanel Miller Speaks, Brock Turner Trash, Brooke Houts, & More

UHOH New YouTube Crackdown Incoming, Chanel Miller Speaks, Brock Turner Trash, Brooke Houts, & More

FBTwitterReddit

video description

Rating: 4.0; Vote: 1
UHOH New YouTube Crackdown Incoming, Chanel Miller Speaks, Brock Turner Trash, Brooke Houts, & More Steven Case: Good job Phil, quite the centrist It takes to completely ignore the facts of the case, her and brock both got drunk made out and he fingered her at worst it was an oil check and she passed out seconds before two heros decided it was rape and beat the shit out of him she got told she was raped and went along with it because she had a boyfriend. she was cheating on him and everyone seen them together and seen them leave together, but no let's just forget the whole situation and focus on a story that was created by people who weren't there, she a grifter playing a victim originally to avoid being caught cheating and now to make money. Funny how you act like you aren't a part of this far left social justice identity politics crowd but you refuse to look more than a surface deep into cases like this, people like you ruined the life of a college kid for getting drunk and hooking up with a girl that was more than happy to participate until she got caught with someone else's hand in her cookie jar
Date: 2019-11-01

Comments and reviews: 9


I'm really not understanding all this Crackdown honestly Children Here worse and seen more from PV and door other forms that have advertisement on it even when they're playing on mobile phones and I'm playing a mobile game do you know how many apps gets shown with specific games that you play? In fact old games mobile even the kid ones have a lot of ads and you mean to tell me that this FTC is only going after YouTube and Google? See they're just greedy and they want money and they hit the biggest people with the biggest pocket they're using them as a scapegoat to prove that they have worth that's all this is I honestly don't see the big deal advertisements have been going on for years and that has been kids asking their parents for the toys in the ads and other things and if they're worried about violent events that would be mostly the movies that are action packed movies I haven't seen any ads that were actually scary and not age suitable for kids
reply

Ladies: Rule of the internet: ANY film or picture of you without your clothes on is going to wind up online. It's not right, but it's pretty much inevitable. Who gets to see your body should be no-one's choice but yours and the moment you allow someone else to posses pics or video of you, you have given up that choice. This includes sending them to your SO's phone or email, as anything that gets put in the digital space is out of your control and hackers can and do actively try to get it, meaning you could wind up all over the internet even if the recipient did not share. Keep that in mind if you decide to take or send vids/pics of yourself. Also, any time someone says it's not going on the internet or they arent going to show anybody, they are 100% lying to you. Don't fall for it.
reply

Anyone who is outraged over Brooke and eats animals are a hypocrite. Sorry but it is the truth. You are upset about one animal who has suffered abuse and survived yet you eat animals who suffered extreme abuse and then was murdered just so you can eat a burger and have cheese, even though there are many healthy alternatives to choose from. Take the time to realise that all animals deserve to be safe from abuse, harm and murder. You only think some animals are for food because thats they way its been for so long, truth is those animals were chosen because they are the most vulnerable and defenceless. They feel pain and love and can suffer no less than her dog. Think about it please.
reply

Phil, I love you, but you NEED to know something. There is absolutely ZERO proof for ANY crime happening. What there is evidence of is 1) them hooking up at a party and 2) she having a boyfriend. Read through the testimonials. Read through the transcripts. How conveniently she forgot EVERYTHING that had happened that night, but she was still able to dance with the guy she was hooking up with. They left for his dorm room, they ended up hooking up on the ground on the way there, and THAT IS ALL. The only reason Brock was convicted of ANYTHING is because media and people made him a rapist beforehand. I'm not kidding. You can find this information on your own. Brock Turner did nothing wrong.
reply

Although I can understand the difficulty in pressing criminal charges against Brooke given the available evidence, I certainly hope that the court of public opinion keeps her exposed. Because to me, that video looked pretty damming. Now, regarding whether or not the court of public opinion is actually a good thing, I believe it is more often than not. News organizations have agendas. Actual courts are limited by due process and law. But word of mouth and public perception? That has an uncanny ability to see through the fog and occasionally, enact justice.
reply

De Franco seems to be popular because he dumbs down a lot. Chanel Miller was taken under the wing of a radical Stanford Professor who got Miller to promote a false narrative about this incident. Not only was there no rape, there was no violence, no pine needles in her vagina, as she claimed Turmer had put there, just a huge number of lies put out by these two. Originally Miller just wanted to not be suspected of cheating by her BF from another very rich family, but now she wants to sell books
reply

Turner is NOT guilty. She woke up with NO memory of the event and made up a story because she had a boyfriend. Check the evidence properly and you will find that there is no actual evidence against him. They had a consensual hookup, they were drunk, they went for a consensual walk and had a drunken lie down. WHere is the evidence of force? Did he throw her over his shoulder and go to the irrelevant dumpster. NO. Everyone there saw consensual behavior. You people are scum.
reply

If people want the police to be able to charge people for this type of animal crimes, please get involved with animal advocacy and help get the laws change. So many states have lax animal cruelty laws and animal control can only enforce the laws as they are currently written. Animal control has a high turn over rate simply because they see so much that they consider cruelty or neglect that they can do nothing about because it is not technically against the law.
reply

I want to know how this change in kids content will affect people like the Logan brothers who have admitted that they target kids and that they have a very young demographic. This will be a test of Youtubes ability to stick to their own rules. If the Paul brothers are not affected by the change then we should definitely question the definition, the way they implement it and what the true purpose of these changes are.
reply
Add a review, comment






Other channel videos